PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thierry A Folliguet

Publications and source records attributed to Thierry A Folliguet.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Early experience with robotic aortic valve replacement.

We report our initial experience with aortic valve replacement using robotic assistance. All procedures were performed with peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass, transthoracic aortic cross-clamp, and antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia. One or two ports and a 5-cm intercostal incision in the right chest were used for access. All patients had aortic valve replacement performed robotically. Between February and September 2004, five patients underwent robotic aortic valve replacement. The mean age was 59 years (range 35-82 years). There were no incisional conversions, death, stokes, or reoperations for bleeding. Overall mean study times were as follows: procedure, 231.2 min (range 180-315 min); cardiopulmonary bypass, 121.5 min (range 83-173 min), and cross-clamp, 98.2 min (range 67-140 min). One patient developed postoperative pneumonia. Aortic valve replacement can be successfully performed with the da Vinci robotic system.

Adult↗

Robotic aortic valve replacement: case report.

We have developed a technique that enables robotic aortic valve replacement with port access via a small right anterior thoracotomy and minimally invasive aortic cross clamping. The procedure is performed under video guidance with all the annular sutures placed with the robot. In the case we report, the patient's postoperative course was extremely simple and pain was minimal. We believe that this is the first reported aortic valve replacement using robotic technology and that it opens a new field of application for robotic assisted surgery.

Aortic Valve Insufficiency↗

Coronary artery bypass graft with minimal extracorporeal circulation.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the advantages and benefits of a minimized extracorporeal circulation system in the performance of coronary artery bypass grafts. METHODS: From September 2000 to February 2003, 279 consecutive patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with minimal extracorporeal circulation. A group of 243 patients at good risk as defined by a Euro- SCORE of 3 underwent complete bypass and blood cardioplegia, and a high-risk group of 45 patients (EuroSCORE, 6) underwent operations with partial assistance and a beating heart. In a prospective substudy analysis of thrombocyte and platelet counts, transfusion requirements, PaO2/FIO2, leukocyte count, C-reactive protein level, postoperative bleeding, intensive care unit stay, and ventilation, 40 patients from the good-risk group were matched and compared with 40 patients who underwent operations with a conventional extracorporeal system. RESULTS: Revascularization was complete with a mean of 2.8 distal anastomoses in the good-risk group and 2.4 in the high-risk group. Mortality rates were 1.2% and 4%, respectively. The system provided either complete or partial bypass assistance and depended on preload and afterload. The system also allowed easy access to all territories with perfect hemodynamic stability. Priming was reduced to 400 mL, and arterial and venous saturation monitoring revealed excellent maintenance of pH values. No complications or failure of the system occurred. Hemodilution, inflammatory response, and transfusion requirements were reduced in the minimal extracorporeal circulation group. CONCLUSIONS: Minimal extracorporeal circulation allows minimal hemodilution and reduces transfusion requirements. The method allows safe and complete revascularization of either an arrested or a beating heart.

Aged↗

Beating heart revascularization with minimal extracorporeal circulation in patients with a poor ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardioplegia in patients with a low ejection fraction carries a risk of myocardial ischemia. Beating heart surgery is associated with hemodynamic changes when the heart is manipulated. We assessed an alternative: minimal extracorporeal circulation for coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart in patients with a poor ejection fraction. METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2002, 50 patients with an ejection fraction of less than 35%, who represented 10% of all patients undergoing coronary artery procedures, underwent revascularization on a beating heart with assistance. We used a closed cardiopulmonary bypass system with a centrifugal pump without reservoir, and the surgical strategy was modified to avoid aortic cross-clamping and to decrease bypass time. RESULTS: The main preoperative characteristics were: age (mean +/- SD) of 64 +/- 11.2 years (range, 41-87 years), 35 male patients (70%), mean left ejection fraction of 24.8% +/- 11.2%, and a mean EuroSCORE of 5.8 +/- 2.7. Revascularizations of 146 distal anastomoses (2.9 +/- 0.7 grafts/patient) were completed. Twelve percent were double bypass, 86% were triple bypasses, and 2% were quadruple bypasses; the mean bypass time was 64.2 +/- 26.2 minutes. The mean graft number was 2.9, and the hospital mortality was 2%. Perioperative hematocrit levels were 30.1%, and 26% of patients received transfusions. Postoperative data showed a median extubation time of 9 hours, a median intensive care unit stay of 48 hours, and a hospital stay of 8 +/- 2 days. Postoperative complications included inotropic support (14%), cerebrovascular events (2%), reoperation for homeostasis (4%), delayed sternal closure (2%), and mediastinitis (2%). Peak troponin Ic level remained a low 2.4 +/- 1.9 g/mL. Follow-up at 6 months was complete with 1 late mortality and with a mean ejection fraction of 30.5% +/- 10.8% for the survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization on a beating heart with extracorporeal assistance can be done in patients with a low ejection fraction. It avoids the myocardial injury associated with aortic cross-clamping and allows safe and complete coronary revascularization.

Adult↗