PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas A Ullman

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas A Ullman.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

5-Aminosalicylic acid therapy and the risk of colorectal cancer among patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affecting the colon are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Published data are conflicting about whether 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) has chemopreventive properties against IBD-related carcinogenesis. The objective of this observational study was to determine if an association between 5-ASA therapy and CRC risk exists in IBD patients. METHODS: Adult patients with a new CRC diagnosis (n = 18,440) were identified from 2 large administrative claims databases. For each case, 20 control patients with no record of CRC diagnosis or bowel surgery (n = 368,800) were identified. RESULTS: An IBD diagnosis was associated with a 6- to 7-fold increased risk of CRC (ulcerative colitis, crude odds ratio [OR] = 6.72, 95% CI, 5.79-7.81; Crohn's disease, crude OR = 6.60, 95% CI, 5.56-7.82). Among patients with IBD (364 CRC cases, 1172 controls), exposure to 5-ASA therapy of any dose or duration during the 12 months before CRC diagnosis was not associated with a reduced risk of CRC (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.23). However, there was a trend toward a decreased risk of CRC with increasing number of mesalamine prescriptions in the previous year, though statistical significance was not achieved (trend P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Treating IBD patients with 5-ASA medications was not found to have a protective effect against colitis-related CRC when assessed over a short period of exposure.

Aged↗

Preventing neoplastic progression in ulcerative colitis.

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's colitis carry an increased risk for developing colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients with more extensive colitis, greater duration of disease, concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis, and a family history of CRC are at greatest risk among UC patients. Young age at disease onset and greater inflammatory burden have also been proposed as risk factors. Maneuvers that limit the impact of cancer in colitis include prophylactic colectomy, which is unacceptable to most UC and Crohn's colitis patients, and dysplasia surveillance. Although recommended in a number of practice guidelines, surveillance has not yet been demonstrated to reduce CRC mortality or morbidity. A number of factors, including low levels of agreement among pathologists interpreting surveillance specimens, patients lost to follow-up, failure to recommend colectomy once dysplasia has been discovered, and others, hinder the success of surveillance. In an effort to compensate for the limitations of surveillance, chemoprevention and newer endoscopic and molecular techniques are being assessed for their effectiveness in augmenting or replacing conventional surveillance.

Chemoprevention↗

Colonoscopic surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To describe recent findings in the literature aimed at decreasing systematic error in dysplasia surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite great promise, colonoscopic surveillance in inflammatory bowel disease has yet to be demonstrated to reduce colorectal cancer mortality. In part, this stems from a number of inherent systematic troubles, including low rates of observer agreement among pathologists; lack of consensus on the natural history of dysplasia, particularly low-grade dysplasia; the patchy nature of dysplasia, which leads to sampling error caused by insufficient biopsy by endoscopists; and incomplete patient follow-up. Recent publications that have focused on defining better the natural history of different levels of dysplasia and improving dysplasia identification at the time of colonoscopy may aid in overcoming the flaws of surveillance. The key recent findings include conflicting evidence on the relative danger of flat low-grade dysplasia, the safety of treating polypoid low-grade dysplasia as a benign adenoma in the absence of flat dysplasia in the rest of the colon or the surrounding mucosa, and preliminary support of chromoendoscopy to target dysplasia better during colonoscopy and to limit unnecessary nontargeted biopsies. SUMMARY: These and other advances stand a reasonable chance of making surveillance a more accurate tool to discriminate between patients with chronic colitis likely to progress to advanced pathology and those less likely to do so. Such advances may result in effective surveillance in which both colorectal cancer mortality and unnecessary colectomy may be limited.

Colonoscopy↗

Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at greater risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) than the general population. Both duration and extent of UC are important risk factors for CRC, as is the presence of primary sclerosing cholangitis, family history of CRC, and (in some studies) early age at diagnosis of UC. Efforts to reduce this risk have focused on colonoscopic surveillance as the best alternative to the more definitive, but less appealing, approach of prophylactic colectomy. However, spurred on by findings in the sporadic CRC literature, there has been a growing interest in a possible role for chemoprevention of CRC in patients with UC. EMPIRICAL STUDIES: Published evidence to date indicates that 5-aminosalicylic acid agents are protective against the development of dysplasia and CRC. Oral, but not topical, steroids also appear to be chemoprotective, but their chronic use cannot be recommended for this indication. Ursodeoxycholic acid has been shown to reduce the risk of neoplasia in UC patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Evidence suggests, but does not prove, that folic acid is chemopreventive in patients with UC. Further studies are needed to fully define the chemoprotective role of these and other agents.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

The fate of low grade dysplasia in ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal strategy for the management of definite low grade dysplasia (LGD) detected in surveillance in ulcerative colitis (UC) is unknown, because the natural history of LGD has not been well described. METHODS: We reviewed the Mayo Clinic records of patients with UC found to have flat LGD between 1990 and 1993 in whom a nonoperative strategy was pursued for 2 months or more. RESULTS: Eighteen patients with UC and LGD were observed for a median of 32 months. Nine of 18 patients identified with UC and LGD developed advanced neoplastic lesions during follow-up, which were defined as adenocarcinoma, raised dysplasia, or high grade dysplasia. The cumulative incidence of progression to an advanced lesion was 33% at 5 yr (95% CI = 9-56%). Only one patient developed adenocarcinoma, diagnosed 74 months after his initial finding of LGD and 20 months after his last surveillance exam. Besides this patient, adenocarcinoma was not detected in the colectomy specimens of 13 other patients who underwent surgery. Colectomies were performed for dysplasia or cancer in seven patients, active colitis in five patients, and unknown reasons in two patients. Four patients did not have colectomies. CONCLUSIONS: Neoplastic progression in patients with UC and LGD is common. Total proctocolectomy should be offered to all patients with flat LGD. Our study illustrates numerous pitfalls in the practice of surveillance.

Adult↗