PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Thys van der Molen

Publications and source records attributed to Thys van der Molen.

17 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Despite asthma being primarily managed in general practice and primary care, there is little research into the issues and tools which may impact on managing poorly controlled asthma in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of health care professionals (HCPs) towards asthma guidelines and self-management plans (SMPs) to identify why these are not used routinely in general practice. METHODS: Data from 54 HCPs [GPs and practice nurses (PNs)] in north-east Scotland were collected via qualitative interviews and focus groups. Participant views and experience of asthma guidelines and SMPs were explored. RESULTS: Participants had mainly positive attitudes towards guidelines and SMPs, although both were used only when deemed suitable by the individual. Suitability depended on individual patient issues (e.g. psychosocial factors, level of control) and/or professional issues (e.g. ease of use, time available, job roles). Patient issues were viewed as impacting on asthma control directly and, indirectly, as the main reason for not using guidelines or SMPs with a patient. HCPs reported lacking necessary communication skills for dealing with patient asthma control issues, particularly where these were non-medical. Professional and organizational issues such as training and communication were also perceived as impairing asthma management. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that guidelines are seen as providing the 'why' of helping asthma patients' self-manage but not the 'what to...' or 'how to...' communicate. Poor professional-patient communication seems largely to explain the poor uptake of SMPs and guideline use in general practice and primary care. This limitation is more obvious to professionals when they are working with patients with poorly controlled asthma. There is a need to identify key communication skills for effective professional-patient partnership in adult asthma management, and to develop robust strategies for effectively training GPs and PNs in enhancing these skills.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A self-rating scale for patient-perceived side effects of inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported side effect questionnaires offer a simple method for the systematic measurement of drug-related side effects. In order to measure patients' inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) related side effect perceptions the 14-day retrospective Inhaled Corticosteroid Questionnaire (ICQ) was developed. In this research we aim to assess the construct validity and reliability of the ICQ and test its responsiveness to dose changes in adult asthma patients. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, current inhaler users with asthma completed the ICQ (27 with non ICS inhaler; 61 BDP equivalent daily ICS low dose < or =400 microg; 62 mid dose 401-800 microg; and 105 with high dose >800 microg). We generated 3 construct validity hypotheses: 1) a hierarchical dose-response pattern for scoring of the individual items on the ICQ, and statistically significant differences in the scores of each of the 15 ICQ domains by ICS dose group 2) an association between ICS dose and ICQ scoring after adjusting for appropriate confounders in multiple regression; 3) greater convergence between local side effect domains than between systemic and local domains of the scale. Test-retest reliability was assessed on a randomly selected subgroup of patients (n = 73) who also completed the ICQ a second time after 7 days. In a separate longitudinal study, 61 patients with asthma completed the ICQ at baseline and after changing their daily ICS dose, at 2- and 6- months, in order to test the ICQ's responsiveness. RESULTS: All three construct validity hypotheses were well supported: 1) a statistically significant difference existed in scores for 14 domains, the high ICS dose group scoring highest; 2) ICS dose independently predicted ICQ scoring after adjusting for confounders; 3) greater convergence existed between local ICQ domains than between local and systemic domains. The ICQ had good reproducibility: test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients were > or =0.69 for all but the 'Facial Oedema' domain. In the longitudinal study, ICQ scores for 'Voice Problems' changed significantly at 2- and 6-months from baseline and other ICQ domains displayed trends in scoring change accordant with dose modulation at 6-months. CONCLUSION: The ICQ has good dose-related discriminative properties, is valid, reliable, and shows potential responsiveness to ICS dose change.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Attitudes and actions of asthma patients on regular maintenance therapy: the INSPIRE study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined the attitudes and actions of 3415 physician-recruited adults aged > or = 16 years with asthma in eleven countries who were prescribed regular maintenance therapy with inhaled corticosteroids or inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta2-agonists. METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted to assess medication use, asthma control, and patients' ability to recognise and self-manage worsening asthma. RESULTS: Despite being prescribed regular maintenance therapy, 74% of patients used short-acting beta2-agonists daily and 51% were classified by the Asthma Control Questionnaire as having uncontrolled asthma. Even patients with well-controlled asthma reported an average of 6 worsenings/year. The mean period from the onset to the peak symptoms of a worsening was 5.1 days. Although most patients recognised the early signs of worsenings, the most common response was to increase short-acting beta2-agonist use; inhaled corticosteroids were increased to a lesser extent at the peak of a worsening. CONCLUSION: Previous studies of this nature have also reported considerable patient morbidity, but in those studies approximately three-quarters of patients were not receiving regular maintenance therapy and not all had a physician-confirmed diagnosis of asthma. This study shows that patients with asthma receiving regular maintenance therapy still have high levels of inadequately controlled asthma. The study also shows that patients recognise deteriorating asthma control and adjust their medication during episodes of worsening. However, they often adjust treatment in an inappropriate manner, which represents a window of missed opportunity.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Sub-optimal patient and physician communication in primary care consultations: its relation to severe and difficult asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Asthma control can be influenced by a range of non-medical issues, including psychosocial factors. Little is known about the views of patients, particularly those with severe and/or difficult asthma, towards their asthma control and their asthma-related primary care consultations. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' experiences of their asthma and primary care asthma consultations in order to identify target areas for intervention. METHODS: This was a qualitative study of 14 asthma patients based in grounded theory. Questions were asked about: asthma understanding; control issues; and interactions with primary care health professionals. Data were analysed using the constant comparative method and framework approach. RESULTS: Participants with severe and/or difficult asthma normalised control issues, were reluctant to discuss non-medical factors with healthcare professionals (HCPs), reported poorer communication with HCPs, and were reluctant to raise relevant but non-medical factors in the consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Our data identifies that patients, particularly those with severe and/or difficult asthma and poor control, underplay symptoms and do not discuss non-medical factors which may impact on asthma control in primary care consultations. This poor communication is associated with patients underestimating disease severity and/or what could be achieved in terms of disease control. Training HCPs in the use of patient-centred communication skills may optimise asthma management in primary care.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Higher patient perceived side effects related to higher daily doses of inhaled corticosteroids in the community: a cross-sectional analysis.

UNLABELLED: The range and extent of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) side effects experienced by patients in the general community are likely to be underestimated. AIMS: To identify the side effects of ICS perceived by patients in the community and, through the use of a self-report questionnaire, measure their intensity, prevalence and relationship with daily medication dose. METHODS: Focus groups and in-depth interviews were conducted to identify side effects that patients associated with their use of ICS. In an international multicentre cross-sectional survey, 395 inhaler users from community pharmacy (mean age 50, 53% female), divided into 4 daily dosage groups (beta2-agonist without ICS n=66, beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalent ICS low dose 400 microg, n=109; mid dose 401-800 microg, n=151; and high dose>800 microg, n=69) reported how much they were affected by these side effects on a 7-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Focus groups and interviews revealed 57 side effects that were associated with ICS use. Cross-sectional survey results showed significant differences in side effect perception between the four dosage groups for 31 items (all P0.01) and a rising intensity with increasing ICS dose for total side effect score (P<0.001). For ICS users reporting the most bothersome side effects (scoring 3 on 0-6 scale) there was a rising prevalence as ICS dose increased for 34 items. A multivariate model confirmed that mid and high ICS dosages were statistically significantly associated with side effect perception after controlling for the other factors and covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Higher daily ICS doses were associated with a higher intensity and a higher prevalence of many patient perceived side effects, lending support to the call for dose titration in clinical practice. Results indicate the usefulness of patient self-report scales for understanding the burden of side effects of ICS in the community.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2006

Do health-status measures play a role in improving treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?

During the past few decades, health status has become increasingly important in the clinical research of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The use of health-status questionnaires in routine practice can enhance understanding about the impact of the disease on the patient, improve standardisation and increase compliance through increased patient satisfaction. However, before health-status measurement in individual patients can be used in routine practice, questionnaires have to be validated on an individual level. In this article, the authors suggest a new method of assessing this individual validity, to enhance the use of health-status instruments in daily clinical practice, and thus improve treatment in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Health Status↗
PubMed2005

International Primary Care Respiratory Group (IPCRG) Guidelines: management of asthma.

Worldwide, most patients with asthma are treated in primary care. Optimal primary care management of asthma is therefore of considerable importance. This IPCRG Guideline paper on the management of asthma in primary care is fully consistent with GINA guidelines. It is split into two sections, the first on the management of adults and schoolchildren, and the second on the management of pre-school children. It highlights the treatment goals for asthma and gives an overview of optimal management including the topics which should be covered by the primary care health professional when educating a patient about asthma. It covers the classification of the disease, the stepwise approach to pharmacologic therapy, disease monitoring, the management of exacerbations, and the identification of patients at risk of asthma death.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2005

Symptom-based questionnaire for differentiating COPD and asthma.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD) carry an inaccurate diagnostic label. Symptom-based questionnaires could identify persons likely to need spirometry. OBJECTIVES: We prospectively tested questions derived from a comprehensive literature review and an international Delphi panel to help identify chronic OLD (COPD) in persons with prior evidence of OLD. METHODS: Subjects were recruited via random mailing to primary-care practices in Aberdeen, Scotland, and Denver, Colorado. Persons aged 40 and older reporting any prior diagnosis of OLD or any respiratory medications in the past year were enrolled. Participants answered 54 questions covering demographics and symptoms and underwent spirometry with reversibility testing. A study diagnosis of COPD was defined by fixed airway obstruction as measured by post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC <0.70. We examined ability of individual questions in a multivariate framework to discriminate between persons with and without the study diagnosis of COPD. RESULTS: 597 persons completed all investigations and proceeded to analysis. The list of 54 questions yielded 52 items for analyses, which was reduced to 19 items for entry into a multivariate regression model. Nine items had significant relationships with the study diagnosis of COPD, including increased age, pack-years, worsening cough, breathing-related disability or hospitalization, worsening dyspnea, phlegm quantity, cold going to the chest, and receipt of treatment for breathing. Individual items yielded odds ratios ranging from 0.33 to 20.7. This questionnaire demonstrated a sensitivity of 72.0 and a specificity of 82.7. CONCLUSIONS: A short, symptom-based questionnaire identifies persons more likely to have COPD among persons with prior evidence of OLD.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Symptom-based questionnaire for identifying COPD in smokers.

BACKGROUND: Symptom-based questionnaires may enhance chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) screening in primary care. OBJECTIVES: We prospectively tested questions to help identify COPD among smokers without prior history of lung disease. METHODS: Subjects were recruited via random mailing to primary care practices in Aberdeen, UK, and Denver, Colo., USA. Current and former smokers aged 40 or older with no prior respiratory diagnosis and no respiratory medications in the past year were enrolled. Participants answered questions covering demographics and symptoms and then underwent spirometry with reversibility testing. A study diagnosis of COPD was defined as fixed airway obstruction as measured by post-bronchodilator FEV(1)/FVC <0.70. We examined the ability of individual questions in a multivariate framework to correctly discriminate between persons with and without COPD. RESULTS: 818 subjects completed all investigations and proceeded to analysis. The list of 54 questions yielded 52 items for analysis, which was reduced to 17 items for entry into multivariate regression. Eight items had significant relationships with the study diagnosis of COPD, including age, pack-years, body mass index, weather-affected cough, phlegm without a cold, morning phlegm, wheeze frequency, and history of any allergies. Individual items yielded odds ratios ranging from 0.23 to 12. This questionnaire demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.4 and specificity of 72.0. CONCLUSIONS: A simple patient self-administered questionnaire can be used to identify patients with a high likelihood of having COPD, for whom spirometric testing is particularly important. Implementation of this questionnaire could enhance the efficiency and diagnostic accuracy of current screening efforts.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Progressive breathlessness in COPD - the role of hyperinflation and its pharmacological management.

Breathlessness, along with the associated inability to engage in normal activity, is one of the most distressing symptoms for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). If treatment for breathlessness is started early in the disease, physical activity could, in theory, be improved or maintained; this may slow the progression of symptoms towards disability and improve quality of life. A significant cause of breathlessness in COPD is hyperinflation of the lungs due to air trapping, which occurs largely as a result of airflow limitation. Regular exercise reduces the respiratory demand of muscles and, by inference, the impact of air trapping during less intensive activities. Moreover, although airflow limitation in COPD is poorly responsive to anti-inflammatory drugs and less responsive to bronchodilators than in asthma, bronchodilators are clinically proven to bring perceivable symptom improvements in COPD. These improvements correlate with improvements in air trapping indices, which can be significant even in the absence of significant change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). The rationale for treatment in COPD, therefore, differs to that for asthma. Understanding of the pathophysiology of COPD improves our chances of achieving an effective intervention with the hope of a better quality of life for patients.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Asthma management: are GINA guidelines appropriate for daily clinical practice?

An international group of primary care asthma experts, as well as pulmonologists and allergists from Europe and the US, met to discuss asthma management focused on the primary care office. This paper summarizes their discussions. Accuracy of diagnosis and appropriateness of treatment is variable depending on the clinical circumstances and patient group. The value of classifying patients based on baseline or static asthma severity scores remains controversial, and asthma management decisions based on symptom control appear to have greater practical utility in a primary care setting. Furthermore, it must be recognized that patients, caregivers and physicians may have differing, and possibly conflicting, goals for therapy. There are many initiatives to improve the quality of asthma management, for example, primary care-focused guidelines being developed by the International Primary Care Respiratory Group, and several groups are working on asthma control scores. In addition, new therapies may improve the options available for increasing compliance and reducing side effects. In conclusion, asthma management should be patient-focused, with outcomes relevant to improving the quality of life for people with asthma.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Treating asthma: is there a place for leukotriene receptor antagonists?

Asthma is a chronic disorder, characterized by airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), airway inflammation and airway remodelling. Evidence has been provided for a relationship between pathophysiology, airway inflammation and remodelling. Moreover, these asthma features have been shown to respond to anti-inflammatory therapy. According to current guidelines, monitoring of asthma is predominantly based on symptoms and lung function data. However, these parameters appeared as poor indices for asthma control. Alternatively, asthma control relates well to exacerbations and (anamnestic) surrogate biomarkers of airway inflammation. Hence, appropriate treatment of asthma should primarily target the airway inflammation. According to current guidelines for asthma management, anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is the cornerstone in the treatment of persistent asthma. To further optimize asthma control, add-on therapy with long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) should be combined with low to high doses of ICS. While the first combination focuses on optimal control of symptoms and lung function, the second provides a more complete suppression of the airway inflammation. In this paper we discuss treatment of asthma according to current guidelines versus new insights, addressing practical issues.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed2004

Development of a primary-care tool to assess treatment success in COPD: consensus report from a closed meeting of respiratory and primary-care specialists.

A 1-day meeting, attended by invited respiratory and primary-care specialists all of whom had an international profile and a specific interest in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), considered specific research recommendations from the Global Initiative in Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) workshop report. Attendees discussed developing a tool to complement spirometry and help primary-care physicians assess treatment success in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Discussion focused on the requirement of such a tool, and the limitations of existing tools. Proposals followed for a simple, cost-effective checklist for primary-care. This paper is a consensus report of the discussions from the meeting. Decisions reached on the proposed questionnaire were unanimous.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2004

Cognitive performance in patients with COPD.

BACKGROUND: Hypoxemic patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) have impaired cognitive performance. These neuropsychological impairments are related to the degree of hypoxemia. So far, cognitive performance has not been tested in non-hypoxemic patients with COPD. METHODS: We recruited patients with stable COPD and PaO2 > 8.0 kPa (60 mmHg), as well as healthy subjects, who were matched for age, intelligence quotient (IQ), and level of education. Cognitive performance was studied by Stroop Colour Word Test, Trailmaking, digit-symbol of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, addition subtest of the Groningen Intelligence Test, and Story Recall. RESULTS: Thirty patients with COPD (FEV1 49.8% pred, mean age 64.8 yr) and 20 healthy volunteers (65.6 yr) were enrolled. COPD patients performed significantly worse on trailmaking B, the digit-symbol test, and on the addition subtest. There was no significant correlation between the tests of cognitive performance and disease specific health status (Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that even non-hypoxemic patients with COPD show significant impairments in cognitive performance. These impairments are not associated with deteriorations in health related quality of life. Prospective evaluation of the impact of treatment on cognitive performance in non-hypoxemic patients with COPD would be a logical subsequent study.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Validity of performance indicators for assessing prescribing quality: the case of asthma.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the concurrent validity between the identification of sub-optimal treatment based on clinical information and computer generated indicators. Indicators that are associated with sub-optimal treatment in one of the four steps of asthma management were assessed. DESIGN: The ability of each indicator to identify patients with sub-optimal asthma treatment from computerised general practitioner (GP) prescription records was assessed by comparing them with the results of an individual patient assessment using clinical data. SETTING: Chronic asthma patients ( n=146) registered with 16 Dutch GPs. MAIN MEASURES: The sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of each performance indicator was determined. RESULTS: The step-1 indicator, focusing on patients not prescribed a short-acting beta-agonist, had an acceptable sensitivity (0.86), but a low PPV (0.52). The two step-2 indicators, targeting under-prescription of inhaled corticosteroids, had sensitivities of 0.74 and 0.37 and PPVs of 0.46 and 0.71, respectively. The step-3 indicator, which targeted under-dosing of inhaled corticosteroids, had a sensitivity of 0.07 and a PPV of 0.2. The fourth indicator, focusing on under-prescription of long-acting beta-agonists, could not be validated due to inadequate numbers of patients with severe asthma in our study sample. DISCUSSION: None of the indicators investigated was considered valid for assessing prescriber performance, despite having good face and content validity. Performance indicators that have not been validated can only provide a broad-brush approach for assessing prescribing quality and should be used with extreme caution.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Development, validity and responsiveness of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: The new Global Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines advice to focus treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) on improvement of functional state, prevention of disease progression and minimization of symptoms. So far no validated questionnaires are available to measure symptom and functional state in daily clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ). METHODS: Qualitative research with patients and clinicians was performed to generate possible items to evaluate clinical COPD control. Thereafter, an item reduction questionnaire was sent to 77 international experts. Sixty-seven experts responded and the 10 most important items, divided into 3 domains (symptoms, functional and mental state) were included in the CCQ (scale: 0 = best, 6 = worst). RESULTS: Cross-sectional data were collected from 119 subjects (57 COPD, GOLD stage I-III; 18 GOLD stage 0 and 44 (ex)smokers). Cronbach's alpha was high (0.91). The CCQ scores in patients (GOLD 0-III) were significantly higher than in healthy (ex)smokers. Furthermore, significant correlations were found between the CCQ total score and domains of the SF-36 (rho = 0.48 to rho = 0.69) and the SGRQ (rho = 0.67 to rho = 0.72). In patients with COPD, the correlation between the CCQ and FEV1%pred was rho =-0.49. Test-retest reliability was determined in 20 subjects in a 2-week interval (Intra Class Coefficient = 0.94). Thirty-six smokers with and without COPD showed significant improvement in the CCQ after 2 months smoking cessation, indicating the responsiveness of the CCQ. CONCLUSION: The CCQ is a self-administered questionnaire specially developed to measure clinical control in patients with COPD. Data support the validity, reliability and responsiveness of this short and easy to administer questionnaire.

Activities of Daily Living↗