PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T S Okada

Publications and source records attributed to T S Okada.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Spemann's influence on Japanese developmental biology.

The discovery of the organizer by H. Spemann and Hilde Mangold, prompted a number of studies of embryonic induction in Japan. C.O. Whitman, N. Yatsu, T. Sato, H. Oka, T. Yamada, and Y.K. Okada were the pioneers in the field of embryonic induction. T. Yamada postulated the double potential theory for embryonic induction. O. Nakamura has modified the fate map of Vogt using newt and Xenopusblastulae. T.S. Okada and G. Eguchi proposed the new concept of "transdifferentiation" based on in vitro experiments in the retina and lens. T.S. Okada is not only an excellent scientist, but he has also nurtured many active developmental biologists. M. Takeichi, from his school, discovered the cell adhesion molecle, cadherin. Nakamura and colleagues tried to determine the origin and formation of the organizer. They performed recombination experiments using the ectoderm, endoderm and mesoderm, and concluded that the phenomenon in which various mesoderm tissues are formed by the recombination of the presumptive ectoderm with endoderm was "regulation of the vegetal-animal gradient". Some groups have also tried to purify specific inducing factors. T. Yamada and colleagues isolated two different types of ribonucleoproteins. I. Kawakami and colleagues showed that the ribosome fraction has neural inducing capacity, and that the extracellular matrix contains mesodermal inducing factors. Finally Asashima and colleagues isolated and identified activin A as a MIF factor. This finding had a great influence not only in the field of developmental biology, but also in molecular biology. Using activin, Asashima's group has successfully generated various organs, tissues, trunk-tail and head structures in vitro using animal caps (undifferentiated cells). Some other important molecules such as BMP, chordin and bFGF are also being studied by young Japanese scientists.

Amphibians↗

Lens regeneration in Xenopus is not a mere repeat of lens development, with respect to crystallin gene expression.

The spatio-temporal expression of three crystallin genes (alpha A, beta B1 and gamma) in lenses of Xenopus laevis was studied by in situ hybridization to compare the process of lens formation in embryonic development with that of lens regeneration from cornea that occurs in the tadpole. During embryonic lens development, all three crystallin transcripts were initially detected at the same stage of lens placode formation, and subsequently their signals became restricted to the presumptive lens fiber region. At later stages, the three crystallin genes were expressed in primary and secondary lens fibers, but not in lens epithelium. During lens regeneration, alpha A- and beta B1-crystallin signals were first detected in the presumptive lens fiber region of the lens vesicle. The expression of gamma-crystallin, however, appeared later than the other two crystallin genes and was detected only in morphologically discernible lens fibers. In the later stages of lens regeneration, expression of these crystallins was observed only in the lens fiber region, similar to embryonic lens development. These results reveal that lens regeneration from the inner layer of the outer cornea is not simply a repetition of embryonic lens development, when examined at the level of crystallin gene transcription.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Pax-6 and Prox 1 expression during lens regeneration from Cynops iris and Xenopus cornea: evidence for a genetic program common to embryonic lens development.

Lens regeneration from non-lens ocular tissues has been well documented in amphibians, from the dorsal iris in the newt and from the outer cornea in Xenopus. To understand the early molecular events which govern lens regeneration, we examined the expression of two early marker genes of normal lens development, Pax-6 and Prox 1. In both Cynops (newt) iris and Xenopus cornea, Pax-6 is expressed soon after lentectomy in a region broader than that giving rise to the regenerating lens, indicative of an important role for Pax-6 in determination of the regeneration potential. Then Prox 1 expression begins within the Pax-6-expressing tissue, and these Prox 1-expressing cells give rise to the regenerating lens. This sequence of events also takes place in the lens placode of the embryo, indicating that the presence of the same genetic program operates in both embryonic lens development and lens regeneration, at least partly. In the Cynops iris, Pax-6 expression occurs initially in the entire marginal region of the iris after lentectomy but then becomes restricted to the dorsal region. Further studies are expected to elucidate the mechanism of this long-standing problem of the dorsal-restriction of lens regeneration from the newt iris.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

A critical role for the optic vesicle in lens development; a reinvestigation of free lens formation in Cynops pyrrhogaster.

The role of the optic vesicle in lens development was reinvestigated in Cynops pyrrhogaster. To study the necessity for the optic vesicle in early lens development, the optic anlages of stage 17-27 embryos were ablated and the frequency of free lens formation was examined with lens specific markers. Free lens formation was not observed when operations were performed prior to contact between the head surface epidermis and the optic vesicle (stages 17-18). On the contrary, free lens formation occurred in all cases where the optic vesicles were removed after the initiation of lens placode formation in the head surface epidermis (stage 27). However, no lens fiber formation was observed in these free lenses as judged by the absence of lens fiber specific gene expression, namely gamma-crystallin, at stages when secondary lens fiber formation could be found in the control lenses of the unoperated sides. The pattern of expression of alpha A-crystallin in the developing free lens also differed from that of the normally developing lens. This paper is the first report to indicate that the coordinated and sequential expression of crystallin genes are influenced by the optic vesicle; the optic vesicle is required for proper regulation of the alpha A- and gamma-crystallin but not beta B1-crystallin genes.

Animals↗

Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of the Japanese Carabinae ground beetles based on mitochondrial ND5 gene sequences.

The phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese Carabinae ground beetles were analyzed by comparing 1,069 nucleotide sequences in the mitochondrial gene encoding NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (ND5). The ND5 phylogenetic tree revealed that the hind-wingless Carabina and the hind-winged Calosoma/Campalita (Calosomina) diverged from the common ancestor, and Cychrus (Cychrini) is the outgroup of them. Five distinct clusters (groups) can be recognized in the Carabina, i.e., CARABUS, HEMICARABUS, LEPTOCARABUS, APOTOMOPTERUS, and PROCRUSTES/DAMASTER. The ancestors of these lineages diverged almost at the same time more than 10 Myr ago. The Carabus cluster includes two subclusters, Carabus and Ohomopterus. Two species of Carabus examined are phylogenetically rather remote, while five species among Ohomopterus are closely related to each other. The results suggest that diversification of Carabus started much earlier than that of Ohomopterus, presumably in the Eurasian continent, and that of Ohomopterus in the Japanese archipelago. The branching order in the LEPTOCARABUS lineage was established, Authenocarabus/Pentacarabus being their outgroup. In the DAMASTER/PROCRUSTES lineage, Procrustes is placed as the outgroup of Damaster, with the branching order of Coptolabrus and Acoptolabrus/Damaster. The diversification of the Damaster subspecies appeared to have occurred in the Japanese archipelago earlier than Ohomopterus, and its phylogeny reflects their geographic distribution in the archipelago rather than the morphological characters.

Animals↗

Parallel evolution in radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles inferred from mitochondrial ND5 gene sequences.

Molecular phylogenetic analyses using mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5 (ND5) gene sequences representing all 15 species and the majority of subspecies or races of the Ohomopterus ground beetles from all over the Japanese archipelago have uncovered a remarkable evolutionary history. Clustering of the species in the molecular phylogenetic tree is linked to their geographic distribution and does not correlate with morphological characters. Taxonomically the "same" species or the members belonging to the same species-group fall out in more than two different places on the ND5 tree. Evidence has been presented against a possible participation of ancestral polymorphism and random lineage sorting or of hybrid individuals for the observed distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes. The most plausible explanation of our results is that parallel evolution took place in different lineages. Most notably, O. dehaanii, O. yaconinus, and O. japonicus in a lineage reveal almost identical morphology with those of the "same" species (or subspecies) but belonging to the phylogenetically remote lineages.

Animals↗

Functional cooperation of lens-specific and nonspecific elements in the delta 1-crystallin enhancer.

The expression of the chicken delta 1-crystallin gene is primarily regulated by the action of a lens-specific enhancer 1 kilobase long and located in the third intron of the gene (S. Hayashi, K. Goto, T. S. Okada, and H. Kondoh, Genes Dev. 1:818-828, 1987). The 120-base-long core segment is required for the activity of the delta 1-crystallin enhancer but by itself shows no activity. We analyzed the action of the core and adjoining segments of the delta 1-crystallin enhancer by two different approaches: (i) multiplication of the segments to express any cryptic effect and (ii) competition among enhancers for nuclear factors involved in enhancer action. We found that (i) the core defines a strictly lens-specific element, (ii) an adjoining segment defines an element with a broad specificity with regard to cell type, (iii) these elements cooperate in cis within the delta 1-crystallin enhancer, (iv) the multimers of these elements complete with each other and with delta 1-crystallin and simian virus 40 enhancers in trans apparently without sequence specificity but in a fashion reflecting the strength of the enhancers, and (v) the enhancers in trans do not affect the expression of enhancer-free genes, thereby ruling out the possibility of competition for general transcription factors. The last two observations raise the possibility that the enhancer segments interacting with different sequence-specific factors also interact with one other component involved in enhancer action.

Animals↗

Stage-dependent expression of the chicken delta-crystallin gene in transgenic fish embryos.

To study the regulation of gene expression of vertebrate crystallin genes, the chicken delta-crystallin gene was introduced into a small freshwater fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes), which lacks this gene, and its expression was examined immunohistologically at several developmental stages before hatching. The gene expression was detected in the central fiber cells of the lens at an early stage, showing a stage-dependent expression. In non-lens tissues, the expression was barely detectable before tissue differentiation. It first became substantial mainly in mesodermal tissues and then later in a greater variety of tissues, including ectodermal and endodermal ones. Thus, the non-lens expression of delta-crystallin was also stage-dependent, with the stage being dependent on the tissue type. These results from lens and non-lens tissues are discussed in relation to tissue differentiation and two categories of delta-crystallin expression.

Animals↗

The expression of cell adhesion molecules, cadherins: markers of kidney morphogenesis.

Cadherins are protein molecules that promote cell adhesion in the presence of calcium. There are several classes of cadherins. The expression of two of these, namely the N- and E-cadherins, is intrinsically associated with the embryonic development of the kidney and thus their study provides a molecular basis for understanding the epithelial organization of this organ.

Animals↗

Developmental regulation of the chicken delta 1-crystallin gene: analysis by transgenesis and gene dissection.

We previously reviewed what we had learned about the regulation of the delta 1-crystallin gene through experiments using gene transfer techniques [Kondoh et al. (1986) Cell Differ. 19, 151-160]. It was concluded then that regulatory genetic elements for the lens-specific expression are associated with the delta 1-crystallin gene, and that these chicken elements properly function in mammalian cells. In the last couple of years, we have made significant progress in the understanding of lens-specific delta-crystallin expression. This is owing to success in transgenesis of mouse with the delta 1-crystallin gene and in functional dissection of the gene which led us to the discovery of an intragenic enhancer as the major determinant for lens-specific expression. In this article, we summarize these recent advances.

Animals↗

Conditions permitting the homotopic expression of lens-specific crystallin genes.

delta-Crystallin is a major soluble protein of the avian and reptilian lens, and its expression is highly tissue-specific in development. In order to understand regulatory mechanisms for tissue-specific expression of delta-crystallin gene, several experimental systems were established in a heterologous combination of the chicken gene and mouse cells. The expression was ectopic in various cell types differentiated in teratomas derived from mouse teratocarcinoma or embryonic stem cells which were transformed to carry the chicken delta-crystallin genes. Cells of the same transformed lines of embryonic stem cells expressed the chicken gene homotopically in chimeric embryos produced by injecting them into the blastocysts. The homotopic expression also occurred in experimental systems consisting of the heterologous introduction of the gene (1) into various mouse cells in primary cultures, and (2) into male pronuclei of mouse fertilized eggs.

Animals↗

Embryonic stem cell-mediated transfer and correct regulation of the chicken delta-crystallin gene in developing mouse embryos.

To study regulation of delta-crystallin expression during ontogeny, we transferred the gene from chicken into developing mouse embryos by first transforming an embryonic stem (ES) cell line of mouse and then producing chimaeric embryos by combining them with normal mouse embryos. Using this technique, genes were transferred into a variety of developing mouse tissues with high efficiency. Two delta-crystallin gene constructs were used: the wild-type gene with 2200 bp of the 5' flanking sequence, shown to be lens-specific in an assay using cultured mouse cells, and a mutant gene with 51 bp of the 5' flanking sequence, lacking the sequence required for expression in lens cells. Five independent lines carrying the former and two lines carrying the latter were employed in producing chimaeras. In the chimaeric embryos having the wild-type gene, delta-crystallin was expressed in the lens and in specific regions of the primitive central nervous system (CNS) as is seen in embryonic expression in the chicken. In adult mouse chimaeras also, expression was restricted to the lens and the CNS, in the pyramidal neurones of the piriform cortex and the hippocampus. delta-crystallin expression in these tissues is due to proper transcriptional regulation, since no expression was observed when chimaeras were produced with the ES lines carrying the mutant gene. The experimental results reported here demonstrate the advantage of ES-cell-mediated gene transfer in the study of embryonic gene regulation, because a number of gene constructs and chromosomal sites can be analysed shortly after embryo manipulation without requiring gene transmission to the next generation.

Animals↗

An embryonic pineal body as a multipotent system in cell differentiation.

The differentiating potency of pineal cells from 8-day quail embryos was studied with cell culture. It was found that the differentiation of striated muscle fibres occurred abundantly in the pineal cells cultured in hypertonic culture conditions. Muscle nature of these fibres was confirmed by utilizing the antiserum against the striated muscle type creatine kinase (MM-CK). When CO2, NAHCO3, NaCl, KCl and MgCl2 were added in hypertonic concentrations, extensive myogenesis occurred in cultured pineal cells. Myogenesis in pineal cultures began as early as 2 days and, after 3 days in the medium with 75 mM additional NaCl, reached 100-fold when compared with that in the isotonic medium. Muscle fibres from pineal cells in culture were similar in morphology to the skeletal muscle fibres of mesodermal origin in situ. Myogenesis of pineal cells under hypertonic conditions was accompanied by the synthesis of a unique 56 x 10(3) Mr protein, which was not found in the intrinsic muscle cells. Clonal cell culture revealed that about 80% of clonable pineal cells were myogenic precursors. Pineal cells of 8-day quail embryos were not only myogenic but oculopotent (melanogenic and lentoidogenic) in cultures. This study examined whether multipotential progenitor cells with both potentials are present in the pineal or not. The results showed that at least 16% of all clonable pineal cells were multipotent precursors. The embryonic pineal is considered to be a typical multipotent system in parallel with the pigmented and neural retina, the neural crest and the teratocarcinoma.

Animals↗

An attempt to assay the state of determination by using transfected genes as probes in transdifferentiation of neural retina into lens.

Hybrid genes coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) with a non-specific retroviral, lens-specific delta-crystallin or lens-specific alpha-crystallin promoters were constructed to transfect the transdifferentiating (lentoidogenic) and non-transdifferentiating (non-lentoidogenic) cultures of chicken embryonic neural retina for assaying the state of determination towards lens differentiation. The expression occurred only when CAT genes with lens-specific promoters were transfected to the cultures maintained in the conditions permissive to lentoidogenesis. The expression of these exogenous, lens-specific CAT genes began at stages of culturing that were earlier than the expression of endogenous crystallin. Presumably, there are two steps in the transdifferentiation of neural retina into lens; acquisition of capacity to express crystallin genes and derepression of the endogenous crystallin genes.

Animals↗