PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

T Welte

Publications and source records attributed to T Welte.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Once versus twice daily formoterol via Novolizer for patients with moderate to severe COPD--a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in patients with moderate to severe COPD whether a single morning dose of 24 microg formoterol from the Novolizer is not inferior to two divided doses of 12 microg formoterol inhaled in the morning and in the evening. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multi-centre study with a 2-week run-in period and a 12-week treatment phase. SETTING: Forty-seven outpatient centres in Germany, including private practices. PARTICIPANTS: N=321 symptomatic patients with moderate to severe COPD aged 40-70 years with an FEV1 of 30-80% predicted and the requirement of 3-12 actuations of salbutamol per day on 5 days during the run-in period. TREATMENT: Eligible patients were randomised to inhale formoterol either (a) as a single 24 microg dose in the morning (OD) or (b) in two divided 12 microg doses in the morning and in the evening (b.i.d.). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean age was 60.3 (SD 7.3) years, and mean baseline pre-dose FEV1 was 1.5l (0.5l) or 50% (12%) of predicted, respectively. After 12 weeks of treatment, pre-dose FEV(1) improved in both groups (mean: OD, +104 ml, b.i.d., +135 ml, mean difference between groups: 31 ml). The 95% CI exceeded the pre-determined margin of 100ml by 2 ml, so that the statistical hypothesis of non-inferiority of once daily dosing was not confirmed. No statistically significant differences were seen for improvements in PEF, MEF75, MEF50, and MEF25. COPD symptoms, percentage of symptom-free days and quality of life (SGRQ) improved in both groups to a similar degree. There were no relevant differences in the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a comparable efficacy and tolerability, the dosing schedule with formoterol via Novolizer as once daily in the morning seems to be an alternative compared to twice daily treatment. The primary endpoint suggests the equivalence of both treatment schedules from a clinical perspective. This regimen can be considered as an alternative therapeutic approach for a subgroup of COPD patients and may help to improve patient compliance.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[COPD--chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its implications for the human organism].

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) belongs next to bronchial asthma to the most important diseases of the respiratory tract in terms of its socio-economic impact. Especially exacerbations of COPD and clinical end-stages exert extremely negative effects on the global burden of disease. This article analyses current aspects of COPD regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, pathophysiology and diagnosis of the disease. Given the estimation that COPD will be the third most common cause of death in the year 2020, the high socio-economic costs and the primary cause tobacco smoke exposure, the disease can be regarded as extremely relevant for numerous aspects of insurance medicine.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMed2006

[Sepsis. Update on pathophysiology, diagnostics and therapy].

Sepsis results from the host response to infection. While a localized and controlled inflammatory reaction helps to control infection, a dysregulated response may lead to multiple organ failure and determines the course and prognosis of the septic patient. Despite intensive care, mortality remains as high as 54% for severe sepsis and septic shock. As the mechanisms are becoming better defined, interventions aiming to interfere with the host response have been undertaken, largely with disappointing results. Thus, many evidence-based recommendations suggest waiving of resource-consuming interventions. Nevertheless, several seminal studies have indicated that early and systematic supportive therapy according to pathophysiological principles, most notably early goal-directed therapy, low-dose hydrocortisone and activated protein C, can disrupt dysfunctional cascades and can favourably influence the course of the disease. In parallel, efforts to better define nationwide epidemiology and treatment habits for severe sepsis by the German competence network "SepNet" indicate that therapy of severe sepsis is generally in poor compliance with guidelines, while the personal perception of physicians in charge would suggest high rates of adherence. Thus, strategies of change management, such as implementation of sepsis bundles are warranted to achieve a better standard of care toward the aim of the "surviving sepsis campaign", i.e. a reduction of mortality by 25% within the next 5 years.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].

A recent survey conducted by the publicly funded Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet) reveals that severe sepsis and/or septic shock occurs in 75,000 inhabitants (110 out of 100,000) and sepsis in 79,000 inhabitants (116 out of 100,000) in Germany annually. This illness is responsible for approximately 60,000 deaths and ranges as the third most frequent cause of death after acute myocardial infarction. Direct costs for the intensive care of patients with severe sepsis alone amount to approximately 1.77 billion euros, which means that about 30% of the budget in intensive care is used to treat severe sepsis. However, until now German guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of severe sepsis did not exist. Therefore, the German Sepsis Society initiated the development of guidelines which are based on international recommendations by the International Sepsis Forum (ISF) and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and take into account the structure and organization of the German health care system. Priority was given to the following guideline topics: a) diagnosis, b) prevention, c) causative therapy, d) supportive therapy, e) adjunctive therapy. The guidelines development process was carefully planned and strictly adhered to the requirements of the Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF).

Delivery of Health Care, Integrated↗
PubMed2006

[Pneumonia - pathogen-based or constellation-based therapy?].

Community-acquired pneumonia is one of the most frequent infectious diseases with high morbidity and mortality. Early and sufficient antibiotic treatment is crucial for the prognosis of the patient. The underlying pathogens are mostly unknown at the onset of symptoms. The choice of antibiotic treatment depends on the suspected pathogens, derived from the typical germs and the typical resistances in a certain area. In addition, individual risk factors, such as age, severity of the diseases, comorbidities, and previous antibiotic treatment have a major impact on the probability of dying for an individual patient. These factors must be considered at the beginning of any treatment. Pathogen-based treatment has to be switched to constellation-based treatment.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2006

[Non-invasive ventilation].

Non-invasive ventilation is a technique to ventilate patients without endotracheal intubation and analgosedation. Pressure tight masks allow the ventilation of patients with severe respiratory or ventilatory insufficiency. Non-invasive ventilation may be used as short-term treatment for patients with acute ventilatory decompensation, as well as for long-term therapy at home for patients with chronic respiratory diseases. The typical indications are hypoxaemic respiratory failure in pneumonia or cardiogenic pulmonary edema, and hypercapnic ventilatory insufficiency in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, neuromuscular disorders, or advanced kyphoscoliosis. The physiological background, technical aspects of performing non-invasive ventilation, and typical indications are discussed.

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure↗
PubMed2006

[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis].

A recent survey conducted by the publicly funded Competence Network Sepsis (Sep- Net) reveals that severe sepsis and/or septic shock occurs in 75,000 inhabitants (110 out of 100,000) and sepsis in 79,000 inhabitants (116 out of 100,000) in Germany annually. This illness is responsible for approx. 60,000 deaths and ranges as the third most frequent cause of death after acute myocardial infarction. Direct costs for the intensive care of patients with severe sepsis alone amount to approx. 1.77 billion euros, which means that about 30% of the budget in intensive care is used to treat severe sepsis. However, until now German guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of severe sepsis did not exist. Therefore, the German Sepsis Society initiated the development of guidelines which are based on international recommendations by the International Sepsis Forum (ISF) and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and take into account the structure and organisation of the German health care system. Priority was given to the following guideline topics: a) diagnosis, b) prevention, c) causative therapy, d) supportive therapy, e) adjunctive therapy. The guidelines development process was carefully planned and strictly adhered to according to the requirements of the Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF).

Critical Care↗
PubMed2006

Cathepsin-regulated apoptosis.

Apoptosis can be mediated by different mechanisms. There is growing evidence that different proteolytic enzymes are involved in the regulation of apoptosis. Cathepsins are proteases which, under physiologic conditions, are localized intralysosomally. In response to certain signals they are released from the lysosomes into the cytoplasm where they trigger apoptotic cell death via various pathways, including the activation of caspases or the release of proapoptotic factors from the mitochondria. Here, we review different mechanisms that induce the release of lysosomal enzymes, and the functional relevance of defined cathepsins in defined models of apoptosis.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Piperacillin/tazobactam vs imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia--a double blind prospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) with its broad spectrum of antibacterial activity is used widely for the treatment of moderate to severe polymicrobial nosocomial infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The efficacy and safety of P/T was compared with imipenem/cilastatin (I/C) in patients with established nosocomial pneumonia. This multicentre study took place from January 1999 to December 2001. Due to difficulties in recruiting sufficient patients it was terminated prematurely. In all, 221 patients were randomly assigned to either P/T at 4 g/0.5 g (n = 110) or I/C at 1 g/1 g (n = 111). Additional aminoglycoside therapy was mandatory if Pseudomonas aeruginosa was present. The ITT population (107 P/T and 110 I/C patients) was used for the analysis of efficacy. RESULTS: The clinical efficacy was equally good for the P/T and I/C groups; 71% [95% CI 61.3, 79.2] vs 77.3% [95% CI 68.1, 84.5] at the end of therapy, 66.4% [95% CI 56.5, 75] vs 70% [95% CI 60.4, 78.2] on day 3, a nd 59.8% [95% CI 49.9, 69] vs 66.4% [95% CI 56.6, 74.9] on day 14 after therapy, respectively. Proven or assumed bacterial eradication at the end of therapy was 45.8% (P/T) and 52.7% (I/C). Treatment-related adverse events (AE) were recorded in 30% of P/T patients and 25.2% I/C patients. There were ten serious treatment-related AEs in the P/T group and five in the I/C group. CONCLUSION: Although numbers were inadequate for full statistical evaluation, P/T and I/C were similarly effective in the treatment of severe nosocomially acquired pneumonia.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[Pharmacotherapy of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)].

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) constitutes the first new infectious disease of the current millennium. It is caused by the novel SARS-Coronavirus (SARS-CoV). SARS is related to a high morbidity and mortality and first appeared during an epidemic in 2002 - 2003. To date no specific therapy against the SARS-CoV is available. Due to the rapid spread of SARS during the epidemics in 2002 - 2003, randomised and controlled multicentre studies were not performed. Therefore, general guidelines have not been developed. Since the outbreak, scientists have been testing potential antiviral substances using in vitro and animal models. This study analyses the presently available in vitro and in vivo data on the pharmacotherapy of SARS.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2006

CRB-65 predicts death from community-acquired pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: The study was performed to validate the CURB, CRB and CRB-65 scores for the prediction of death from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in both the hospital and out-patient setting. DESIGN: Data were derived from a large multi-centre prospective study initiated by the German competence network for community-acquired pneumonia (CAPNETZ) which started in March 2003 and were censored for this analysis in October 2004. SETTING: Out- and in-hospital patients in 670 private practices and 10 clinical centres. SUBJECTS: Analysis was done for n = 1343 patients (n = 208 out-patients and n = 1135 hospitalized) with all data sets completed for the calculation of CURB and repeated for n = 1967 patients (n = 482 out-patients and n = 1485 hospitalized) with complete data sets for CRB and CRB-65. INTERVENTION: None. 30-day mortality from CAP was determined by personal contacts or a structured interview. RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality was 4.3% (0.6% in out-patients and 5.5% in hospitalized patients, P < 0.0001). Overall, the CURB, CRB and CRB-65 scores provided comparable predictions for death from CAP as determined by receiver-operator-characteristics (ROC) curves. However, in hospitalized patients, CRB misclassified 26% of deaths as low risk patients. Availability of the CRB-65 score (90%) was far superior to that of CURB (65%), due to missing blood urea nitrogen values (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both the CURB and CRB-65 scores can be used in the hospital and out-patients setting to assess pneumonia severity and the risk of death. Given that the CRB-65 is easier to handle, we favour the use of CRB-65 where blood urea nitrogen is unavailable.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

[Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis: guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].

A recent survey conducted by the publicly funded Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet) reveals that severe sepsis and/or septic shock occurs in 75,000 inhabitants (110 out of 100,000) and sepsis in 79,000 inhabitants (116 out of 100,000) in Germany annually. This illness is responsible for approximately 60,000 deaths and ranges as the third most frequent cause of death after acute myocardial infarction. Direct costs for the intensive care of patients with severe sepsis alone amount to approximately 1.77 billion euros, which means that about 30% of the budget in intensive care is used to treat severe sepsis. However, until now German guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of severe sepsis did not exist. Therefore, the German Sepsis Society initiated the development of guidelines which are based on international recommendations by the International Sepsis Forum (ISF) and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) and take into account the structure and organization of the German health care system. Priority was given to the following guideline topics: a) diagnosis, b) prevention, c) causative therapy, d) supportive therapy, e) adjunctive therapy. The guidelines development process was carefully planned and strictly adhered to the requirements of the Working Group of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF).

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

[New therapeutic strategies for community acquired pneumonia].

Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP) is the most important infectious disease in Germany. In the acute phase, lethality is almost 10%, and in the six months follow up period following the acute infection, lethality is more than 15%. Problems with resistances had not been found in Germany, except for a decreasing susceptibility of S. pneumoniae against macrolides. The CRB-65 score allows a reliable discrimination between patients with a high and low risk of dying. The new S3 guideline for diagnosis and treatment of community acquired pneumonia recommends a risk adapted treatment. Low risk patients shall receive a monotherapy with e. g. amoxicillin, high risk patients should be treated with a broad spectrum combination therapy (beta-lactam and macrolide).

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2005

[Drug transport in the respiratory epithelium].

The aerosolic administration of peptidomimetic drugs with a peptide backbone may play a crucial role in the future treatment of diseases. Especially rational drug design offers an option to synthesize new drugs that are carried by specific drug transporters. Out of the presently identified transporter proteins PEPT1 and PEPT2, the high-affinity transporter PEPT2 is found in the respiratory tract. The transporter possess 12 membrane spanning domains and catalyses an electrogenic uphill drug transport using a transmembrane electrochemical proton gradient. PEPT2 is expressed in the bronchial epithelium and in alveolar type II pneumocytes in human airways. Kinetic studies demonstrated that peptidomimetic compounds including antibiotic, antiviral and antineoplastic drugs are carried by PEPT2. The transporter also carries delta-aminolevulinic acid into the airways. This molecule can be used for the diagnostics of pulmonary neoplasms and for photodynamic therapy. Using the recently published data on minimal structural requirements for PEPT2-substrates, rational drug design may lead to a new generation of respiratory drugs and prodrugs, which are delivered to the airways via the molecular mechanisms of the PEPT2 transport system.

Aerosols↗