PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas R McCune

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas R McCune.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Vasodilatation vs. immunotherapy to prevent delayed graft function: delayed graft function as an indication of immune activation.

Delayed renal allograft function (DGF) is a factor for acute rejection and chronic allograft nephropathy. Cold ischemia time (CIT) is associated with an increased in DGF. Twenty patients receiving allografts with CIT>12 were enrolled in a double-blinded, randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled study to assess vasodilatation with fenoldopam (Abbott; dopamine-1 receptor agonist) on DGF. Fenoldopam infusion began at arterial anastomosis at 0.025 microg/kg/min and titrated to 0.1 microg/kg/min continued for 48 h postop (PO). Immunosuppression included steriods, MMF, and calcinurin inhibitors begun 36 h PO. Antibody induction (AI) using antithymocyte globulin (rabbit) (AT-G(r); Sangstat) was added halfway through the study to African-Americans and for PRA>40%. The need for dialysis, cumulative urine output (UOP), and creatinine (Cr) at PO day 7, 14, and 30 were compared. Eighteen patients completed the study drug infusion. Demographics of groups were not different. There was no difference between fenoldopam and controls for dialysis, UOP at 48 and 72 h, or Cr at 7, 14, or 30 days. There was a difference in UOP when AI (n=7) was compared to non-AI (n=11). At 48 h non-AI UOP 4796+/-3284 ml compared to AI UOP 8960+/-5130 ml (p=0.050). At 72 h, non-AI patients had UOP of 6824+/-4547 ml compared to AI patients with UOP of 12196+/-5868 ml (p=0.044). There was a trend to a lower Cr at day 7 for AI 2.7+/-2.1mg/dl compared to 4.9+/-3.0 mg/dl in non-AI (p=0.11). There was no difference in dialysis or Cr at day 14 and 30 between the AI and non-AI patients. AI with AT-G(r) significantly increases UOP in allografts with CIT>12 h, whereas vasodilatation did not. Therapy for DGF may include AT-G(r) AI.

Adult↗

The Living Organ Donor Network: a model registry for living kidney donors.

The South-Eastern Organ Procurement Foundation presents the first report on a programme to track donors through questionnaires completed at the time of donation, 3 months, 6 months, and yearly thereafter. Donors at participating centres were eligible for an insurance policy with a total benefit of 250,000 US dollars, covering accidental death related to donation, surgery, medical expenses of complications, and disability income. The four participating centres have registered 104 donors. Response rate to the questionnaires was 90.91%. The majority of the donors come from the immediate family (81.62%), either by blood or marriage. The majority of donors are employed full time, with income ranges similar to the national census. Donors rely on employer-provided vacation time and sick leave to recuperate, but the average donor required 12 days of unpaid leave before returning to work. Donors also experienced costs of transportation, lodging, and childcare. Anti-depressants were prescribed to 10.58% of donors, and 4.8% of donors reported they are treated for hypertension. Complications were reported by 37.5% of the donors, but only 7.6% of the complications were serious enough to require hospitalization or surgery. Donors reported higher complication rates than reported by the centres and experience financial burdens afterwards.

Employment↗

Sensitized patients require sharing of highly matched kidneys.

BACKGROUND: Improved HLA matching can allow for renal transplantation in sensitized patients. United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) is currently considering removing the points awarded for HLA matching. METHOD: Twenty-six transplant centers shared kidneys, according to the algorithm: A, UNOS mandatory 0-mismatch (MM) share; B, UNOS mandatory 0-mm payback; C, 0 - B,Dr-MM; PRA> or = 40%; ROP tray negative; D, 0-B,Dr-MM; panel reactive antibodies (PRA) <40%; E, 0-B,Dr payback; F, local use. RESULTS: A total of 354 patients received transplants through the program and were compared with 6492 control patients. There was a significantly greater primary nonfunction rate in sensitized patients in spite of similar length cold ischemia time. Blacks were not significantly disadvantaged by the HLA matching requirements of the program. White recipients were favored by the matching program to the detriment of race group "other." Women were more frequently found in the sensitized groups but were not favored by sharing. Retransplant patients and patients with current PRA > or = 40% were favored by the sharing program. Sharing for HLA match does not improve graft survival at 1, 2, 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: (1). Elimination of suboptimal HLA matching by UNOS will probably not adversely affect 1-, 2-, and 3-year graft survival; (2). Removing the consideration for HLA matching will result in fewer transplant opportunities for highly sensitized patients such as retransplants and currently sensitized patients.

Adult↗