Biomedical subjects

Tanya B Dorff

Publications and source records attributed to Tanya B Dorff.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Association between smoking, tumor genetics, and outcomes in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Smoking has been associated with increased metastatic prostate cancer mortality, but the mechanisms behind this are largely unknown. We hypothesized that smoking increases the risk of genetic alterations associated with aggressive disease and/or the transformation to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical genomic database for this retrospective analysis. We associated patient characteristics and tumor genetic data with smoking exposure at diagnosis (current, former, never and pack years) and with clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) from diagnosis or time to developing metastatic disease and NEPC status. RESULTS: We identified 2353 men with prostate cancer and next generation somatic tumor sequencing evaluable for analysis in PROMISE, including 8% current, 39% former, and 52% never smokers. Current smokers were more likely to be younger and to have metastatic (M1 or N1) disease at diagnosis, and less likely to have prior local therapy (all p < 0.001). Current smoking was associated with worse OS from diagnosis (99.9 mo vs 137.6 mo, HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.14-1.77), which remained significant after adjusting for disease characteristics. We found no difference in the percentage of NEPC at initial diagnosis or at any time between current, former, and never smokers (p = 0.8). We found positive associations between smoking status and genetic alterations in SPOP (current: 15%, former 6.7%, never 3.8%; p = 0.018), FGFR1 (current 10%, former 0.4%, never 1.1% p = 0.001), and ARID1A (current 5.1%, former 2.2%, never 0.4%; p = 0.035) in patients with metastatic androgen pathway modulator sensitive prostate cancer (APMS). CONCLUSION: Active smoking is associated with worse overall and prostate cancer specific survival as compared to never/former smoking and was associated with specific tumor genetic alterations but not small cell/NEPC transformation.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine expression in lymph node-positive prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the expression of chromogranin A, a marker for neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation, in patients with lymph node-positive prostate cancer to determine its prognostic significance. NE cells are involved in cellular growth and differentiation in both normal and pathologic conditions of the prostate. METHODS: We reviewed the data of 140 patients with lymph node-positive prostate adenocarcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The median follow-up was 10.9 years (range 0.8 to 19.7). Immunohistochemical staining for chromogranin A was evaluated in areas of benign epithelium, primary prostate cancer, and lymph node metastasis. The association between chromogranin A expression and the clinical and pathologic factors (preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen and prostatectomy Gleason score and stage) and clinical outcomes, including overall and recurrence-free survival, was evaluated. RESULTS: Staining was positive in 86% of benign areas, 61% of primary cancer specimens, and 12% of lymph node deposits. The preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level and pathologic stage and grade of the primary tumor did not show any statistically significant correlation with NE staining in any of the areas. Only NE expression in the primary tumor was associated with clinical recurrence, with a 10-year recurrence-free survival rate for those with less than 5% staining of 67% compared with 35% for those with 5% staining or greater (P = 0.03). Furthermore, after adjusting for age, greater NE expression in the primary tumor (relative risk 2.15, P = 0.02) and lymph node deposit (relative risk 2.03, P = 0.03) was associated with poorer overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: NE expression in the primary tumor and lymph node metastasis of patients with node-positive prostate cancer may provide additional prognostic stratification.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

Evolving treatment paradigms for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer.

While men with early stage prostate cancer typically enjoy long-term survival after definitive management, for those who present with locally advanced or metastatic disease, survival is compromised. Multimodality therapy can prolong survival in these patients, with state-of-the-art options including intensity-modulated radiation or brachytherapy in conjunction with androgen ablation, adjuvant androgen ablation and/or chemotherapy with radical retropubic prostatectomy. In addition, novel biological therapies are being explored to target the unique molecular changes in prostate cancer cells and their interactions with the microenvironment. With these advances the outlook will undoubtedly improve, even for patients presenting with advanced disease. Careful application of these emerging therapies to a select group of prostate cancer patients most likely to obtain benefit from them is the challenge for urologists, medical oncologists and radiation oncologists for the future.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2005

Prostate cancer metastases to bone: pathophysiology, pain management, and the promise of targeted therapy.

Bone metastases are a significant cause of pain and morbidity in prostate cancer, especially if they lead to complications such as pathological fractures and spinal cord compression. Palliation of pain can be achieved with radiation, radioisotopes, hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and bisphosphonates. Bisphosphonates also reduce the risk of skeletal complications. Studies with animal models and advances in understanding the molecular basis for bone metastases have yielded new targets for therapy. Some of the promising therapeutic trials are reviewed in this paper.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Ethnic differences in neuroendocrine cell expression in normal human prostatic tissue.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether any differences exist in neuroendocrine (NE) cell differentiation in normal prostates among various ethnic groups because the incidence and mortality from prostate cancer vary across racial groups. METHODS: Archived paraffin-embedded prostate samples not containing any malignancy were obtained from cystoprostatectomy specimens. Prostatic tissue was obtained from 15 African Americans, 13 Hispanics, 15 Asians, and 16 whites. NE cells were identified based on immunoreactivity for chromogranin A. The mean number of NE cells per high power field (HPF) for each patient was determined using a visual quantitative method by two observers who were unaware of the race of the patients. RESULTS: The geometric mean number of NE cells was 6.1/HPF for Asians, 5.6/HPF for whites, 4.0/HPF for Hispanics, and 0.7/HPF for African Americans. A highly significant difference was observed in the distribution of NE cells between African Americans and each of the other races (P < or =0.003). A trend toward greater NE expression was noted in Asians and whites compared with Hispanics; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: We found a fivefold to eightfold difference in the distribution of NE cells in the normal prostates of African-American men compared with that of other races. The comparatively low NE cell expression in African-American men may play a role in the greater rate of prostate carcinogenesis seen in this ethnic group.

Black or African American↗