PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas D Bird

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas D Bird.

42 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

GeneTests-GeneClinics: genetic testing information for a growing audience.

The development and usage of two companion NIH-funded genetic testing information databases, GeneTests (www.genetests.org) and GeneClinics (www.geneclinics.org), now merged into one web site, reflect the steadily increasing use of genetic testing and the expanding audience for genetic testing information. Established in 1993 as Helix, a genetics laboratory directory of approximately 110 listings, GeneTests has grown into a database of over 900 tests for inherited diseases, a directory of over 500 international laboratories, a directory of over 1,000 U.S. and international genetics clinics, and a resource for educational/teaching materials and reports of summary genetic test data. GeneClinics, founded in 1997 as an expert-authored, peer-reviewed, disease-specific knowledge base relating genetic testing to patient care, has grown steadily, now containing over 130 expert-authored, peer-reviewed full-text entries relating genetic testing information to diagnosis, management, and genetic counseling of specific inherited diseases. In spring 2001 the two databases were merged and in October 2001 the two web sites were merged for the purpose of seamless navigation into the GeneTests-GeneClinics site (www.genetests.org or www.geneclinics.org); the GeneClinics knowledge base was renamed "GeneReviews" to avoid confusion with the U.S. and international clinic directories. As genetic testing has moved steadily out of research venues and into routine medical practice, the user audience for these databases has become international and expansive and includes healthcare providers, patients, educators, policy makers, and the media. The use of these combined resources has grown to approximately 3,200 visits/day.

Databases, Genetic↗

Genetics of dementia.

Many neurodegenerative diseases are exceedingly complex disorders (Fig. 6). In the past decade, we have made tremendous advances in our understanding [figure: see text] of the genetic basis of these disorders. One common characteristic of these disorders is the existence of rare families in which a given disease is inherited as a Mendelian trait. In this article, we have reviewed the genetics of several common neurodegenerative disorders that are associated with cognitive disturbances and for which causative genes have been identified. Further genetic analysis should clarify the roles of known genes in the pathogenesis of common sporadic forms of these various diseases. Investigation of the normal and aberrant functions of these genes should provide insight into the underlying mechanisms of these disorders. Such research should facilitate new strategies for therapeutic interventions. Although molecular genetics has helped to clarify the etiology of these disorders, clinicians have played a critical role in the careful identification and classification of many families who were involved in the eventual mapping and cloning of causative mutations. The role of the clinician should not be underestimated. Future clinical and molecular genetics findings hold many clinical implications. It is likely that new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for dementing disorders are just on the horizon.

Adult↗

Approaches to the patient with neurogenetic disease.

The approach to a patient with a possible neurogenetic disorder is a complex process that challenges the physician's knowledge, diagnostic acumen and counseling abilities. This article focuses on six aspects of the process: 1. Clues suggesting the presence of a genetic disease, 2. The importance of family history, 3. The interpretation of sporadic cases, 4. Genetic counseling, 5. Genetic testing and 6. Available resources.

Central Nervous System Diseases↗

Patients lacking the major CNS myelin protein, proteolipid protein 1, develop length-dependent axonal degeneration in the absence of demyelination and inflammation.

Axonal degeneration contributes to clinical disability in the acquired demyelinating disease multiple sclerosis. Axonal degeneration occurs during acute attacks, associated with inflammation, and during the chronic progressive phase of the disease in which inflammation is not prominent. To explore the importance of interactions between oligodendrocytes and axons in the CNS, we analysed the brains of rodents and humans with a null mutation in the gene encoding the major CNS myelin protein, proteolipid protein (PLP1, previously PLP). Histological analyses of the CNS of Plp1 null mice and of autopsy material from patients with null PLP1 mutations were performed to evaluate axonal and myelin integrity. In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of PLP1 null patients was conducted to measure levels of N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), a marker of axonal integrity. Length-dependent axonal degeneration without demyelination was identified in the CNS of Plp1 null mice. Proton MRS of PLP1-deficient patients showed reduced NAA levels, consistent with axonal loss. Analysis of patients' brain tissue also demonstrated a length-dependent pattern of axonal loss without significant demyelination. Therefore, axonal degeneration occurs in humans as well as mice lacking the major myelin protein PLP1. This degeneration is length-dependent, similar to that found in the PNS of patients with the inherited demyelinating neuropathy, CMT1A, but is not associated with significant demyelination. Disruption of PLP1-mediated axonal--glial interactions thus probably causes this axonal degeneration. A similar mechanism may be responsible for axonal degeneration and clinical disability that occur in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Adult↗

Mapping of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C to chromosome 16p identifies a novel locus for demyelinating neuropathies.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) neuropathy represents a genetically heterogeneous group of diseases affecting the peripheral nervous system. We report genetic mapping of the disease to chromosome 16p13.1-p12.3, in two families with autosomal dominant CMT type 1C (CMT1C). Affected individuals in these families manifest characteristic CMT symptoms, including high-arched feet, distal muscle weakness and atrophy, depressed deep-tendon reflexes, sensory impairment, slow nerve conduction velocities, and nerve demyelination. A maximal combined LOD score of 14.25 was obtained with marker D16S500. The combined haplotype analysis in these two families localizes the CMT1C gene within a 9-cM interval flanked by markers D16S519 and D16S764. The disease-linked haplotypes in these two pedigrees are not conserved, suggesting that the gene mutation underlying the disease in each family arose independently. The epithelial membrane protein 2 gene (EMP2), which maps to chromosome 16p13.2, was evaluated as a candidate gene for CMT1C.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease↗

Familial occurrence of dementia with Lewy bodies.

OBJECTIVE: The authors investigated the validity of the designation "familial dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB)" by evaluating the clinical, neuropathological, and genetic characteristics of previously reported families exhibiting both familial parkinsonism and dementia. METHODS: Several families, including multiple individuals with parkinsonism as well as prominent dementia, were identified through a literature search. Selected families had at least one member with dementia with autopsy evidence of neocortical and/or limbic Lewy-body (LB) pathology. Clinical and neuropathological evidence from reports of families with prominent dementia as well as parkinsonism was reviewed to further define familial DLB. RESULTS: All selected families had at least one affected individual with dementia and autopsy-proven DLB. Therefore, these families might be considered examples of familial DLB. Individuals in the first six families typically presented with parkinsonian features, whereas cognitive decline did not appear until years later. In contrast, in the other six families, affected individuals typically presented with cognitive decline, and parkinsonism developed later. CONCLUSIONS: Families exist in which one or more persons meet both clinical and neuropathological criteria for DLB. They differ as to whether the signs of parkinsonism precede or follow signs of dementia. It remains to be determined whether this clinical distinction is biologically important. Susceptibility to developing LB pathology may be determined by the interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors.

Brain↗