PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas E Warfel

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas E Warfel.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess relative intra- and interobserver agreement in detecting pulmonary nodules when interpreting low-dose chest CT screening examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred ninety-three selected low-dose CT examinations of the lung were independently interpreted by three radiologists to detect and classify pulmonary nodules. The data set selected was enriched with examinations depicting pulmonary nodules. A subset of 30 examinations was interpreted twice. All pulmonary nodules greater than 1.0 mm were marked. All nodules greater than 3.0 mm were marked, measured, and scored as to their probability of being benign or malignant. Nodule-based and examination-based relative reviewer agreements were evaluated using percentage of agreement and kappa statistics. Similar assessments were performed on the subset of examinations interpreted twice. RESULTS: The three radiologists identified a total of 470, 729, and 876 pulmonary nodules of which 395, 641, and 778 were rated as noncalcified with some level of suspicion for being malignant. Nodule-based interobserver agreement among the radiologists was poor (highest kappa value in a paired comparison, 0.120). Examination-based agreement was higher (highest kappa value in a paired comparison, 0.458). Intraobserver agreement was higher than interobserver agreement for examination-based agreement (highest kappa = 0.889) but lower for nodule-based agreement (highest kappa = -0.035). Agreement improved as the suspicion of malignancy increased. CONCLUSION: Unaided intra- and interobserver agreement in detecting pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT of the lung is relatively low. Computer-assisted detection may provide the consistency that is needed for this purpose.

Female↗

Integrating dictation with PACS to eliminate paper.

Five years ago our department migrated from a film-based imaging environment to a PACS-based environment. We discovered that our reliance on paper tracking forms for clinical history and dictation information was hindering our practice. Integrating dictation with PACS was one of three key components we needed to free ourselves from the tyranny of paper, the other two being an online worklist and an online patient history. We discuss our evolution to a (mostly) paperless reading room environment, our implementation, general performance, and future development plans, focusing on integrated dictation.

Humans↗

Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment.

PURPOSE: To measure observer performance at various levels of prevalence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multiobserver multiabnormality receiver operating characteristic (ROC) study to assess the effect of prevalence on observer performance was conducted. Fourteen observers, including eight faculty members, two fellows, and four residents, interpreted 1,632 posteroanterior chest images with five prevalence levels by using a nested study design. Performance comparisons were accomplished by using a multireader multicase approach to assess the effect of prevalence from 28% (69 of 249) to 2% (31 of 1,577) on diagnostic accuracy. The mean times required to review and report a case were analyzed and compared for different levels of prevalence and readers' experience. RESULTS: Area under the ROC curve demonstrated that, with the study experimental conditions, no significant effect could be measured as a function of prevalence (P >.05) for any abnormality, group of cases, or readers. There were no significant differences (P >.05) in the mean times required to review and report cases at different prevalence levels and with different groups of readers. CONCLUSION: The consistency in the results and the size of this study suggest that with laboratory conditions, if a prevalence effect exists, it is quite small in magnitude; hence, it will not likely alter conclusions derived from such studies.

Laboratories↗