PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thomas W Schnider

Publications and source records attributed to Thomas W Schnider.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Closed-loop control of mean arterial blood pressure during surgery with alfentanil: clinical evaluation of a novel model-based predictive controller.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to hypnosis, there is no surrogate parameter for analgesia in anesthetized patients. Opioids are titrated to suppress blood pressure response to noxious stimulation. The authors evaluated a novel model predictive controller for closed-loop administration of alfentanil using mean arterial blood pressure and predicted plasma alfentanil concentration (Cp Alf) as input parameters. METHODS: The authors studied 13 healthy patients scheduled to undergo minor lumbar and cervical spine surgery. After induction with propofol, alfentanil, and mivacurium and tracheal intubation, isoflurane was titrated to maintain the Bispectral Index at 55 (+/- 5), and the alfentanil administration was switched from manual to closed-loop control. The controller adjusted the alfentanil infusion rate to maintain the mean arterial blood pressure near the set-point (70 mmHg) while minimizing the Cp Alf toward the set-point plasma alfentanil concentration (Cp Alfref) (100 ng/ml). RESULTS: Two patients were excluded because of loss of arterial pressure signal and protocol violation. The alfentanil infusion was closed-loop controlled for a mean (SD) of 98.9 (1.5)% of presurgery time and 95.5 (4.3)% of surgery time. The mean (SD) end-tidal isoflurane concentrations were 0.78 (0.1) and 0.86 (0.1) vol%, the Cp Alf values were 122 (35) and 181 (58) ng/ml, and the Bispectral Index values were 51 (9) and 52 (4) before surgery and during surgery, respectively. The mean (SD) absolute deviations of mean arterial blood pressure were 7.6 (2.6) and 10.0 (4.2) mmHg (P = 0.262), and the median performance error, median absolute performance error, and wobble were 4.2 (6.2) and 8.8 (9.4)% (P = 0.002), 7.9 (3.8) and 11.8 (6.3)% (P = 0.129), and 14.5 (8.4) and 5.7 (1.2)% (P = 0.002) before surgery and during surgery, respectively. A post hoc simulation showed that the Cp Alfref decreased the predicted Cp Alf compared with mean arterial blood pressure alone. CONCLUSION: The authors' controller has a similar set-point precision as previous hypnotic controllers and provides adequate alfentanil dosing during surgery. It may help to standardize opioid dosing in research and may be a further step toward a multiple input-multiple output controller.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Human physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for propofol.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is widely used for both short-term anesthesia and long-term sedation. It has unusual pharmacokinetics because of its high lipid solubility. The standard approach to describing the pharmacokinetics is by a multi-compartmental model. This paper presents the first detailed human physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for propofol. METHODS: PKQuest, a freely distributed software routine http://www.pkquest.com, was used for all the calculations. The "standard human" PBPK parameters developed in previous applications is used. It is assumed that the blood and tissue binding is determined by simple partition into the tissue lipid, which is characterized by two previously determined set of parameters: 1) the value of the propofol oil/water partition coefficient; 2) the lipid fraction in the blood and tissues. The model was fit to the individual experimental data of Schnider et. al., Anesthesiology, 1998; 88:1170 in which an initial bolus dose was followed 60 minutes later by a one hour constant infusion. RESULTS: The PBPK model provides a good description of the experimental data over a large range of input dosage, subject age and fat fraction. Only one adjustable parameter (the liver clearance) is required to describe the constant infusion phase for each individual subject. In order to fit the bolus injection phase, for 10 or the 24 subjects it was necessary to assume that a fraction of the bolus dose was sequestered and then slowly released from the lungs (characterized by two additional parameters). The average weighted residual error (WRE) of the PBPK model fit to the both the bolus and infusion phases was 15%; similar to the WRE for just the constant infusion phase obtained by Schnider et. al. using a 6-parameter NONMEM compartmental model. CONCLUSION: A PBPK model using standard human parameters and a simple description of tissue binding provides a good description of human propofol kinetics. The major advantage of a PBPK model is that it can be used to predict the changes in kinetics produced by variations in physiological parameters. As one example, the model simulation of the changes in pharmacokinetics for morbidly obese subjects is discussed.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Xenon does not reduce opioid requirement for orthopedic surgery.

PURPOSE: Is to test the hypothesis that 70% xenon has a relevant opioid sparing effect compared to a minimum alveolar concentration (MAC)-equivalent combination of N(2)O and desflurane. METHODS: In this randomized, controlled study of 30 patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery, we determined the plasma alfentanil concentration required to suppress response to skin incision in 50% of patients (Cp(50)) anesthetized with xenon (70%) or a combination of N(2)O (70%) and desflurane (2%). A response was defined as movement, pressor response > 15 mmHg, heart rate > 90 beats x min(-1), autonomic reactions or a combination of these. At skin incision, alfentanil was administered at a randomly selected target plasma concentration thereafter the concentration was increased or decreased according to the patient's response. After skin incision, desflurane was adjusted to maintain the bispectral index below 60 and prevent responsiveness in both groups. RESULTS: The Cp(50) (+/- standard error) of alfentanil was 83 +/- 48ng x mL(-1) with xenon and 49 +/- 26 ng x mL(-1) with N(2)O/desflurane (P =0.451). During surgery five xenon and 15 N(2)O/desflurane patients were given desflurane at 1.0 +/- 0.5 volume % and 2.5 +/- 0.7 volume %. The total age adjusted MAC was 0.97 +/- 0.07 and 0.94 +/- 0.07 respectively (P = 0.217). The intraoperative plasma alfentanil concentrations were 95 +/- 80 and 93 +/- 60 ng x mL(-1) respectively (mean +/- SD; P = 0.451). Patients given xenon were slightly more bradycardic, whereas blood pressure was similar. CONCLUSION: Xenon compared to a MAC-equivalent combination of N(2)O and desflurane does not substantially reduce opioid requirement for orthopedic surgery. A small but clinically irrelevant difference cannot be excluded, however.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Preoperative fibrin monomer measurement allows risk stratification for high intraoperative blood loss in elective surgery.

We recently demonstrated that patients with increased blood loss due to intraoperative coagulopathy show a persistent pre-, intra- and postoperative increase in fibrin monomer concentration. We thus tested the hypothesis that preoperative fibrin monomer concentrations can be used as a risk indicator for intraoperative blood loss in a study designed for diagnostic test evaluation in 168 patients admitted to the surgical service of our hospital. Intraoperative blood loss increased with preoperative fibrin monomer concentration (median blood loss of 50, 100, 200 and 400 ml in preoperative fibrin monomer quartile groups 1 to 4, p<0.001, ANOVA on ranks; interquartile comparisons p < 0.05 (4/6), Mann Whitney Rank Sum test). In contrast, intraoperative blood loss was unrelated to preoperative values of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time and platelet count. By multivariate (logistic regression) analysis, only fibrin monomer remained a significant predictor of intraoperative blood loss > 500 ml when age, gender, BMI, fibrin monomer and the different types of surgical procedures (tumor surgery, vascular surgery, cholecystectomy, gastric banding, varicous vein surgery and hernia repair) were included as independent variables. Most importantly, accuracy evaluation showed that preoperative fibrin monomer concentration < 3 microg/l excluded intraoperative blood loss > 500 ml with 92% sensitivity and 95% negative predictive value. These results support our hypothesis that preoperative fibrin monomer concentrations are related to intraoperative blood loss in elective surgery. Fibrin monomer should be further investigated for it's potential to serve as a routine tool for preoperative risk stratification of intraoperative bleeding.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Using the time of maximum effect site concentration to combine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

BACKGROUND: To simulate the time course of drug effect, it is sometimes necessary to combine the pharmacodynamic parameters from an integrated pharmacodynamic-pharmacodynamic study (e.g., volumes, clearances, k(e0) [the effect site equilibration rate constant], C(50) [the steady state plasma concentration associated with 50% maximum effect], and the Hill coefficient) with pharmacokinetic parameters from a different study (e.g., a study examining a different age group or sampling over longer periods of time). Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters form an interlocked vector that describes the relationship between input (dose) and output (effect). Unintended consequences may result if individual elements of this vector (e.g., k(e0)) are combined with pharmacokinetic parameters from a different study. The authors propose an alternative methodology to rationally combine the results of separate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies, based on t(peak), the time of peak effect after bolus injection. METHODS: The naive approach to combining separate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies is to simply take the k(e0) from the pharmacodynamic study and apply it naively to the pharmacokinetic study of interest. In the t(peak) approach, k(e0) is recalculated using the pharmacokinetics of interest to yield the correct time of peak effect. The authors proposed that the t(peak) method would yield better predictions of the time course of drug effect than the naive approach. They tested this hypothesis in three simulations: thiopental, remifentanil, and propofol. RESULTS: In each set of simulations, the t(peak) method better approximated the postulated "true" time course of drug effect than the naive method. CONCLUSIONS: T(peak) is a useful pharmacodynamic parameter and can be used to link separate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. This addresses a common difficulty in clinical pharmacology simulation and control problems, where there is usually a wide choice of pharmacokinetic models but only one or two published pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. The results will be immediately applicable to target-controlled anesthetic infusion systems, where linkage of separate pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters into a single model is inherent in several target-controlled infusion designs.

Aging↗
PubMed2003

Modulation of remifentanil-induced analgesia, hyperalgesia, and tolerance by small-dose ketamine in humans.

UNLABELLED: Adding a small dose of ketamine to opioids may increase the analgesic effect and prevent opioid-induced hyperalgesia and acute tolerance to opioids. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover study, we investigated the effect of remifentanil combined with small concentrations of ketamine on different experimental pain models. Pain detection thresholds to single and repeated IM electrical stimulation and to repeated transcutaneous electrical stimulation, pressure pain tolerance threshold, and sedative, respiratory, and cardiovascular side effects were assessed in 14 healthy volunteers. Saline, remifentanil alone, and remifentanil combined with ketamine at target plasma concentrations of 50 or 100 ng/mL were administered in four study sessions. The ketamine infusion was started after baseline testing at a constant target concentration. Remifentanil was started after testing with ketamine alone at an initial target concentration of 1 ng/mL and then increased to 2 ng/mL and decreased to 1 ng/mL. The last test series were started 10 min after discontinuation of remifentanil. Acute remifentanil-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance were detected only by the pressure pain test and were not suppressed by ketamine. Remifentanil alone induced significant analgesia with all pain tests. Ketamine further increased the remifentanil effect only on IM electrical pain. Remifentanil at a 2 ng/mL target concentration induced a slight respiratory depression that was antagonized by ketamine. We conclude that ketamine effects on opioid analgesia are pain-modality specific. IMPLICATIONS: Coadministration of ketamine and morphine for pain relief is still controversial. Our experimental pain study with volunteers showed that ketamine enhances opioid analgesia without increasing sedation and reduces respiratory depression. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia and tolerance were not affected by ketamine and depended on the type of nociceptive stimulus. This may explain the conflicting results on opioid tolerance in previous studies.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Efficient trial design for eliciting a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model-based response surface describing the interaction between two intravenous anesthetic drugs.

BACKGROUND: The authors published a pharmacokinetic- pharmacodynamic model for two drugs based on response surface methodology. Because of the complexity of the model, they performed a simulation study to answer two questions about use of the model: (1) which study design would be most satisfactory; and (2) how many patients would need to be studied to adequately describe an entire response surface. METHODS: Data were simulated using realistic variability for two hypothetical intravenous anesthetic drugs that interact synergistically and that could be given by computer-controlled infusion. Three trial designs were simulated, one that made a series of parallel slices of the response surface, one that crisscrossed the response surface, and one that made a series of radial slices across the surface. Series of 5, 10, 20, and 40 "subjects" were simulated. A pooled data approach was used to assess the ability of the various trial designs and numbers of subjects to adequately identify the interaction response surface and estimate the original response surface. RESULTS: The crisscross design was shown to be the most robust in terms of its ability to both discriminate the correct order of the interaction term and to discriminate the original response surface using the least number of patients. Twenty subjects would be required to adequately define a surface using the crisscross study design, and 40 subjects would be required using the other trial designs. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that a number of trial designs would be viable, but a design that crossed the surface in a crisscross fashion would give the most robust result with the least patients.

Algorithms↗