PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Theodore P Rasmussen

Publications and source records attributed to Theodore P Rasmussen.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

DNA CpG hypomethylation induces heterochromatin reorganization involving the histone variant macroH2A.

In mammalian heterochromatin, cytosine bases of CpG dinucleotides are symmetrically modified by methylation. Patterns of CpG methylation are maintained by the action of Dnmt1, the mammalian maintenance cytosine methyltransferase enzyme. We genetically manipulated the levels of CpG methylation and found that extensive chromatin alterations occur in pericentric heterochromatin. Homozygous mutations in Dnmt1 cause severe hypomethylation of pericentric heterochromatin and concomitant chromatin reorganization involving the histone variant macroH2A. Demethylation-induced alterations in macroH2A localization occur in both interphase and mitotic embryonic stem (ES) cells. Heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) marks interphase pericentric heterochromatin (chromocenters). MacroH2A immunostaining in Dnmt1(-/-) cells becomes coincident with chromocenters detected by HP1 content. MacroH2A, but not HP1, is enriched in nuclease-resistant chromatin fractions extracted from Dnmt1(-/-) cells. Normal localization of macroH2A was restored upon reintroduction of a Dnmt1 transgene into Dnmt1(-/-) cells. MacroH2A localization was also affected in T-antigen-transformed fibroblasts subjected to the conditional mutation of Dnmt1. Together, these results suggest that pericentric heterochromatin can be maintained in the absence of CpG methylation, but in a significantly altered configuration.

Animals↗

A maternal store of macroH2A is removed from pronuclei prior to onset of somatic macroH2A expression in preimplantation embryos.

MacroH2A histones are variants of canonical histone H2A that are conserved among vertebrates. Previous studies have implicated macroH2As in epigenetic gene-silencing events including X chromosome inactivation. Here we show that macroH2A is present in developing and mature mouse oocytes. MacroH2A is localized to chromatin of germinal vesicles (GV) in both late growth stage (lg-GV) and fully grown (fg-GV) stage oocytes. In addition, macroH2A is associated with the chromosomes of mature oocytes, and abundant macroH2A is present in the first polar body. However, maternal macroH2A is lost from zygotes generated by normal fertilization by the late 2 pronuclei (2PN) stage. Normal embryos at 2-, 4-, and 8-cell stages lack macroH2A except in residual polar bodies. MacroH2A protein expression reappears in embryos after the 8-cell stage and persists in morulae and blastocysts, where nuclear macroH2A is present in both the trophectodermal and inner cell mass cells. We followed the loss of macroH2A from pronuclei in parthenogenetic embryos generated by oocyte activation. Abundant macroH2A is present upon the metaphase II plate and persists through parthenogenetic anaphase, but macroH2A is progressively lost during pronuclear decondensation prior to synkaryogamy. Examination of embryos generated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) revealed that macroH2A is associated exclusively with female pronuclei prior to loss in late pronucleus stage embryos. These results outline a surprising finding that a maternal store of macroH2A is removed from the maternal genome prior to synkaryogamy, resulting in embryos that execute three to four mitotic divisions in the absence of macroH2A prior to the onset of embryonic macroH2A expression.

Animals↗

Embryonic stem cell differentiation: a chromatin perspective.

Embryonic stem (ES) cells hold immense promise for the treatment of human degenerative disease. Because ES cells are pluripotent, they can be directed to differentiate into a number of alternative cell-types with potential therapeutic value. Such attempts at "rationally-directed ES cell differentiation" constitute attempts to recapitulate aspects of normal development in vitro. All differentiated cells retain identical DNA content, yet gene expression varies widely from cell-type to cell-type. Therefore, a potent epigenetic system has evolved to coordinate and maintain tissue-specific patterns of gene expression. Recent advances show that mechanisms that govern epigenetic regulation of gene expression are rooted in the details of chromatin dynamics. As embryonic cells differentiate, certain genes are activated while others are silenced. These activation and silencing events are exquisitely coordinated with the allocation of cell lineages. Remodeling of the chromatin of developmentally-regulated genes occurs in conjunction with lineage commitment. Oocytes, early embryos, and ES cells contain potent chromatin-remodeling activities, an observation that suggests that chromatin dynamics may be especially important for early lineage decisions. Chromatin dynamics are also involved in the differentiation of adult stem cells, where the assembly of specialized chromatin upon tissue-specific genes has been studied in fine detail. The next few years will likely yield striking advances in the understanding of stem cell differentiation and developmental biology from the perspective of chromatin dynamics.

Animals↗

BRCA1 supports XIST RNA concentration on the inactive X chromosome.

BRCA1, a breast and ovarian tumor suppressor, colocalizes with markers of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) on Xi in female somatic cells and associates with XIST RNA, as detected by chromatin immunoprecipitation. Breast and ovarian carcinoma cells lacking BRCA1 show evidence of defects in Xi chromatin structure. Reconstitution of BRCA1-deficient cells with wt BRCA1 led to the appearance of focal XIST RNA staining without altering XIST abundance. Inhibiting BRCA1 synthesis in a suitable reporter line led to increased expression of an otherwise silenced Xi-located GFP transgene. These observations suggest that loss of BRCA1 in female cells may lead to Xi perturbation and destabilization of its silenced state.

Animals↗

Chromosomal silencing and localization are mediated by different domains of Xist RNA.

The gene Xist initiates the chromosomal silencing process of X inactivation in mammals. Its product, a noncoding RNA, is expressed from and specifically associates with the inactive X chromosome in female cells. Here we use an inducible Xist expression system in mouse embryonic stem cells that recapitulates long-range chromosomal silencing to elucidate which Xist RNA sequences are necessary for chromosomal association and silencing. We show that chromosomal association and spreading of Xist RNA can be functionally separated from silencing by specific mutations. Silencing requires a conserved repeat sequence located at the 5' end of Xist. Deletion of this element results in Xist RNA that still associates with chromatin and spreads over the chromosome but does not effect transcriptional repression. Association of Xist RNA with chromatin is mediated by functionally redundant sequences that act cooperatively and are dispersed throughout the remainder of Xist but show little or no homology.

Animals↗

Reprogramming mediated by stem cell fusion.

Advances in mammalian cloning prove that somatic nuclei can be reprogrammed to a state of totipotency by transfer into oocytes. An alternative approach to reprogram the somatic genome involves the creation of hybrids between somatic cells and other cells that contain reprogramming activities. Potential fusion partners with reprogramming activities include embryonic stem cells, embryonic germ cells, embryonal carcinoma cells, and even differentiated cells. Recent advances in fusion-mediated reprogramming are discussed from the standpoints of the developmental potency of hybrid cells, genetic and epigenetic correlates of reprogramming, and other aspects involved in the reprogramming process. In addition, the utility of fusion-mediated reprogramming for future cell-based therapies is discussed.

Animals↗