Images in emergency medicine. Reexpansion pulmonary edema.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Timothy F Platts-Mills.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with injuries requiring surgical airway management occurring far from medical care might benefit from the availability of a simple, reliable, improvisational method of cricothyrotomy with materials available in a wilderness or prehospital setting. We evaluated an improvised cricothyrotomy device in an experimental, unembalmed human cadaver model. METHODS: A high-flow intravenous spike and drip chamber was cut through the drip chamber and used as the sole apparatus for performing cricothyrotomy on unembalmed cadavers whose anterior neck surfaces and deep tissues were warmed to or near body temperature. Correct placement in the trachea and damage to the posterior wall of the trachea were assessed by either fiberoptic bronchoscopy or neck dissection. Video recordings were used to time each procedure. Each operator was responsible for both device insertion and bag valve mask attachment and ventilation, modeling as the sole care provider for the patient. RESULTS: One physician and 3 emergency medicine residents, all without previous, specific instruction, performed 10 procedures on 5 female and 5 male unembalmed cadavers weighing a mean of 65 kg (range 45-110 kg). All 10 attempts at placement of the intravenous tubing spike through the cricothyroid membrane were successful. On 2 attempts, the initial placement of the device was incorrect, but the error was immediately identified on attempt to ventilate the patient. Repositioning of the device resulted in appropriate cannulation of the trachea in both attempts. The median time span from manual identification of the cricothyroid membrane to percutaneous access and connection of the bag valve mask with successful ventilation was 27.3 seconds. Violation of the posterior tracheal wall was not seen on any of the 5 procedures in which fiberoptic visualization was available or in the 5 procedures evaluated by neck dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Cricothyrotomy is the quickest and most effective method for obtaining airway access when nonsurgical methods of securing the airway are contraindicated or fail. Although frequently described, no improvised airway devices of this type have been tested in a systematic manner. We tested the reliability and utility of cricothyrotomy with a high-flow intravenous spike and drip chamber. Our results suggest that the spike and drip chamber is a plausible means of temporarily establishing airway access in patients with acute airway obstruction in a wilderness or prehospital environment.
OBJECTIVES: The authors describe the evaluation of obese and nonobese adult patients with abdominal pain presenting to an emergency department (ED). The hypothesis was that more ED and hospital resources are used to evaluate and treat obese patients. METHODS: A prospective observational study of obese (n = 98; body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2) and nonobese (n = 176; body mass index < 30 kg/m2) adults presenting to the ED with abdominal pain was performed. ED length of stay (LOS) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included use of laboratory tests, computed tomography, and ultrasonography, and rates of consultations, operations, and admissions. ED diagnoses were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Obese patients were older (41.9 vs. 38.3 years; p = 0.027) and more often female (69% vs. 51%; p = 0.003) than nonobese patients. There were no significant differences between obese and nonobese patients in either the primary or the secondary outcome measures. Obese patients were similar to nonobese patients in regard to LOS (457 vs. 486 minutes), laboratory studies (3.2 vs. 2.9 tests), abdominopelvic computed tomographic scans (30% vs. 31%), and abdominal ultrasounds (16% vs. 13%). Obese and nonobese patients were also similar in their rates of consultations (27% vs. 31%), operations (14% vs. 12%), and admissions (18% vs. 24%). No difference was found for LOS between obese and nonobese patients as evaluated by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test (p = 0.81). Logistic regression analysis controlling for baseline characteristics revealed no significant differences between obese and nonobese patients for secondary outcome variables. ED diagnoses for obese and nonobese patients were similar except that genitourinary diagnoses were less common in obese patients (8% vs. 21%; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In contradiction to the hypothesis, the results suggest that LOS and ED resource use in obese patients with abdominal pain are not increased when compared with nonobese patients.