Biomedical subjects

Thi Binh Nguyen

Publications and source records attributed to Thi Binh Nguyen.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Movements modulate cortical activities evoked by noxious stimulation.

To evaluate the effects of movement on cortical activities evoked by noxious stimulation, we recorded magnetoencephalography following noxious YAG laser stimulation applied to the dorsum of the left hand in normal volunteers. Results of the present study can be summarized as follows: (1) active movement of the hand ipsilateral to the side of noxious stimulation resulted in significant attenuation of both primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI and SII) in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated hand (cSI and cSII). Activity in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the side of stimulation (iSII) was not affected. (2) Active movement of the hand contralateral to the side of noxious stimulation resulted in significant attenuation of cSII. Activity in cSI and iSII was not affected. (3) Passive movement of the hand ipsilateral to the side of noxious stimulation resulted in significant attenuation of cSI. Activity in cSII and iSII was not affected. (4) Visual analogue scale (VAS) changes showed a similar pattern to the amplitude changes of cSII. These results suggest that activities in three regions are modulated by movements differently. Inhibition in cSI was considered to be mainly due to an interaction in SI by the signals ascending from the stimulated and movement hand. Inhibition in cSII was considered to be mainly due to particular brain activities relating to motor execution and/or movement execution associated with a specific attention effect. In addition, since VAS changes showed a similar relationship with the amplitude changes of cSII, cSII may play a role in pain perception.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Cerebral responses following stimulation of unmyelinated C-fibers in humans: electro- and magneto-encephalographic study.

There are two kinds of pain, a sharp pain ascending through Adelta fibers (first pain) and a second burning pain ascending though C fibers (second pain). By using a novel method, the application of a low intensity CO(2) laser beam to a tiny area of skin using a very thin aluminum plate with numerous tiny holes as a spatial filter, we succeeded in selectively stimulating unmyelinated C fibers of the skin in humans, and could record consistent and clear brain responses using electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). The conduction velocity (CV) of the C fibers of the peripheral nerve and spinal cord, probably spinothalamic tract (STT), is approximately 1-4 m/s, which is significantly slower than that of Adelta (approximately 10-15 m/s) and Abeta fibers (approximately 50-70 m/s). This method should be very useful for clinical application. Following C fiber stimulation, primary and secondary somatosensory cortices (SI and SII) are simultaneously activated in the cerebral hemisphere contralateral to the stimulation, and then, SII in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stimulation is activated. These early responses are easily detected by MEG. Then, probably limbic systems such as insula and cingulate cortex are activated, and those activities reflected in EEG components. Investigations of the cortical processing in pain perception including both first and second pain should provide a better understanding of pain perception and, therefore, contribute to pain relief in clinical medicine.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Effects of sleep on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields in humans.

We investigated the effects of sleep on pain-related somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) following painful electrical stimulation to identify the mechanisms generating them in both fast A-beta fibers relating to touch and slow A-delta fibers relating to pain. While the subjects were awake, non-painful and painful electrical stimulations were applied, and while asleep, painful stimulation was applied to the left index finger. During awake, five components (1M-5M) were identified following both non-painful and painful stimulation, but the 4M and 5M at around 70-100 ms and 140-180 ms, respectively, were significantly enhanced following painful stimulation. During sleep, 1M and 2M generated in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) did not show a significant change, 3M in SI showed a slight but significant amplitude reduction, and 4M and 5M generated in both SI and the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) were significantly decreased in amplitude or disappeared. The 4M and 5M are complicated components generated in SI and SII ascending through both A-beta fibers and A-delta fibers. They are specifically enhanced by painful stimulation due to an increase of signals ascending through A-delta fibers, and are markedly decreased during sleep, because they much involve cognitive function.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Sensory perception during sleep in humans: a magnetoencephalograhic study.

We reported the changes of brain responses during sleep following auditory, visual, somatosensory and painful somatosensory stimulation by using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Surprisingly, very large changes were found under all conditions, although the changes in each were not the same. However, there are some common findings. Short-latency components, reflecting the primary cortical activities generated in the primary sensory cortex for each stimulus kind, show no significant change, or are slightly prolonged in latency and decreased in amplitude. These findings indicate that the neuronal activities in the primary sensory cortex are not affected or are only slightly inhibited during sleep. By contrast, middle- and long-latency components, probably reflecting secondary activities, are much affected during sleep. Since the dipole location is changed (auditory stimulation), unchanged (somatosensory stimulation) or vague (visual stimulation) between the state of being awake and asleep, different regions responsible for such changes of activity may be one explanation, although the activated regions are very close to each other. The enhancement of activities probably indicates two possibilities, an increase in the activity of excitatory systems during sleep, or a decrease in the activity of some inhibitory systems, which are active in the awake state. We have no evidence to support either, but we prefer the latter, since it is difficult to consider why neuronal activities would be increased during sleep.

Adult↗