PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T S Lawrence

Publications and source records attributed to T S Lawrence.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

A phase I trial of intravenous bromodeoxyuridine and radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: Improved radiosensitization may lead to improved results of treatment for pancreatic cancer. This Phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerable dose of intravenous bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) when given in an alternating weekly fashion with radiation therapy for patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with resected or locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were eligible if distant metastases were not present. A continuous intravenous infusion of BrdUrd was given on weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7. Twice a day radiation therapy (1.5 Gy per fraction) was given on weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8 to the pancreas/pancreatic bed (total dose 60 Gy) and draining regional lymph nodes (total dose 45 Gy). The starting dose of BrdUrd was 800 mg/m2/day with a planned escalation to 1000 mg/m2/day if at least six out of eight patients were without Grade > or = 3 toxicity. Patients were assessed weekly for toxicity, and were followed every 3 months after treatment for complications and survival. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with resected (six) or unresectable (nine) pancreatic cancer were enrolled. One patient failed to complete therapy due to tumor progression. One of 11 patients treated with 800 mg/m2/day had a Grade 3 toxicity, while Grade 3 or 4 toxicity was found in all 3 patients receiving 1000 mg/m2/day. The dose-limiting toxicities were hematologic. The acute gastrointestinal toxicity was minimal. Two patients, including one with unresectable disease, were without evidence of disease during exploration for complications (ulcer, small bowel obstruction). CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of BrdUrd for Phase II study is 800 mg/m2/day. The gastrointestinal mucosa did not appear to be sensitized by this method of BrdUrd administration. The presence of a pathologic complete response is encouraging. Further improvements in radiosensitization are possible and may lead to improved local control.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Long-term results of hepatic artery fluorodeoxyuridine and conformal radiation therapy for primary hepatobiliary cancers.

PURPOSE: We have previously shown that conformal radiation therapy (RT) combined with hepatic artery (HA) fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) had encouraging hepatic control and survival rates for patients with nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary malignancies. With longer follow-up, we were particularly interested if long-term hepatic control and disease-free survival could be achieved, and if late hepatic complications due to radiation therapy were observed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with unresectable primary hepatobiliary cancer were treated with concurrent HA FdUrd (0.2 mg/kg/day) and conformal RT (1.5-1.65 Gy per fraction, twice a day), directed only to the liver abnormalities. Three-dimensional treatment planning was used to define both the target and normal liver volumes. The total dose of radiation (48 or 66 Gy) was determined by the fractional volume of normal liver excluded from the high dose volume. Patients were followed routinely for response, patterns of failure, long-term toxicity, and survival. The median potential follow-up was 54 months. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients (11 with hepatocellular carcinoma and 11 with cholangiocarcinoma) were treated. There were 10 objective responses in the 11 evaluable patients. The overall freedom from hepatic progression at more than 2 years was about 50%. The median survival was 16 months with an actuarial 4-year survival of about 20%. Gastrointestinal bleeding was the most common long-term toxicity. Late hepatic toxicity was not observed; in fact, hypertrophy of the untreated liver was seen. CONCLUSIONS: Combined conformal RT and HA FdUrd can produce long-term freedom from hepatic progression and survival in patients with unresectable, nondiffuse primary hepatobiliary malignancies. There were no long-term liver complications observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Radiosensitizing nucleosides.

Chemotherapeutic drugs that perturb nucleotide metabolism have the potential to produce substantial sensitization of tumor cells to radiation treatment. The process is called radiosensitization, and the agents that induce it are called radiosensitizers. The clinical effectiveness of fluoropyrimidines as radiosensitizers has been proven in multiple randomized trials. Thymidine analogues and hydroxyurea also appear to produce clinically relevant increases in radiation sensitivity. Recent laboratory investigations have identified difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine) and fludarabine as promising agents to use in combination with radiation. Until recently, little was known about how the biochemical changes caused by these drugs produced radiosensitization. However, advances in related fields, such as cell cycle checkpoint control, have permitted the development of a hypothesis that may explain the relative tumor selectivity of fluoropyrimidine-mediated radiosensitization. In addition, recent findings suggest that the rational manipulation of drug administration schedules and the use of combinations of radiosensitizers have the potential to improve the efficacy of the currently used agents and to establish the benefit of new ones.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Preclinical studies of chemotherapy and radiation therapy for pancreatic carcinoma.

The use of radiation therapy combined with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of pancreatic cancer has been well established. It has been hypothesized that any benefit from combined 5-FU and radiation has been due to radiosensitization. Improved therapy could result from a better understanding of the mechanism of radiosensitization and the development of compounds capable of providing better radiosensitization. This article reviews preclinical findings on the mechanism of cytotoxicity and radiosensitization for 5-FU, fluorodeoxyuridine, thymidine analogs, and gemcitabine (2',2'-difluorodeoxycytidine) and discusses the clinical implications of these findings.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1996

Uncertainties in CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning associated with patient breathing.

PURPOSE: To evaluate uncertainties associated with treatment-planning computed tomography (CT) data obtained with the patient breathing freely. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with thoracic or abdominal tumors underwent a standard treatment-planning CT study while breathing quietly and freely, followed by CT scans while holding their breath at normal inhalation and normal exhalation. Identical treatment plans on all three CT data sets for each patient pointed out differences in: (a) radiation path lengths; (b) positions of the organs; (c) physical volumes of the lung, liver, and kidneys; (d) the interpretation of plan evaluation tools such as dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models; and (e) how well the planning CT data set represented the average of the inhalation and exhalation studies. RESULTS: Inhalation and exhalation data differ in terms of radiation path length (nearly one quarter of the cases had path-length differences > 1 cm), although the free breathing and average path lengths do not exhibit large differences (0-9 mm). Liver and kidney movements averaged 2 cm, whereas differences between the free breathing and average positions averaged 0.6 cm. The physical volume of the liver between the free breathing and static studies varied by as much as 12%. The NTCP calculations on exhale and inhale studies varied from 3 to 43% for doses that resulted in a 15% NTCP on the free-breathing studies. CONCLUSION: Free-breathing CT studies may improperly estimate the position and volume of critical structures, and thus may mislead evaluation of plans based on such volume dependent criteria such as dose-volume histograms and NTCP calculations.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗
PubMed1996

Fluoropyrimidine-mediated radiosensitization depends on cyclin E-dependent kinase activation.

Fluoropyrimidines radiosensitize human colon cancer cells that progress into S phase in the presence of drug (M.A. Davis, H-Y. Tang, J. Maybaum, and T.S. Lawrence. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 67. 509-512, 1995). We hypothesized that progression occurs in cells that generate elevated levels of cyclin E-dependent kinase activity despite the presence of the fluoropyrimidine. To test this hypothesis, we treated HT29 and SW620 human colon cancer cells with fluorodeoxyuridine under conditions that produced nearly complete inhibition of thymidylate synthase but which sensitized only the HT29 cells. We found that, whereas HT29 cells progressed into S phase and demonstrated increased cyclin E-dependent kinase activity, SW620 cells arrested just past the G1-S boundary and showed no change in kinase activity. Because these cell lines have the same p53 mutation, these findings suggest that there is a p53-independent G1-S checkpoint that mediates radiosensitization produced by fluorodeoxyuridine.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed1996

Radiosensitization of pancreatic cancer cells by 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine.

PURPOSE: We have reported that the deoxycytidine analog 2',2'difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (dFdCyd) is a potent radiosensitizer of HT29 human colon cancer cells probably through its effects on intracellular deoxyribonucleotide (dNTP) pools. Because dFdCyd has activity against pancreatic cancer in clinical trials, we wished to determine if dFdCyd would radiosensitize human pancreatic cancer cells. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We assessed the effect of dFdCyd on radiation sensitivity of two human pancreatic cancer cell lines, Panc-1 and BxPC-3. To begin to investigate the mechanism of sensitization, we determined the effect of dFdCyd on dNTP pools and cell cycle distribution. RESULTS: We found that dFdCyd produced radiation enhancement ratios of 1.7-1.8 under noncytotoxic conditions in both cell lines. Sensitization was not associated with intracellular levels of 2',2'-difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine triphosphate, the cytotoxic metabolite of dFdCyd, but occurred when dATP pools were depleted below the level of approximately 1 micromolar. Although both cell lines showed substantial cell cycle redistribution after drug treatment, the flow cytogram of the BxPC-3 cells would not, by itself, be anticipated to result in increased radiation sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that dFdCyd is a potent radiation sensitizer of human pancreatic cancer cells and support the development of a clinical protocol using combined dFdCyd and radiation therapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed1996

Effect of irradiation on bromodeoxyuridine incorporation in human colon cancer xenografts.

PURPOSE: Although we have characterized the incorporation of the thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) into human colon cancer xenografts under a wide variety of conditions, little is known about the effect of radiation on subsequent incorporation. Because clinical protocols include, as one component, BrdUrd administration after radiation, it was important to confirm that irradiation did not prevent subsequent BrdUrd incorporation. Therefore, we studied the effect of irradiation on BrdUrd incorporation into HT29 human colon cancer xenografts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two types of experiments were performed. In the first, the effect of radiation on subsequent incorporation was measured. Tumors received doses of 0, 2, 8, and 12 Gy, animals were infused with BrdUrd for 4 days, and incorporation was assessed at the end of the infusion. In the second, the effect of radiation on the elimination of BrdUrd from tumors was determined. Animals were infused with BrdUrd, tumors were irradiated with either 0 or 12 Gy, and tumor incorporation of BrdUrd was measured 1 and 3 days later. RESULTS: Radiation affected neither the incorporation into nor the elimination of BrdUrd from human tumor xenografts. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the feasibility of clinical trials interdigitating BrdUrd infusion and radiation.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Gemcitabine and radiosensitization in human tumor cells.

Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue with excellent clinical activity against solid tumors. Within the cell, gemcitabine is rapidly phosphorylated to its active di- and triphosphate metabolites. Cytotoxicity with gemcitabine appears to be related to multiple effects on DNA replication, where gemcitabine triphosphate can serve as both an inhibitor and substrate for DNA synthesis. Gemcitabine diphosphate inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, producing decreases in cellular dNTP pool levels in a cell-specific manner. These two major characteristics of gemcitabine, reduction in cellular dNTP pools and incorporation into DNA, are features of other antimetabolites antitumor agents which also exhibit radiosensitizing properties. Based on these favorable metabolic characteristics and the clinical activity of gemcitabine in tumor types which are commonly treated with radiation, the ability of gemcitabine to enhance X-radiation induced cytotoxicity was evaluated. Gemcitabine has been shown to be a potent radiosensitizer in a variety of tumor cell lines, including HT-29 colorectal carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, breast, non-small cell lung and head and neck cancer cell lines. Gemcitabine was most effective as a radiosensitizer when administered at least 2 hours prior to irradiation. For most cell lines, radiosensitization was evident at non-cytotoxic concentrations. The extent of radiosensitization increased with both increasing gemcitabine concentration and duration of exposure. Radiosensitization did not require redistribution of cells into a more radiosensitive phase of the cell cycle. The major metabolic effects observed under radiosensitizing conditions were the accumulation of high levels of gemcitabine triphosphate, and a selective decrease in the cellular dATP pool. The pattern of dATP decrease paralleled the increase in radiosensitization, whereas the level of gemcitabine triphosphate was not associated with the enhanced sensitivity to radiation. Compared to other radiosensitizers, the advantage of gemcitabine is that is can induce radiosensitization at concentrations that are 1000 times lower than typical plasma levels obtained with this drug. These studies will be used as guidelines for developing clinical trials of gemcitabine with radiation.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1996

Dependence of fluorodeoxyuridine-induced cytotoxicity and megabase DNA fragment formation on S phase progression in HT29 cells.

The relationship between cell cycle progression and induction of DNA double-strand breaks and cytotoxicity by exposure to fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) was studied in HT29 human colon cancer cells. Fractionation of drug-treated populations by centrifugal elutriation yielded subpopulations having widely divergent abilities to progress through S phase in the presence of the drug. One of these subpopulations, which appeared to undergo coordinated growth arrest, was resistant to FdUrd cytotoxicity and DNA damage. In contrast, the subpopulation which was able to progress furthest through S phase in the presence of FdUrd underwent unbalanced growth arrest (i.e., increase in size and mass out of proportion to DNA synthesis), and displayed both DNA double-strand break formation (assayed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis) and loss of clonogenicity. When cells were elutriated prior to drug treatment, producing fractions enriched in cells at various cell cycle stages, no significant differences in sensitivity to FdUrd-induced cytotoxicity were detected among elutriation fractions. These findings support the model that, in HT29 cells, progression into and through S phase during drug treatment is an important determinant of FdUrd-induced DNA damage and cytotoxicity, but that the cell cycle position at the start of drug exposure is not a critical factor for these effects.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1996

Fluorodeoxyuridine-mediated cytotoxicity and radiosensitization require S phase progression.

The role of cell cycle redistribution in fluoropyrimidine-mediated radiosensitization remains unresolved. To determine if radiosensitization resulted from the redistribution of cells into a sensitive phase of the cell cycle, we assessed fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd)-mediated radiosensitization in flow-sorted mid-S phase HT29 human colon cancer cells. We hypothesized that if FdUrd-mediated radiosensitization were strictly the result of cell cycle redistribution, FdUrd-treated mid-S phase cells would remain as radioresistant as mid-S phase cells cultured in the absence of drug. However, we found that the mid-S phase cells from FdUrd-treated populations were markedly radiosensitized. To assess the role of S phase progression in radiosensitization, we exposed FdUrd-treated cells to aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase alpha, prior to irradiation. We found that aphidicolin blocked the radiosensitizing (and cytotoxic) effects of FdUrd. These results, combined with our previous observations that FdUrd-treated cells at the G1/S boundary are minimally sensitized, appear to disprove the hypothesis that sensitization results strictly from cell cycle distribution. Furthermore, they suggest that a key aspect of both FdUrd-mediated radiosensitization and cytotoxicity is S phase progression on a damaged DNA template.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1996

Radiosensitization of human solid tumor cell lines with gemcitabine.

Gemcitabine has high clinical activity in several solid tumors that are treated with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. The mode of action of gemcitabine involves a number of intracellular changes that are shared by other radiation sensitizing anticancer drugs. There is therefore a clear rationale for investigating the interaction between gemcitabine and radiation in human cancer cell lines in vitro. Gemcitabine has been shown to be a potent radiosensitizer in human colorectal, pancreatic, and other solid tumor cell lines. Gemcitabine produces radiation enhancement ratios that are higher than those of other established radio-sensitizing agents, and this radiation enhancement occurs at low noncytotoxic concentrations. Radiosensitization increases with dose and with duration of exposure to gemcitabine, and is greatest when exposure to gemcitabine precedes radiation. The primary radiosensitizing effect of gemcitabine seems to be associated with depletion of endogenous nucleotide pools; deoxyadenosine triphosphate reduction is particularly striking, even at the lowest concentrations of gemcitabine. These studies suggest a number of approaches that are relevant to the clinical use of gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1995

Incorporation of 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine into colorectal liver metastases and liver in patients receiving a 7-day hepatic arterial infusion.

Preclinical and clinical data suggest that the combination of hepatic arterial bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd), a thymidine analogue radiation sensitizer, and high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy offer a high potential for improving the local control of intrahepatic cancers. A key step in the design of a successful protocol is to determine in patients the conditions for BrdUrd administration that would be expected to produce selective radiosensitization of the tumor. Therefore, we designed a clinical trial to assess BrdUrd incorporation into the DNA of hepatic colorectal metastases and normal liver after a 7-day continuous BrdUrd infusion at a dose rate of 25 mg/kg/day (the maximal tolerated dose for a 14-day infusion) for patients undergoing laparotomy for either resection of liver metastases or hepatic arterial catheter and pump placement. Thirteen patients were entered into this study. We found that the average replacement of thymidine by BrdUrd in the tumor and normal liver were 11.6 +/- 1.2% and 1.1 +/- 0.2%, respectively. This extent of incorporation would be expected to produce a single fraction radiation enhancement of 1.5 in the tumor without detectable sensitization of the normal liver. Immunohistochemical staining for BrdUrd revealed heterogeneity of incorporation with a range of approximately 60-80% of the cells labeled in different regions of the specimens. These findings suggest that hepatic arterial BrdUrd given at this dose and schedule has a high likelihood of producing clinically significant radiosensitization for patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Furthermore, the demonstrated selectivity of tumor perfusion that can be obtained with hepatic arterial infusion combined with the high proliferative rate of colorectal metastases (versus normal liver) suggests that these patients may be good candidates for tumor-directed gene transfer therapy by using regionally delivered retroviral vectors.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The treatment of colorectal liver metastases with conformal radiation therapy and regional chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Whole-liver radiation, with or without chemotherapy, has been of modest benefit in the treatment of unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. A Phase I/II study combining escalating doses of conformally planned radiation therapy (RT) with intraarterial hepatic (IAH) fluorodeoxyuridine (FdUrd) was performed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-two patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, 14 of whom had progressed after previous chemotherapy (2 with prior IAH FdUrd), were treated with concurrent IAH FdUrd (0.2 mg/kg/day) and conformal hepatic radiation therapy (1.5-1.65 Gy/fraction twice a day). The total dose of radiation given to the tumor (48-72.6 Gy) depended on the fraction of normal liver excluded from the high-dose volume. All patients were assessed for response, toxicity, hepatobiliary relapse, and survival. Median potential follow-up was 42 months. RESULTS: Eleven of 22 patients demonstrated an objective response, with the remainder showing stable disease. Actuarial freedom from hepatic progression was 25% at 1 years. The most common acute toxicity was mild to moderate nausea and transient liver function test abnormalities. There were three patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (none requiring surgical intervention) after the completion of treatment. Overall median survival was 20 months. The presence of extrahepatic disease was associated with decreased survival (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Combined conformal radiation therapy and IAH FdUrd can produce an objective response in 50% of patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. However, response was not durable, and hepatic progression was frequent. Improvements in hepatic tumor control for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer may require higher doses of conformal radiation and/or improved radiosensitization. In an effort to increase radiosensitization, we have recently initiated a clinical trial combining IAH bromode-oxyuridine, a thymidine analog radiosensitizer, with conformal high dose radiation therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Hepatic toxicity resulting from cancer treatment.

Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), often called radiation hepatitis, is a syndrome characterized by the development of anicteric ascites approximately 2 weeks to 4 months after hepatic irradiation. There has been a renewed interest in hepatic irradiation because of two significant advances in cancer treatment: three dimensional radiation therapy treatment planning and bone marrow transplantation using total body irradiation. RILD resulting from liver radiation can usually be distinguished clinically from that resulting from the preparative regime associated with bone marrow transplantation. However, both syndromes demonstrate the same pathological lesion: veno-occlusive disease. Recent evidence suggests that elevated transforming growth factor beta levels may play a role in the development of veno-occlusive disease. Three dimensional treatment planning offers the potential to determine the radiation dose and volume dependence of RILD, permitting the safe delivery of high doses of radiation to parts of the liver. The chief therapy for RILD is diuretics, although some advocate steroids for severe cases. The characteristics of RILD permit the development of a grading system modeled after the NCI Acute Common Toxicity Criteria, which incorporates standard criteria of hepatic dysfunction.

Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation↗
PubMed1995

Analysis of clinical complication data for radiation hepatitis using a parallel architecture model.

PURPOSE: The detailed knowledge of dose volume distributions available from the three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiation treatment of tumors in the liver (reported elsewhere) offers new opportunities to quantify the effect of volume on the probability of producing radiation hepatitis. We aim to test a new parallel architecture model of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) with these data. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Complication data and dose volume histograms from a total of 93 patients with normal liver function, treated on a prospective protocol with 3D conformal radiation therapy and intraarterial hepatic fluorodeoxyuridine, were analyzed with a new parallel architecture model. Patient treatment fell into six categories differing in doses delivered and volumes irradiated. By modeling the radiosensitivity of liver subunits, we are able to use dose volume histograms to calculate the fraction of the liver damaged in each patient. A complication results if this fraction exceeds the patient's functional reserve. To determine the patient distribution of functional reserves and the subunit radiosensitivity, the maximum likelihood method was used to fit the observed complication data. RESULTS: The parallel model fit the complication data well, although uncertainties on the functional reserve distribution and subunit radiosensitivity are highly correlated. CONCLUSION: The observed radiation hepatitis complications show a threshold effect that can be described well with a parallel architecture model. However, additional independent studies are required to better determine the parameters defining the functional reserve distribution and subunit radiosensitivity.

Hepatitis↗