Biomedical subjects

Tatsuya Yoshida

Publications and source records attributed to Tatsuya Yoshida.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Clinical outcomes and genomic features of uncommon EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes in osimertinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion subtypes may be associated with differential survival outcomes following EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. However, evidence remains scarce, particularly regarding osimertinib, and the underlying biological mechanisms are poorly understood. We aimed to compare survival outcomes among EGFR exon 19 deletion subtypes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with osimertinib. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with NSCLC were stratified according to exon 19 deletion subtypes. Whole-exome sequencing data from the American Association for Cancer Research Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange registry and Memorial Sloan Kettering Clinicogenomic Harmonized Oncologic Real-World Dataset were analyzed to investigate co-occurring genomic alterations. RESULTS: Overall, 111 patients with advanced EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive NSCLC were analyzed and 86.5% received osimertinib as first-line therapy. Patients with non-E746_A750del (n = 25) had shorter progression-free survival (PFS) than those with E746_A750del (n = 86) (median: 14.3 vs. 20.6 months; p < 0.05). Among non-E746_A750del subtypes, L747_A750delinsP (n = 4) had a particularly poor prognosis, with significantly worse survival than those with E746_A750del (median PFS: 3.5 vs. 20.6 months; p < 0.001, and median overall survival: 11.8 vs. 48.5 months; p < 0.001). In public database analyses, non-E746_A750del had a higher rate of RBM10 co-mutations, whereas L747_A750delinsP was characterized by frequent CDKN2A/B homozygous deletions and MYC amplifications. CONCLUSIONS: Non-E746_A750del was associated with poorer outcomes, with L747_A750delinsP potentially being a high-risk subtype. Differences in co-occurring genomic alterations may contribute to the prognostic heterogeneity among exon 19 deletion subtypes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Patient-reported outcomes with tarlatamab in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer after platinum-based chemotherapy: results from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial.

BACKGROUND: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with a high symptom burden and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This prespecified analysis from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for tarlatamab versus standard-of-care (SoC) chemotherapy following first-line platinum-based therapy. METHODS: DeLLphi-304 is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 study in adults with ES-SCLC. PROs were assessed using validated instruments, including the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-LC13, FACT-G GP5, BPI-SF, and the EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale. Change from baseline, response rates, and time to deterioration in these PROs were analyzed. RESULTS: PRO data from all 509 patients enrolled were evaluated. Compliance with QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 assessments remained above 69% through 19 weeks. A higher proportion of patients receiving tarlatamab achieved symptom or functional improvement at 19 weeks compared with SoC in chest pain (19% vs 10%), cough (35% vs 26%), dyspnea (22% vs 7%), physical functioning (13% vs 8%), and global health status (23% vs 15%), respectively. Tarlatamab also delayed deterioration in symptoms, physical functioning, and pain at worst relative to SoC. FACT-G GP5 results indicated that patients receiving tarlatamab were less bothered by treatment side effects over time. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its previously reported antitumor activity, tarlatamab demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in symptoms and HRQoL compared with SoC. These findings support a favorable benefit-risk profile of tarlatamab in patients previously treated for ES-SCLC.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Implications of EGFR expression on EGFR signaling dependency and adaptive immunity against EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma (EGFRm LUAD), EGFR mutations do not necessarily result in increased EGFR expression (EGFR-exp), which differs among patients. However, the factors influencing EGFR-exp and the impact of EGFR-exp on tumor characteristics in patients with EGFRm LUAD remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Whole-exome and RNA sequencing were performed for patients with early- and advanced-stage EGFRm LUAD. The patients were classified into low or high EGFR-exp groups based on the median transcripts per million. We retrospectively examined the association between EGFR-exp, genomic characteristics, downstream EGFR signaling activity, tumor microenvironment (TME) status, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 450 and 45 patients in the early- and advanced-stage cohorts, respectively. In both cohorts, the EGFR-exp low group exhibited a lower incidence of TP53 co-mutations and EGFR amplification and a higher incidence of EGFR subclonal mutations than the EGFR-exp high group. Furthermore, downstream EGFR signaling pathways, such as the MAPK signaling, were less activated in the EGFR-exp low group. However, this group showed significantly enriched adaptive immune response pathways (Q < 0.0001) and an immune-inflamed TME. Additionally, a low EGFR-exp was a significantly favorable factor for postoperative relapse (odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P = 0.04). However, in the advanced-stage cohort, a low EGFR-exp was a significant risk factor for non-responders to osimertinib (OR, 17.5; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In EGFRm LUAD, significant associations were observed between EGFR-exp levels and both EGFR signaling pathways and adaptive immune status, which in turn influence clinical outcomes. This large-scale multi-omics analysis highlights the heterogeneity among patients with EGFRm LUAD and emphasizes the need to assess EGFR-exp levels alongside mutation status for optimal treatment strategies in EGFRm LUAD.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Evolving treatments and prognosis in Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer: 20 years of progress of novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in pharmacotherapy, including molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the treatment for Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past two decades. However, differences in drug approval timelines across countries raise important questions about their impact on survival rates. This study investigates trends in overall survival (OS), patient characteristics, and the association between OS improvements and the introduction of new drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included patients with Stage IV NSCLC treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan from 2001 to 2021. Using data from the Department of Thoracic Oncology registries, 2,555 patients were identified and categorized into four time periods: 2001-2005 (Group A), 2006-2010 (Group B), 2011-2015 (Group C), and 2016-2021 (Group D). RESULTS: While baseline characteristics remained relatively consistent, Group D had an increased proportion of elderly patients (≥ 75 years) and those with brain metastases. Additionally, the gender ratio became more balanced over time. Notably, Group D patients with EGFR mutations or ALK fusion positivity and older age demonstrated significantly longer OS. Analysis revealed steady and substantial improvements in OS across time periods (median OS: Group A, 10.68 months; Group B, 14.12 months; Group C, 16.49 months; and Group D, 25.46 months, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates marked improvements in survival for patients with Stage IV NSCLC, particularly in the last six years, despite the increase in brain metastases and elderly patients. This finding suggests the crucial role of novel therapies in enhancing survival outcomes.

Humans↗