PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas E Hutson

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas E Hutson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Sorafenib in advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor of tumor-cell proliferation and angiogenesis, in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma. METHODS: From November 2003 to March 2005, we randomly assigned 903 patients with renal-cell carcinoma that was resistant to standard therapy to receive either continuous treatment with oral sorafenib (at a dose of 400 mg twice daily) or placebo; 451 patients received sorafenib and 452 received placebo. The primary end point was overall survival. A single planned analysis of progression-free survival in January 2005 showed a statistically significant benefit of sorafenib over placebo. Consequently, crossover was permitted from placebo to sorafenib, beginning in May 2005. RESULTS: At the January 2005 cutoff, the median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the sorafenib group and 2.8 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for disease progression in the sorafenib group, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.55; P<0.01). The first interim analysis of overall survival in May 2005 showed that sorafenib reduced the risk of death, as compared with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.94; P=0.02), although this benefit was not statistically significant according to the O'Brien-Fleming threshold. Partial responses were reported as the best response in 10% of patients receiving sorafenib and in 2% of those receiving placebo (P<0.001). Diarrhea, rash, fatigue, and hand-foot skin reactions were the most common adverse events associated with sorafenib. Hypertension and cardiac ischemia were rare serious adverse events that were more common in patients receiving sorafenib than in those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with placebo, treatment with sorafenib prolongs progression-free survival in patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma in whom previous therapy has failed; however, treatment is associated with increased toxic effects. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00073307 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Since sunitinib malate has shown activity in two uncontrolled studies in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, a comparison of the drug with interferon alfa in a phase 3 trial is warranted. METHODS: We enrolled 750 patients with previously untreated, metastatic renal-cell carcinoma in a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial to receive either repeated 6-week cycles of sunitinib (at a dose of 50 mg given orally once daily for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment) or interferon alfa (at a dose of 9 MU given subcutaneously three times weekly). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Secondary end points included the objective response rate, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the sunitinib group (11 months) than in the interferon alfa group (5 months), corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.42 (95% confidence interval, 0.32 to 0.54; P<0.001). Sunitinib was also associated with a higher objective response rate than was interferon alfa (31% vs. 6%, P<0.001). The proportion of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related fatigue was significantly higher in the group treated with interferon alfa, whereas diarrhea was more frequent in the sunitinib group (P<0.05). Patients in the sunitinib group reported a significantly better quality of life than did patients in the interferon alfa group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Progression-free survival was longer and response rates were higher in patients with metastatic renal-cell cancer who received sunitinib than in those receiving interferon alfa (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00098657 and NCT00083889 [ClinicalTrials.gov]).

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Management of recurrent testicular germ cell tumors.

Although front-line chemotherapy cures most men with testicular germ cell tumors, salvage therapy is still important in a small but significant minority. Second-line conventional-dose or high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue may cure 25%-50% of patients. New chemotherapeutic agents, including the taxanes gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, have added to the therapeutic armamentarium. Salvage surgical resection has an important role in selected patients. Cisplatin-refractory patients have a poor prognosis with current therapy, and novel chemotherapeutic and biologic agents need to be discovered for such patients.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer: a RAND Appropriateness Panel.

BACKGROUND: New developments in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (MRCC) have suggested a need to reevaluate the role of systemic therapies. The authors convened a panel of medical and urologic oncologists to rate the appropriateness of the main options. METHODS: The authors used the RAND/University of California-Los Angeles Appropriateness Method to evaluate systemic therapy options and cytoreductive nephrectomy. After a comprehensive literature review, an expert panel rated the appropriateness of systemic options (108 permutations) and cytoreductive nephrectomy (24 permutations) for patients with MRCC. RESULTS: The appropriateness evaluation indicated that 27.3% of permutations were rated "appropriate," 46.9% were rated "inappropriate," and 25.8% were rated "uncertain." There was a high rate of agreement (95%). Sunitinib and sorafenib were rated appropriate for patients with low-to-moderate risk regardless of prior treatment. Temsirolimus was rated appropriate for first-line therapy for higher risk patients. Interferon-alpha and low-dose interleukin-2 were rated inappropriate or uncertain. In patients who received prior immunotherapy, cytokines were rated inappropriate. In all permutations for evaluating systemic therapy, enrollment into an investigational trial was considered appropriate, treatment with bevacizumab was uncertain, and thalidomide was inappropriate regardless of risk status or prior therapy. For good surgical risk patients with planned immunotherapy, nephrectomy was rated appropriate in patients who had limited metastatic burden regardless of tumor-related symptoms and in symptomatic patients regardless of metastatic burden. Only the most favorable combination of surgical risk, metastatic burden, and symptoms generated an "appropriate" rating for patients with planned targeted therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The current results begin the process of defining an appropriate role for cytokines, newer targeted therapies, and surgery in the treatment of MRCC.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗
PubMed2006

Hormone refractory prostate cancer: Management and advances.

Effective therapeutic options have not existed for prostate cancer progressing after androgen deprivation therapy until very recently. Secondary hormonal manipulations offer marginal benefits. Docetaxel based chemotherapy has been demonstrated to extend survival and change the natural history of the disease in two large randomized trials. These studies have provided the impetus to combine docetaxel with novel biologic agents to further consolidate the gains in long-term outcome. With the arrival of exciting agents including vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, bone-targeted drugs, antisense oligonucleotides, anti-angiogenic drugs and small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the future treatment of prostate cancer appears promising.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

New approaches in hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Effective therapeutic options have not existed for prostate cancer progressing after androgen deprivation therapy until very recently. Docetaxel based chemotherapy has been demonstrated to extend survival in 2 large randomized trials. These studies have provided the impetus to combine docetaxel with novel biologic agents to further consolidate the gains in long-term outcome. With the arrival of exciting agents including vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, bone-targeted drugs, antisense oligonucleotides, antiangiogenic drugs, and small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the future of prostate cancer therapy appears promising.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Systemic chemotherapy for urothelial cancer.

Although metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder and urothelium commonly responds to first-line chemotherapy, eventual progression is nearly universal. Current salvage therapy for progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy is ineffective, and such patients are candidates for clinical trials. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves long-term outcome and provides an exciting paradigm for the rapid development of systemic therapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation also facilitates bladder conservation in patients who attain pathologic complete remission. Definitive data supporting adjuvant chemotherapy are lacking. With the unraveling of bladder cancer biology and the discovery of novel agents targeting several carcinogenic pathways, the future of therapy for transitional cell carcinoma appears promising.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Cytokine therapy: a standard of care for metastatic renal cell carcinoma?

Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is refractory to standard cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens. The rationale for the use of cytokines in RCC is based on compelling evidence that RCC is sensitive to immunologic manipulation. Cytokine-based therapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2) or interferon (IFN)-alpha can result in objective tumor responses in as many as 15% of patients, and in selected patients, these responses can be durable. The development of targeted therapies for clear-cell RCC with the potential for greater antitumor activity and less toxicity has brought into question the role of cytokines in this patient population. However, no noncytokine therapy to date has proven curative in patients with metastatic RCC. Until results from ongoing trials clearly demonstrate superiority of newer agents over IFN-alpha or IL-2, these agents should remain a standard of care for the treatment of RCC.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Rapid analysis of docetaxel in human plasma by tandem mass spectrometry with on-line sample extraction.

A simple, rapid, and sensitive analytical method for the measurement of docetaxel in human plasma was developed and validated. The method is based on positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI+-MS-MS) with on-line sample extraction. It uses paclitaxel as internal standard for calibration. The on-line sample extraction minimizes sample handling and is readily adopted for automation. Quantitation of plasma docetaxel was done by the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The method had a linear calibration range of 1.00-3000 ng/mL with a correlation coefficient >0.9999. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) for docetaxel in plasma was 1.00 ng/mL. The on-line extraction recovery of docetaxel was between 86.1-94.7%, with %CV < or = 6.1%. This method has high accuracy (90.1-96.3%), and excellent intra-assay (0.6-3.8%) and inter-assay (2.0-5.7%) precision. Its applicability to clinical samples was demonstrated by measuring patient plasma samples after treatment of weekly docetaxel at 25 mg/m2 as 60-min infusion.

Calibration↗
PubMed2004

Clinical and immunologic effects of subcutaneously administered interleukin-12 and interferon alfa-2b: phase I trial of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma or malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: Interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interferon alfa-2b (IFN-alpha-2b) are pleiotropic cytokines with activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and malignant melanoma (MM) as single agents. Preclinical studies suggest concurrent administration may have synergistic antitumor effects. We conducted a phase I trial of concurrent subcutaneous (SC) administration of IL-12 and IFN-alpha-2b in patients with metastatic RCC or MM to determine toxicity, maximum-tolerated dose, preliminary efficacy, and effects on chemokine/cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating doses of IL-12 (dose I, 100 ng/kg; dose II, 300 ng/kg; dose III, 500 ng/kg; dose IV, 500 ng/kg SC) given twice weekly and IFN-alpha-2b (dose I, 1.0 MU/m(2); dose II, 1.0 MU/m(2); dose III, 1.0 MU/m(2); dose IV, 3.0 MU/m(2) SC) three times weekly in 4-week cycles. Effects on gene expression were assessed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (19 with RCC, seven with MM) were accrued at dose levels I (n = 3), II (n = 3), III (n = 13), and IV (n = 7). Dose-limiting toxicity included grades 3 and 4 hepatotoxicity and neutropenia/leukopenia. Patients received a median of three cycles of treatment. Two patients with RCC and one patient with MM had partial responses. Median survival was 13.8 months. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction on PBMCs revealed induction of IP-10, Mig, B7.1 (CD80), interleukin-5, and interferon gamma in selected patients. CONCLUSION: Concurrent SC administration of IL-12 and IFN-alpha-2b is possible at the dose levels utilized. Recommended doses for phase II trials are 500 ng/kg IL-12 and 1.0 MU/m(2) IFN-alpha-2b. Consistent induction of IP-10 and Mig, as well as variable induction of B7.1, interleukin-5, and interferon gamma expression was noted in PBMCs.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Phase I trial of vinorelbine and diphenylhydantoin in patients with refractory carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: The anti-epileptic diphenylhydantoin (DPH; Dilantin) selectively enhances the in vitro cytotoxicity of vinca microtubule poisons in both parent sensitive and multi-drug resistant (MDR) human tumor cells. The in vivo clinical activity of this combination has not been fully evaluated. PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and preliminary antitumor activity of the combination of intravenous (IV) bolus vinorelbine (VRL) and oral diphenylhydantoin (DPH) in patients (pts) with refractory solid tumors. METHODS: Cohorts of 3-6 pts with refractory cancer were treated with escalating doses of weekly IV bolus VRL (I -20.0 mg/m(2); II -22.5 mg/m(2); III -25.0 mg/m(2); IV -27.5 mg/m(2); V -30.0 mg/m(2); VI -32.5 mg/m(2)) combined with a fixed oral dose of DPH (400 mg/day) until MTD or progression. During each 35 day cycle, pts received DPH 400 mg/day administered orally on Days -6 to Day +22 and weekly IV bolus infusion of VRL on Days +1, +8, +15, and +22. The cohort treated at the MTD was expanded to further define toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 25 evaluable pts. (9 men; 16 women) were treated with VRL and DPH at dose levels I ( n = 5), II ( n = 3), III ( n = 2), IV ( n = 3), V ( n = 7) and VI ( n = 5) in 5 week cycles over a 16 month period. Dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose level VI (VRL 32.5 mg/m(2)) and included grade 3 leukopenia ( n = 2), grade 3 neutropenia ( n = 1) and grade 4 neutropenia ( n = 1) occurring within the first cycle of treatment. There were no responses, however 9 pts had stable disease of variable duration (8-56 weeks) and received a median of 2 cycles of treatment (range 2-14). CONCLUSION: Intravenous bolus administration of VRL and oral administration of a fixed dose of DPH was well tolerated according to the schedule reported here. Although there were no responses, several patients had prolonged disease stabilization. The recommended phase II dose of VRL when used in this combination is 30 mg/m(2).

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Phase I trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with refractory malignancies.

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study using weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine was conducted to investigate toxicity; to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of each agent; and, in a preliminary fashion, to determine the antitumor activity of the combination. METHODS: Docetaxel and gemcitabine were administered intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. The dose levels of docetaxel and gemcitabine were as follows: Level I, docetaxel 20 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level II, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 400 mg/m(2); Level III, docetaxel 30 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); Level IV, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2); and Level V, docetaxel 36 mg/m(2)and gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Thirty-three eligible patients were entered. The diagnoses were as follows: Eleven patients had nonsmall cell lung carcinoma, 3 patients had carcinoma of the bladder, 3 patients had renal carcinoma, 2 patients had adrenal carcinoma, 5 patients had unknown primary tumors, and 9 patients had miscellaneous malignancies. Fifty-nine percent of patients had received prior chemotherapy. The median age was 62 years (range, 27-77 years), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 1 (range, 0-1). Five patients were treated at Dose Levels I and II, 6 patients were treated at Dose Levels III and V, and 11 patients were treated at Dose Level IV. Grade 3-4 toxicities during Cycle I included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and diarrhea. Dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, occurred in three of six patients at Dose Level V. The combination of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2) (Dose Level IV) was determined as the MTD and was the recommended Phase II dose. Two patients had a partial response: one patient with bladder carcinoma (Dose Level II) and one patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (Dose Level III). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine were well tolerated. Further studies using this combination are planned, including a Phase II trial in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Evolving role of pegylated interferons in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Interferon (IFN)-alpha has demonstrated antitumor activity in a variety of solid and hematologic malignancies, including metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Pegylation, the process of combining a polyethylene glycol moiety to a biologic protein, substantially changes the pharmacokinetic profile of a drug, resulting in prolongation in half-life, increased area under the curve and, in some cases, improved efficacy. Pegylated IFN-alpha has been evaluated in chronic hepatitis C, chronic myelogenous leukemia and most recently in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Registrational studies of pegylated IFN-alpha2a (PEGASYS) and pegylated IFN-alpha2b (PEG Intron) in patients with hepatitis C demonstrated greater efficacy with similar safety and tolerability to nonpegylated IFNs, with the advantage of less frequent administration. Studies evaluating these agents in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and other cancers are ongoing.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Phase I trial of consensus interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: toxicity and immunological effects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and effects on chemokine/cytokine gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of consensus IFN (CIFN). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Cohorts of three to six patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were treated with escalating doses of CIFN (dose level I, 9.0 microg/m(2); dose level II, 15.0 microg/m(2); dose level III, 21.0 microg/m(2)) given s.c. three times weekly in 4-week cycles until progression. The cohort treated at the maximum tolerated dose was expanded to further define toxicity. An additional three patients were treated with i.v. CIFN (15.0 microg/m(2)) to evaluate route-related differences in gene expression. Cytokine and chemokine gene expression in PBMCs was assessed by reverse transcription-PCR. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients (18 men and 7 women) were enrolled between January 28, 1999, and November 1, 2000, at dose levels I (n = 4), II (n = 14), and III (n = 7). Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at dose level III (21 microg/m(2)) and included grade-3 or -4 respiratory distress/failure (n = 3) and hypocalcemia (n = 1) occurring within the first cycle of treatment. Other severe toxicities included grade-3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and nausea/vomiting. Studies of cytokine and chemokine gene expression in PBMCs from eight patients revealed induction of IFN-gamma, IP-10, and Mig. I.V. administration was associated with a faster induction, but of shorter duration. There were no responses; however, 24 patients had stable disease of variable duration (4-32 weeks) and received a median of three cycles of treatment (range, 1-8 cycles). Overall median survival was 13.5 months, and was 12.7 months in the previously treated patients. CONCLUSION: CIFN was safely administered s.c. three times weekly at doses up to 15.0 microg/m(2). Although there were no responses, the median survival was longer than expected in a previously treated patient population with metastatic RCC.

Adult↗