PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Terence J Colgan

Publications and source records attributed to Terence J Colgan.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Villoglandular adenocarcinoma in situ of intestinal type of the hymen: de novo origin from squamous mucosa?

Adenocarcinomas of the lower genital tract are rare diseases, and most of them arise from the Bartholin glands. Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of intestinal type is a very uncommon neoplasm of unknown origin with only few cases described on the vulva and in the vagina. It is characterized by villoglandular architecture, mucinous-type epithelium with intestinal differentiation (goblet cells), and direct apposition of the tumor with the surface epithelium. We report a case that developed on the hymen of a 64-year-old woman and discuss its possible origin as arising de novo from the squamous epithelium.

Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous↗
PubMed2006

Robustness of validation criteria in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.

CONTEXT: Field validation of slides used in gynecologic cytology proficiency testing has surfaced as an important issue. Although the precision of diagnoses in peer-reviewed educational programs has been examined, the robustness of the validation criteria for specific types of interpretations used in proficiency testing has not been previously studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the robustness of validation criteria for slides entering an educational slide program. DESIGN: We reviewed the results of the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology and compared the robustness of validation criteria for different reference diagnoses, using a total of 16,948 circulating slides. RESULTS: Validation criteria could be divided into 2 significantly different groups. The criteria for herpes, Trichomonas, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma were significantly more robust than the diagnoses of unsatisfactory; negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, not otherwise specified; low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The validation criteria used in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology show 2 different levels of robustness or redundancy. These results have implications for the design of fair proficiency tests. Proficiency testing can be designed with the necessary number of reviews needed for slide validation.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2006

The significance of certification in liquid-based cytology and performance in the college of american pathologists interlaboratory comparison program in cervicovaginal cytopathology.

CONTEXT: Morphology training and certification provided by the manufacturer is required before laboratories are allowed to prepare and interpret liquid-based cytology (LBC) gynecologic slides. Whether this certification is associated with improved LBC interpretation performance is not known. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether LBC certification correlates with performance. DESIGN: The results of the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology for the year 2004 were reviewed. During this year a question on the answer form asked participants whether they were certified in LBC preparations. Participant responses were analyzed at 2 levels of agreement with the reference diagnosis of unknown glass slides mailed quarterly. RESULTS: For cytotechnologists and pathologists, participants who were LBC certified had a significantly lower total discordant rate to series than participants who were not certified for validated LBC ThinPrep (Cytyc Corp, Marlborough, Mass) preparations (P < .001 for both groups). The results were similar for validated conventional preparations for pathologists but not for cytotechnologists. The differences were present across most individual diagnostic series. Differences were most striking for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions. In addition, cytotechnologists and pathologists who were certified had a significantly lower total discordant rate to the exact diagnosis for validated LBC ThinPrep slides than those who were not certified (discordant rates for cytotechnologists, 14.14% and 23.36%, respectively, P < .001; for pathologists, 15.99% and 24.07%, respectively, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although not all confounding factors were excluded in this study, LBC certification is associated with a significantly lower discordant rate to both series and exact diagnosis for validated LBC ThinPrep preparations.

Allied Health Personnel↗
PubMed2006

Hyperchromatic crowded groups in cervical cytology--differing appearances and interpretations in conventional and ThinPrep preparations: a study from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.

CONTEXT: The practice of gynecologic cytology requires that high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) be precisely recognized. In this regard, hyperchromatic crowded groups are known to be difficult to classify in conventional gynecologic cytology, but whether this is true in ThinPrep specimens is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether hyperchromatic crowded groups of cells in challenging HSIL cases are a problem in ThinPrep preparations, and whether these groups differ in appearance from those of conventional smears. DESIGN: Sixteen images were taken from both conventional smears and ThinPrep slides that had a reference diagnosis of HSIL in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology, but had performed poorly on subsequent participants' reviews. These 32 representative images were of hyperchromatic crowded groups and were classified by 20 Cytopathology Resource Committee members (17 pathologists and 3 cytotechnologists), who were masked to the reference diagnosis. A consensus classification was derived using the majority opinion of the individual reviewers. Finally, 5 cytologic features were assessed for those images that were interpreted as abnormal by the consensus classification. RESULTS: None of the 32 images was uniformly interpreted as either benign, squamous lesion, or glandular lesion on individual review. Only 27% of individual interpretations of conventional smear images and 15% of ThinPrep images were interpreted as HSIL/squamous cell carcinoma (P < .001). Individual interpretations of ThinPrep images as glandular lesions (60%) were more often made than those of conventional smears (44%, P < .001). The consensus interpretation of ThinPrep images was glandular lesion in 75% of cases, whereas fewer than 50% of the consensus interpretations of conventional smear images were in this category. Conventional smear images were characterized by elongate nuclei (43%) and large nuclei (71%), whereas ThinPrep images more often showed rounded smooth edges (53%) and small nuclei (80%), and were recognized as a glandular lesion. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperchromatic crowded groups of cells are a source of difficulty in challenging HSIL cases for both conventional smears and ThinPrep specimens. In conventional smears, these groups are more likely to be labeled as a squamous lesion, owing to their elongate and large nuclei. In ThinPrep specimens, however, these groups are more likely to be labeled as glandular lesions, owing to their smooth contoured borders and small nuclei.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2006

Papanicolaou tests with mixed high-grade and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion features: distinct performance in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology.

CONTEXT: Previous studies have shown that in gynecologic cytology, cases of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) perform differently on interpretive review. The performance of cases with mixed LSIL and HSIL features is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of gynecologic cytology cases of "pure" LSIL and HSIL with cases showing mixed LSIL and HSIL features. DESIGN: We compiled performance data from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytopathology from the years 2003 and 2004, and compared the performance of slides showing relatively pure LSIL and HSIL (< or = 10% misclassification as HSIL and LSIL, respectively) with slides showing mixed LSIL or HSIL features (cases misclassified as LSIL or HSIL > 10% of the time). RESULTS: Interpretations from a total of 4508 cases (2452 HSIL and 2056 LSIL) were analyzed. Overall, the sensitivity of participants on slides with a reference diagnosis of HSIL was 97.3%, and of LSIL was 95.9%. Performance trends for pure versus mixed cases varied by slide type and reference diagnosis. For conventional slides, participant sensitivity on pure HSIL cases was greatest (98.0%) and on pure LSIL cases was least (95.2%), while participant performance on cases with mixed features was intermediate (97.0% for mixed HSIL and 96.7% for mixed LSIL). In contrast, participant performance on ThinPrep slides showed the greatest sensitivity for mixed LSIL slides (97.9%), while performance on mixed HSIL slides showed the lowest sensitivity (95.7%); slides with pure features had intermediate sensitivity levels (96.3% for both HSIL and LSIL). Further evaluation demonstrated that conventional pure HSIL slides performed significantly better than mixed HSIL slides (P = .006), whereas mixed LSIL slides performed better than pure LSIL slides (P = .01). For ThinPrep slides, pure HSIL cases performed similarly to mixed HSIL cases (P = .43), while mixed LSIL cases performed better than pure LSIL cases (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Slides with mixed LSIL and HSIL features have measurably distinct performance characteristics in comparison to slides with pure LSIL or HSIL features. Participant performance on conventional mixed cases is distinctly different from performance on ThinPrep mixed cases.

Diagnosis, Differential↗
PubMed2005

Clinical and pathologic findings of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomies in 159 BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the likelihood of occult cancer diagnosis at prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers in different age groups and to determine the histopathology of these lesions. METHODS: We describe a series of 159 female BRCA1 or BRCA2 carriers who underwent prophylactic oophorectomy at the University Health Network, Toronto from January 1, 1992 to June 30, 2004. RESULTS: Seven (4.4%) occult cancers were detected at pathologic examination. None of the 159 subjects had clinical signs or symptoms of ovarian carcinoma prior to, or at the time of, surgery. Only two cancers were grossly visible at surgery. There were 94 BRCA1 carriers, of whom six were found to have an occult cancer (6.4%). In contrast, only one of the 65 BRCA2 carriers was found to have an occult cancer (1.5%). Three of the seven cases of occult malignancy involved the fallopian tube and not the ovaries. CONCLUSION: Approximately 6% of BRCA1 carriers and 2% of BRCA2 carriers who undergo prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy will be found to have occult carcinomas if the ovaries and tubes are rigorously examined. A significant proportion of these appear to originate in the fallopian tube. No cancers were detected among women who had the operation at age 39 or younger.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Proteomic analysis of the proliferative and secretory phases of the human endometrium: protein identification and differential protein expression.

Proteomic analyses of the proliferative and secretory phases of the human endometrium were carried out to identify proteins and discover differentially expressed proteins using isotope-coded affinity tags, three stages of chromatographic separation and online tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). From an initial list of 346 proteins identified by ProICAT, manual inspection of MS/MS spectra and confirmatory searches pared the list down to 119 positively identified proteins. Only five of the proteins showed consistent differential expression. The utility of some of these proteins as indicators of true differential expression in the endometrium is open to discussion. The two proteins with unquestionable differential expressions in the secretory endometrium are: glutamate NMDA receptor subunit zeta 1 precursor and FRAT1. Some of the proteins that show no differential expression have previously been examined in gene-expression studies with similar conclusions.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2005

A strategy for high-resolution protein identification in surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry: calgranulin A and chaperonin 10 as protein markers for endometrial carcinoma.

Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization-mass spectrometry (SELDI-MS) has conventionally been practiced on linear time of flight (TOF) which has low mass accuracy and resolution. Here we demonstrate in an examination of both malignant and nonmalignant endometrial tissue homogenates that high mass accuracy and resolution in the MS stage are crucial. Using a commercially available quadrupole/TOF (QqTOF), we were able to resolve two potential cancer markers, subsequently identified off-line as chaperonin 10 and calgranulin A, that differ by 8 Da in mass. Two off-line protein identification protocols were developed: the first was based on size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), protein extraction, trypsin digestion, and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-tandem MS (MALDI-MS/MS); the second on SEC and shotgun nano-liquid chromatography (nanoLC)-MS/MS. Analyses on a cohort of 44 endometrial homogenates showed 22 out of 23 nonmalignant samples had nondetectable to very low abundance of chaperonin 10 and calgranulin A; 17 of the 21 malignant samples had detectable to abundant levels of both proteins. Immunohistochemical staining of a tissue microarray of 32 samples showed that approximately half of malignant endometrial tissues exhibited positive staining for calgranulin A in the malignant epithelium, while 9 out of 10 benign tissues exhibited negative epithelial staining. In addition, macrophages/granulocytes in malignant as well as nonmalignant tissues showed positive staining. No immunostaining occurred in stroma or myometrium. Calgranulin A, in combination with chaperonin 10 and other proteins, may eventually constitute a panel of markers to permit diagnosis and screening of endometrial cancer.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2005

Direct analysis of laser capture microdissected endometrial carcinoma and epithelium by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Direct analysis of laser capture microdissected malignant and normal endometrial epithelium using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MS) was able to detect a number of proteins that are overexpressed in malignant epithelial cells. A total of 16 physiologic and malignant endometrial samples were laser capture microdissected, including four proliferative and four secretory endometria, and eight endometrioid adenocarcinomas. Two of these proteins, at 10,834 and 10,843 Da, likely correspond to calgranulin A and chaperonin 10, two proteins that had previously been identified in endometrioid adenocarcinoma in whole tissue homogenate by MS analysis. Direct analysis by MALDI-MS not only confirms that these proteins are overexpressed in endometrial carcinoma, but also localizes them to the epithelial cells, the expected cancer site.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed2005

Disclosure of diagnostic errors: the death knell of retrospective pathology reviews?

Full disclosure of medical errors to patients is now widely seen as an essential component of error management, although its update into daily clinical practice is variable. Laboratory diagnostic errors are discovered in retrospective reviews of previous surgical and cytopathology cases. This quality assurance practice is a valuable tool of practice audit and change for both cytotechnologists and pathologists. Presently, these diagnostic errors are only reported to the clinician and patient if the new finding affects current patient management. Mandatory full disclosure of all diagnostic errors discovered in the retrospective review process would have a significant adverse impact on cytotechnologists, pathologists, the laboratory, the clinic, the institution, and insurers. Retrospective pathology review would become so burdensome that its survival would be in jeopardy-unless measures are undertaken to ameliorate the anticipated adverse consequences.

Diagnostic Errors↗
PubMed2005

Measuring the significance of field validation in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology: how good are the experts?

CONTEXT: Expert opinion is often used as a gold standard for gynecologic cytology in the evaluation of new technologies, in the legal setting, and in the validation of cases for use in educational programs and proficiency testing. However, the reliability of expert opinion alone in selecting slides of a specific cytodiagnosis that can be reproducibly and reliably identified by subsequent reviewers has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of expert opinion to select slides that are validated in subsequent reviews. DESIGN: In the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology, each case in every cytodiagnostic category is accepted for circulation only after review by 3 expert cytopathologists. The percentage of these cases that could not be reliably and reproducibly identified by program participants for each cytodiagnostic category ("failed field validation") was determined during the duration of the program from 1989 to 2004. RESULTS: More than 10,000 conventional smears and ThinPrep cases were selected by the expert panel for circulation. Of these selected slides, 19% of conventional smears and 15% of ThinPrep specimens failed field validation. Compared with the overall slide performance, significantly higher percentages (P < .001) of conventional smears with reference diagnoses of unsatisfactory (51.7%), repair (58%), or low-grade intraepithelial lesion (31.8%) and of ThinPrep specimens with reference diagnoses of unsatisfactory (54.5%) and repair (76.9%) failed field validation. In contrast, significantly lower percentages of conventional smears with reference diagnoses of squamous cell carcinoma (4.5%), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (9%), Trichomonas vaginalis infection (11.7%), or herpes (9.9%) and of ThinPrep specimens with reference diagnoses of adenocarcinoma (5.1%), herpes (2.1%), and fungal organism consistent with Candida (8.4%) failed field validation (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Between 15% and 19% of gynecologic cytologic cases that have been selected by expert cytopathologists as good examples of cytodiagnostic abnormalities fail field validation. The proportion of cases failing field validation varies with cytodiagnostic category, but it occurs in all cytodiagnostic entities.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2005

Measuring the significance of participant evaluation of acceptability of cases in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in cervicovaginal cytology.

CONTEXT: The quality of gynecologic cytology slides within educational and proficiency testing programs may deteriorate during use. Participant evaluation of the acceptability of these slides subsequent to possible deterioration is not known. OBJECTIVE: To assess participants' evaluation of the acceptability of slides circulating within an educational gynecologic cytology glass slide program. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology is a peer comparison and educational program that evaluates the ability of the participants to correctly classify gynecologic cytology preparations. The program uses both expert review and field validation to select slides for the graded portion of the program. Participants were asked to assess the acceptability of slides within the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology, and their responses were assessed with respect to type of slide preparation, validation status, and reference diagnosis. In addition, we compared the cytodiagnostic discordancy rates of slides that were deemed acceptable by participants with those that were deemed unacceptable. SETTING: Participant assessments were derived from pathologists and cytotechnologists from cytology laboratories of all types. RESULTS: A total of 17,210 slide interpretations were reviewed, and 2.91% of the cases were labeled unacceptable by participants. For all slides, the percentage of cases called unacceptable varied from 1.65% for cases with a reference interpretation of herpes to 45% for cases with a reference interpretation of unsatisfactory. The percentage of slides deemed unacceptable was higher for validated slides than for educational slides (3.27% vs 2.55%, P = .006). The discordancy rate (to reference diagnosis series) for cases deemed unacceptable was significantly higher than the discordancy rate for cases deemed acceptable for both validated (10.39% vs 1.76%) and educational slides (21.72% vs 3.53%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Greater than 97% of all slides in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology were judged acceptable by participants. Despite expert review and field validation, a small percentage of slides (almost 3%) in this program were deemed unacceptable by participants. These results support the use of participant evaluation of cases to continually improve the quality of cases in this program.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed2005

Altered recognition of reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.

CONTEXT: Previous studies have shown that the diagnosis of reparative changes in conventional smears in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology is one of the least reproducible diagnoses. Indeed, the diagnosis of reparative changes consistently yields the highest false-positive rate of any negative for intraepithelial lesions and malignancy (NILM) cytodiagnostic category. It is unknown whether cytologists recognize reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens as well, or less often, as in conventional smears. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the ability of cytologists to recognize reparative changes in conventional and ThinPrep preparations. DESIGN: We compiled performance data from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology from the 2000-2003 program years. More than 400 slides with a reference diagnosis of reparative changes met our study criteria, representing a total of 11 200 individual responses for conventional cases and 1155 individual responses for ThinPrep specimens. We evaluated the results of both individual and laboratory participants using 2 performance criteria: the false-positive discordancy rate and the exact match error rate (any response that does not exactly match the reference diagnosis of 120 [reparative changes]). RESULTS: Cases with a reference diagnosis of reparative changes made up 1.2% of all ThinPrep slides and 3.7% of all conventional slides in circulation. The false-positive discordancy rate of individual responses on educational slides for conventional smears was significantly higher than the corresponding false-positive discordancy rate for ThinPrep specimens (15.7% for conventional vs 7.1% for ThinPrep specimens, P < .001). Laboratory responses on educational conventional smears and ThinPrep slides showed a similar trend (14.2% for conventional smears vs 2.4% for ThinPrep slides, P = .002). The exact match error rate on educational conventional slides was 41.4% for individual responses, while on educational ThinPrep slides, the overall error rate was 57.5% (P < .001). For laboratory responses, the exact match error rate was 40.5% for educational conventional smears versus 58.9% for educational ThinPrep smears (P < .001). Characteristic features of reparative changes were identified in ThinPrep specimens. CONCLUSIONS: In the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Gynecologic Cytology, ThinPrep slides with a reference diagnosis of reparative changes have a lower false-positive discordancy rate than conventional slides. Responses to ThinPrep cases with a reference diagnosis of reparative change show a higher exact match error rate than conventional smears. Since reparative changes in gynecologic cytology are recognized as indicating an increased risk of significant lesions, the clinical significance of these altered patterns of recognition of reparative changes in ThinPrep specimens warrants further investigation.

Cervix Uteri↗
PubMed2004

Results of the implementation of liquid-based cytology-SurePath in the Ontario screening program.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to evaluate the adequacy and detection rates of SurePath after its implementation in Ontario. METHODS: The detection and adequacy rates of the SurePath liquid-based cytology system (SP-LBC) were calculated for manually reviewed slides of the year 2002. The adequacy and detection rates from this study group were compared with a historical conventional smear (CS) group from the same laboratories during the same period of the previous year. RESULTS: The SP-LBC study group consisted of 352,680 specimens with cytodiagnoses and the CS group included 378,990 specimens. The unsatisfactory rate for SP-LBC (0.24%) was less than that of the CS group (0.58%). The detection rate of atypical squamous cells (ASC+) by the SP-LBC group (4.69%) was greater than that of the CS group (3.81%), as was the detection rate of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL+; 2.13% vs. 1.50% in the CS group). There was only a trend toward increased detection of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL+) in the SP-LBC group (0.34%) relative to the CS group (0.31%), because the detection rate for carcinoma by SP-LBC declined. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of SP-LBC has been followed by better specimen adequacy and detection rates for ASC+, LSIL+, and a trend of increased detection of HSIL+ relative to CS practice. To determine sensitivity rates, a histopathologic database for cervical carcinoma and precancer needs to be established.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗
PubMed2004

Long-term surveillance is required for all women treated for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the recurrence rate of disease in women treated for cervical adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) by either hysterectomy or conservative surgical management. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients with a histopathologic diagnosis of ACIS or glandular dysplasia were identified in a retrospective clinicopathological review. Sixty-seven of the 100 patients were managed conservatively by local excision and were followed up for a mean period of 59 months (range, 1-222 months). The remaining 33 patients underwent hysterectomy as the primary management method and were followed up for a mean of 88 months (range, 1-248 months). If there was histologic documentation of ACIS or invasive adenocarcinoma more than 1 year after treatment, this was considered a recurrence. RESULTS: A total of four recurrences were noted in the 100 patients, three in the conservatively managed group and one in the hysterectomy group. Two late recurrences were noted at 97 and 153 months, one each in the conservatively managed and hysterectomy groups. CONCLUSIONS: Women who have been treated for cervical ACIS require long-term surveillance for at least 10 years regardless of whether they have undergone hysterectomy or conservative management.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

Bethesda 2001 implementation and reporting rates: 2003 practices of participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.

CONTEXT: The 2001 Bethesda System for the reporting of cervical cytology specimens and the use of new liquid-based and human papillomavirus testing technologies have led to changes in cervical cytology reporting practices. OBJECTIVES: To analyze current laboratory reporting practices using Bethesda 2001 terminology and to compare results with previous survey data from 1996. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey mailed to 1751 laboratories in mid-2003. PARTICIPANTS: Laboratories enrolled in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology. RESULTS: Of the 759 responding laboratories, most (85.5%) had implemented Bethesda 2001 terminology, and the majority had adopted major changes, such as elimination of the benign cellular changes category and the satisfactory but limited category. The median reporting rate for low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion was 2.1%, compared to a 1996 median rate of 1.6%, but the increase was confined to liquid-based preparations. Reporting rates for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (median, 0.5%) and atypical squamous cells (ASC) had changed little. Most ASC cases were subclassified as "undetermined significance" (median, 3.9%) with ASC, cannot exclude high-grade SIL accounting for a minority (median, 0.2%). The median ratio of ASC to squamous intraepithelial lesions and carcinomas (SIL+) was 1.4 and was lower than the 1996 median ratio of 2.0. Median reporting rates for squamous abnormalities for 2002 were noted to be significantly higher for liquid-based preparations than for conventional smears, while median ASC/SIL+ ratios were lower. Most laboratories offer human papillomavirus testing, but almost half (47%) of laboratories do not know the percentage of positive testing results in patients with ASC. CONCLUSIONS: Most laboratories have implemented Bethesda 2001 terminology. New criteria and liquid-based methods have led to an increase in low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion reporting rates and a decrease in ASC/ SIL+ ratios when compared with 1996 data. Liquid-based preparations have higher median squamous intraepithelial lesion rates and lower ASC/SIL+ ratios than conventional smears.

Cervix Uteri↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of performance of conventional and ThinPrep gynecologic preparations in the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytology Program.

CONTEXT: Results of clinical trials suggest that interpretation of liquid-based cytology preparations is more accurate and is associated with less screening error than interpretation of conventional preparations. OBJECTIVE: In this study, the performance of participants in interpreting ThinPrep (TP) preparations was compared with participants' performance on conventional Papanicolaou tests in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology (PAP). DESIGN: The results of the PAP from the year 2002 were reviewed, and the discordancies to series and exact-match error rates for the 2 cytologic methods were compared. RESULTS: For this study, a total of 89 815 interpretations from conventional smears and 20 886 interpretations from TP samples were analyzed. Overall, interpretations of TP preparations had both significantly fewer false-positive (1.6%) and false-negative (1.3%) rates than those of conventional smears (P =.001 and P =.02, respectively) for validated or validated-equivalent slides, as assessed by concordance with the correct diagnostic series. In this assessment of concordance to series, interpretations of educational TP and conventional preparations were similar, except for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, in which the performance was significantly worse for educational TP preparations (false-negative rate of 8.1% vs 4.1% for conventional smears, P <.001). When interpretations were matched to the exact diagnosis, validated-equivalent TP preparations were generally more accurate for diagnoses in the 100 series and 200 series than were conventional smears. Notably, for the reference diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma, the exact-match error rate on validated equivalent TP slides was significantly greater than that of conventional slides (44.5% vs 23.1%, P <.001). Interpretations of educational TP preparations also had a significantly higher error rate in matching to the exact reference diagnosis for squamous cell carcinoma (33.7% vs 22.8%, P =.007). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, TP preparations in this program were associated with significantly lower error rates than conventional smears for both validated and educational cases. However, unlike the negative for intraepithelial lesion and malignancy, not otherwise specified, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, and adenocarcinoma cytodiagnostic challenges, participants' responses indicated some difficulty in recognizing high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and squamous cell carcinoma.

Female↗