Biomedical subjects

Tatsu Shimoyama

Publications and source records attributed to Tatsu Shimoyama.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Gene expression profiling of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters as a predictor of the pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Drug resistance is a major obstacle to the successful chemotherapy. Several ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters including ABCB1, ABCC1 and ABCG2 have been known to be important mediators of chemoresistance. Using oligonucleotide microarrays (HG-U133 Plus 2.0; Affymetrix), we analyzed the ABC transporter gene expression profiles in breast cancer patients who underwent sequential weekly paclitaxel/FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We compared the ABC transporter expression profile between two classes of pretreatment tumor samples divided by the patients' pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (residual disease [RD] versus pathologic complete response [pCR]) ABCB3, ABCC7 and ABCF2 showed significantly high expression in the pCR. Several ABC transporters including ABCC5, ABCA12, ABCA1 ABCC13, ABCB6 and ABCC11 showed significantly increased expression in the RD (p<0.05). We evaluated the feasibility of developing a multigene predictor model of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using gene expression profiles of ABC transporters. The prediction error was evaluated by leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). A multigene predictor model with the ABC transporters differentially expressed between the two classes (p<or=0.003) showed an average 92.8% of predictive accuracy (95% CI, 88.0-97.4%) with a 93.2% (95% CI, 85.2-100%) positive predictive value for pCR, a 93.6% (95% CI, 87.8-99.4%) negative predictive value, a sensitivity of 88.1%(95% CI, 76.8-99.4%), and a specificity of 95.9% (91.1% CI, 87.8-100%). Our results suggest that several ABC transporters in human breast cancer cells may affect the clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and transcriptional profiling of these genes may be useful to predict the pathologic response to sequential weekly paclitaxel/FEC in breast cancer patients.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗

PubMed2006

Effects of different combinations of gefitinib and irinotecan in lung cancer cell lines expressing wild or deletional EGFR.

EGFR mutations are a major determinant of lung tumor response to gefitinib, an EGFR-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Obtaining a response from lung tumors expressing wild-type EGFR is a major obstacle. The combination of gefitinib and cytotoxic drugs is one strategy against lung cancers expressing wild-type EGFR. The DNA topoisomerase inhibitor irinotecan sulfate (CPT-11) is active against lung cancer. We examined the sensitivity of lung cancers expressing wild- or mutant-type EGFR to the combination of gefitinib and CPT-11. The in vitro effect of gefitinib and SN-38 (the active metabolite of CPT-11) was examined in seven lung cancer cell lines using the dye formation assay with a combination index. When administered concurrently, gefitinib and SN-38 had a synergistic effect in five of the seven cell lines expressing wild-type EGFR, whereas the combination was antagonistic in PC-9 cells and a PC-9 subline resistant to gefitinib and expressing deletional mutant EGFR (PC-9/ZD). When administered sequentially, treatment with SN-38 followed by gefitinib had remarkable synergistic effects in the PC-9 and PC-9/ZD cells. In an in vivo tumor-bearing model, this combination had a schedule-dependent synergistic effect in the PC-9 and PC-9/ZD cells. An immunohistochemical analysis of the tumors in mice treated with CPT-11 and gefitinib demonstrated that the number of Ki-67 positive tumor cells induced by CPT-11 treatment was decreased when CPT-11 was administered in combination with gefitinib. In conclusion, the sequential combination of CPT-11 and gefitinib is considered to be active against lung cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2005

Dimerization and the signal transduction pathway of a small in-frame deletion in the epidermal growth factor receptor.

A short, in-frame deletional mutant (E746-A750del) is one of the major mutant forms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and has been reported to be a determinant of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib and erlotinib. However, the biological and pharmacological functions of mutational EGFR remain unclear. To clarify these biological functions of deletional EGFR, we examined the cellular response to EGF ligand stimulation. Dimerization and phosphorylation of EGFR were observed without any ligand stimulation in the 293(D) cells transfected with deletional EGFR as compared with those transfected with wild-type EGFR (293(W) cells). When the 293(D) cells were exposed to gefitinib, an immunoblotting analysis revealed remarkable inhibition of AKT phosphorylation but not phospho-p44/42 MAPK. To examine the cellular response in a lung cancer cell line intrinsically expressing deletional EGFR, phospho-EGFR, and downstream reactions were monitored under EGF stimulation with a beads-based mulitiplex assay. EGFR and its downstream proteins were constitutively phosphorylated in the PC-9 cells without any ligand stimulation as compared with A549 lung cancer cells expressing wild-type EGFR. In conclusion, deletional EGFR is constitutively active and phosphorylates p44/42 MAPK and AKT in the cells, although the fact that the EGFR phosphorylation in the PC-9 cells is still modulated by EGF stimulation cannot be ignored. Gefitinib-inhibited phospho-AKT predominantly in deletional EGFR expressing cells.

Cell Line↗

PubMed2005

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of edotecarin, a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor, administered once every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Edotecarin (J-107088) is a potent indolocarbazole topoisomerase I inhibitor which is structurally distinct from the camptothecins. This study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose for future Phase II studies and the safety, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary antitumor activity of edotecarin in a population of patients with advanced solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Edotecarin was administered as a single dose by IV infusion over 2 h every 21 days (with 1 week permitted for recovery from toxicities, if needed) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Doses ranged from 8 to 15 mg/m(2). Pharmacokinetic assessments were performed during and after the first administration. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received 61 cycles of therapy. Dose-limiting toxicities (infection, febrile neutropenia, constipation, ileus, and prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia) were observed in 3 of 5 evaluable patients at the 15 mg/m(2) dose, defining the MTD. The most commonly reported non-hematologic toxicities were anorexia, nausea, malaise, and constipation. Diarrhea was neither frequent nor severe. Neutropenia was the most common hematologic toxicity (grade 3-4 in 21/23 patients during cycle 1). Plasma concentrations of edotecarin rose rapidly following the start of the 2-hour infusion, reaching C (max) values of 103+/-17 ng/ml at the 13 mg/m(2) dose, and decreased steeply after the end of the infusion. Plasma concentrations declined to approximately 1-2 ng/ml at 26 h post start of infusion, the last PK sampling time point. The mean apparent plasma half-life of the drug was 20 h, which should be considered a preliminary estimate until results from studies with a longer duration of plasma sampling are available. A mean of 1.4-3.6% of the dose was recovered as unchanged drug in the urine over 48 h. Unconfirmed tumor regression > or =50% was observed in 2 patients, 1 with metastatic gastric carcinoma and 1 with esophageal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of edotecarin administered IV over 2 h every 21 days was 15 mg/m(2). The recommended dose for Phase II studies with a 3-week schedule (with 1 week permitted for recovery from toxicities, if needed) is 13 mg/m(2). The observed safety profile and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity warrant further investigation of this drug in solid tumors.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Establishment of a human non-small cell lung cancer cell line resistant to gefitinib.

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) has shown promising activity preclinically and clinically. Because comparative investigations of drug-resistant sublines with their parental cells are useful approaches to identifying the mechanism of gefitinib resistance and select factors that determine sensitivity to gefitinib, we established a human non-small cell lung carcinoma subline (PC-9/ZD) that is resistant to gefitinib. PC-9/ZD cells are approximately 180-fold more resistant to gefitinib than their parental PC-9 cells and PC-9/ZD cells do not exhibit cross-resistance to conventional anticancer agents or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, except AG-1478, a specific inhibitor of EGFR. PC-9/ZD cells also display significant resistance to gefitinib in a tumor-bearing animal model. To elucidate the mechanism of resistance, we characterized PC-9/ZD cells. The basal level of EGFR in PC-9 and PC-9/ZD cells was comparable. A deletion mutation was identified within the kinase domain of EGFR in both PC-9 and PC-9/ZD, but no difference in the sequence of EGFR cDNA was detected in either cell line. Increased EGFR/HER2 (and EGFR/HER3) heterodimer formations were demonstrated in PC-9/ZD cells by chemical cross-linking and immunoprecipitation analysis in cells unexposed to gefitinib. Exposure to gefitinib increased heterodimer formation in PC-9 cells, but not in PC-9/ZD cells. Gefitinib inhibits EGFR autophosphorylation in a dose-dependent manner in PC-9 cells but not in PC-9/ZD cells. A marked difference in inhibition of site-specific phosphorylation of EGFR was observed at Tyr1068 compared to other tyrosine residues (Tyr845, 992 and 1045). To elucidate the downstream signaling in the PC9/ZD cellular machinery, complex formation between EGFR and its adaptor proteins GRB2, SOS, and Shc was examined. A marked reduction in the GRB2-EGFR complex and absence of SOS-EGFR were observed in PC-9/ZD cells, even though the protein levels of GRB2 and SOS in PC-9 and PC-9/ZD cells were comparable. Expression of phosphorylated AKT was increased in PC-9 cells and inhibited by 0.02 microM gefitinib. But the inhibition was not significant in PC-9/ZD cells. These results suggest that alterations of adaptor-protein-mediated signal transduction from EGFR to AKT is a possible mechanism of the resistance to gefitinib in PC-9/ZD cells. These phenotypes including EGFR-SOS complex and heterodimer formation of HER family members are potential biomarkers for predicting resistance to gefitinib.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2005

Randomized pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of docetaxel: dosing based on body-surface area compared with individualized dosing based on cytochrome P450 activity estimated using a urinary metabolite of exogenous cortisol.

PURPOSE: Docetaxel is metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP3A4) enzyme, and the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) is correlated with neutropenia. We developed a novel method for estimating the interpatient variability of CYP3A4 activity by the urinary metabolite of exogenous cortisol (6-beta-hydroxycortisol [6-beta-OHF]). This study was designed to assess whether the application of our method to individualized dosing could decrease pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) variability compared with body-surface area (BSA) -based dosing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were randomly assigned to either the BSA-based arm or individualized arm. In the BSA-based arm, 60 mg/m(2) of docetaxel was administered. In the individualized arm, individualized doses of docetaxel were calculated from the estimated clearance (estimated clearance = 31.177 + [7.655 x 10(-4) x total 6-beta-OHF] - [4.02 x alpha-1 acid glycoprotein] - [0.172 x AST] - [0.125 x age]) and the target AUC of 2.66 mg/L . h. RESULTS: In the individualized arm, individualized doses of docetaxel ranged from 37.4 to 76.4 mg/m(2) (mean, 58.1 mg/m(2)). The mean AUC and standard deviation (SD) were 2.71 (range, 2.02 to 3.40 mg/L . h) and 0.40 mg/L . h in the BSA-based arm, and 2.64 (range, 2.15 to 3.07 mg/L . h) and 0.22 mg/L . h in the individualized arm, respectively. The SD of the AUC was significantly smaller in the individualized arm than in the BSA-based arm (P < .01). The percentage decrease in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) averaged 87.1% (range, 59.0 to 97.7%; SD, 8.7) in the BSA-based arm, and 87.4% (range, 78.0 to 97.2%; SD, 6.1) in the individualized arm, suggesting that the interpatient variability in percent decrease in ANC was slightly smaller in the individualized arm. CONCLUSION: The individualized dosing method based on the total amount of urinary 6-beta-OHF after cortisol administration can decrease PK variability of docetaxel.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Translational studies for target-based drugs.

The biological background for the clinical and prognostic heterogeneity among tumors within the same histological subgroup is due to individual variations in the biology of tumors. The number of investigations looking at the application of novel technologies within the setting of clinical trials is increasing. The most promising way to improve cancer treatment is to build clinical research strategies on intricate biological evidence. New genomic technologies have been developed over recent years. These techniques are able to analyze thousands of genes and their expression profiles simultaneously. The purpose of this approach is to discover new cancer biomarkers, to improve diagnosis, predict clinical outcomes of disease and response to treatment, and to select new targets for novel agents with innovative mechanisms of action. Gene expression profiles are also used to assist in selecting biomarkers of pharmacodynamic effects of drugs in the clinical setting. Biomarker monitoring in surrogate tissues may allow researchers to assess "proof of principle" of new treatments. Clinical studies of biomarkers monitoring toxicity profiles have also been done. Such pharmacodynamic markers usually respond to treatment earlier than clinical response, and as such may be useful predictors of efficacy. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in lung cancer tissues is a strong predictive biomarker for EGFR-targeted protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Monitoring of EGFR mutation has been broadly performed in retrospective and prospective clinical studies. However, global standardization for the assay system is essential for such molecular correlative studies. A more sensitive assay for EGFR mutation is now under evaluation for small biopsy samples. Microdissection for tumor samples is also useful for the sensitive detection of EGFR mutation. Novel approaches for the detection of EGFR mutation in other clinical samples such as cytology, pleural effusion and circulating tumor cells are ongoing.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2005

Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenomic study of E7070 administered once every 21 days.

E7070 is a novel sulfonamide anticancer agent that disrupts the G1/S phase of the cell cycle. The objectives of this phase I study of E7070 were to estimate the maximal tolerated dose (MTD), to determine the recommended dose for phase II, and to clarify the pharmacokinetic profile of E7070 and its relation to polymorphisms of CYP2C9 (*2, *3) and CYP2C19 (*2, *3) in Japanese patients. Patients received 1-2-h i.v. infusions of E7070 (400, 600, 700, 800 or 900 mg/m2) on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Twenty-one patients received between one and eight cycles of E7070. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) comprised leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, elevation of aspartate aminotransferase, colitis, and ileus. The mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) for successive dose levels increased in a non-dose-proportional manner. Two patients were heterozygous for the CYP2C9 mutation. For CYP2C19, eight patients were wild type and the remainder had heterozygous (n = 8) or homozygous mutations (n = 5). Regarding the CYP2C19 genotype, the AUC of patients with mutant alleles were higher than those of patients with wild type at a dose of 600 mg/m2 or more. The severity of toxic effects, such as myelosuppression, seemed to depend on the AUC. No partial responses were observed. One patient treated at a dose of 700 mg/m2 experienced a maximum tumor volume reduction of 22.5%. The MTD was estimated to be 900 mg/m2. A dose of 800 mg/m2 is recommended for further phase II studies. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties of E7070 seemed to be influenced by CYP2C19 genotype. The observed safety profile and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity warrant further investigation of this drug in monotherapy or in combination chemotherapy.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Study of paclitaxel and dose escalation of cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a dose-finding and feasibility study in which we administered a fixed dose 3-h infusion of paclitaxel and an escalating dose of cisplatin in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Chemotherapy consisted of fixed dose (210 mg/m(2)) paclitaxel given over 3 h on day 1 and an escalating dose of cisplatin on day 2, every 3-4 weeks. The dose of cisplatin was 40 mg/m(2) at level 1, 60 mg/m(2) at level 2 and 80 mg/m(2) at level 3. RESULTS: Between October 1999 and February 2001, 24 patients were enrolled and 58 cycles were administered. The major hematological toxicities were leukopenia and neutropenia. Grade 4 neutropenia developed in 83.3%, 66.7% and 83.3% of patients at the dose levels of 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The major non-hematological toxicities consisted of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation and peripheral neuropathy. Grade 3 ALT elevation was observed in two of the 12 patients at level 3, but both recovered within 3 days. The peripheral neuropathy was sensory-dominant and frequent, and it was almost tolerable. The maximum tolerated dose was not identified even at the highest dose of paclitaxel (210 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (80 mg/m(2)) administered in the study. The recommended dose was determined to be paclitaxel 210 mg/m(2) on day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on day 2, every 3-4 weeks. Seven partial responses were observed in the 24 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel 210 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) was found to be a well-tolerated active regimen in Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Phase I/II study of 3-week cycle cisplatin-gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine is one of the most active chemotherapy regimens against non-small cell lung cancer. However, the optimum schedule for this combination has not been determined. This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine combined with cisplatin in a 3-week cycle regimen and to observe safety and efficacy for Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: 80 mg/m(2) of cisplatin on day 1 and escalated doses of gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 were administered every 3 weeks to patients with previously untreated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 1000 mg/m(2) and was escalated in 250 mg/m(2) increments. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled between March and December 2000. In total, 64 courses were given. The main toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and hepatotoxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 1500 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine combined with 80 mg/m(2 )of cisplatin. Nine of 24 patients (37.5%) achieved a partial response. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine repeated every three weeks is tolerable for Japanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We determined 1250 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine combined with 80 mg/m(2 )of cisplatin to be the recommended dose.

Adult↗