A mechanistic study of delta-aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic therapy for cutaneous leishmaniasis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Aminolevulinic Acid↗
Biomedical subjects
Tayyaba Hasan
Publications and source records attributed to Tayyaba Hasan.
A mechanism-based combination therapy reduces local tumor growth and metastasis in an orthotopic model of prostate cancer.
Therapy-induced stimulation of angiogenic molecules can promote tumor angiogenesis leading to enhanced tumor growth and cancer metastasis. Several standard and emerging therapies, such as radiation and photodynamic therapy (PDT), can induce angiogenic molecules, thus limiting their effectiveness. PDT is approved for the treatment of several cancers; however, its induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) creates conditions favorable to enhanced tumor growth and metastasis, therefore mitigating its cytotoxic and antivascular effects. This is the first report showing that subcurative PDT in an orthotopic model of prostate cancer (LNCaP) increases not only VEGF secretion (2.1-fold) but also the fraction of animals with lymph node metastases. PDT followed by administration of an antiangiogenic agent, TNP-470, abolished this increase and reduced local tumor growth. On the other hand, administration of TNP-470 before PDT was less effective at local tumor control. In addition, animals in all groups, except in the PDT + TNP-470 group, had a weight loss of >3 g at the time of sacrifice; the weight of the animals in the PDT + TNP-470 group did not change. The significant reduction (P < 0.05) in tumor weight and volume observed between the PDT + TNP-470 group and the control group suggests that the combination of PDT and antiangiogenic treatment administered in the appropriate sequence was not only more effective at controlling local tumor growth and metastases but also reduced disease-related toxicities. Such molecular response-based combinations merit further investigations as they enhance both monotherapies and lead to improved treatment outcomes.
Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
Vitamin D enhances ALA-induced protoporphyrin IX production and photodynamic cell death in 3-D organotypic cultures of keratinocytes.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) is based upon the intracellular synthesis of protoporphyrin IX (PpIX), which absorbs light and targets metabolically active cells. We tested the hypothesis that levels of PpIX within keratinocytes might be increased by vitamin D (Vit D), a differentiation-promoting hormone. Vit D promoted terminal differentiation in monolayer cultures of rat epidermal keratinocytes (REKs), but high PpIX signals were found only in stratifying islands. To simulate a normal epidermis, REKs were grown in organotypic cultures. The presence of Vit D (10(-10) M for 4 days) led to heightened expression of terminal differentiation markers (stratum corneum, K10, and loricrin). PpIX levels, at 4 hours after addition of ALA (1 mM), were significantly increased in the Vit D-preconditioned cultures by confocal fluorescence microscopy and semiquantitative image analysis. Maximal PpIX induction was seen at (Vit D) 10(-12)-10(-10) M. Phototoxic cell killing after exposure to 635 nm light was significantly higher in Vit D-preconditioned cultures. No differences in apoptotic markers between Vit D and control cultures were seen, suggesting that Vit D augments photodynamic cell death via alternative pathways (e.g., necrosis). In summary, Vit D may be useful as a biological enhancer of ALA-based PDT.
Aminolevulinic Acid↗
Mechanistic investigation and implications of photodynamic therapy induction of vascular endothelial growth factor in prostate cancer.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is now an approved therapeutic modality, and induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) following subcurative PDT is of concern as VEGF may provide a survival stimulus to tumors. The processes that limit the efficacy of PDT warrant investigation so that mechanism-based interventions may be developed. This study investigates VEGF increase following subcurative PDT using the photosensitizer benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD) both in an in vitro and in an orthotopic model of prostate cancer using the human prostate cancer cell line LNCaP. The two subcurative doses used, 0.25 and 0.5 J/cm(2), mimicked subcurative PDT and elicited a 1.6- and 2.1-fold increase, respectively, in secreted VEGF 24 hours following PDT. Intracellular VEGF protein measurement and VEGF mRNA showed a 1.4- and 1.6-fold increase only at 0.5 J/cm(2). In vivo subcurative PDT showed an increase in VEGF by both immunohistochemistry and ELISA. In vitro analysis showed no activation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) following subcurative PDT; furthermore, small interfering RNA inhibition of HIF-1alpha and COX-2 inhibitor treatment had no effect on PDT induction of VEGF. PDT in the presence of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT inhibitor or mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibitor still induced VEGF. However, subcurative PDT increased phosphorylated p38 and stress-activated protein kinase/c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase. The p38 MAPK inhibitor abolished PDT induction of VEGF. The results establish the importance of VEGF in subcurative BPD-PDT of prostate cancer and suggest possible molecular pathways for its induction. These findings should provide the basis for the development of molecular-based interventions for enhancing PDT and merit further studies.
Animals↗
Pretreatment photosensitizer dosimetry reduces variation in tumor response.
PURPOSE: To compensate for photosensitizer uptake variation in photodynamic therapy (PDT), via control of delivered light dose through photodynamic dose calculation based on online dosimetry of photosensitizer in tissue before treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Photosensitizer verteporfin was quantified via multiple fluorescence microprobe measurements immediately before treatment. To compensate individual PDT treatments, photodynamic doses were calculated on an individual animal basis, by matching the light delivered to provide an equal photosensitizer dose multiplied by light dose. This was completed for the lower quartile, median, and upper quartile of the photosensitizer distribution. PDT-induced tumor responses were evaluated by the tumor regrowth assay. RESULTS: Verteporfin uptake varied considerably among tumors and within a tumor. The coefficient of variation in the surviving fraction was found significantly decreased in groups compensated to the lower quartile (CL-PDT), the median (CM-PDT), and the upper quartile (CU-PDT) of photosensitizer distribution. The CL-PDT group was significantly less effective compared with NC-PDT (Noncompensated PDT), CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatments. No significant difference in effectiveness was observed between NC-PDT, CM-PDT, and CU-PDT treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This research suggests that accurate quantification of tissue photosensitizer levels and subsequent adjustment of light dose will allow for reduced subject variation and improved treatment consistency.
Algorithms↗
Tumor vascular permeabilization by vascular-targeting photosensitization: effects, mechanism, and therapeutic implications.
PURPOSE: Loss of vascular barrier function has been observed shortly following vascular-targeting photodynamic therapy. However, the mechanism involved in this event is still not clear, and the therapeutic implications associated with this pathophysiologic change have not been fully explored. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effect of vascular-targeting photodynamic therapy on vascular barrier function was examined in both s.c. and orthotopic MatLyLu rat prostate tumor models and endothelial cells in vitro, using photosensitizer verteporfin. Vascular permeability to macromolecules (Evans blue-albumin and high molecular weight dextran) was assessed with dye extraction (ex vivo) and intravital microscopy (in vivo) methods. Intravital microscopy was also used to monitor tumor vascular functional changes after vascular-targeting photodynamic therapy. The effects of photosensitization on monolayer endothelial cell morphology and cytoskeleton structures were studied with immunofluorescence staining. RESULTS: Vascular-targeting photodynamic therapy induced vascular barrier dysfunction in the MatLyLu tumors. Thus, tumor uptake of macromolecules was significantly increased following photodynamic therapy treatments. In addition to vascular permeability increase, blood cell adherence to vessel wall was observed shortly after treatment, further suggesting the loss of endothelial integrity. Blood cell adhesion led to the formation of thrombi that can occlude blood vessels, causing vascular shutdown. However, viable tumor cells were often detected at tumor periphery after vascular-targeting photodynamic therapy. Endothelial cell barrier dysfunction following photodynamic therapy treatment was also observed in vitro by culturing monolayer endothelial cells on Transwell inserts. Immunofluorescence study revealed microtubule depolymerization shortly after photosensitization treatment and stress actin fiber formation thereafter. Consequently, endothelial cells were found to retract, and this endothelial morphologic change led to the formation of intercellular gaps. CONCLUSIONS: Vascular-targeting photodynamic therapy permeabilizes blood vessels through the formation of endothelial intercellular gaps, which are likely induced via endothelial cell microtubule depolymerization following vascular photosensitization. Loss of endothelial barrier function can ultimately lead to tumor vascular shutdown and has significant implications in drug transport and tumor cell metastasis.
Animals↗
Targeted photodynamic therapy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an emerging modality for the treatment of various neoplastic and non-neoplastic pathologies. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: PDT usually occurs when reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated from light-activated chemicals (photosensitizer, PS) destroy the target. For non-dermatologic applications the PS are delivered systemically and accumulate, at different concentrations, in most organs. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Typically there is a modest enhanced accumulation of the PS in tumor tissues, providing a first level of selectivity. Additional selectivity is provided by the confined illumination of the target area with the appropriate wavelength of light. For the treatment of pathologies in complex anatomical sites, such as in the peritoneal cavity, where restricted illumination is difficult; improved targeting of the PS is necessary to prevent damage to the surrounding healthy tissue. This article will focus on targeted PDT.
Animals↗
The role of photosensitizer molecular charge and structure on the efficacy of photodynamic therapy against Leishmania parasites.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is emerging as a potential therapeutic modality in the clinical management of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). In order to establish a rationale for effective PDT of CL, we investigated the impact of the molecular charge and structure of photosensitizers on the parasitic phototoxic response. Two photosensitizers from the benzophenoxazine family that bear an overall cationic charge and two anionic porphyrinoid molecules were evaluated. The photodynamic activity of the photosensitizers decreases in the following order: EtNBSe > EtNBS > BpD > PpIX. The studies suggest that compared to hydrophobic anionic photosensitizers, the hydrophilic cationic benzophenoxazine analogs provide high effectiveness of PDT possibly due to (1) their strong attraction to the negatively charged parasitic membrane, (2) their hydrophilicity, (3) their high singlet oxygen quantum yield, and (4) their efficacy in targeting intracellular organelles.
Animals↗
Photoinactivation of Mycobacteria in vitro and in a new murine model of localized Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced granulomatous infection.
Treatment of tuberculosis is currently hindered by prolonged antibiotic regimens and the emergence of significant drug resistance. Alternatives and adjuncts to standard antimycobacterial agents are needed. We propose that a direct attack utilizing photosensitizers and light-based treatments may be effective in curtailing Mycobacterium tuberculosis in discrete anatomical sites in the most infectious phase of pulmonary tuberculosis. To demonstrate experimental proof of principle, we have applied established photodynamic therapy (PDT) technology to in vitro cultures and an in vivo mouse model using Mycobacterium bovis BCG. We report here in vitro and in vivo PDT efficacy studies and the use of a three-dimensional collagen gel as a delivery vehicle for BCG, subcutaneously inserted, to induce specifically localized granuloma-like lesions in mice. When a benzoporphyrin derivative was utilized as the photosensitive agent, exposure to light killed extracellular and intracellular BCG in significant numbers. Collagen scaffolds containing BCG inserted in situ in BALB/c mice for 3 months mimicked granulomatous lesions and demonstrated a marked cellular infiltration upon histological examination, with evidence of caseating necrosis and fibrous capsule formation. When 10(5) BCG were present in the in vivo-induced granulomas, a significant reduction in viable mycobacterial cells was demonstrated in PDT-treated granulomas compared to those of controls. We conclude that PDT has potential in the treatment of localized mycobacterial infections, such as pulmonary granulomas and cavities.
Animals↗
Vascular and cellular targeting for photodynamic therapy.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) involves the combination of photosensitizers (PS) with light as a treatment, and has been an established medical practice for about 10 years. Current primary applications of PDT are age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and several types of cancer and precancer. Tumor vasculature and parenchyma cells are both potential targets of PDT damage. The preference of vascular versus cellular targeting is highly dependent upon the relative distribution of photosensitizers in each compartment, which is governed by the photosensitizer pharmacokinetic properties and can be effectively manipulated by the photosensitizer drug administration and light illumination interval (drug-light interval) during PDT treatment, or by the modification of photosensitizer molecular structure. PDT using shorter PS-light intervals mainly targets tumor vasculature by confining photosensitizer localization within blood vessels, whereas if the sensitizer has a reasonably long pharmacokinetic lifetime, then PDT at longer PS-light intervals can induce more tumor cellular damage, because the photosensitizer has then distributed into the tumor cellular compartment. This passive targeting mechanism is regulated by the innate photosensitizer physicochemical properties. In addition to the passive targeting approach, active targeting of various tumor endothelial and cellular markers has been studied extensively. The tumor cellular markers that have been explored for active photodynamic targeting are mainly tumor surface markers, including growth factor receptors, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors, transferrin receptors, folic acid receptors, glucose transporters, integrin receptors, and insulin receptors. In addition to tumor surface proteins, nuclear receptors are targeted, as well. A limited number of studies have been performed to actively target tumor endothelial markers (ED-B domain of fibronectin, VEGF receptor-2, and neuropilin-1). Intracellular targeting is a challenge due to the difficulty in achieving sufficient penetration into the target cell, but significant progress has been made in this area. In this review, we summarize current studies of vascular and cellular targeting of PDT after more than 30 years of intensive efforts.
Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗
Tumor cell lines resistant to ALA-mediated photodynamic therapy and possible tools to target surviving cells.
We isolated and characterized cell lines resistant to aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) derived from a murine adenocarcinoma and studied cross resistance with other injuries. The most resistant clones were numbers 4 and 8, which exhibited 6.7- and 4.2-fold increase in resistance respectively. Several characteristics were altered in these clones. A 2-fold increase in cell volume, higher cell spreading, and a more fibroblastic, dendritic pattern, were the morphology features that led us to think they could have different adhesive, invasive or metastatic phenotypes. The amount of porphyrins synthesized per cell in the resistant clones was similar to the parental line but, when it was expressed per mg protein, there was a 2-fold decrease, with a higher proportion of hydrophilic porphyrins. These cells were not cross-resistant to photosensitization with Benzoporphyrin derivative and Merocyanine 540, but exhibited a slight resistance to exogenous protoporphyrin IX treatment. Both clones displayed higher protein content and increased number of mitochondria, together with a higher oxygen consumption. The distinctive features found in the resistant lines led as to think how to exploit the changes induced by PDT treatment to target surviving cells. Those hypoxic cells can be also a preferential target of bioreductive drugs and hypoxia-directed gene therapy, and would be sensitive to treatment with other photosensitizers.
Aminolevulinic Acid↗
Synergism of epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted immunotherapy with photodynamic treatment of ovarian cancer in vivo.
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer often develops resistance to standard treatments, which is a major reason for the high mortality associated with the disease. We examined the efficacy of a treatment regimen that combines immunotherapy to block the activity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), overexpression of which is associated with the development of resistant ovarian cancer, and photodynamic therapy (PDT), a mechanistically distinct photochemistry-based modality that is effective against chemo- and radioresistant ovarian tumors. METHODS: We tested a combination regimen consisting of C225, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits the receptor tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR, and benzoporphyrin derivative monoacid A (BPD)-based PDT in a mouse model of human ovarian cancer. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in acute treatment response and survival studies that used 9-19 mice per group. Analysis of variance and Wilcoxon statistics were used to analyze the data. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Mice treated with PDT + C225 had the lowest mean tumor burden compared with that in the no-treatment control mice (mean percent tumor burden = 9.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.3% to 17.3%, P < .001). Mean percent tumor burden for mice treated with C225 only or PDT only was 66.6% (95% CI = 58.7% to 74.4%, P < .001) and 38.2% (95% CI = 29.3% to 47.0%, P < .001), respectively. When compared with PDT only or C225 only, PDT + C225 produced synergistic reductions in mean tumor burden (P < .001, analysis of variance) and improvements in survival (P = .0269, Wilcoxon test). Median survival was approximately threefold greater for mice in the PDT + C225 group than for mice in the no-treatment control group (80 days versus 28 days), and more mice in the PDT + C225 group were alive at 180 days (3/9; 33% [95% CI = 7% to 70%]) than mice in the C225-only (0/12; 0% [95% CI = 0% to 22%]) or PDT-only (1/10; 10% [95% CI = 0.2% to 44%]) groups. CONCLUSION: A mechanistically nonoverlapping combination modality consisting of receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition with C225 and BPD-PDT is well tolerated, effective, and synergistic in mice.
Analysis of Variance↗
Photodynamic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus infected burn wounds in mice.
The rise of multiply antibiotic resistant bacteria has led to searches for novel antimicrobial therapies to treat infections. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a potential candidate; it uses the combination of a photosensitizer with visible light to produce reactive oxygen species that lead to cell death. We used PDT mediated by meso-mono-phenyl-tri(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)-porphyrin (PTMPP) to treat burn wounds in mice with established Staphylococcus aureus infections The third degree burn wounds were infected with bioluminescent S. aureus. PDT was applied after one day of bacterial growth by adding a 25% DMSO/500 microM PTMPP solution to the wound followed by illumination with red light and periodic imaging of the mice using a sensitive camera to detect the bioluminescence. More than 98% of the bacteria were eradicated after a light dose of 210 J cm(-2) in the presence of PTMPP. However, bacterial re-growth was observed. Light alone or PDT both delayed the wound healing. These data suggest that PDT has the potential to rapidly reduce the bacterial load in infected burns. The treatment needs to be optimized to reduce wound damage and prevent recurrence.
Animals↗
Combining vascular and cellular targeting regimens enhances the efficacy of photodynamic therapy.
PURPOSE: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be designed to target either tumor vasculature or tumor cells by varying the drug-light interval. Photodynamic therapy treatments with different drug-light intervals can be combined to increase tumor response by targeting both tumor vasculature and tumor cells. The sequence of photosensitizer and light delivery can influence the effect of combined treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The R3327-MatLyLu rat prostate tumor model was used in this study. Photosensitizer verteporfin distribution was quantified by fluorescence microscopy. Tumor blood flow changes were monitored by laser-Doppler system and tumor hypoxia was quantified by the immunohistochemical staining for the hypoxic marker EF5. The therapeutic effects of PDT treatments were evaluated by the histologic examination and tumor regrowth assay. RESULTS: Fluorescence microscopic studies indicated that tumor localization of verteporfin changed from predominantly within the tumor vasculature at 15 min after injection, to being throughout the tumor parenchyma at 3 h after injection. Light treatment (50 J/cm(2)) at 15 min after verteporfin injection (0.25 mg/kg, i.v.) induced significant tumor vascular damage, as manifested by tumor blood flow reduction and increase in the tumor hypoxic fraction. In contrast, the vascular effect observed after the same light dose (50 J/cm(2)) delivered 3 h after administration of verteporfin (1 mg/kg, i.v.) was an initial acute decrease in blood flow, followed by recovery to the level of control. The EF5 staining revealed no significant increase in hypoxic fraction at 1 h after PDT using 3 h drug-light interval. The combination of 3-h interval PDT and 15-min interval PDT was more effective in inhibiting tumor growth than each individual PDT treatment. However, it was found that the combined treatment with the sequence of 3-h interval PDT before 15-min interval PDT led to a superior antitumor effect than the other combinative PDT treatments. Histologic studies confirmed that this combined treatment led to damage to both tumor vasculature and tumor cells. Importantly, the combined PDT treatment did not increase normal tissue damage and tissue recovered well at 60 days after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that targeting both tumor vascular and cellular compartments by combining a long-interval PDT with a short-interval PDT can be an effective and safe way to enhance PDT damage to tumor tissue.
Animals↗
Photochemical targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor: a mechanistic study.
PURPOSE: Photoimmunotherapy may allow target-specific photodynamic destruction of malignancies and may also potentiate anticancer antibody therapies. However, clinical use of either of the two modalities is limited for different reasons. Antibody therapies suffer from being primarily cytostatic and the need for prolonged administration with consequent side effects. In the case of photoimmunotherapy, a major impediment has been the absence of well-characterized photosensitizer immunoconjugates (PIC). In this investigation, we suggest a strategy to overcome these limitations and present the successful targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) using a well-characterized PIC. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The PIC consisted of the EGFR-recognizing chimeric monoclonal antibody, C225, conjugated with a two-branched polyethylene glycol and benzoporphyrin derivative (BPD, Verteporfin). Mechanistic studies included photophysics, phototoxicity, cellular uptake, and catabolism experiments to yield dosimetric parameters. Target cells included two EGFR-overexpressing human cancer cell lines, OVCAR-5 and A-431. Nontarget cells included an EGFR-negative fibroblast cell line, 3T3-NR6, and a monocyte-macrophage cell line, J774. RESULTS: BPD-C225 PICs targeted and photodynamically killed EGFR-overexpressing cells, whereas free BPD exhibited no specificity. On a per mole basis, PICs were less phototoxic than free BPD, but PICs were very selective for target cells, whereas free BPD was not. Phototoxicity of the PICs increased at prolonged incubations. Photodynamic dose calculations indicated that PIC photophysics, photochemistry, catabolism, and subcellular localization were important determinants of PIC phototoxic potency. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the efficacy of EGFR targeting with PIC constructs and suggests approaches to improve PIC designs and targeting strategies for in vivo photoimmunotherapy. The approach offers the possibility of dual effects via antibody-mediated cytostasis and photoimmunotherapy-based cytotoxicity.
Animals↗
Effect of tumor host microenvironment on photodynamic therapy in a rat prostate tumor model.
PURPOSE: Tumor host microenvironment plays an important role in tumor growth, metastasis, and response to cancer therapy. In this study, the influence of tumor host environment on tumor pathophysiology, photosensitizer distribution, and photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment effect was examined in the metastatic at lymph node and lung (MatLyLu) rat prostate tumor. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: MatLyLu tumors implanted in different host environment [i.e., orthotopically (in the prostate) or s.c.] were compared for difference in vessel density, average vessel size, vascular permeability, tumor vascular endothelial growth factor production, and tumor oxygenation. Uptake of photosensitizer verteporfin in tumors in both sites was determined by fluorescence microscopy. To compare tumor response to PDT, both orthotopic and s.c. MatLyLu tumors were given the same doses of verteporfin and laser light treatment, and PDT-induced tumor necrotic area was measured histologically. RESULTS: Orthotopic MatLyLu tumors were found to grow faster, have higher vessel density and more permeable vasculature, have higher vascular endothelial growth factor protein levels, and have lower tumor hypoxic fraction than the s.c. tumors. Uptake of photosensitizer verteporfin in the orthotopic tumor was higher than in the s.c. tumors at 15 minutes after injection (1 mg/kg, i.v.), and became similar at 3 hours after injection. For the vascular targeting PDT treatment (0.25 mg/kg verteporfin, 50 J/cm(2) at 50 mW/cm(2), 15 minutes drug-light interval), there was no significant difference in PDT-induced tumor necrotic area between the orthotopic and s.c. tumors, with 85% to 90% necrosis in both types of tumors. However, tumor necrosis induced by the cellular targeting PDT (1 mg/kg verteporfin, 50 J/cm(2) at 50 mW/cm(2), 3 hours drug-light interval) was significantly different in the orthotopic (64%) versus the s.c. (29%) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor host environment can significantly affect photosensitizer verteporfin distribution and PDT treatment effect. Verteporfin-PDT regimen targeting tumor cells is more sensitive to such influence than the vascular targeting PDT. Our study showed the importance of tumor host environment in determining tumor physiologic properties and tumor response to PDT. To obtain clinically relevant information, orthotopic tumor model should be used in the experimental studies.
Animals↗
Liposomal delivery of photosensitising agents.
Photodynamic therapy is a clinically approved treatment for cancer and noncancer diseases. This modality utilises light-activatable chemicals (photosensitising agents) to capture photons and use light energy for the production of cytotoxic reactive molecular species. Most photosensitisers that are in use clinically or in preclinical development are hydrophobic and tend to aggregate in the aqueous environment, which limits their delivery and photosensitising efficiency. Liposomal delivery of photosensitisers will often overcome or decrease these problems. In addition, as with chemotherapeutic agents, liposomal formulations of photo-sensitising agents may help to achieve better selectivity for tumour tissue compared with normal tissue. Over the past years, liposomal photosensitisers have emerged as therapeutic agents in many experimental studies, and have obtained approval for clinical applications. Recent progress in liposomal technology further opens up the possibility of generating more selectively targeted photosensitisers encapsulated in liposomes. This review will cover progress in the use of liposomal photosensitisers, summarise current liposomal formulations, and project future directions for the liposomal delivery of photosensitising agents.
Biological Availability↗
In vivo flow cytometry: a new method for enumerating circulating cancer cells.
The fate of circulating tumor cells is an important determinant of their ability to form distant metastasis. Here, we demonstrate the use of in vivo flow cytometry as a powerful new method for detecting quantitatively circulating cancer cells. We specifically examine the circulation kinetics of two prostate cancer cell lines with different metastatic potential in mice and rats. We find that the cell line and the host environment affect the circulation kinetics of prostate cancer cells, with the intrinsic cell line properties determining the initial rate of cell depletion from the circulation and the host affecting cell circulation at later time points.
Animals↗