PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas Bak

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas Bak.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Impact of pretransplant diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on cadveric liver allocation in the era of MELD.

The allocation system based on the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) has led to more patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being transplanted. We hypothesized that more patients misdiagnosed with HCC are also being transplanted, leading to inappropriate organ allocation. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed all liver transplants at our center from July 14, 2000, to October 22, 2002 (N = 172; 129 pre-MELD, 43 post-MELD), comparing pretransplant HCC diagnosis to explant histology. Thirty patients met the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) diagnostic criteria for pretransplant HCC diagnosis. There were 25 men (median age, 52.5 yr), and 80% had hepatitis C. The proportion of patients transplanted who had an HCC diagnosis increased from 12% (15/129) pre-MELD to 35% (15/43) post-MELD implementation (P < 0.01). Three of 15 (20%) transplanted pre-MELD and 5 of 15 (33%) transplanted post-MELD lacked HCC in the explant (P = 0.10). Of the three false-positives pre-MELD, one was Status 2B already, and two received living-donor livers. Of the 5 false-positives post-MELD, three had score upgrades that led to early transplantation (13 to 29, 20 to 29, and 9 to 24) while two had MELD scores of 35 and 36 already. The percentage of organs that could have gone to patients with more advanced liver disease without HCC increased from 0% (0/129) pre-MELD to 7% (3/43) post-MELD (P < 0.01). Since the implementation of MELD, the proportion of patients transplanted who had an HCC diagnosis nearly tripled, and a small but significant proportion of organs are now going to patients misdiagnosed with HCC. More stringent HCC diagnostic criteria will be required to decrease the effect that misdiagnosis has on organ allocation.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

Hepatic artery chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients listed for liver transplantation.

We retrospectively analyzed all listed patients having hepatic artery chemoembolization (HACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) stage T2 or less. Outcomes were transplantation, waiting list removal, death, and HCC recurrence. Twenty patients (mean age 55.7 years; 15 males) were identified. Twelve (60%) were transplanted, seven (35%) were removed from the list and one (5%) remains listed. Fourteen (70%) are alive. All 12 transplanted patients are alive (mean 2.94 years); one of seven removed from the list is alive (mean 1.45 years). Survival was significantly higher for those transplanted or listed vs. removed from the list (100% vs. 14.3%, p = 0.0002). No HCC's recurred. Three patients (15%) were removed from the list after prolonged waiting times before MELD. Hepatic artery chemoembolization induced deterioration and removal from the list of one (5%) patient. Survival for those transplanted was excellent(100%), but overall survival was significantly lower (61.3%) at a mean 5.48 years. Hepatic artery chemoembolization for listed patients with <or=euro T2 stage HCC is beneficial, but must be weighed against decreased waiting times and risk of HACE-induced deterioration. This balance is influenced greatly by the MELD system's determination of waiting times for HCC patients.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

Language function and dysfunction in corticobasal degeneration.

OBJECTIVE: S: The authors assessed language functioning in corticobasal degeneration (CBD), an area that has received little systematic study. Aphasia has been reported occasionally, and the authors hypothesized that appropriate assessments would reveal at least mild language impairment, particularly affecting phonologic (sound-based) processing, even in cases without frank aphasia. METHODS: A series of 10 unselected patients with CBD (one with pathologic confirmation) were administered neuropsychological tests assessing the following aspects of cognitive functioning: verbal fluency, naming, reading, oral spelling, auditory-verbal short-term memory, phoneme blending and segmentation, visuospatial skills, and semantic memory. RESULTS: Phonologic and spelling impairments were prevalent, even in nonaphasic patients. The prevalence of visuospatial, constructional, and frontal impairments, demonstrated in previous research, was also replicated. A minority of patients had deficits in semantic memory, naming, and reading, but the impairments were usually mild. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found phonologic impairment to be a typical feature of CBD. There is substantial overlap between progressive nonfluent aphasia and CBD, and the linguistic impairment can be thought of as a continuum, with mild phonologic impairment at one end and severe aphasia at the other.

Aged↗

Comprehensive cost comparison of adult-adult right hepatic lobe living-donor liver transplantation with cadaveric transplantation.

BACKGROUND: An important long-term consideration for living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the expense compared with cadaveric-liver transplantation. LDLT is a more complex procedure than cadaveric transplantation and the cost of donor evaluation, donor surgery, and postoperative donor care must be included in a cost analysis for LDLT. In this study, we compare the comprehensive cost of LDLT with that of cadaveric-liver transplantation. METHODS: All costs for medical services provided at our institution were recorded for 24 LDLT and 43 cadaveric recipients with greater than 1 year follow-up transplanted between August 1997 and April 2000. The donor costs include donors evaluated and rejected, donors evaluated and accepted, donor right hepatectomy costs, and donor follow-up costs (365 days postdonation). LDLT and cadaveric recipient costs include medical care 90 days pre-LDLT, recipient transplant costs, and recipient follow-up costs (365 days posttransplant) including retransplantation. Cost is expressed as an arbitrary cost unit (CU) that is a value between $500 to $1,500. RESULTS: Total LDLT costs (evaluations of rejected donors+evaluations of accepted donors+donor hepatectomy+donor follow-up care for 1 year+pretransplant recipient care [90 days pretransplant]+recipient transplantation+recipient 1-year posttransplant care)= 162.7 CU. Total mean cadaveric transplant costs (pretransplant recipient care [90 days pretransplant]+recipient transplantation [including organ acquisition cost]+recipient 1-year posttransplant care)= 134.5 CU, (P =ns). CONCLUSIONS: The total comprehensive cost of LDLT is 21% higher than cadaveric transplantation, although this difference is not significant.

Adult↗

Sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in liver transplantation is not associated with hepatic artery or wound complications.

Sirolimus is a new immunosuppressive agent increasingly being used in liver transplant recipients. There is concern that sirolimus may be associated with wound complications and hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT). We have used sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in 170 liver transplant recipients and therefore reviewed our experience with wound complications and HAT in our cohort of patients. Records of all 170 patients administered sirolimus as primary immunosuppression and 180 historic controls were reviewed. Numbers of wound and hepatic artery complications were recorded, as well as the prevalence of obesity, reoperation, diabetes, and OKT3 use, all of which are risk factors for wound complications. The prevalence of wound complications was 12.4% in sirolimus-treated patients compared with 13.9% in historic controls (P = not significant [NS]). The prevalence of hepatic artery complications was 5.3% in sirolimus-treated patients compared with 8.3% in historic controls (P = NS). The prevalence of obesity and OKT3 administration was significantly lower in sirolimus-treated patients. Multivariate analysis failed to show an association between sirolimus therapy and hepatic artery or wound complications. The prevalence of wound and hepatic artery complications is not different in liver transplant recipients administered sirolimus as part of a primary immunosuppressive regimen compared with historic controls.

Cohort Studies↗

Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score does not predict patient or graft survival in living donor liver transplant recipients.

Although living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a successful procedure for most recipients, outcomes in patients who undergo transplantation as United Network for Organ Sharing status 2A are marginal. There are no published data on living donor liver transplant recipient outcomes relative to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Such information could be useful in living donor liver transplant recipient selection. We retrospectively analyzed all non-fulminant hepatic failure, right hepatic lobe, adult-to-adult living donor liver transplant recipients at our center between August 1997 and March 2002. We calculated MELD scores at the time of LDLT and correlated scores with 1-year patient and graft survival and hospital days during the 90-day post-LDLT period. There were 62 recipients with greater than 6 months of follow-up: 38 men, 24 women; mean age, 47.9 years; 42 white, 1 black, 17 Hispanic, and 2 Asian patients. Twenty-nine patients had hepatitis C virus infection; 4 patients, hepatitis C virus infection and alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, alcoholic liver disease; 4 patients, cryptogenic cirrhosis; 13 patients, primary sclerosing cholangitis; 5 patients, autoimmune hepatitis; and 3 patients, primary biliary cirrhosis. Mean and median MELD scores were 15.2 and 13, respectively (range, 6 to 40). One-year patient and graft survival were 59 of 62 patients (95%) and 52 of 62 patients (84%), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between median MELD scores of dead versus living patients (15 v 13; P =.15) or patients who underwent retransplantation versus those who did not (16.5 v 13; P =.30). Mean and median hospital days in the 90-day post-LDLT period were 23.7 and 16.0 days, respectively. Living donor liver transplant recipients with a MELD score of 18 or greater had significantly more hospital days compared with recipients with a MELD score less than 18 (35.2 v 19.8 days; P =.01). In conclusion, MELD scores did not predict post-LDLT patient or graft survival at 1 year. However, higher MELD scores (> or =18) were associated with more hospital days during the 3-month post-LDLT period.

Female↗

Different immunosuppressive regimens and recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is the fourth leading diagnosis in liver transplant recipients in the United States. The disease is known to recur in 15% to 30% of liver transplant recipients. We set out to investigate how different immunosuppression regimens affected natural history of PSC after liver transplantation at our center. We reviewed records of all patients who underwent a liver transplantation at our institution in between 1988 and 2000 and had a diagnosis of PSC at the time of liver transplantation. Primary sclerosing cholangitis recurred in 15 of 71 patients (21.1%) who had complete records and survived more than 30 days after liver transplantation. Although recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis was most often seen (but not statistically significantly so) in patients who received maintenance corticosteroids, the time to recurrence was not significantly different between those who were treated with maintenance, those who were not successfully weaned, and those who successfully weaned off corticosteroids within 3 months after liver transplantation. Orthoclone (OKT3) therapy (Ortho-Biotech, Inc., Raritan, NJ) was associated with a higher risk of primary sclerosing cholangitis recurrence (29% versus 10%, P <.05). Recurrence was not influenced by immunosuppression with either cyclosporine or tacrolimus. Coexistent inflammatory bowel disease was a cause of failure to wean off corticosteroids, was associated with a shorter time to recurrence of sclerosing cholangitis, and was responsible for significant comorbidity (colon cancer in 7.3%). Primary sclerosing cholangitis recurrence is commonly seen after liver transplantation. More immunosuppression seems to be detrimental to the outcome of our patients with sclerosing cholangitis: use of OKT3 was associated with a greater incidence of recurrence. Length of corticosteroid use did not affect timing or risk of recurrence, and because it has been proven that early corticosteroid withdrawal after liver transplantation is beneficial, we continue to recommend this practice.

Adult↗

Hepatitis C virus therapy, hepatocyte drug metabolism, and risk for acute cellular rejection.

We recently reported on a series of patients who experienced acute cellular rejection (ACR) during the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in our posttransplantation cohort. Our hypothesis is that HCV clearance improves hepatic microsomal function, which in turn results in lower trough cyclosporine (CyA) and tacrolimus (TAC) levels, predisposing the patient to ACR. Records of all patients receiving transplants for HCV infection at our center from 1993 to June 2002 were reviewed. Two hundred three patients were identified. Thirty-seven patients (18%) were treated with interferon-based therapies in combination with ribavirin. Twelve patients were selected for analysis because they became HCV RNA negative during therapy, and 18 patients with no antiviral response were selected as controls (7 other patients had incomplete data or had switched from one immunosuppression [IS] therapy to the other). Baseline IS levels were compared with the first available level after documented negative HCV RNA results in the study group and the last on-treatment IS level in the control group. We also compared frequency and percentage of change in IS levels during therapy. Mean decline in CyA trough levels in the study group was from 187.28 ng/mL at baseline to 118.14 ng/mL immediately after becoming HCV RNA negative (-36.92%; P =.018). Mean decline in TAC levels was from 7.34 ng/mL at baseline to 5.02 ng/mL immediately after becoming HCV RNA negative (-29.17%; P =.044). Overall, 6 of 12 patients who cleared HCV RNA during therapy experienced ACR; 1 patient died as a result of ACR. Using percentage of decrease from baseline IS level, we combined results for patients administered CyA and TAC and found a significant decrease from baseline IS levels in responders (-31.8% after HCV RNA clearance on treatment; P =.0001). Nonresponders experienced a 0.98% decline in IS levels while on treatment, and the difference was significant compared with the change in the responder group (P =.006). A greater proportion of antiviral therapy responders also experienced trough IS levels 20% less than baseline than nonresponder controls during therapy (P =.0006). In conclusion, IS levels decreased significantly in patients responding favorably to anti-HCV therapy. This decrease in IS levels may have a key role in predisposing these patients to ACR.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗

Cognitive functioning in neurologically symptomatic and asymptomatic forms of Wilson's disease.

We sought to determine the pattern of cognitive deficits in patients with Wilson's disease (WD) with different type and degree of neurological involvement, and to interpret the findings in relation to the underlying pathology. A total of 67 WD patients were examined with a neuropsychological test battery assessing different aspects of cognitive processing. The patients were subdivided into three groups: neurologically asymptomatic, neurological with pure basal ganglia lesions, and neurological with more extensive pathology. The results were compared with 50 matched healthy controls. Patients with a neurological form of WD showed a mild but definitive impairment in all cognitive functions. In contrast, the neurologically asymptomatic patients showed no deficits when compared with normal controls. Multifocal pathology was associated with more severe cognitive deficits than selective basal ganglia lesions but did not contribute significantly to memory impairment. A range of cognitive functions, including frontal-executive ability, aspects of memory and visuospatial processing, are affected in the neurologically symptomatic WD patients. In contrast, no subliminal deficits were observed in the asymptomatic patients. The lesions of the basal ganglia seem to be of central importance in explaining the symptomatology.

Adult↗

Apraxia, mechanical problem solving and semantic knowledge: contributions to object usage in corticobasal degeneration.

To investigate the nature of the apraxia in corticobasal degeneration (CBD) five patients with CBD and five matched controls were compared on tests of: i) meaningless and symbolic gesture production, ii) a battery of semantic tasks based on 20 everyday items (involving naming and picture-picture matching according to semantic attributes, matching gestures-to-objects, object usage from name and with the real object) and iii) a novel tool test of mechanical problem solving. All five patients showed severe impairment in the production of meaningless and symbolic gestures from command, and by imitation, and were also impaired when using real objects. Deficits were not, however, restricted to action production: four were unable to match gestures to objects and all five showed impairment in the selection and usage of novel tools in the mechanical problem solving task. Surprising was the finding of an additional semantic knowledge breakdown in three cases, two of whom were markedly anomic. The apraxia in CBD is, therefore, multifactorial. There is profound breakdown in the organisation and co-ordination of motor programming. In addition, patients show central deficits in action knowledge and mechanical problem solving, which has been linked to parietal lobe pathology. General semantic memory may also be affected in CBD in some cases and this may then contribute to impaired object usage. This combination of more than one deficit relevant for object use may explain why CBD patients are far more disabled by their dyspraxia in everyday life than any other patient group.

Aged↗

Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipients.

Two recent brief reports suggest that recipients of living donor liver transplants achieve higher levels of immunosuppressive agents than cadaveric (CAD) liver transplant recipients administered the same dose. These results could have important implications regarding the dosing of immunosuppressives in living donor liver transplant recipients. We report our findings relative to immunosuppressive doses and levels in a cohort of 46 living donor liver transplant recipients. Immunosuppressive blood levels and doses were recorded weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 and months 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 for 46 living donor liver transplant recipients and 66 matched CAD liver transplant recipients who underwent transplantation between August 1997 and May 2001. The ratio of level to dose also was recorded at each interval. The mean overall cyclosporine A dose was similar in living donor liver transplant recipients (323 mg/d) compared with CAD recipients (344 mg/d; P = not significant [NS]). The mean overall tacrolimus dose was 15% lower in patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT; 5.7 mg/d) than CAD transplantation (6.7 mg/d), although statistical significance was not achieved (P =.08). The mean overall cyclosporine A level was 18% higher in those undergoing LDLT (275 ng/mL) than CAD transplantation (234 ng/mL; P =.015). The mean overall tacrolimus level was the same in living donor liver transplant recipients (10.8 ng/mL) and CAD recipients (10.2 ng/mL; P = NS). The overall cyclosporine A level-dose ratio was 26% higher for those undergoing LDLT (0.83) than CAD transplantation (0.66; P =.01). The overall tacrolimus level-dose ratio was 26% higher for those undergoing LDLT (1.82) than CAD transplantation (1.44; P =.01). In conclusion, (1) living donor liver transplant recipients achieve higher blood levels of tacrolimus and cyclosporine A for a given dose compared with CAD recipients, and (2) this difference is observed up to 6 months after transplantation, when hepatic regeneration is completed.

Adult↗