Biomedical subjects

Theresa Williams

Publications and source records attributed to Theresa Williams.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Rectal-wall dose dependence on postplan timing after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Dose to rectal wall after permanent-seed prostate brachytherapy is dependent on distance between posterior prostatic seeds and anterior rectal wall and is influenced by postimplant periprostatic edema. We analyzed the effect of postplan timing on anterior rectal-wall dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients received permanent seed 125I brachytherapy as monotherapy (145 Gy). Implants were preplanned by use of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and carried out by use of preloaded needles. Postimplant dosimetry was calculated by use of magnetic resonance imaging-computed tomography fusion on Days 1, 8, and 30. The anterior rectal-wall dose is reported as the isodose enclosing 1.0 or 2.0 cc of rectal wall and as the RV100 in cc. RESULTS: The dose to rectal wall increased progressively over time. The median increase in dose to 1.0 cc of rectal wall (RD [1 cc]) from Day 1 to 30 was 39.2 Gy (p < 0.001). RV100 increased from a median of 0.07 cc on Day 1 to 0.67 cc on Day 30. The most significant predictor of rectal-wall dose (RD [1 cc], RD [2 cc], or RV100) was the time of evaluation (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although periprostatic edema cannot be quantified by postimplant imaging, the dose to the anterior rectal wall increases significantly over time as prostatic and periprostatic edema resolve. Critical-organ dose reporting and guidelines for minimizing toxicity must take into account the time of the assessment.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Sequential evaluation of prostate edema after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy using CT-MRI fusion.

PURPOSE: To analyze the extent and time course of prostate edema and its effect on dosimetry after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients scheduled for permanent seed (125)I prostate brachytherapy agreed to a prospective study on postimplant edema. Implants were preplanned using transrectal ultrasonography. Postimplant dosimetry was calculated using computed tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (CT-MRI) fusion on the day of the implant (Day 1) and Days 8 and 30. The prostate was contoured on MRI, and the seeds were located on CT. Factors investigated for an influence on edema were the number of seeds and needles, preimplant prostate volume, transitional zone index (transition zone volume divided by prostate volume), age, and prostate-specific antigen level. Prostate dosimetry was evaluated by the percentage of the prostate volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (V(100)) and percentage of prescribed dose received by 90% of the prostate volume (D(90)). RESULTS: Prostate edema was maximal on Day 1, with the median prostate volume 31% greater than preimplant transrectal ultrasound volume (range, 0.93-1.72; p < 0.001) and decreased with time. It was 21% greater than baseline at Day 8 (p = 0.013) and 5% greater on Day 30 (p < 0.001). Three patients still had a prostate volume greater than baseline by Day 30. The extent of edema depended on the transition zone volume (p = 0.016) and the preplan prostate volume (p = 0.003). The median V(100) on Day 1 was 93.6% (range, 86.0-98.2%) and was 96.3% (range, 85.7-99.5%) on Day 30 (p = 0.079). Patients with a Day 1 V(100) >93% were less affected by edema resolution, showing a median increase in V(100) of 0.67% on Day 30 compared with 2.77% for patients with a V(100) <93 % on Day 1. CONCLUSION: Despite the extreme range of postimplant edema, the effect on dosimetry was less than expected. Dose coverage of the prostate was good for all patients during Days 1-30. Our data indicate that postimplant dosimetry on the day of implant is sufficient for patients with good dose coverage (Day 1 V(100) >93%).

Aged↗

PubMed2004

MRI-CT fusion to assess postbrachytherapy prostate volume and the effects of prolonged edema on dosimetry following transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Quality assurance through postplan assessment is an integral part of permanent seed prostate implants. The use of MRI-CT fusion for 1-month postimplant dosimetry permits accurate assessment of prostate volume without seed induced artifact and uncertainties of prostate contour inherent to CT assessments. Routine use of MRI-CT fusion reveals significant prostate edema may persist several weeks. This study evaluates the effect of edema, and its subsequent resolution, on dosimetry. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 2001 to June 2003, 241 men were treated with (125)I seed implants based on a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) preplan. Quality assessment was performed at 1 month by CT-MRI fusion using VariSeed software. Over this 24-month period, 29 patients (12%) with residual edema at 1 month (12-60% >TRUS plan volume), had repeat CT-MRI fusion at 2-4 months to reassess volume and dosimetry. Eleven of the 29 had received prior androgen ablation to shrink the prostate preimplant. RESULTS: For the entire group (n = 241), mean preimplant prostate volume was 33.7 cc and median postplan dosimetric parameters were: V100, 92.2%; D90, 153 Gy; and V150, 53%. For the 29 patients with prolonged edema, mean preimplant volume was 34.8 cc and 1-month volume was 46.1 cc (p <0.001). Mean volume reduction between 1 and 2 months was 13%. The decrease in prostate volume had a significant effect on dosimetry with median increase between 1 month and 2 months in calculated V100 of 9.5%, V150 22.6%, V200 30.1%, and D90 11.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Significant residual edema is seen 1-month postimplant in 12% of prostates and may have a profound effect on dosimetry. Further study is underway to characterize the time course of resolution of the edema, and to perform integral dosimetry based on the changing volume.

Brachytherapy↗

PubMed2004

Factors predicting an increased dose to the penile bulb in permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: Erectile dysfunction following permanent seed brachytherapy for prostate cancer may be related to the dose to the penile bulb. We investigated anatomic and dosimetric factors that might contribute to an increased dose to the penile bulb. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One-month CT and MR images were examined for 50 consecutive patients treated with exclusive (125)I permanent seed prostate brachytherapy to a prescribed dose of 145 Gy. Implants were preplanned by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS). Postimplant dosimetry was performed at 1 month using an MRI-CT fusion. Spearman's correlation was used to establish a correlation between dosimetric parameters, anatomical factors, and the dose to the penile bulb. RESULTS: Penile bulb volumes ranged from 1.2-8.5 cc (median, 3.9 cc). The distance from the penile bulb to the prostate apex ranged from 5-33 mm (median, 15.5 mm). D50 of the penile bulb ranged from 13-121 Gy. The range for the V45 (65 Gy) was 0-87%; only 3% of patients had >2 cc covered by this isodose and in 16% of patients the V45 covered more than 50% of the penile bulb. About one-third of the patients received a dose to the bulb that would put them at a high risk of erectile dysfunction after external beam radiation, if the dose were radiobiologically equivalent. There was a significant inverse correlation between the distance between the prostate apex and the penile bulb, and the dosimetric parameters of the bulb: r = -0.548, -0.656, p = < 0.01. The further caudal the apex was from the symphysis, the closer it was to the penile bulb (r = -0.564, p = <0.01). We could not find a correlation between the dose to the prostate or its apex and the dose to the penile bulb. CONCLUSION: When the prostate apex is close to the penile bulb, care should be taken to limit the dose to the penile bulb, if possible. This may reduce the incidence of erectile dysfunction and urinary toxicity after permanent seed prostate brachytherapy.

Brachytherapy↗