Biomedical subjects

T Suppes

Publications and source records attributed to T Suppes.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Psychopharmacologic treatment strategies for depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia.

Patients with serious psychiatric disorders are frequently treated by primary care physicians, who may have difficulty keeping up with recent advances in psychiatry. This paper presents an updated synopsis for three major psychiatric illnesses: major depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Current definitions, updated diagnostic criteria, short- and long-term treatment strategies with algorithms, and special challenges for the clinician are discussed for each of these illnesses. On the basis of each illness's distinct characteristics, five treatment principles are emphasized: 1) Treatment strategies should be long-term and should emphasize adherence, 2) treatment choice should be empirical, 3) combinations of medications may be helpful, 4) a combination of psychosocial and pharmacologic treatments may be more useful than either alone, and 5) the family or "significant others" as well as a consumer organization need to be involved. Some of the new directions in dinical research to refine these strategies and meet these challenges are also described.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2001

Drug abuse and bipolar disorder: comorbidity or misdiagnosis?

Bipolar disorder is a common, severe and cyclic psychiatric illness. A strong association between alcohol dependence and bipolar disorder has been reported in numerous studies. The abuse of other drugs including cocaine, amphetamines, opiates, cannabis, and prescription medications in bipolar patients is also an important public health concern and has been less extensively investigated. This review examines the abuse of drugs other than alcohol or nicotine in people with bipolar disorder. The high rates of milder affective symptoms but not mania observed in patients in drug abuse treatment settings suggests the symptoms may in many cases be associated with the drug use. However, such patients presenting in psychiatric settings might be suffering from cyclothymic and related attenuated bipolar disorders (type II). Substance abuse may be associated with medication non-compliance, more mixed or dysphoric mania and possibly an earlier onset of affective symptoms and more hospitalizations. The pharmacotherapy of patients with bipolar disorder and drug abuse is examined, including evidence on the use of mood stabilizers, neuroleptics and the newer atypical antipsychotics in this population.

Bipolar Disorder↗

PubMed2001

The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Treatment Outcome Network. I. Longitudinal methodology.

The NIMH-Stanley Foundation Bipolar Treatment Outcome Network, a multisite clinical trials network, has been established to address many of the neglected areas of research in bipolar illness. The Network was designed so that it would be able to conduct randomized clinical trials at several different levels of methodologic rigor (blinded and open-label) both in academic and community practice settings in order to better assess long-term efficacy of existing treatments and develop new ones. In this fashion, large numbers of representative patients with bipolar disorder have been enrolled with an additional focus of elucidating possible clinical and biological predictors of treatment response. The unique focus of the Network is its systematic longitudinal approach to illness so that patients can be assessed comprehensively over the long-term in sequential randomized clinical trials at critical clinical decision points where data on relative efficacy are inadequate. Bipolar I and bipolar II patients with a range of illness variants and comorbidities are included. Daily prospective ratings of severity of mania and depression and associated degree of functional impairment are completed on the NIMH-Life Chart Method and a modified Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Bipolar Illness (CGI-BP) is utilized. More detailed cross-sectional ratings for depression (Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology), mania (Young Mania Rating Scale), and psychosis (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) are additionally used at academic centers. This article describes the rationale for the Network, its guiding principles, methods, and study design to systematically assess the highly variable course of bipolar illness and its response to current and future treatments.

Bipolar Disorder↗

PubMed2001

The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Treatment Outcome Network. II. Demographics and illness characteristics of the first 261 patients.

BACKGROUND: Since recent NIMH Bipolar Disorder Workshops highlighted the dearth of longitudinal and controlled studies of bipolar illness, the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network (SFBN) has recruited a large cohort of patients with bipolar disorder to begin to address these issues. This report describes the demographics and course of illness characteristics of this study population. METHODS: The first 261 outpatients to be diagnosed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) and complete a detailed patient and a brief clinician questionnaire are described. All patients met DSM-IV criteria for bipolar I (n=211), bipolar II (n=42), or NOS (n=5) or schizoaffective (n=3), bipolar type. Chi-square and t-tests were used to examine statistically significant associations among important demographic and descriptive items. RESULTS: The general demographic and illness characteristics were similar to those in many bipolar clinical samples and not dissimilar from those reported in epidemiological surveys. The majority of patients had been hospitalized, with almost half reporting a worsening of illness over time, and two-thirds were not asymptomatic between episodes. First treatment for patients had been delayed by an average of 10 years from illness onset (by SCID). Almost a third of patients had attempted suicide at least once, and 30% reported current suicidal ideation at study entry. A total of 62% reported moderate to severe impact of the illness on occupational functioning. Early onset bipolar illness (< or =17 years old) was associated with increased frequency of mood switches, worsening course of illness, and history of early abuse (physical, verbal, or sexual). CONCLUSION: The SFBN represents a sample of predominantly BP I patients largely recruited from the community who will be followed in detail longitudinally, participate in clinical trials, and thus help advance our understanding and treatment of this life-threatening medical disorder. While there is a broad range of illness characteristics and severity, the majority of patients have been severely impacted by their illness despite the availability of multiple conventional treatment approaches in the community. These data further underscore the need for development of new and earlier treatment interventions. LIMITATION: The SFBN population is limited by the lack of random selection and represents a cohort willing to be treated and followed intensively in academic tertiary referral centers. While its characteristics are similar to many clinical study populations, the generalizability to non-clinic populations remains uncertain.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2001

Axis I psychiatric comorbidity and its relationship to historical illness variables in 288 patients with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Bipolar disorder often co-occurs with other axis I disorders, but little is known about the relationships between the clinical features of bipolar illness and these comorbid conditions. Therefore, the authors assessed comorbid lifetime and current axis I disorders in 288 patients with bipolar disorder and the relationships of these comorbid disorders to selected demographic and historical illness variables. METHOD: They evaluated 288 outpatients with bipolar I or II disorder, using structured diagnostic interviews and clinician-administered and self-rated questionnaires to determine the diagnosis of bipolar disorder, comorbid axis I disorder diagnoses, and demographic and historical illness characteristics. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-seven (65%) of the patients with bipolar disorder also met DSM-IV criteria for at least one comorbid lifetime axis I disorder. More patients had comorbid anxiety disorders (N=78, 42%) and substance use disorders (N=78, 42%) than had eating disorders (N=9, 5%). There were no differences in comorbidity between patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. Both lifetime axis I comorbidity and current axis I comorbidity were associated with earlier age at onset of affective symptoms and syndromal bipolar disorder. Current axis I comorbidity was associated with a history of development of both cycle acceleration and more severe episodes over time. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with bipolar disorder often have comorbid anxiety, substance use, and, to a lesser extent, eating disorders. Moreover, axis I comorbidity, especially current comorbidity, may be associated with an earlier age at onset and worsening course of bipolar illness. Further research into the prognostic and treatment response implications of axis I comorbidity in bipolar disorder is important and is in progress.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network. I. Rationale and methods.

BACKGROUND: The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network (SFBN) was created to address the paucity of help studies in bipolar illness. AIMS: To describe the rationale and methods of the SFBN. METHOD: The SFBN includes five core sites and a number of affiliated sites that have adopted consistent methodology for continuous longitudinal monitoring of patients. Open and controlled studies are performed as patients' symptomatology dictates. RESULTS: The reliability of SFBN raters and the validity of the rating instruments have been established. More than 500 patients are in continuous daily longitudinal follow-up. More than 125 have been randomised to one of three of the newer antidepressants (bupropion, sertraline and venlafaxine) as adjuncts in a study of mood stabilizers and 93 to omega-3 fatty acids. A number of open clinical case series have been published. CONCLUSIONS: Well-characterised patients are followed in a detailed continuous longitudinal fashion in both opportunistic case series and double-blind, randomised controlled trials with reliable and validated measures.

Antimanic Agents↗

PubMed2001

The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network. 2. Preliminary summary of demographics, course of illness and response to novel treatments.

BACKGROUND: The Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network (SFBN) evaluates treatments, course and clinical and neurobiological markers of response in bipolar illness. AIMS: To give a preliminary summary of emerging findings in these areas. METHOD: Studies with established and potentially antimanic, antidepressant and mood-stabilising agents range from open case series to double-blind randomised clinical trials, and use the same core assessment methodology, thereby optimising the comparability of the outcomes. The National Institute of Mental Health Life Chart Method is the core instrument for retrospective and prospective longitudinal illness description. RESULTS: The first groups of patients enrolled show a considerable degree of past and present symptomatology, psychiatric comorbidity and functional impairment. There are associations of both genetic and early environmental factors with more severe courses of illness. Open case series with add-on olanzapine, lamotrigine, gabapentin or topiramate show a differential spectrum of effectiveness in refractory patients. CONCLUSIONS: The SFBN provides important new data for the understanding and treatment of bipolar disorder.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Texas Medication Algorithm Project: development and feasibility testing of a treatment algorithm for patients with bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Use of treatment guidelines for treatment of major psychiatric illnesses has increased in recent years. The Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP) was developed to study the feasibility and process of developing and implementing guidelines for bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia in the public mental health system of Texas. This article describes the consensus process used to develop the first set of TMAP algorithms for the Bipolar Disorder Module (Phase 1) and the trial testing the feasibility of their implementation in inpatient and outpatient psychiatric settings across Texas (Phase 2). METHOD: The feasibility trial answered core questions regarding implementation of treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder. A total of 69 patients were treated with the original algorithms for bipolar disorder developed in Phase 1 of TMAP. RESULTS: Results support that physicians accepted the guidelines, followed recommendations to see patients at certain intervals, and utilized sequenced treatment steps differentially over the course of treatment. While improvements in clinical symptoms (24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) were observed over the course of enrollment in the trial, these conclusions are limited by the fact that physician volunteers were utilized for both treatment and ratings. and there was no control group. CONCLUSION: Results from Phases 1 and 2 indicate that it is possible to develop and implement a treatment guideline for patients with a history of mania in public mental health clinics in Texas. TMAP Phase 3, a recently completed larger and controlled trial assessing the clinical and economic impact of treatment guidelines and patient and family education in the public mental health system of Texas, improves upon this methodology.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

Bipolar rapid cycling: focus on depression as its hallmark.

The phenomenon of frequent cycling in bipolar disorder was first recognized by Emil Kraepelin in 1913. More recently, rapid cycling has been reported to be a predictor of nonresponse to treatment. At the time of presentation, most patients with DSM-IV-defined rapid cycling appear to be in the depressed phase of their illness. Frequent and more severe episodes of depression appear to be the hallmark of rapid cycling. Reported in this article are recent preliminary data suggesting that the combination of lithium and divalproex sodium administered continuously over 6 months appears to result in marked acute and continuation antimanic efficacy in 85% of patients and marked antidepressant efficacy in 60%. However, only one half of patients experienced bimodal stabilization. Comorbid alcohol, cannabis, and/or cocaine abuse and/or dependence did not appear to directly affect the spectrum of efficacy of lithium and divalproex or response rates in compliant patients. Comorbidity appeared to alter prognosis by increasing the prevalence of poor compliance. The majority of patients receiving lithium and divalproex who required additional treatment were depressed, suggesting that the frequent recurrence of depression is the primary unmet need in patients with rapid cycling. The use of antidepressants in this population has been discouraged because of concerns about the possibility of cycle acceleration. There exists a need for a pharmacotherapy that not only possesses marked acute antidepressant properties, but that does so without inducing switching or cycle acceleration. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine monotherapy in bipolar I depression has demonstrated efficacy without causing switching at a rate exceeding placebo; however, this initial study excluded patients with rapid cycling. To explore the efficacy of lamotrigine in rapid cycling, a recent multicenter study has examined lamotrigine as a maintenance therapy for this population. The results indicate that lamotrigine may be a useful treatment for patients with rapid-cycling bipolar II disorder and that this drug has begun to address this unmet need.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2001

Rate of switch in bipolar patients prospectively treated with second-generation antidepressants as augmentation to mood stabilizers.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar patients with breakthrough major depressive episodes despite ongoing adequately-dosed mood stabilizer medication were randomized in a double-blind manner to one of three antidepressants with different mechanisms of action: bupropion, sertraline, or venlafaxine. Preliminary data are presented on the switch rates into hypomania or mania for the antidepressants as a group prior to unblinding the specific individual drug efficacy and tolerability data in this ongoing clinical trial. METHODS: Subjects included 64 bipolar patients who participated at five sites in a 10-week double-blind trial for depression and a 1-year blinded continuation maintenance phase for responders. Nonresponders were re-randomized such that there were 95 acute treatment phases. In the acute phase, doses were titrated to clinical response, side effects, or maximum dose of bupropion (450 mg/day), sertraline (200 mg/day), or venlafaxine (375 mg/day). Daily ratings on the National Institute of Mental Health-Life Chart Methodology (NIMH-LCM) were inspected for the degree of improvement on the Clinical Global Impressions scale as revised for bipolar illness (CGI-BP) and the occurrence of hypomania or mania. RESULTS: Thirty-five (37%) of the 95 acute treatment phases were associated with a much or very much improved rating in depression on the CGI-BP. Thirteen (14%) of these 95 acute trials of antidepressants as adjuncts to mood stabilizers were associated with switches, seven into hypomania and six into mania. Forty-two patients elected to go into the continuation phase in 48 instances. Sixteen (33%) of the continuation phase trials were associated with mood switches, 10 into hypomania and six into mania. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized double-blind prospective study of three second-generation antidepressants (bupropion, sertraline, and venlafaxine) in bipolar patients whose depression broke through ongoing treatment with mood stabilizers, switches into hypomania or mania occurred in 14% of the acute phases and 33% of the continuation phases. Individual data on each drug will be assessed in the next phase of the study after more subjects are recruited and the blind is broken.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Methodological issues in developing new acute treatments for patients with bipolar illness.

One important aim of the recent reorganization of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) is to streamline the development of new treatments for patients with severe mental illnesses, such as bipolar disorder. Researching new treatments for patients with bipolar disorder presents specific problems not readily addressed by traditional efficacy trial methodologies that aim to maximize internal validity. This article reexamines several assumptions that have guided the design of these efficacy trials but that also create obstacles for studies of bipolar disorder and suggests potential solutions. This article draws on literature from neurology and psychiatry and discussions at a MacArthur Foundation-sponsored Conference on Longitudinal Methodology in 1992 (David J. Kupfer, M.D., Chair), which brought together investigators to consider alternative designs for patients with severe and persistent mental illness. In addition, we benefited from discussions at two NIMH-sponsored conferences, one held in 1989 (Prien and Potter 1990) and the other in 1994 (Prien and Rush 1996), at which investigators and methodologists discussed issues surrounding the development and conduct of informative efficacy trials for patients with bipolar disorder. Based on these discussions and recent literature reviews, we 1) outline common problems in the development and evaluation of effective acute treatments for bipolar disorder and 2) suggest possible solutions to these impediments. We also discuss alternative designs by which to build a sequence of acute treatment studies from which efficacy, safety, and the comparative value of different treatments can be established.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

The McLean-Harvard first-episode project: 6-month symptomatic and functional outcome in affective and nonaffective psychosis.

BACKGROUND: The McLean-Harvard First-Episode Project recruited affective and nonaffective patients at their first lifetime psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: Baseline evaluation and 6-month follow-up in 257 cases yielded recovery outcomes defined by syndromal (absence of DSM-IV criteria for a current episode) and functional (vocational and residential status at least at baseline levels) status. Time to recovery was assessed by survival analysis, and risk factors by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Syndromal recovery was attained by 77% of cases over an average of 84 days. By diagnostic group, syndromal recovery rates ranked (p = .001) major affective disorders (81%) > nonaffective acute psychoses (74%) > schizoaffective disorders (70%) > schizophrenia (36%). Functional recovery was significantly associated to syndromal recovery, diagnosis, shorter hospitalization normalized to year, and older age at onset. Average hospital stay declined across the study period, but recovery did not vary with year of entry. CONCLUSIONS: Syndromal recovery was achieved by nearly one half of patients within 3 months of a first lifetime hospitalization for a psychotic illness, but functional recovery was not achieved by 6 months in nearly two thirds of patients who had attained syndromal recovery.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Open-label adjunctive topiramate in the treatment of bipolar disorders.

BACKGROUND: To preliminarily explore the spectrum of effectiveness and tolerability of the new antiepileptic drug topiramate in bipolar disorder, we evaluated the response of 56 bipolar outpatients in the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Outcome Network (SFBN) who had been treated with adjunctive topiramate in an open-label, naturalistic fashion. METHODS: In this case series, response to topiramate was assessed every 2 weeks for the first 3 months according to standard ratings in the SFBN, and monthly thereafter while patients remained on topiramate. Patients' weights, body mass indices (BMIs), and side effects were also assessed. RESULTS: Of the 54 patients who completed at least 2 weeks of open-label, add-on topiramate treatment, 30 had manic, mixed, or cycling symptoms, 11 had depressed symptoms, and 13 were relatively euthymic at the time topiramate was begun. Patients who had been initially treated for manic symptoms displayed significant reductions in standard ratings scores after 4 weeks, after 10 weeks, and at the last evaluation. Those patients who were initially depressed or treated while euthymic showed no significant changes. Patients as a group displayed significant decreases in weight and BMI from topiramate initiation to week 4, to week 10, and to the last evaluation. The most common adverse side effects were neurologic and gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary open observations of adjunctive topiramate treatment suggest that it may have antimanic or anticycling effects in some patients with bipolar disorder, and may be associated with appetite suppression and weight loss that is often viewed as beneficial by the patient and clinician. Controlled studies of topiramate's acute and long-term efficacy and side effects in bipolar disorder appear warranted.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

A review of randomized, controlled clinical trials in acute mania.

This review considers the evidence supporting the use of somatic therapies (medications and electroconvulsive therapy) in the treatment of acute mania associated with bipolar disorder. Data from randomized, controlled clinical trials have established the efficacy of lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine in the treatment of acute mania. The use of combinations of mood stabilizers in the treatment of acute mania has not been well examined in controlled trials. Conventional antipsychotics and some atypical antipsychotics are frequently used as initial or adjunctive treatment. Similarly, benzodiazepines are frequently used as adjunctive agents. Preliminary data suggest that some calcium channel blockers and several anticonvulsants, e.g., lamotrigine, gabapentin, and topiramate, may have therapeutic value in the treatment of acute mania. In contrast, electroconvulsive therapy is generally accepted as being highly effective despite the lack of controlled evidence.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2000

Switching outpatients between atypical antipsychotics.

1. Some reports have suggested an increase in symptoms when switching patients with psychosis from clozapine to other atypical antipsychotics. 2. No data are available on switching between atypical antipsychotics other than clozapine, though this is common in clinical practice. 3. Six patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type were switched to quetiapine after finishing a clinical trial of sertindole. 4. During the observation period of two to ten weeks no subjects worsened and one improved. Side effects were mild. 5. These preliminary data suggest that switching between some atypical agents may be well tolerated. Larger controlled trials are needed to confirm this observation.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Validation of the prospective NIMH-Life-Chart Method (NIMH-LCM-p) for longitudinal assessment of bipolar illness.

BACKGROUND: Systematic and accurate depiction of a patient's course of illness is crucial for assessing the efficacy of maintenance treatments for bipolar disorder. This need to rate the long-term prospective course of illness led to the development of the National Institute of Mental Health prospective Life Chart Methodology (NIMH-LCM-p or LCM). The NIMH-LCM-p allows for the daily assessment of mood and episode severity based on the degree of mood associated functional impairment. We have previously presented preliminary evidence of the reliability and validity of the LCM, and its utility in clinical trials. This study is a further and more extensive validation of the clinician rated NIMH-LCM-p. METHODS: Subjects included 270 bipolar patients from the five sites participating in the Stanley Foundation Bipolar Network. Daily prospective LCM ratings on the clinician form were initiated upon entry, in addition to at least monthly ratings with the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-clinician rated (IDS-C), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). We correlated appropriate measures and time domains of the LCM with the IDS-C, YMRS and GAF. RESULTS: Severity of depression on the LCM and on the IDS-C were highly correlated in 270 patients (r = -0.785, P < 0.001). Similarly, a strong correlation was found between LCM mania and the YMRS (r = 0.656, P < 0.001) and between the LCM average severity of illness and the GAF (r = -0.732, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data further demonstrate the validity and potential utility of the NIMH-LCM-p for the detailed daily longitudinal assessment of manic and depressive severity and course, and response to treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Effect size of lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To develop effect sizes for 3 mood stabilizers--lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine--for the acute-phase treatment of bipolar I or II disorder, mixed or manic episode, in children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years. METHOD: Forty-two outpatients with a mean age of 11.4 years (20 with bipolar I disorder and 22 with bipolar II disorder) were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of open treatment with either lithium, divalproex sodium, or carbamazepine. The primary efficacy measures were the weekly Clinical Global Impression Improvement scores and the Young Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS). RESULTS: Using a > or = 50% change from baseline to exit in the Y-MRS scores to define response, the effect size was 1.63 for divalproex sodium, 1.06 for lithium, and 1.00 for carbamazepine. Using this same response measure with the intent-to-treat sample, the response rates were as follows: sodium divalproex, 53%; lithium, 38%; and carbamazepine, 38% (chi 2(2) = 0.85, p = .60). All 3 mood stabilizers were well tolerated, and no serious adverse effects were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Divalproex sodium, lithium, and carbamazepine all showed a large effect size in the open treatment of children and adolescents with bipolar I or II disorder in a mixed or manic episode.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2000

Efficacy of divalproex therapy for schizoaffective disorder.

Schizoaffective disorder is a common, severe, and lifelong illness; however, little is known about the pharmacologic treatment of this mental disorder. Divalproex has proven efficacy in the treatment of bipolar disorder. Therefore, to determine whether divalproex is also effective as adjunctive therapy for schizoaffective disorder, the authors performed a retrospective study of 20 patients in the public mental health system with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, who initiated divalproex therapy. The mean maximum dose of divalproex (+/-1 SD) was 1,150 mg (+/-400 mg; range, 500-2,000). The mean peak serum valproic acid level was 61 microg/mL (+/-25 microg/mL; range, 20-92). The overall improvement in Clinical Global Impression Scale scores was observed in 75% (15/20) of the patients (p = 0.0001). None in the sample worsened, and none discontinued divalproex because of side effects. These data suggest that divalproex is well-tolerated and effective as treatment of persistent schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Thus, divalproex may be an effective agent in the treatment of schizoaffective disorder as well as bipolar disorder. Controlled prospective trials in patients with schizoaffective disorder are needed to verify these findings.

Adult↗