Biomedical subjects

T Waegemans

Publications and source records attributed to T Waegemans.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2000

A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of two oral doses of levetiracetam, 2000 mg daily and 4000 mg daily, without titration in patients with refractory epilepsy.

The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and efficacy of two oral regimens of levetiracetam, 1000 mg and 2000 mg twice daily, as add-on treatment without titration in patients with refractory epilepsy. After a 1- to 4-week baseline, 119 patients were randomized to receive levetiracetam 2000 mg daily, 4000 mg daily, or placebo for a 24-week double-blind period, then levetiracetam 4000 mg daily in a 24-week open-label phase. Somnolence was the most common reason for discontinuation, and along with asthenia, occurred more frequently with levetiracetam than placebo. Responder rates were higher with levetiracetam 2000 mg and 4000 mg daily (48.1% [P < 0.05] and 28.6% [NS], respectively) than placebo (16.1%). In the open-label phase, the overall responder rate was 43.0%. Switching from placebo to levetiracetam increased the overall responder rate from 16.7% to 44.0%. No such increase was observed with patients initiated on levetiracetam 2000 mg daily. Levetiracetam initiated at doses of 2000 mg or 4000 mg daily without titration is well-tolerated and effective as add-on therapy in patients with partial and/or generalized seizures. The higher dose may be related to an increased incidence of somnolence and is not necessarily more effective than the lower dose.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1993

Effectiveness of piracetam in cortical myoclonus.

Twenty-one patients with disabling spontaneous, reflex, or action myoclonus due to various causes, who had shown apparent clinical improvement on introduction of piracetam, entered a placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial of piracetam (2.4-16.8 g daily). All but one patient had electrophysiological evidence of cortical myoclonus. Patients were randomly allocated to a 14-day course of piracetam followed by identical placebo, or placebo followed by piracetam. Nineteen patients received piracetam/placebo in addition to their routine antimyoclonic treatment (carbamazepine, clonazepam, phenytoin, primidone, sodium valproate, or tryptophan plus isocarboxazid, alone or in combination) and two received piracetam/placebo as monotherapy. All patients were rated at the end of each treatment phase using stimulus sensitivity, motor, writing, functional disability, global assessment, and visual analogue scales. Ten of the 21 patients had to be rescued from the placebo phase of the trial because of a severe and intolerable exacerbation of their myoclonus. No patients required rescue from the piracetam phase of the double-blind trial. When the 21 patients were considered together, there was a significant improvement in motor, writing, functional disability, global assessment, and visual analogue scores during treatment with piracetam compared with placebo. The total rating score also improved significantly with piracetam, by a median of 22%. Piracetam, usually in combination with other antimyoclonic drugs, is a useful treatment for myoclonus of cortical origin.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Measurement of reaction times in tasks of varying complexity: an indication of the degree and evolution of mental deterioration in the elderly.

In a group of 40 elderly patients with intellectual deterioration, slowing of behaviour was measured with an original reaction time apparatus. Three types of measurements in ascending degree of complexity were evaluated against each other. Intercorrelations, made with indicators of physical, mental and behavioural functioning, demonstrated that ascending complexity in reaction time measurements can be used as an evaluation of the degree of mental deterioration. An example of the use of the apparatus in the evaluation of the improvement after treatment with suloctidil is given.

Aged↗

PubMed1985

Double-blind trial of suloctidil versus placebo in moderate to severe mental deterioration.

A double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study was carried out in 30 elderly patients with moderate to severe mental deterioration to assess the effect of suloctidil on their mental condition. A battery of clinical and psychometric evaluations failed to demonstrate any significant differences between the two groups at the end of a 6-month treatment period during which patients received either 200 mg suloctidil or placebo 3-times daily. However, further analysis of the results showed that in the sub-group of patients with moderate mental deterioration on entry, suloctidil treatment produced significant improvement from baseline in the Rey 15 words test and the results were significantly different from those in patients with severe mental deterioration. No consistent changes were observed in the placebo group.

Age Factors↗