PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas J Begley

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas J Begley.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent biosynthesis of aminovaleramide by AvaS in tRNA.

In eubacteria, decoding of isoleucine codon AUA requires a specialized tRNA (tRNAIle2) modified with lysidine (k2C) at the anticodon wobble position (C34), which switches decoding specificity from methionine (AUG) to isoleucine (AUA). Recently, aminovaleramide cytidine (ava2C) was discovered at the same tRNA position in several bacteria and plants and shown to support AUA decoding and Ile-specific aminoacylation. However, the enzyme catalyzing ava2C was unknown. Here, we report that tRNAIle-aminovaleramididine synthetase (AvaS) catalyzes ava2C biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. AvaS converts k2C to ava2C through a pyridoxal-phosphate-dependent oxidative decarboxylation mechanism, supported by site-directed mutagenesis and in vitro enzymatic assays. Dual-reporter assays demonstrated that ava2C-modified tRNA exhibits lower AUA decoding efficiency than k2C-modified tRNA. Additionally, genome-wide screening revealed an unexpected link between ava2C levels and metabolic and stress response pathways influencing i6A/ms2i6A dynamics. Together, these findings define the molecular basis of ava2C biosynthesis and its broader cellular metabolic networks.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

The DNA-damage signature in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is associated with single-strand breaks in DNA.

BACKGROUND: Upon exposure to agents that damage DNA, Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergo widespread reprogramming of gene expression. Such a vast response may be due not only to damage to DNA but also damage to proteins, RNA, and lipids. Here the transcriptional response of S. cerevisiae specifically induced by DNA damage was discerned by exposing S. cerevisiae to a panel of three "radiomimetic" enediyne antibiotics (calicheamicin gamma1I, esperamicin A1 and neocarzinostatin) that bind specifically to DNA and generate varying proportions of single- and double-strand DNA breaks. The genome-wide responses were compared to those induced by the non-selective oxidant gamma-radiation. RESULTS: Given well-controlled exposures that resulted in similar and minimal cell death (~20-25%) across all conditions, the extent of gene expression modulation was markedly different depending on treatment with the enediynes or gamma-radiation. Exposure to gamma-radiation resulted in more extensive transcriptional changes classified both by the number of genes modulated and the magnitude of change. Common biological responses were identified between the enediynes and gamma-radiation, with the induction of DNA repair and stress response genes, and the repression of ribosomal biogenesis genes. Despite these common responses, a fraction of the response induced by gamma radiation was repressed by the enediynes and vise versa, suggesting that the enediyne response is not entirely "radiomimetic." Regression analysis identified 55 transcripts with gene expression induction associated both with double- or single-strand break formation. The S. cerevisiae "DNA damage signature" genes as defined by Gasch et al. 1 were enriched among regulated transcripts associated with single-strand breaks, while genes involved in cell cycle regulation were associated with double-strand breaks. CONCLUSION: Dissection of the transcriptional response in yeast that is specifically signaled by DNA strand breaks has identified that single-strand breaks provide the signal for activation of transcripts encoding proteins involved in the DNA damage signature in S. cerevisiae, and double-strand breaks signal changes in cell cycle regulation genes.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2006

A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways.

Failure of cells to respond to DNA damage is a primary event associated with mutagenesis and environmental toxicity. To map the transcriptional network controlling the damage response, we measured genomewide binding locations for 30 damage-related transcription factors (TFs) after exposure of yeast to methyl-methanesulfonate (MMS). The resulting 5272 TF-target interactions revealed extensive changes in the pattern of promoter binding and identified damage-specific binding motifs. As systematic functional validation, we identified interactions for which the target changed expression in wild-type cells in response to MMS but was nonresponsive in cells lacking the TF. Validated interactions were assembled into causal pathway models that provide global hypotheses of how signaling, transcription, and phenotype are integrated after damage.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2005

Genome-wide responses to DNA-damaging agents.

Genome-wide studies of mRNA regulation and phenotypic responses have shown that eukaryotic cells mount a robust and multifaceted response upon exposure to DNA-damaging agents. The integration of theses studies over frameworks provided by protein-protein interactions, protein-DNA interactions, and subcellular localization information have led to the identification of networked responses to damage. Taken together, these studies illustrate that cellular protection from DNA and other macromolecular damage involves an intricate network of proteins involved in many different cellular functions, some of them expected (e.g., DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints) but many of them unexpected (e.g., protein trafficking and degradation). This review highlights many of the studies that detail genome-wide responses to DNA-damaging agents and examines how these datasets have been used to build a systems view of cellular responses to damage.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2004

Global network analysis of phenotypic effects: protein networks and toxicity modulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Using genome-wide information to understand holistically how cells function is a major challenge of the postgenomic era. Recent efforts to understand molecular pathway operation from a global perspective have lacked experimental data on phenotypic context, so insights concerning biologically relevant network characteristics of key genes or proteins have remained largely speculative. Here, we present a global network investigation of the genotype/phenotype data set we developed for the recovery of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae from exposure to DNA-damaging agents, enabling explicit study of how protein-protein interaction network characteristics may be associated with phenotypic functional effects. We show that toxicity-modulating proteins have similar topological properties as essential proteins, suggesting that cells initiate highly coordinated responses to damage similar to those needed for vital cellular functions. We also identify toxicologically important protein complexes, pathways, and modules. These results have potential implications for understanding toxicity-modulating processes relevant to a number of human diseases, including cancer and aging.

Cluster Analysis↗
PubMed2004

Hot spots for modulating toxicity identified by genomic phenotyping and localization mapping.

DNA repair and checkpoint pathways protect against carcinogen-induced toxicity. Here, we describe additional, equally protective pathways discovered by interrogating 4,733 yeast proteins for their ability to diminish toxicity induced by four known carcinogens. A computational mapping strategy for global phenotypic data was developed to build a systems toxicology model detailing recovery from carcinogen exposure and identifying protein complexes that modulate toxicity. Global phenotypic data were merged with global subcellular localization and protein interactome data to generate an integrated picture of cellular recovery after carcinogen exposure. Statistically validated results from this systems-wide integration demonstrate that, in addition to the nucleus, subnetworks of toxicity-modulating proteins were overrepresented in the vacuolar membrane, endosome, endoplasmic reticulum, and mitochondrion. In addition, we show that many proteins associated with RNA polymerase II, macromolecular trafficking, and vacuole function can now be counted among the many proteins that modulate carcinogen-induced toxicity.

Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed2003

Kinetics and binding of the thymine-DNA mismatch glycosylase, Mig-Mth, with mismatch-containing DNA substrates.

We have examined the removal of thymine residues from T-G mismatches in DNA by the thymine-DNA mismatch glycosylase from Methanobacterium thermoautrophicum (Mig-Mth), within the context of the base excision repair (BER) pathway, to investigate why this glycosylase has such low activity in vitro. Using single-turnover kinetics and steady-state kinetics, we calculated the catalytic and product dissociation rate constants for Mig-Mth, and determined that Mig-Mth is inhibited by product apyrimidinic (AP) sites in DNA. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) provide evidence that the specificity of product binding is dependent upon the base opposite the AP site. The binding of Mig-Mth to DNA containing the non-cleavable substrate analogue difluorotoluene (F) was also analyzed to determine the effect of the opposite base on Mig-Mth binding specificity for substrate-like duplex DNA. The results of these experiments support the idea that opposite strand interactions play roles in determining substrate specificity. Endonuclease IV, which cleaves AP sites in the next step of the BER pathway, was used to analyze the effect of product removal on the overall rate of thymine hydrolysis by Mig-Mth. Our results support the hypothesis that endonuclease IV increases the apparent activity of Mig-Mth significantly under steady-state conditions by preventing reassociation of enzyme to product.

DNA↗
PubMed2003

AlkB mystery solved: oxidative demethylation of N1-methyladenine and N3-methylcytosine adducts by a direct reversal mechanism.

All organisms have multiple DNA repair pathways to protect against alkylation-induced mutation and cell death. For nearly two decades, we have known that the Escherichia coli alkB gene product protects against cell killing by S(N)2-alkylating agents, probably through DNA repair. Despite numerous attempts, a specific DNA repair activity could not be assigned to AlkB. Now, a breakthrough in biology and biochemistry, coupled with the discovery of an in silico protein structure, has uncovered a novel direct reversal DNA repair mechanism that is catalyzed by AlkB, namely the oxidative demethylation of N1-methyladenine or N3-methylcytosine DNA lesions. This reaction occurs on both single- and double-stranded DNA, and requires AlkB-bound non-heme Fe(2+), O(2) and alpha-ketogluterate to oxidize the offending methyl group. This is followed by the release of succinate, CO(2) and formaldehyde, and the restoration of undamaged A or C in DNA.

Adenine↗
PubMed2002

Structure and activity of a thermostable thymine-DNA glycosylase: evidence for base twisting to remove mismatched normal DNA bases.

The repair of T:G mismatches in DNA is key for maintaining bacterial restriction/modification systems and gene silencing in higher eukaryotes. T:G mismatch repair can be initiated by a specific mismatch glycosylase (MIG) that is homologous to the helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) DNA repair enzymes. Here, we present a 2.0 A resolution crystal structure and complementary mutagenesis results for this thermophilic HhH MIG enzyme. The results suggest that MIG distorts the target thymine nucleotide by twisting the thymine base approximately 90 degrees away from its normal anti position within DNA. We propose that functionally significant differences exist in DNA repair enzyme extrahelical nucleotide binding and catalysis that are characteristic of whether the target base is damaged or is a normal base within a mispair. These results explain why pure HhH DNA glycosylases and combined glycosylase/AP lyases cannot be interconverted by simply altering their functional group chemistry, and how broad-specificity DNA glycosylase enzymes may weaken the glycosylic linkage to allow a variety of damaged DNA bases to be excised.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2002

Damage recovery pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic phenotyping and interactome mapping.

We have generated a genomic phenotyping database identifying hundreds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes important for viable cellular recovery after mutagen exposure. Systematic phenotyping of 1,615 gene deletion strains produced distinctive signatures for each of four mutagens. Integration of the phenotyping database with mutagen-induced transcriptional profiling data demonstrated that being transcriptionally responsive to a mutagen does not predict whether or not a gene contributes to recovery from exposure to that mutagen. Computational integration of the database with 4,025 interacting proteins, comprising the yeast interactome, identified several multiprotein networks important for damage recovery. Some networks were associated with DNA metabolism and cell cycle control functions, but most were associated with unexpected functions such as cytoskeleton remodeling, chromatin remodeling, protein, RNA, and lipid metabolism. Hence, a plethora of responses other than the DNA damage response is important for recovery. These network mapping results demonstrate how systematic phenotypic assays may be linked directly to underlying molecular mechanisms.

Cell Division↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Network responses to DNA damaging agents.

Global transcriptional profiling and large scale phenotypic studies have shown that eukaryotic cells mount a robust and complex response to damage. Further, systems biology approaches have employed powerful analytical methods to integrate global data sets with regulatory sequences, protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions, which have led to the identification of large networked responses to damage. A number of groups have shown that damage responsive networks embrace groups of highly connected genes and proteins and have illustrated that multiple interconnected cellular pathways respond to damage and moreover, dictate viability post damage. This review highlights some of the global studies that examine cellular responses to damage, and proposes that we should be moving from pathways to networks, in order to gain better insight into cellular defense mechanisms.

Animals↗