Biomedical subjects

Tim Jordan

Publications and source records attributed to Tim Jordan.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Fox's in development and disease.

Since the first forkhead (Fox) gene was identified, the importance of this family of transcription factors has increased steadily with the discoveries of the diverse range of developmental processes that they regulate in eukaryotes. Among other processes, the Fox factors are important in the establishment of the body axis and the development of tissues from all three germ layers. In this article, we present some of the recent data on this gene family with reference to selected phenotypes observed in patients and model organisms, and the sensitivity of developmental processes to alterations in forkhead gene dosage.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Novel anterior segment phenotypes resulting from forkhead gene alterations: evidence for cross-species conservation of function.

PURPOSE: Mutations in murine and human versions of an ancestrally related gene usually result in similar phenotypes. However, interspecies differences exist, and in the case of two forkhead transcription factor genes (FOXC1 and FOXC2), these differences include corneal or anterior segment phenotypes, respectively. This study was undertaken to determine whether such discrepancies provide an opportunity for identifying novel human-murine ocular phenotypes. METHODS: Four pedigrees with early-onset glaucoma phenotypes secondary to segmental chromosomal duplications or deletions encompassing FOXC1 and 18 individuals from 9 FOXC2 mutation pedigrees underwent detailed ocular phenotyping. Subsequently, mice with mutations in Foxc1 or a related forkhead gene, Foxe3, were assessed for features of the human phenotypes. RESULTS: A significant increase in central corneal thickness was present in affected individuals from the segmental duplication pedigrees compared with their unaffected relatives (mean increase 13%, maximum 35%, P < 0.05). Alterations in corneal thickness were present in mice heterozygous and homozygous for Foxe3 mutations but neither in Foxc1 heterozygotes nor the small human segmental deletion pedigree. Mutations in FOXC2 resulted in ocular anterior segment anomalies. These were more severe and prevalent with mutations involving the forkhead domain. CONCLUSIONS: Normal corneal development is dependent on the precise dose and levels of activity of certain forkhead transcription factors. The altered corneal thickness attributable to increased forkhead gene dosage is particularly important, because it may affect the clinical management of certain glaucoma subtypes and lead to excessive treatment. The FOXC1 and Foxe3 data, taken together with the novel ocular phenotypes of FOXC2 mutations, highlight the remarkable cross-species conservation of function among forkhead genes.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Ocular developmental abnormalities and glaucoma associated with interstitial 6p25 duplications and deletions.

PURPOSE: Mutations in the forkhead transcription factor gene FOXC1 on 6p25 cause a range of ocular developmental abnormalities, with associated glaucoma. However, FOXC1 mutations have not been found in all similarly affected pedigrees mapping to this interval. This study was undertaken to investigate the potential role of 6p25 rearrangements in causing such phenotypes. METHODS: Two large families with autosomal dominant iris hypoplasia and early-onset glaucoma, 21 probands with Axenfeld-Rieger phenotypes not attributable to PITX2 mutations, and 7 individuals with documented 6p25 cytogenetic rearrangements, were investigated by genotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization, with markers and probes from the 6p25 region. RESULTS: Interstitial 6p25 duplications were present in the unrelated families with iris hypoplasia, whereas an interstitial 6p25 deletion was identified in one Axenfeld-Rieger pedigree. Larger cytogenetic rearrangements, leading to trisomy or monosomy of the 6p25 region, resulted in microcornea and Rieger syndrome phenotypes, respectively. All the rearrangements encompassed FOXC1, increasing or decreasing the number of FOXC1 copies present, and appeared to correlate with the phenotypes observed. CONCLUSIONS: These findings represent the first example of both interstitial duplications and deletions cosegregating with a human developmental disorder that is attributable to altered dose of transcription factor. The data presented provide additional evidence for the pathogenicity of altered gene dosage of FOXC1 and suggest that a common mechanism is responsible for rearrangements of 6p25.

Base Sequence↗