Biomedical subjects

Thierry Le Chevalier

Publications and source records attributed to Thierry Le Chevalier.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2004

Benefits of adding a drug to a single-agent or a 2-agent chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding a drug to a single-agent or to a 2-agent regimen increased the tumor response rate in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although its impact on survival remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of adding a drug to a single-agent or 2-agent chemotherapy regimen in terms of tumor response rate, survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Data from all randomized controlled trials performed between 1980 and 2001 (published between January 1980 and October 2003) comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen or comparing a triplet regimen with a doublet regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC. There were no language restrictions. Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed using the search terms non-small-cell lung carcinoma/drug therapy, adenocarcinoma, large-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, lung, neoplasms, clinical trial phase III, and randomized trial. Manual searches were also performed to find conference proceedings published between January 1982 and October 2003. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent investigators reviewed the publications and extracted the data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the objective tumor response rate, 1-year survival rate, and toxicity rate were calculated using the fixed-effect model. Pooled median ratios (MRs) for median survival also were calculated using the fixed-effect model. ORs and MRs lower than unity (<1.0) indicate a benefit of a doublet regimen compared with a single-agent regimen (or a triplet regimen compared with a doublet regimen). DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixty-five trials (13 601 patients) were eligible. In the trials comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen, a significant increase was observed in tumor response (OR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.47; P<.001) and 1-year survival (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P<.001) in favor of the doublet regimen. The median survival ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P<.001). An increase also was observed in the tumor response rate (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75; P<.001) in favor of the triplet regimen, but not for 1-year survival (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.21; P =.88). The median survival ratio was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06; P =.97). CONCLUSION: Adding a second drug improved tumor response and survival rate. Adding a third drug had a weaker effect on tumor response and no effect on survival.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2004

Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of a previous meta-analysis, the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial was designed to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients either to three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or to observation. Before randomization, each center determined the pathological stages to include, its policy for chemotherapy (the dose of cisplatin and the drug to be combined with cisplatin), and its postoperative radiotherapy policy. The main end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1867 patients underwent randomization; 36.5 percent had pathological stage I disease, 24.2 percent stage II, and 39.3 percent stage III. The drug allocated with cisplatin was etoposide in 56.5 percent of patients, vinorelbine in 26.8 percent, vinblastine in 11.0 percent, and vindesine in 5.8 percent. Of the 932 patients assigned to chemotherapy, 73.8 percent received at least 240 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area. The median duration of follow-up was 56 months. Patients assigned to chemotherapy had a significantly higher survival rate than those assigned to observation (44.5 percent vs. 40.4 percent at five years [469 deaths vs. 504]; hazard ratio for death, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.98; P<0.03). Patients assigned to chemotherapy also had a significantly higher disease-free survival rate than those assigned to observation (39.4 percent vs. 34.3 percent at five years [518 events vs. 577]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.94; P<0.003). There were no significant interactions with prespecified factors. Seven patients (0.8 percent) died of chemotherapy-induced toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival among patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Uncertain benefit from surgery in patients with lung metastases from breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Isolated lung metastases have been reported to occur in 10-20% of all women with breast carcinoma. The authors described a series of patients who underwent surgery for lung metastases from breast carcinoma. METHODS: They reviewed the files of 125 consecutive patients who underwent surgery with a curative intent for lung metastases from breast carcinoma between 1972 an 1998 at a single institution. Survival curves were plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were identified using the log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model for univariate and multivariate analyses, respectively. RESULTS: The median age at surgery was 53 years. There was a median of 1 resected metastasis (range, 1-16 resected metastases). The median size of the largest metastasis was 19 mm (range, 5-70 mm). The median disease-free interval (DFI) was 3 years. The median follow-up time after surgery was 8.5 years (range, 25 days to 22 years). The 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year probabilities of survival were 58% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 49-67%), 45% (95% CI, 36-55%), and 30% (95% CI, 21-41%), respectively. The median survival time after surgery was 4.2 years. Complete resection was achieved in 96 patients. The quality of the resection (complete vs. incomplete) was not a statistically significant prognostic factor by univariate analysis and there was no significant difference between these two groups in terms of adjuvant postoperative therapy. The characteristics of the primary tumor and the number of metastases (one vs. two or more) had no detectable influence on survival. The size of the largest metastasis (> 20 mm or < or = 20 mm) and the DFI (< or = 3 years vs. > 3 years) were highly significant prognostic factors (P = 0.006 and P = 0.003, respectively). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis. Patients with a DFI < or = 3 years and/or the largest metastasis > 20 mm reportedly had a poor outcome (median survival, 2.6 years vs. 8.5 years for patients with none of these poor prognostic factors). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of lung metastases from breast carcinoma was associated with a significant 5-year survival rate of 45%. Whether these encouraging findings resulted from the surgical procedure itself or the preoperative selection of patients remained uncertain. When surgery is considered in this setting, the size of the largest metastasis and the DFI should be taken into account.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Although surgical resection remains the best potentially curative treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), more than half the patients undergoing resection will eventually die of recurrent disease. Approximately two thirds of relapses occur outside the chest, indicating a potential role for adjuvant chemotherapy. Indeed, a meta-analysis has suggested an absolute survival benefit of 5% at 5 years with adjuvant cisplatin-based regimens. This finding has incited several large-scale randomized trials, the largest of which, the International Adjuvant Lung Trial, has confirmed a similar survival advantage. Conversely, a meta-analysis on postoperative radiotherapy has suggested a detrimental effect, especially for stage I and II patients, that is related most probably to a poor radiation technique. Its value for stage III remains controversial: the observed reduction in local failure did not translate into a survival benefit. In this article, the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy are reviewed, and future prospects are discussed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2004

Adjuvant treatment of lung cancer: current status and potential applications of new regimens.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of lung cancers diagnosed worldwide. Surgical resection offers the best chance for cure for those patients diagnosed with early-stage disease; however, the vast majority of patients will eventually relapse. Despite complete surgical resection, recurrences are likely due to undetectable microscopic disease at diagnosis, making these patients potential candidates for effective adjuvant therapy. Postoperative radiation therapy may actually have a detrimental effect in patients with NO-N1 disease and has been shown to possibly prevent local recurrences in patients with N2 disease. Although results from a large meta-analysis of data on adjuvant chemotherapy suggested an absolute benefit of 5% at 5 years from cisplatin-based chemotherapy, a rate similar to that seen in breast and colon cancers where adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard of care, the use of adjuvant therapy in NSCLC remained controversial. In addition, results of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT), which compared adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy to observation in patients with resected stage-I-IIIA NSCLC, suggested that adjuvant therapy had the potential to prevent a substantial number of deaths each year. Two recently reported landmark studies have demonstrated the survival advantages of adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage NSCLC. Docetaxel, one of the most active agents for advanced NSCLC, is also regularly used for locally advanced disease as part of neoadjuvant or combined-modality regimens. As recent findings have established the value of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage NSCLC, agents such as docetaxel warrant rigorous evaluation in this setting.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2004

Gemcitabine in patients with solid tumors and renal impairment: a pharmacokinetic phase I study.

The purpose of this phase I study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with advanced, recurrent, and/or metastatic cancer and renal impairment. Patients were entered in 4 groups estimated by EDTA-Cr plasma clearance (CLp, mL/min): > or =80; > or =60 and <80; > or =30 and <60; and > or =30 and <80 plus renal insufficiency induced by previous chemotherapy, respectively. Gemcitabine 500 to 1000 mg/m was administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Plasma concentration data were pooled and analyzed using a population pharmacokinetic program (NONMEM). Eighteen white patients (14 females, 4 males) entered the study with a median age of 55 years. Linear regression analyses revealed no significant relationship between gemcitabine CLp and indices of renal impairment (EDTA-Cr CL; p = 0.797 or beta2-microglobulin; p = 0.153). Hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities were mild. Thus, there seems to be no significant impact of mild to moderate renal insufficiency on gemcitabine pharmacokinetics in patients with advanced cancer.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2004

[Adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer].

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in France. Nearly 80% of lung tumors are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Surgery is the best curative approach, but it only concerns 30% of NSCLC, since the diagnosis is frequently made in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Even when surgery is performed relapse occurs in up to 50% of patients. Several adjuvant trials have been led in the late 90's after an individual data-based meta-analysis suggested a 5% survival benefit at 5 years. Among those, the IALT study, with 1 867 patients included, confirms the benefit of post-operative chemotherapy in resected NSCLC. In this article, the current status of adjuvant chemotherapy is reviewed, and future prospects are discussed.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2004

[Cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors and cancer chemoprevention].

Chemoprevention is the use of natural or synthetic compounds in order to reverse. suppress or prevent the carcinogenic process. Among the many pathways dysregulated during the carcinogenic process, cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox2) seems to be one of the most promising pathways to target in order to achieve chemopreventive and anticancer effects. Indeed, Cox2 overexpression contributes to the carcinogenic by at least 5 different mechanisms including transformation of procarcinogens on carcinogens, pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effect, resistance to apoptosis, angiogenesis and invasion progression... This review will focus on the rationale and the ongoing research areas related to chemopreventive approaches targeting Cox2.

Cyclooxygenase 2↗

PubMed2004

[Cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors and cancer chemoprevention].

Chemoprevention is the use of natural or synthetic compounds in order to reverse, suppress or prevent the carcinogenic process. Among the many pathways dysregulated during the carcinogenic process, cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox2) seems to be one of the most promising pathways to target in order to achieve chemopreventive and anticancer effects. Indeed, Cox2 overexpression contributes to the carcinogenic by at least 5 different mechanisms including transformation of procarcinogens on carcinogens, pro-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effect, resistance to apoptosis, angiogenesis and invasion progression... This review will focus on the rationale and the ongoing research areas related to chemopreventive approaches targeting Cox2.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Phase II study of imatinib in patients with small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to assess the objective response to imatinib administered to patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eligible patients were those with SCLC who either had chemotherapy-naive extensive-stage or had SCLC in a sensitive relapse. Patients enrolled on the trial were treated with 600 mg of imatinib daily. The response was assessed using Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) criteria after 3 and 6 weeks. Tumor specimens were examined by immunohistochemistry for the KIT receptor. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with SCLC entered on the study, including 16 men and 3 women. Nine patients had previously untreated extensive-stage disease and 10 patients had sensitive relapse. A central pathology review confirmed SCLC in only 14 of the 19 patients. There were no objective responses; however, one patient with sensitive-relapse disease had prolonged stabilization of disease (>3 months) while on imatinib therapy. The median time to progression was 0.8 months (range, 0.6-1.3 months) and 1.2 months (range, 0.2-4.1 months) in the previously untreated and sensitive-relapse groups, respectively. Tumor tissue samples from 4 (21%) of the 19 patients had the KIT receptor (CD117). CONCLUSIONS: There was no observed antitumor activity in this limited Phase II trial of patients with SCLC, of which only a few tumors showed expression of the imatinib target. The results of this trial are, thus, inconclusive about the antitumor activity of imatinib against SCLC with the targeted KIT receptor (CD117). Further testing of imatinib in patients with SCLC will focus on demonstration of KIT expression in the setting of confirmed SCLC histology.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

The emerging role of pemetrexed (Alimta) and gemcitabine in non-small cell lung cancer.

In recent years, several new cytotoxic agents have been investigated for the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including the antimetabolic gemcitabine (Gemzar; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) and the new multitargeted antifolate pemetrexed (Alimta, Eli Lilly and Company), which are both among the most active agents in advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine has become one of the key drugs in the management of NSCLC, alone or in association with platin compounds. Promising results have also been reported with pemetrexed used as a single-agent or in combination with cisplatin or gemcitabine. These results indicate that pemetrexed may also play a vital role in the treatment of NSCLC, malignant mesothelioma, and other solid tumors. Ongoing (and planned) trials are investigating the use of single-agent pemetrexed, or combinations with cisplatin, gemcitabine, and other cytotoxic agents in various malignancies.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗

PubMed2003

Imatinib in small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Imatinib Mesylate in untreated or sensitive relapsed small cell lung carcinoma patients. Secondary endpoints included assessment of the safety and tolerance of Imatinib, and an analysis of KIT expression in tumor samples. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or with a sensitive relapse (one prior regimen with a sustained response for over 60 days) were eligible. Imatinib was delivered at 600 mg on a daily basis. Response was evaluated at 6 weeks using SWOG criteria. RESULTS: As planned in the study design, a total of 19 patients were included in the trial (9 chemonaive patients with extensive disease and 10 sensitive relapse SCLC patients). No objective responses were observed with most previously untreated patients staying on study for less than 30 days. The median time to progression was 1 and 1.2 month in the untreated and sensitive relapse groups, respectively. Only 4 out of 19 tumor samples (21%) stained for KIT by means of immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of antitumor activity was observed in this small phase II trial including 19 SCLC patients treated with Imatinib Mesylate. KIT positivity in tumor samples appeared to be far less common than anticipated (21 vs. 70%). Future trials should include a screening procedure to evaluate KIT expression in SCLC samples. A better evaluation of KIT contribution to SCLC tumor progression needs to be achieved.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2003

Ongoing and future trials of biologic therapies in lung cancer.

Lung cancer is the leading world-wide cause of cancer death. The care rate remains less than 15% despite improvements in surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The majority of deaths can be attributed to systemic metastases. Chemotherapy prolongs survival but produces few complete responses and survival at 5-years is rare. Molecular advances have provided many new targets for lung cancer therapy. Many new agents have been developed to attack these targets. This article describes current and proposed trials for these new targeted therapies in both small cell and non-small cell lung cancers.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Part 1: Early-stage disease.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung tumors. Patients diagnosed with early-stage disease generally undergo surgery, but up to 50% develop local or distant recurrences. The benefit of chemotherapy in this disease is modest, but new drugs and combined strategies offer hope of improved survival rates. Because the disease recurs outside the chest in 70% of cases, one of the foremost goals of therapy is to prevent distant dissemination. To this end, chemotherapy may be administered preoperatively or after resection of the tumor. The first part of this article, which concludes next month, will address adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

PubMed2003

Chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer. Part 2: Advanced disease.

The prognosis of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains poor. Systemic chemotherapy prolongs survival in this group of patients and palliates symptoms compared to best supportive care alone but more effective therapeutic strategies are needed. Novel agents that selectively target biological pathways of tumor growth offer hope of improving response and survival rates beyond what has been achieved with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Part 2 of this two-part article addresses the role of chemotherapy in locally advanced and advanced NSCLC, including the use of novel agents, considerations in elderly patients, and studies of second-line treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

[Molecular therapy targets in lung cancer].

Molecular targeted therapies offer great hope in lung cancer because they are supposed to act upon biologic abnormalities specific to cancer cells. In the present review, we will describe the major pathways of tumor cell growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis and invasion as well as the targeted therapies interacting with these pathways. We will provide an overview of the trials involving targeted therapies in lung cancer, along with the specific problems related to the development of these new therapies.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2003

[Therapeutic implications of epidermal growth factor receptor in lung cancer].

Lung cancer is very frequent and associated with a high mortality. In the last 25 years therapeutic progress have been limited and do not allow a 5 year global survival rate exceeding to 13-14%. Tumor biology permits a better comprehension of cancerization mechanisms and offers hope of new treatments with targeted therapies which would be specific of cancer cells and so more efficient and less toxic. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway and its receptor (EGFR) expressed by most lung cancer cells is the most successfully completed example. The bond of EGF with its receptor stimulates tyrosine kinase domain of EGFR and allows transduction of an activating signal. Inhibition of this signaling pathway stops tumor growth. Several agents are in development, from preclinical studies to phase III trials. It is a matter of humanized monoclonal antibodies, such as C225 (cetuximab), targeted against EGFR, or small molecules inhibiting tyrosine kinase activity of EGFR including ZD1839 (Iressa), OS1774 (Tarceva) or CI1033, and last antisense oligonucleotides. Antibodies and small molecules are well tolerated and are responsible for limited amount of side effects, mostly cutaneous toxicity and diarrhoea. Antitumor activity has been observed in monotherapy reaching up to 25% of clinical responses in the best series. EGFR inhibition seems to be also promising in combination with chemotherapy according to the synergy observed in preclinical studies and response rate up to 50% have been reported. But phase III studies have been disappointing and additional studies are warranted before consideration for a current daily practice, mostly that severe secondary effects were reported with pulmonary toxicities. In particular it remains to explain why clinical responses do not appear correlated with EGFR expression.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

PubMed2002

Malignant effusions and immunogenic tumour-derived exosomes.

BACKGROUND: Exosomes derived from tumours are small vesicles released in vitro by tumour cell lines in culture supernatants. To assess the role of these exosomes in vivo, we examined malignant effusions for their presence. We also investigated whether these exosomes could induce production of tumour-specific T cells when pulsed with dendritic cells. METHODS: We isolated exosomes by ultracentrifugation on sucrose and D(2)O gradients of 11 malignant effusions. We characterised exosomes with Western blot analyses, immunoelectron microscopy, and in-vitro stimulations of autologous T lymphocytes. FINDINGS: Malignant effusions accumulate high numbers of membrane vesicles that have a mean diameter of 80 nm (SD 30). These vesicles have antigen-presenting molecules (MHC class-I heat-shock proteins), tetraspanins (CD81), and tumour antigens (Her2/Neu, Mart1, TRP, gp100). These criteria, including their morphological characteristics, indicate the similarities between these vesicles and exosomes. Exosomes from patients with melanoma deliver Mart1 tumour antigens to dendritic cells derived from monocytes (MD-DCs) for cross presentation to clones of cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific to Mart1. In seven of nine patients with cancer, lymphocytes specific to the tumour could be efficiently expanded from peripheral blood cells by pulsing autologous MD-DCs with autologous ascitis exosomes. In one patient tested, we successfully expanded a restricted T-cell repertoire, which could not be recovered carcinomatosis nodules. INTERPRETATION: Exosomes derived from tumours accumulate in ascites from patients with cancer. Ascitis exosomes are a natural and new source of tumour-rejection antigens, opening up new avenues for immunisation against cancers.

Adenocarcinoma↗