INTRODUCTION: Patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer have a good prognosis but a significant chance for local recurrence. In the past, limited surgery with postoperative 131I only for extremely high-risk cases or recurrence was not uncommon. As more aggressive surgical and postoperative treatments appear to gain wider acceptance, toxicity and long-term morbidity become more important issues. Our goal is to present the experience of a single institution with emphasis on oral side effects related to 131I as well as acute and chronic symptoms related to this diagnosis and their impact on quality of life. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients were followed for a median time of 19.3 months. All patients received therapeutic 131I (mean dose, 154.7 mCi) between January 1, 1996 and August 30, 2002. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (94.7%) were alive at the time of analysis. Sixteen (28.1%) required a second treatment: any sign of persistence resulted in retreatment. Complaints with 131I treatment included altered taste, 26.3%; acute xerostomia, 21.1%; and acute sialoadenitis, 15.8%. Chronic xerostomia occurred in 6 (35.3%) of all patients who received multiple treatments. The incidence of chronic xerostomia was reduced to 1 of 11 (9.1%) with amifostine pretreatment. Other chronic side effects associated with this disease included fatigue 54.4%, weight gain of more than 6 months duration 24.6%, with 12 (27.9%) of those under 60 experiencing an average gain of 2.3 kg from initial diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Review of treatment-related symptoms prompted policies to reduce toxicity including amifostine pretreatment for 131I therapy and thyrotropin (synthetic TSH) use in place of iatrogenic hypothyroidism for thyroglobulin testing and scanning.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2004

Shielding of the contralateral breast during tangential irradiation.

The purpose of this study was to investigate both optimal and practical contralateral breast shielding during tangential irradiation in young patients. A shaped sheet of variable thickness of lead was tested on a phantom with rubber breasts, and an optimized shield was created. Testing on 18 consecutive patients 50 years or younger showed shielding consistently reduced contralateral breast dose to at least half, with small additional reduction after removal of the medial wedge. For younger patients in whom radiation exposure is of considerable concern, a simple shield of 2 mm lead thickness proved practical and effective.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is an increasingly popular technical means of tightly focusing the radiation dose around a cancer. As with stereotactic radiotherapy, IMRT uses multiple fields and angles to converge on the target. The potential for total dose escalation and for escalation of daily fraction size to the gross cancer is exciting. The excitement, however, has greatly overshadowed a range of radiobiological and clinical concerns.

Dose Fractionation, Radiation↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Lymphedema of the arm and breast in irradiated breast cancer patients: risks in an era of dramatically changing axillary surgery.

The purpose of this study was to assess risk for lymphedema of the breast and arm in radiotherapy patients in an era of less extensive axillary surgery. Breast cancer patients treated for cure were reviewed, with a minimum follow-up of 1.5 years from the end of treatment. Clinical, surgical, and radiation-related variables were tested for statistical association with arm and breast lymphedema using regression analyses, t-tests, and chi-squared analyses. Between January 1998 and June 2001, 240 women received radiation for localized breast cancer in our center. The incidence of lymphedema of the ipsilateral breast, arm, and combined (breast and arm) was 9.6%, 7.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, with a median follow-up of 27 months. For breast edema, t-test and multivariate analysis showed body mass index (BMI) to be significant (p = 0.043, p = 0.0038), as was chi-squared and multivariate testing for site of tumor in the breast (p = 0.0043, p = 0.0035). For arm edema, t-test and multivariate analyses showed the number of nodes removed to be significant (p = 0.0040, p = 0.0458); the size of the tumor was also significant by multivariate analyses (p = 0.0027). Tumor size appeared significant because a number of very large cancers failed locally and caused cancer-related obstructive lymphedema. In our center, even modern, limited level 1-2 axillary dissection and tangential irradiation carries the risk of arm lymphedema that would argue in favor of sentinel node biopsy. For breast edema, disruption of draining lymphatics by surgery and radiation with boost to the upper outer quadrant increased risk, especially for the obese. Fortunately both breast and arm edema benefited from manual lymphatic drainage.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Cosmesis with bilateral mammoreduction for conservative breast cancer treatment.

Over 7 years, 57 women with breast cancer underwent lumpectomy and bilateral mammoreduction. Physical complaints about large or lax breast shape were the predominate rationale. Two patients were immediately lost to follow-up, 55 patients remained and were followed every 3 months for an average of 1.6 years. This is the largest series traceable by computer and literature search. Chart review and patient examination in this retrospective review were utilized as the basis for data within the article. Collated notes from patients' doctors were assessed, as well as documented patient responses to the procedure. Pictures without head/face for identifiers were taken of the patients. Chart data were collected by clinicians, but were reviewed blindly by a statistician. The overall control and cosmesis rates as well as alleviation of heavy breast problems were noted. Only 6% of women had fair to poor cosmetic results; the majority (82%) had excellent to good results. Women with very large breasts or markedly relaxed breast tissue of concern to the patients proved optimal candidates for lumpectomy of cancer and bilateral mammoreduction in the conservative treatment of these cancers. There was a significant reduction in the physical complaints of the patients as well. For women with very pendulous or extremely large breasts, lumpectomy and bilateral mammoreduction may prove to be the optimal course of action.

Breast Neoplasms↗