Biomedical subjects

Tara Maddala

Publications and source records attributed to Tara Maddala.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Uncovering the diagnostic potential of seminal fluid beyond fertility: cfDNA methylation analysis for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Research on the potential use of seminal fluid as a liquid biopsy for prostate cancer detection has been limited due to challenges associated with acquisition of this bodily fluid in clinical studies. Here we sought to expand on our previous analysis, which demonstrated high levels of prostate-derived cell free DNA (cfDNA) in seminal fluid in presumed healthy individuals, to a much larger cohort that included participants with prostate cancer. A total of 279 men scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled over 4 months across 12 sites. Prior to their biopsy, participants mailed a seminal fluid sample collected at home to the laboratory, from which cfDNA was extracted and underwent methylation analysis. Consistent with our earlier study in healthy individuals, we observed an abundance of high molecular weight (HMW) cfDNA in all samples. Tissue-of-origin deconvolution revealed that granulocytes and sperm were the principal contributors to seminal fluid cfDNA, while prostate-derived cfDNA was present at abundances readily detectable with current technologies. The nucleosomal fraction was very pronounced in some but not all samples and was determined to be correlated with the relative sperm signal. The sperm signal was also observed to be associated with an increase in small insert sizes (< 125 bp) in the sequenced libraries. Unsupervised clustering revealed two distinct populations driven by the abundance of sperm and granulocytes. Since summarizing at the genomic region level confounded tissues of different origins, fragment-level DNA methylation features were used to characterize and quantify the prostate cancer related signal, and features associated with clinically significant prostate cancer were identified. This study expands on our previous work to further characterize seminal fluid and highlights its potential as a promising liquid biopsy medium for the detection and monitoring of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Humans↗

PubMed2003

An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences.

In conjoint analysis (CA) studies, choosing between scenarios with multiple health attributes may be demanding for respondents. This study examined whether simplifying the choice task in CA designs, by using a design with more overlap of attribute levels, provides advantages over standard minimal-overlap methods. Two experimental conditions, minimal and increased-overlap discrete choice CA designs, were administered to 353 respondents as part of a larger HIV testing preference survey. In the minimal-overlap survey, all six attribute levels were allowed to vary. In the increased-overlap survey, an average of two attribute levels were the same between each set of scenarios. We hypothesized that the increased-overlap design would reduce cognitive burden, while minimally impacting statistical efficiency. We did not find any significant improvement in consistency, willingness to trade, perceived difficulty, fatigue, or efficiency, although several results were in the expected direction. However, evidence suggested that there were differences in stated preferences. The results increase our understanding of how respondents answer CA questions and how to improve future surveys.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗

PubMed2002

Measuring preferences for health care interventions using conjoint analysis: an application to HIV testing.

OBJECTIVE: To examine preferences for HIV test methods using conjoint analysis, a method used to measure economic preferences (utilities). DATA SOURCES: Self-administered surveys at four publicly funded HIV testing locations in San Francisco, California, between November 1999 and February 2000 (n = 365, 96 percent response rate). STUDY DESIGN: We defined six important attributes of HIV tests and their levels (location, price, ease of collection, timeliness/accuracy, privacy/anonymity, and counseling). A fractional factorial design was used to develop scenarios that consisted of combinations of attribute levels. Respondents were asked 11 questions about whether they would choose "Test A or B" based on these scenarios. DATA ANALYSIS: We used random effects probit models to estimate utilities for testing attributes. Since price was included as an attribute, we were able to estimate willingness to pay, which provides a standardized measure for use in economic evaluations. We used extensive analyses to examine the reliability and validity of the results, including analyses of: (1) preference consistency, (2) willingness to trade among attributes, and (3) consistency with theoretical predictions. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Respondents most preferred tests that were accurate/timely and private/anonymous, whereas they had relatively lower preferences for in-person counseling. Respondents were willing to pay an additional $35 for immediate, highly accurate results; however, they had a strong disutility for receiving immediate but less accurate results. By using conjoint analysis to analyze new combinations of attributes, we found that respondents would most prefer instant, highly accurate home tests, even though they are not currently available in the U.S. Respondents were willing to pay $39 for a highly accurate, instant home test. CONCLUSIONS: The method of conjoint analysis enabled us to estimate utilities for specific attributes of HIV tests as well as the overall utility obtained from various HIV tests, including tests that are under consideration but not yet available. Conjoint analysis offers an approach that can be useful for measuring and understanding the value of other health care goods, services, and interventions.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗

PubMed2002

Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast methods and findings from two approaches to valuation used in the same survey: measurement of "attitudes" using simple rankings and ratings versus measurement of "preferences" using conjoint analysis. Conjoint analysis, a stated preference method, involves comparing scenarios composed of attribute descriptions by ranking, rating, or choosing scenarios. We explore possible explanations for our findings using focus groups conducted after the quantitative survey. METHODS: A self-administered survey, measuring attitudes and preferences for HIV tests, was conducted at HIV testing sites in San Francisco in 1999-2000 (n = 365, response rate = 96 percent). Attitudes were measured and analyzed using standard approaches. Conjoint analysis scenarios were developed using a fractional factorial design and results analyzed using random effects probit models. We examined how the results using the two approaches were both similar and different. RESULTS: We found that "attitudes" and "preferences" were generally consistent, but there were some important differences. Although rankings based on the attitude and conjoint analysis surveys were similar, closer examination revealed important differences in how respondents valued price and attributes with "halo" effects, variation in how attribute levels were valued, and apparent differences in decision-making processes. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare attitude surveys and conjoint analysis surveys and to explore the meaning of the results using post-hoc focus groups. Although the overall findings for attitudes and preferences were similar, the two approaches resulted in some different conclusions. Health researchers should consider the advantages and limitations of both methods when determining how to measure what people value.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗