PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Therese Riley

Publications and source records attributed to Therese Riley.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Contextualizing and assessing the social capital of seniors in congregate housing residences: study design and methods.

BACKGROUND: This article discusses the study design and methods used to contextualize and assess the social capital of seniors living in congregate housing residences in Calgary, Alberta. The project is being funded as a pilot project under the Institute of Aging, Canadian Institutes for Health Research. DESIGN/METHODS: Working with seniors living in 5 congregate housing residencies in Calgary, the project uses a mixed method approach to develop grounded measures of the social capital of seniors. The project integrates both qualitative and quantitative methods in a 3-phase research design: 1) qualitative, 2) quantitative, and 3) qualitative. Phase 1 uses gender-specific focus groups; phase 2 involves the administration of individual surveys that include a social network module; and phase 3 uses anamolous-case interviews. Not only does the study design allow us to develop grounded measures of social capital but it also permits us to test how well the three methods work separately, and how well they fit together to achieve project goals. This article describes the selection of the study population, the multiple methods used in the research and a brief discussion of our conceptualization and measurement of social capital.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Ecological theory in practice: illustrations from a community-based intervention to promote the health of recent mothers.

We present a qualitative case study where we used four principles of ecological theory from community psychology as a template to assess the dynamics about how a preventive community intervention was transacted in eight communities in Victoria, Australia. The principles were cycling of resources, interdependence, adaptation, and succession. Ecological thinking focuses on key resources in communities. That is, the people, events, and settings that are the foundations of thinking about communities as systems. The data set consists of field diaries kept by and serial interviews with nine community development workers over a 2-year period. We found that the analysis highlighted a process-oriented way of representing the intervention, one that sees beyond the intervention's technical components (or packaged elements) to the complexities of the cultural and political change processes occurring beneath. The value of this is the attention focussed on likely project sustainability.

Community Networks↗
PubMed2005

Contested ground: how should qualitative evidence inform the conduct of a community intervention trial?

This paper presents issues which arose in the conduct of qualitative evaluation research within a cluster-randomized, community-level, preventive intervention trial. The research involved the collection of narratives of practice regarding the intervention by community development officers working in eight communities over a two-year period. The community development officers were largely responsible for implementing the intervention. We discuss the challenges associated with the collection of data as the intervention unfolded, in particular, the disputes over cues to revise and adjust the intervention (i.e. to use the early data formatively). We explore the ethical uncertainties that arise when multiple parties have different views on the legitimacy of types of knowledge and the appropriate role of research and theory in various trial stages. These issues are discussed drawing on the fields of ethnography, community psychology, epidemiology, qualitative methodology and notions of research reflexivity. We conclude by arguing that, in addition to the usual practice of having an outcome data-monitoring committee, community intervention trials also require a process data-monitoring committee as a forum for debate and decision-making. Without such a forum, the relevance, ethics and position of qualitative evaluation research within randomized controlled trials are destined to be a point of contention rather than a source of insight.

Cluster Analysis↗
PubMed2004

Researching practice: the methodological case for narrative inquiry.

Research interest in the analysis of stories has increased as researchers in many disciplines endeavor to see the world through the eyes of others. We make the methodological case for narrative inquiry as a unique means to get inside the world of health promotion practice. We demonstrate how this form of inquiry may reveal what practitioners value most in and through their practice, and the indigenous theory or the cause-and-consequence thinking that governs their actions. Our examples draw on a unique data set, i.e. 2 two years' of diaries being kept by community development officers in eight communities engaged in a primary care and community development intervention to reduce postnatal depression and promote the physical health of recent mothers. Narrative inquiry examines the way a story is told by considering the positioning of the actor/storyteller, the endpoints, the supporting cast, the sequencing and the tension created by the revelation of some events, in preference to others. Narrative methods may provide special insights into the complexity of community intervention implementation over and above more familiar research methods.

Community Networks↗
PubMed2004

Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial.

Insignificant or modest findings in intervention trials may be attributable to poorly designed or theorised interventions, poorly implemented interventions, or inadequate evaluation methods. The pre-existing context may also account for the effects observed. A combination of qualitative and quantitative methods is outlined that will permit the determination of how context level factors might modify intervention effectiveness, within a cluster randomised community intervention trial to promote the health of mothers with new babies. The methods include written and oral narratives, key informant interviews, impact logs, and inter-organisational network analyses. Context level factors, which may affect intervention uptake, success, and sustainability are the density of inter-organisational ties within communities at the start of the intervention, the centrality of the primary care agencies expected to take a lead with the intervention, the extent of context-level adaptation of the intervention, and the amount of local resources contributed by the participating agencies. Investigation of how intervention effects are modified by context is a new methodological frontier in community intervention trial research.

Community Health Services↗