PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Tiange Wang

Publications and source records attributed to Tiange Wang.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Effects of intensive blood pressure control on cardio-kidney outcomes by KDIGO risk categories: a Post Hoc analysis of ACCORD-BP and SPRINT trials.

The effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control on cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes across different Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories remain unclear. We performed a secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and the SPRINT-eligible Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial. Participants were categorized into low, moderate, and high/very-high KDIGO risk groups. The primary outcomes were composite adverse CV events (defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, fatal or hospitalized heart failure (HF), and CV mortality) and composite adverse kidney events (defined as a sustained decline in eGFR of &#x2265;&#xa0;40% and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)). We found that intensive BP control reduced the risk of composite CV events (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.78), with attenuated benefits in higher KDIGO risk categories (P for interaction = 0.055). This interaction was mainly driven by nonfatal MI and fatal or hospitalized HF (both P for interaction < 0.05). Intensive BP control increased the risk of composite kidney events (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52-2.33), mainly in low- and moderate-risk groups rather than in high/very-high risk groups (P for interaction = 0.04). Similar patterns were observed for sustained eGFR decline (P for interaction = 0.03), but not for ESKD (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.74-1.48; P for interaction = 0.71). The KDIGO risk classification modified the effects of intensive BP control. Balancing CV benefits against potential kidney impacts in patients with different KDIGO risks during intensive BP treatment is recommended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01206062 (SPRINT) and NCT00000620 (ACCORD).

Cardiovascular outcome

Age-stratified associations of glycemia, blood pressure, and cholesterol with mortality in diabetes: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Optimization of HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol, referred to as the "ABCs", is central to the management of diabetes. However, the age-specific associations of these factors with mortality in patients with diabetes remains unclear. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 43,732 Chinese adults aged&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;40 years with diabetes were included from the China Cardiometabolic Disease and Cancer Cohort (4C) Study. Participants were stratified by age (<&#x2009;55, 55-<65, 65-<75, &#x2265;&#x2009;75 years). Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray competing risk models were employed to estimate the associations of HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality across age groups. Relative importance and population attributable fractions (PAFs) were computed for each metabolic factor. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 10.1 years, 3,975 deaths were documented. Age significantly modified the associations of HbA1c, SBP, and LDL-C with all mortality outcomes (all P for interaction&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05). Among participants aged&#x2009;<&#x2009;75 years, HbA1c showed graded positive associations with all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality. The SBP thresholds associated with increased mortality risk were 140 mmHg in those aged&#x2009;<&#x2009;65 years and 160 mmHg in those aged 65-<75 years. Among those aged&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;75 years, however, the patterns of these associations differed markedly. Elevated mortality risk was observed only at HbA1c&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;9%, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-1.91) for all-cause mortality and a subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) of 1.70 (95% CI: 1.23-2.36) for cardiovascular mortality, while SBP showed no significant association with any mortality outcome in this age group. Moreover, LDL-C emerged as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular mortality. Compared with participants with LDL-C&#x2009;<&#x2009;1.8 mmol/L, those with LDL-C of 1.8-<2.6 mmol/L exhibited a significantly higher risk (SHR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.11-3.11). Additionally, LDL-C had the largest PAF for cardiovascular mortality (9.6%) within this age group. CONCLUSIONS: The impacts of ABC factors on mortality risk vary substantially by age among adults with diabetes. In patients aged&#x2009;&#x2265;&#x2009;75 years, less stringent glycemic and blood pressure targets may be appropriate, whereas lipid management remains critically important for reducing cardiovascular mortality.

Humans

The association between GLP-1R expression and cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic-related diseases in non-diabetic and non-obese population: evidence triangulation using Mendelian randomization, observational and polygenic score association analysis.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists are emerging as promising therapies for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) related diseases in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or obesity. But their effects in non-obese and non-diabetic individuals are unclear. This study triangulates evidence using Mendelian randomization (MR), polygenic scores (PGS) and observational analyses to estimate the associations of GLP-1R expression with chronic kidney disease (CKD), heart failure (HF) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). METHODS: For the MR analysis, instruments mimicking GLP-1R expression were identified using pancreas-specific cis-expression quantitative trait loci from GTEx (N&#x2009;&#x2264;&#x2009;305). MR-Robust method was used as the primary MR approach. PGS and observational analyses were performed both in non-diabetic and non-obese individuals separately. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) for MASLD (14,231 cases and 348,091 controls) was performed in the general population using data from UK Biobank. RESULTS: GLP-1R expression showed robust effects on CKD (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95%CI 0.95 to 0.97, q&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.7&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-&#x2009;10 ), HF (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.96, 95%CI 0.94 to 0.97, q&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.5&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-&#x2009;8) and MASLD (OR&#x2009;=&#x2009;0.96, 95%CI 0.93 to 0.98, q&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.3&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-&#x2009;3) in the general population. Consistent results were observed in validation analyses. Furthermore, PGS and observational analyses among non-T2DM and non-obese individuals found little evidence to support its association with CKD, HF or MASLD. GWAS analysis identified eight conditionally independent variants associated with MASLD, in which rs563199662 was a new signal located at TFPI region. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides multilayered evidence for GLP-1R expression in mitigating CKD, HF and MASLD risks in the general population, while de-prioritized its effect on CKM-related diseases in non-obese and non-diabetic individuals. Further clinical trials are needed to validate the effects of GLP-1R agonists in relative health population.

Humans

Life-course influence of birthweight and subsequent pathways on healthy aging: a Mendelian randomization study.

BACKGROUND: Birthweight readily measurable marker of fetal growth that may influence health across the lifespan. We aimed to investigate the potential causal association between birthweight and healthy aging and to identify the mediating roles of subsequent socioeconomic, behavioral, functional, and disease-related factors to inform life-course strategies to promote healthy aging and reduce health inequities. METHODS: We performed two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses in European-ancestry participants to estimate the effect of birthweight (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;298,142-423,683) on two robust, composite healthy aging phenotypes (genetically independent phenotype of aging (aging-GIP) and multivariate aging-related genetic factor (mvAge)) and six individual aging phenotypes, including healthspan, resilience, parental lifespan, self-rated health, phenotypic age deceleration, and 90th percentile self-longevity (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;34,710-1,958,774), and screened for 100 candidate mediators (n&#x2009;=&#x2009;14,267-1,812,017) using a two-step mediation analysis. RESULTS: Genetically determined each 1-SD higher birthweight was associated with higher aging-GIP (&#x3b2; [95% CI] in different models ranging from 0.131 [0.066-0.196] to 0.162 [0.089-0.235] SDs) and mvAge (0.036 [0.010-0.063] to 0.045 [0.024-0.067]), independent of later-life obesity indicators; also with more interpretable benefits, including 12%-16% higher odds of longer healthspan, a 0.079-0.089 SD improvement in resilience, and a 1.22-1.74&#xa0;year increase in parental lifespan. Of 100 candidates, 26 and 25 mediated the effect of birthweight on aging-GIP and mvAge, respectively, including socioeconomic indicators (education, household income, occupational attainment; individual mediation proportion: 12.72%-27.79%); behaviors (e.g., cheese intake, age at first sex; 10.38%-29.56%); physical functions (e.g., blood pressure, grip strength; 7.57%-42.65%); and cardiometabolic diseases (e.g., type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases; 25.02%-70.11%). CONCLUSIONS: Higher birthweight within the normal range directly promotes healthy aging, mediated by multifaceted modifiable factors. Our findings advocate adopting a life-course approach to foster healthy aging, starting with optimal birthweight and extending to interventions that enhance socioeconomic status, promote healthy behaviors, strengthen physical functions, and prevent cardiometabolic diseases.

Mendelian Randomization Analysis