PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Takashi Hiiragi

Publications and source records attributed to Takashi Hiiragi.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Embryology: does prepatterning occur in the mouse egg?

A recurring question in developmental biology has been whether localized determinants play any role in mammalian preimplantation development. This is a controversial issue that brings back the idea of prepatterning and is explored further by Plusa et al., who claim it is the first cleavage of the mouse zygote that predicts the blastocyst axis, rather than the animal pole or sperm entry point, as previously suggested. However, other evidence indicates that the blasotcyst axis is not predetermined and there is no prepatterning in the mouse egg. Here we investigate the origin of these different views and conclude that they arise from differences in the data themselves and in their interpretation.

Animals↗

Space asymmetry directs preferential sperm entry in the absence of polarity in the mouse oocyte.

Knowledge about the mechanism that establishes embryonic polarity is fundamental in understanding mammalian development. In re-addressing several controversial claims, we recently proposed a model in which mouse embryonic polarity is not specified until the blastocyst stage. Before fertilization, the fully differentiated oocyte has been characterized as "polarized," and we indeed observed that the sperm preferentially enters the polar body half. Here we show that preferential sperm entry is not due to an intrinsic polarity of the oocyte, since fertilization takes place uniformly when the zona pellucida is removed. We suggest that the term "asymmetry" denotes morphological differences, whereas "polarity" in addition implies developmental consequences. Thus, the mouse oocyte can be considered "asymmetric" but "non-polarized." The penetration through the zona pellucida is also random, and a significant proportion of sperm binds to the oocyte membrane at a point distant from the zona penetration site. Time-lapse recordings confirmed that sperm swim around the perivitelline space before fertilization. Experimental enlargement of the perivitelline space in the non-polar body half increased the regional probability of fertilization. Based on these experiments, we propose a model in which the space asymmetry exerted by the first polar body and the zona pellucida directs sperm entry preferentially to the polar body half, with no need for oocyte polarity.

Animals↗

Fatal flaws in the case for prepatterning in the mouse egg.

The presence or absence of predetermination and polarity in the mouse preimplantation embryo is still controversial. The question is if the mechanisms underlying early mammalian development is comparable to those operating in non-mammalian 'model' organisms. In a recent article by Gardner in this journal, the author criticizes two of our recent publications. However, in order to resolve this controversy it is essential to read relevant reports carefully without bias and to provide data on which a particular claim is based.

Animals↗

Where do we stand now? Mouse early embryo patterning meeting in Freiburg, Germany (2005).

Mechanism underlying mammalian preimplantation development has long been a subject of controversy and the central question has been if any "determinants" play a key role in a manner comparable to the non-mammalian "model" system. During the last decade, this issue has been revived (Pearson, 2002; Rossant and Tam, 2004) by claims that the axes of the mouse blastocyst are anticipated at the egg ("prepatterning model"; Gardner, 1997; Gardner, 2001; Piotrowska et al., 2001; Piotrowska and Zernicka-Goetz, 2001; Zernicka-Goetz, 2005), suggesting that a mechanism comparable to that operating in non-mammals may be at work. However, recent studies by other laboratories do not support these claims ("regulative model"; Alarcon and Marikawa, 2003; Chroscicka et al., 2004; Hiiragi and Solter, 2004; Alarcon and Marikawa, 2005; Louvet-Vallee et al., 2005; Motosugi et al., 2005) and the issue is currently under hot debate (Vogel, 2005). Deepening our knowledge of this issue will not only provide an essential basis for understanding mammalian development, but also directly apply to ongoing clinical practices such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). These practices were originally supported by a classical premise that mammalian preimplantation embryos are highly regulative (Tarkowski, 1959; Tarkowski, 1961; Tarkowski and Wroblewska, 1967; Rossant, 1976), in keeping with the "regulative model". However, if the "prepatterning model" is correct, the latter will require critical reassessment.

Animals↗

Mechanism of first cleavage specification in the mouse egg: is our body plan set at day 0?

In most animals the body axis is specified in the egg. Because of their highly regulative capacity after experimental manipulations, mammalian preimplantation embryos have long been thought to be an exception to this rule, lacking polarity until the blastocyst stage. However, it has recently been suggested that the embryonic-abembryonic (Em-Ab) axis of the mouse blastocyst arises perpendicular to the first cleavage plane. Considering the second polar body (2pb) as a stationary marker for the "animal pole (A-pole)" during preimplantation development, the authors concluded that the polarity of the mouse embryo is already specified in the egg, as is the case for most non-mammalian animals. However, the results of our recent time-lapse recordings have shown(8) that in 50% of the embryos the first cleavage occurs at a considerable distance from the "animal-vegetal (A-V) axis" and that the 2pb moves towards the first cleavage plane, in contrast to the previous claims. Thus, there is no predetermined axis in the mouse egg. We also presented a novel model for specification of the first cleavage plane: this is defined as the plane separating the two apposing pronuclei that have moved to the center of the egg. In this review we will elucidate the discrepancy between the previous model and our model, and discuss the possible causes.

Animals↗

Polarity of the mouse embryo is established at blastocyst and is not prepatterned.

Polarity formation in mammalian preimplantation embryos has long been a subject of controversy. Mammalian embryos are highly regulative, which has led to the conclusion that polarity specification does not exist until the blastocyst stage; however, some recent reports have now suggested polarity predetermination in the egg. Our recent time-lapse recordings have demonstrated that the first cleavage plane is not predetermined in the mouse egg. Here we show that, in contrast to previous claims, two-cell blastomeres do not differ and their precise future contribution to the inner cell mass and/or the trophectoderm cannot be anticipated. Thus, all evidence so far strongly suggests the absence of predetermined axes in the mouse egg. We observe that the ellipsoidal zona pellucida exerts mechanical pressure and space constraints as the coalescing multiple cavities are restricted to one end of the long axis of the blastocyst. We propose that these mechanical cues, in conjunction with the epithelial seal in the outer cell layer, lead to specification of the embryonic-abembryonic axis, thus establishing first polarity in the mouse embryo.

Animals↗

Reprogramming is essential in nuclear transfer.

Fertile offspring have been produced by nuclear transfer from adult somatic cells in several mammalian species (Wilmut et al., 1997; Kato et al., 1998; Wakayama et al., 1998; Polejaeva et al., 2000; Chesne et al., 2002; Shin et al., 2002; Zhou et al., 2003). Various possible causes have been suggested for the overall low efficiency (Perry and Wakayama, 2002). Notably, however, it has not yet been clearly demonstrated whether reprogramming after nuclear transfer is necessary for successful cloning. Here we show that reprogramming is essential in nuclear transfer, by comparing the developmental efficiency after the transfer of cumulus cell nuclei with that for zygote nuclei. Nuclear transfers from blastomeres of a series of pre-implantation stages showed further that, as development proceeds, the nuclei progressively lose their potency and become more difficult to reprogram upon their transfer into enucleated MII oocytes. We also found that naturally ovulated oocytes are much better recipients of a nucleus than are superovulated oocytes, which have been used in all the nuclear transfer experiments reported so far. This indicates that cloning efficiency can also be increased to some extent by technical improvements. All these results enable us to distinguish more clearly between the inherent problem of reprogramming and technical problems associated with materials, manipulation, and in vitro culture.

Animals↗

First cleavage plane of the mouse egg is not predetermined but defined by the topology of the two apposing pronuclei.

Studies of experimentally manipulated embryos have led to the long-held conclusion that the polarity of the mouse embryo remains undetermined until the blastocyst stage. However, recent studies reporting that the embryonic-abembryonic axis of the blastocyst arises perpendicular to the first cleavage plane, and hence to the animal-vegetal axis of the zygote, have led to the claim that the axis of the mouse embryo is already specified in the egg. Here we show that there is no specification of the axis in the egg. Time-lapse recordings show that the second polar body does not mark a stationary animal pole, but instead, in half of the embryos, moves towards a first cleavage plane. The first cleavage plane coincides with the plane defined by the two apposing pronuclei once they have moved to the centre of the egg. Pronuclear transfer experiments confirm that the first cleavage plane is not determined in early interphase but rather is specified by the newly formed topology of the two pronuclei. The microtubule networks that allow mixing of parental chromosomes before dividing into two may be involved in these processes.

Actins↗

Role of transglutaminase 1 in stabilisation of intercellular junctions of the vascular endothelium.

Microvascular endothelial monolayers from mouse myocardium (MyEnd) cultured for up to 5 days postconfluency became increasingly resistant to various barrier-compromising stimuli such as low extracellular Ca(2+) and treatment with the Ca(2+) ionophore A23187 and with the actin depolymerising compound cytochalasin D. In contrast, microvascular endothelial monolayers from mouse lung microvessels (PulmEnd) remained sensitive to these conditions during the entire culture period which corresponds to the well-known in vivo sensitivity of the lung microvasculature to Ca(2+) depletion and cytochalasin D treatment. One molecular difference between pulmonary and myocardial endothelial cells was found to be transglutaminase 1 (TGase1) which is strongly expressed in myocardial endothelial cells but is absent from pulmonary endothelial cells. Resistance of MyEnd cells to barrier-breaking conditions correlated strongly with translocation of TGase1 to intercellular junctions. Simultaneous inhibition of intracellular and extracellular TGase activity by monodansylcadaverine (MDC) strongly weakened barrier properties of MyEnd monolayers, whereas inhibition of extracellular TGases by the membrane-impermeable active site-directed TGase inhibitor R281 did not reduce barrier properties. Weakening of barrier properties could be also induced in MyEnd cells by downregulation of TGase1 expression using RNAi-based gene silencing. These findings suggest that crosslinking activity of intracellular TGase1 at intercellular junctions may play a role in controlling barrier properties of endothelial monolayers.

Animals↗