PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Saunderson

Publications and source records attributed to T Saunderson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Urban-rural variations in suicides and undetermined deaths in England and Wales.

BACKGROUND: Given that a high proportion of undetermined deaths are thought to be suicides, the objective of the study was to compare the geography of the two verdicts, with emphasis on urban-rural differences, to determine whether the likelihood of a death being classified as suicide varies according to location. METHODS: Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were mapped for the local authority districts of England and Wales, using data aggregated over the period 1989-1992. Districts were classified according to population density, and SMRs calculated for each quartile. Finally, regression equations were obtained to model the relationship of suicide and undetermined death with a series of risk factors. RESULTS: Both male and female undetermined deaths showed a significant deficit in the most sparsely populated districts and a significant excess in the most densely populated districts. Female suicides were also significantly high in densely populated districts, but male suicides were highest in the most rural areas (SMR 110, 95 per cent confidence intervals 105-115). District variations in both verdicts were associated with the proportion of single-person households for both sexes, but male suicides and male undetermined deaths were associated with additional predictors, consistent with their distinct geographical distributions. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in suicide methods, the likelihood of communicating suicidal intent and, perhaps, variations in access to psychiatric services might be contributory factors to the observed differences between the verdicts. The results suggest that recorded suicides are a biased subset of actual suicides, particularly for males, and that the study of suicide verdicts alone is potentially misleading.

England↗

Exploring the "psychometric paradigm": comparisons between aggregate and individual analyses.

The "psychometric paradigm" developed by Slovic, Fischhoff, and Lichtenstein was a landmark in research about public attitudes toward risks. One problem with work, however, was that (at least initially) it did not attempt to distinguish between individuals or groups of people, except "experts" vs. "lay people." This paradigm produced a "cognitive map" of hazards, and the assumption seemed to be that the characteristics identified were inherent attributes of risk. This paper examines the validity of this assumption. A questionnaire survey similar to those designed by Slovic et al. was conducted, but the data were analyzed at both the aggregate level, using mean scores, and at the level of individuals (N = 131 Norwich residents). The results reported here demonstrate that (1) individuals vary in their perception of the same risk issue; (2) individuals vary in their rating of the same risks characteristics on the same risk issue; and (3) some of the strong intercorrelations observed between risk characteristics at the aggregate level are not supported when the same data are analysed at the level of individuals. Despite these findings, the relationship between risk characteristics and risk perceptions inferred by the psychometric paradigm did hold true at the level of individuals, for most--but not all--of the characteristics. In particular, the relationship between "lack of knowledge to those exposed" and risk perceptions appears to be a complex one, a finding which has important implications for risk communication strategies.

Communication↗