Biomedical subjects

Tanya Boutros

Publications and source records attributed to Tanya Boutros.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Pharmacodynamic interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe is a lipid-lowering drug indicated for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia as co-administration with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) or as monotherapy. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the pharmacodynamic effects and safety of the co-administration of ezetimibe and the new statin rosuvastatin. A secondary objective was to examine the potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. METHODS: This was a randomized, evaluator (single)-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in healthy hypercholesterolemic subjects (untreated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] > or = 130 mg/dL [3.37 mmol/L]). After the outpatient screening and NCEP Step I diet stabilization periods, 40 subjects were randomized to one of the 4 following treatments: rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg (n = 12); rosuvastatin 10 mg plus placebo (matching ezetimibe 10 mg) (n = 12); ezetimibe 10 mg plus placebo (matching ezetimibe 10 mg) (n = 8); or placebo (2 tablets, matching ezetimibe 10 mg) (n = 8). All study treatments were administered once daily in the morning for 14 days as part of a 16-day inpatient confinement period. Fasting serum lipids were assessed pre-dose on days 1 (baseline), 7, and 14 by direct quantitative assay methods. Safety was evaluated by monitoring laboratory tests and recording adverse events. Blood samples were collected for ezetimibe and rosuvastatin pharmacokinetic evaluation prior to the first and last dose and at frequent intervals after the last dose (day 14) of study treatment. Plasma ezetimibe, total ezetimibe (ezetimibe plus ezetimibe-glucuronide) and rosuvastatin concentrations were determined by validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS) assay methods. RESULTS: All active treatments caused statistically significant (p < or = 0.02) decreases in LDL-C concentration versus placebo from baseline to day 14. The co-administration of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin caused a significantly (p < 0.01) greater reduction in LDL-C and total cholesterol than either drug alone. In this 2-week inpatient study with restricted physical activity there was no apparent effect of any treatment on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglycerides. The co-administration of ezetimibe and rosuvastatin caused a significantly (p < 0.01) greater percentage reduction in mean LDL-C (-61.4%) than rosuvastatin alone (-44.9%), with a mean incremental reduction of -16.4% (95%CI -26.3 to -6.53). Reported side effects were generally mild, nonspecific, and similar among treatment groups. There were no significant increases or changes in clinical laboratory tests, particularly those assessing muscle and liver function. There was no significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction between ezetimibe and rosuvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Co-administration of ezetimibe 10 mg with rosuvastatin 10 mg daily caused a significant incremental reduction in LDL-C compared with rosuvastatin alone. Moreover, co-administering ezetimibe and rosuvastatin was well tolerated in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and lovastatin in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe (Zetia) is a novel inhibitor of intestinal absorption of cholesterol that is approved for the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. In a separate pilot study, co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin resulted in a significant pharmacodynamic interaction, leading to an additive reduction in LDL-C. The current study was designed to further investigate the potential for pharmacokinetic interaction between ezetimibe and lovastatin. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, 3-way crossover study in 18 healthy adult volunteers. All subjects received the following treatments orally once daily for 7 days: ezetimibe 10 mg, lovastatin 20 mg, or ezetimibe 10 mg plus lovastatin 20 mg. Plasma samples obtained on day 7 were evaluated for steady-state pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe (unconjugated), total ezetimibe (ezetimibe and ezetimibe-glucuronide conjugate), lovastatin, and beta-hydroxylovastatin. RESULTS: Co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin did not affect the pharmacokinetics of ezetimibe. There were no significant differences in the exposure to total ezetimibe, ezetimibe-glucuronide and ezetimibe after co-administration with lovastatin vs. ezetimibe given alone. Co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin had no significant effect on the exposure to either lovastatin or beta-hydroxylovastatin. The point estimates based on the log-transformed Cmax and AUC values for lovastatin and beta-hydroxylovastatin were 113% and 119%, respectively, for co-administration of ezetimibe with lovastatin vs. lovastatin administration alone. Co-administration therapy with ezetimibe and lovastatin was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin or beta-hydroxylovastatin and vice versa. Co-administration of ezetimibe and lovastatin is unlikely to cause a clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interaction.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Effect of race and sex on single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of desloratadine.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to characterise the single and multiple dose pharmacokinetic profile of desloratadine, a new antihistamine, and its main metabolite, 3-hydroxy (3-OH) desloratadine, in healthy volunteers differing in sex and race. DESIGN: An open-label, parallel-group, single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetic trial. INTERVENTION: A single 7.5mg oral tablet of desloratadine on day 1, followed by 7.5mg daily doses on days 4 to 17. PARTICIPANTS: 48 healthy, nonsmoking volunteers (12 White men, 12 Black men, 12 White women, 12 Black women). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: AUC(24h) and C(max) determined from serial blood samples of desloratadine and 3-OH desloratadine. RESULTS: There were no clinically relevant differences between men and women or Black participants and White participants for desloratadine and 3-OH desloratadine maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Following multiple doses, the geometric mean C(max) was 5.17 microg/L in men, 5.68 microg/L in women, 5.87 microg/L in Black participants and 5.00 microg/L in White participants; the corresponding AUC from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(24h)) values were 77.9, 80.0, 90.6 and 68.8 micro g/L x h. Corresponding 3-OH desloratadine geometric mean C(max) values were 1.93, 2.79, 2.20 and 2.45 microg/L, and the AUC(24h) values were 32.1, 47.5, 37.1 and 41.1 microg/L. h. CONCLUSIONS: Oral administration of multiple doses of desloratadine 7.5mg, a dose 50% higher than the recommended 5mg clinical dose, was well tolerated by healthy adults differing in sex and race. Comparison of the C(max) and AUC values following 14 days of treatment with desloratadine indicates that no dosage adjustment is needed on the basis of sex or race.

Administration, Oral↗