PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thierry A Flam

Publications and source records attributed to Thierry A Flam.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Age difference between patient and partner is a predictive factor of potency rate following radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the influence of partner age on postoperative erectile function in patients who underwent bilateral nerve sparing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study group was a cohort of 240 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy with a minimum 1-year followup. None had received adjuvant therapy. Evaluation was done by questionnaires mailed to a third party. Potency was defined by erection sufficient for sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration. A total of 200 patients were evaluable. RESULTS: The postoperative potency rate in 189 preoperatively sexually active patients was 59%. On univariate analysis patient age and the age difference between patient and partner were significantly associated with the potency rate following surgery, that is 60.8 and 6.8 years in the preserved potency group and 63.3 and 4.2 years in the impotent group (p <0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). On multivariate analysis age difference was a predictive factor of postoperative potency independent of patient age (p = 0.008). Age difference was also an independent predictor of potency with and without aid (p = 0.037 and 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first study to identify the influence of age difference between patient and partner on potency preservation following radical prostatectomy. Age difference was a significant predictive factor of maintaining postoperative potency independent of patient age. We suggest that partner age difference should be reported in radical prostatectomy outcomes series because it influences postoperative potency rates. It is a new prognostic factor that might help counseling patients preoperatively.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: analysis of 61 cases.

BACKGROUND: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) is often associated with a favorable prognosis. However, to the authors' knowledge, only few clinical data are available regarding this variant of tumor. In the current study, the authors report their experience with CRCC over the last 14 years. METHODS: Since 1989, 61 patients have been treated at the study institution for CRCC. Tumor characteristics and patient outcome were analyzed retrospectively. Data were obtained from the patients' medical records. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 58 years. Of the 61 tumors, 68.8% were discovered incidentally. The mean tumor size was 6.9 cm. Fifty-seven patients (93.4%) were treated with radical nephrectomy and 4 patients (6.6%) underwent partial nephrectomy. According to the 1997 TNM classification, the pathologic tumor stage was T1 in 65.6% of cases, T2 in 31.1% of cases, and T3a in 3.3% of cases. All tumors were staged as N0M0. Nuclear grade was low (1 or 2) in 88.5% of cases. In no case of CRCC was a sarcomatoid component observed. At a mean follow-up of 49.5 months (range, 5-135 months), no patient had experienced tumor recurrence or disease progression, and none had died of renal carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' experience, CRCC carries an excellent prognosis, possibly due to the high rate of low-stage and low-grade tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Post-brachytherapy transurethral resection of the prostate in patients with localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: We assessed the rate and results of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients previously treated with brachytherapy as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From May 1998 to May 2003, 600 patients with localized prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy at our institution. Brachytherapy was performed as monotherapy with curative intent for clinically localized prostate cancer without adjuvant treatment in patients with clinical stages T1c (68.4%) or T2a (31.6%) disease. -Iodine and palladium implants were used in 583 and 7 patients, respectively. A real-time interactive implantation technique was used in all but the first 17 patients, who were treated using a preplanned technique. RESULTS: Of the 600 patients 19 (3.1%) underwent TURP after brachytherapy. Among the patients with acute urinary retention the median interval between prostate brachytherapy and urinary retention was 2 months (range 0.5 to 32). No TURP was done within 6 months after implant. The median interval between prostate brachytherapy and TURP was 7 months (range 6 to 41) and median prostate specific antigen (PSA) before TURP was 0.5 ng/ml (range 0.04 to 3.4). In the 19 patients the median weight of resected prostatic tissue was 8 gm (range 2 to 19) and 1 to 11 seeds were removed (median 5). The perioperative and postoperative courses were uneventful. There was no TURP related incontinence. With a median followup of 28 months after brachytherapy (range 7 to 48) no patient had clinical or biochemical evidence of disease progression, and for the group of 19 patients who underwent TURP median serum PSA at the end of followup was 0.38 ng/ml (range 0.03 to 3.4). CONCLUSIONS: After brachytherapy as monotherapy, TURP can be done safely if indicated. In our experience the resection of prostatic tissue along with a limited number of seeds at least 6 months after implantation did not impair PSA based biological and clinical results of brachy-therapy.

Aged↗