PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Timothy Petersen

Publications and source records attributed to Timothy Petersen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Timing of clinical improvement and symptom resolution in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

The goal of the present work is to assess for the relationship between the timing of clinical improvement and the resolution of depressive symptoms in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). 182 MDD outpatients (40.5+/-9.7 years; 53.8% female) who responded following an 8-week, 20 mg, open trial of fluoxetine were included in the analysis. The symptoms questionnaire (SQ) and Beck hopelessness scale (BHS) were also administered to 83 and 153 of these patients, respectively. Onset of clinical improvement was defined as a 30% decrease in 17-item Hamilton depression scale (HDRS-17) scores. Controlling for baseline symptom severity, we then assessed for the relationship between the timing of clinical improvement and depressive symptom at endpoint. Earlier clinical improvement in responders predicted lower HDRS-17, BHS, SQ-depression, SQ-anxiety, but not SQ-somatic symptom or SQ-anger/hostility scores at week 8. This was true regardless of whether improvement was defined as a continuous measure (30% decrease in symptom severity), as a dichotomous measure (clinical response occurring in the first two weeks of treatment). In conclusion, earlier clinical improvement with fluoxetine treatment is predictive of greater symptom resolution at endpoint. Further studies exploring the impact of various treatment modalities and placebo on the timing of clinical improvement and symptom resolution in MDD are warranted.

Adolescent↗

Problem-solving ability and comorbid personality disorders in depressed outpatients.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with poor problem-solving abilities. In addition, certain personality disorders (PDs) that are common among patients with MDD are also associated with limited problem-solving skills. Attempts to understand the relationship between PDs and problem solving can be complicated by the presence of acute MDD. Our objective in this study was to investigate the relationships between PDs, problem-solving skills, and response to treatment among outpatients with MDD. We enrolled 312 outpatients with MDD in an open, fixed-dose, 8-week fluoxetine trial. PD diagnoses were ascertained via structured clinical interview before and after fluoxetine treatment. Subjects completed the Problem-Solving Inventory (PSI) at both time points. We used analyses of covariance (ANCOVAs) to assess relationships between PD diagnoses and PSI scores prior to treatment. Subjects were divided into three groups: those with PD diagnoses that remained stable after fluoxetine treatment (N=91), those who no longer met PD criteria after fluoxetine treatment (N=119), and those who did not meet criteria for a PD at any time point in the study (N=95). We used multiple chi(2) analyses to compare rates of MDD response and remission between the three PD groups. ANCOVA was also used to compare posttreatment PSI scores between PD groups. Prior to fluoxetine treatment, patients with avoidant, dependent, narcissistic, and borderline PDs reported significantly worse problem-solving ability than did patients without any PDs. Only subjects with dependent PD remained associated with poorer baseline problem-solving reports after the effects of baseline depression severity were controlled. Patients with stable PD diagnoses had significantly lower rates of MDD remission. Across PD groups, problem solving improved as MDD improved. No significant differences in posttreatment problem-solving were found between PD groups after controlling for baseline depression severity, baseline PSI score, and response to treatment. Treatment with fluoxetine is less likely to lead to remission of MDD in patients with stable PDs. More study is needed to investigate causal links between PDs, problem solving, and MDD treatment response.

Adult↗

Clinical characteristics of depressed patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus.

Both diabetes and depression are highly prevalent. Patients with diabetes experience higher rates of depression compared to the general population. When present, depression is associated with an increase in the morbidity and mortality of diabetes, suggesting the importance of treatment in this population. The objective of the present study was to characterize depressive characteristics in depressed patients with and without comorbid diabetes. Seventeen patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were drawn from outpatient clinical trials. Depressed patients without diabetes were identified from the same studies. Unpaired t-tests and multiple chi-square analyses were used to compare demographic and clinical characteristics between the samples. Diabetic patients in our sample were more depressed and reported lower levels of somatic well-being and contentment compared to non-diabetic patients. The samples did not differ significantly along other dimensions of depression, including course of illness, response to previous treatments and comorbid conditions. These findings suggest that depressed diabetic patients are more similar than not to non-diabetic depressed patients, although important differences exist.

Adolescent↗

Serum prolactin levels among outpatients with major depressive disorder during the acute phase of treatment with fluoxetine.

OBJECTIVE: To determine changes in serum prolactin levels in outpatients with DSM-IV-diagnosed major depressive disorder (MDD) following a 12-week open-label trial of fluoxetine. METHOD: 87 outpatients enrolled in the trial had serum prolactin levels determined at baseline and during their final visit (week 12 or discontinuation visit). In addition, serum testosterone levels were measured in 44 of the 46 men during these 2 visits. Hyperprolactinemia was defined as a serum prolactin level greater than 16.5 ng/mL or 18.9 ng/mL for men and women, respectively. The study was conducted from September 1997 to March 2002. RESULTS: Of 80 patients with normal prolactin levels at baseline, 10 (12.5%) developed hyper-prolactinemia following fluoxetine treatment. Specifically, 2 (4.5%) of 44 men and 8 (22.2%) of 36 women with normal prolactin levels at baseline developed hyperprolactinemia following treatment with fluoxetine (p = .0174 for between-gender difference). In addition, there was a significant increase in mean +/- SD serum prolactin levels following treatment with fluoxetine in all patients with normal baseline prolactin levels (6.4 +/- 3.4 to 10.0 +/- 7.0 ng/mL, p = .002). There were no significant changes from baseline in testosterone levels in men following fluoxetine treatment (448.4 +/- 139.6 to 439.5 +/- 142.1 ng/dL, p > .05; normal above 245 ng/dL), while none of the 44 men developed low testosterone levels following fluoxetine treatment. CONCLUSION: 4.5% of men and 22.2% of women with MDD developed new onset hyper-prolactinemia following fluoxetine treatment.

Adult↗

The relationship between serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine levels in major depressive disorder and the timing of improvement with fluoxetine.

The objective of the present study was to examine the relationship between serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine levels and the timing of clinical improvement to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients. A total of 110 outpatients with MDD who responded to an 8-wk trial of fluoxetine had serum folate, B12, and homocysteine measurements at baseline (prior to fluoxetine initiation). Onset of clinical improvement was defined as a 30% decrease in Hamilton Depression Scale scores that led to a 50% decrease by week 8. Patients with low folate levels ( 0.05). In conclusion, low serum folate levels were found to be associated with a delayed onset of clinical improvement during treatment with fluoxetine in MDD by, on average, 1.5 wk.

Adolescent↗

Empirical testing of two models for staging antidepressant treatment resistance.

BACKGROUND: An increasing amount of attention has been paid to treatment resistant depression. Although it is quite common to observe nonremission to not just one but consecutive antidepressant treatments during a major depressive episode, a relationship between the likelihood of achieving remission and one's degree of resistance is not clearly known at this time. This study was undertaken to empirically test 2 recent models for staging treatment resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Psychiatrists from 2 academic sites reviewed charts of patients on their caseloads. Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) scales were used to measure severity of depression and response to treatment, and 2 treatment-resistant staging scores were classified for each patient using the Massachusetts General Hospital staging method (MGH-S) and the Thase and Rush staging method (TR-S). RESULTS: Out of the 115 patient records reviewed, 58 (49.6%) patients remitted at some point during treatment. There was a significant positive correlation between the 2 staging scores, and logistic regression results indicated that greater MGH-S scores, but not TR-S scores, predicted nonremission. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the hierarchical manner in which the field has typically gauged levels of treatment resistance may not be strongly supported by empirical evidence. This study suggests that the MGH staging model may offer some advantages over the staging method by Thase and Rush, as it generates a continuous score that considers both number of trials and intensity/optimization of each trial.

Adult↗

Characteristics of insured and noninsured outpatients with depression in STAR(*)D.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined data from the first 1,500 patients with major depressive disorder who were entered into the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) and compared baseline characteristics of outpatients on the basis of their insurance status. METHODS: We compared the demographic and clinical characteristics and the features of the presenting symptoms of outpatients with private insurance, public insurance, Medicaid and Medicare, or no insurance who were seeking treatment for depression. RESULTS: Valid insurance data were available for 1,452 patients. Compared with patients with private insurance, patients with public or no insurance were more likely to be members of a racial or ethnic minority group, unmarried, less educated, and unemployed. Patients were more likely to attend primary care clinics if they had public insurance (46 percent) compared with private insurance (34 percent) or no insurance (30 percent). Compared with the other groups, patients with public insurance had the greatest number and severity of comorbid medical conditions. In general, compared with patients with private insurance, those with public or no insurance had greater severity of depression, more comorbid psychiatric symptoms, lower life satisfaction scores, and greater functional impairment. These findings remained after the analyses adjusted for gender, employment, comorbid medical conditions, race, and duration of illness. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with patients with private insurance, those with public or no insurance had a more chronic, more severe, and more disabling form of depression.

Adult↗

Obesity among outpatients with major depressive disorder.

Studies focusing on the prevalence of obesity in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), or the impact of excess body fat on the treatment of MDD are lacking. The aim of the present work is to systematically study obesity in MDD outpatients. A total of 369 MDD outpatients enrolled in an 8-wk trial of 20 mg fluoxetine had height and weight measured at baseline. We then examined: (1) the prevalence of being overweight or obese, (2) the relationship between obesity and a number of demographic and clinical variables, and, (3) the relationship between relative body weight and obesity with clinical response. We found that more than 50% of patients were overweight [body mass index (BMI) > or =2 5 kg/m2], while 20% were obese (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2). Obese patients presented with worse somatic well-being scores than non-obese MDD patients, but they did not differ with respect to depression severity, anxiety, somatic complaints, hopelessness or hostility. Greater relative body weight, but not obesity, predicted non-response. In conclusion, greater relative body weight was found to place MDD outpatients at risk for fluoxetine resistance.

Adult↗

Anxiety and somatic symptoms as predictors of treatment-related adverse events in major depressive disorder.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between the degree of anxiety or somatic symptoms present before treatment with the subsequent diagnosis of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) enrolled in an 8-week open trial of fluoxetine (20 mg). Baseline symptom questionnaires (SQ) were completed by 170 MDD patients enrolled in the trial. We then tested whether pre-treatment scores for anxiety and somatic symptoms predicted (1) whether patients were subsequently diagnosed with TRAEs; (2) whether they were subsequently diagnosed with moderate or severe TRAEs; or (3) whether a greater number of TRAEs were diagnosed during the trial. We found that depressed patients who presented with prominent somatic symptoms were significantly more likely to report at least one moderate or severe side effect during the course of treatment, but not more likely to report a greater number of side effects. Pre-treatment anxiety was not related to the development of side effects.

Adult↗

Psychosocial functioning in patients with treatment resistant depression.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a disorder that causes disability, with a profound adverse impact on all areas of psychosocial functioning. This is particularly true for those with treatment resistant depression (TRD). However, to date, no systematic assessments of psychosocial functioning for patients with TRD have been conducted. METHODS: In the present study, we used the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (LIFE) scale to measure psychosocial functioning in 92 patients with TRD. These patients met formal criteria for TRD and were part of a clinical trial examining the efficacy of lithium augmentation of nortriptyline. RESULTS: Clinicians rated this sample of patients as experiencing mild to moderate impairment in work-related activities, good to fair interpersonal relations, poor level of involvement in recreational activities, and mild impairment of ability to enjoy sexual activity. Patients and clinicians rated global social adjustment as poor. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with formally defined TRD experience significant impairment in psychosocial functioning. In this sample a tendency existed for both clinicians and patients to assign more severely impaired global ratings when compared with ratings for specific functional areas.

Adolescent↗

Psychosocial functioning during the treatment of major depressive disorder with fluoxetine.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with significant disability, having a profound impact on psychosocial functioning. Therefore, studying the impact of treatment on psychosocial functioning in MDD could help further improve the standard of care. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-two MDD outpatients were treated openly with 20 mg fluoxetine for 8 weeks. The self-report version of the Social Adjustment Scale was administered at baseline and during the final visit. We then tested for the relationships between (1) self-report version of the Social Adjustment Scale scores at baseline and clinical response, (2) nonresponse, response and remission status and overall psychosocial adjustment at end point, (3) the number/severity of residual depressive symptoms and overall psychosocial adjustment at end point in responders, and (4) the time to onset of response and overall psychosocial adjustment at end point. RESULTS: An earlier onset of clinical response predicted better overall psychosocial functioning at end point (P = 0.0440). Responders (n = 128) demonstrated better overall psychosocial adjustment at end point than nonresponders (P = 0.0003), while remitters (n = 64) demonstrated better overall psychosocial adjustment at end point than nonremitted responders (P = 0.0031). In fact, a greater number/severity of residual symptoms predicted poorer overall psychosocial adjustment at end point in responders (P = 0.0011). Psychosocial functioning at baseline did not predict response. CONCLUSIONS: While MDD patients appear equally likely to respond to treatment with fluoxetine, regardless of their level of functioning immediately before treatment, the above results stress the importance of achieving early symptom improvement then followed by full remission of depressive symptoms with respect to restoring psychosocial functioning in MDD.

Activities of Daily Living↗

S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) as an adjunct for resistant major depressive disorder: an open trial following partial or nonresponse to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this open trial was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of oral S-adenosyl-L-methionine as an antidepressant adjunct among partial and nonresponders to serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. METHOD: Thirty antidepressant-treated adult outpatients with persisting major depressive disorder received 800 to 1600 mg of S-adenosyl-L-methionine tosylate over a 6-week trial. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analyses based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale revealed a response rate of 50% and a remission rate of 43% following augmentation with S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Gastrointestinal symptoms and headaches were the most common side effects. CONCLUSION: Augmentation of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine with S-adenosyl-L-methionine warrants a placebo-controlled trial in resistant depression.

Adult↗

Serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine in major depressive disorder, Part 1: predictors of clinical response in fluoxetine-resistant depression.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we assessed the relationship between serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine levels and clinical response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) who had previously failed to respond to open treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day and were enrolled in a 4-week, double-blind trial of either (1) fluoxetine dose increase, (2) lithium augmentation of fluoxetine, or (3) desipramine augmentation of fluoxetine. METHOD: Fifty-five outpatients (mean +/- SD age = 41.7 +/- 10.6 years; 50.9% women) with MDD as assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R who were enrolled in the double-blind trial had serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine measurements completed at baseline (prior to fluoxetine treatment initiation). Folate levels were classified as either low (< or = 2.5 ng/mL) or normal. Vitamin B12 levels were classified as either low (< or = 200 pg/mL) or normal. Homocysteine levels were classified as either elevated (> or = 13.2 micromol/L) or normal. With the use of a logistic regression, we then assessed the relationship between (1) low or normal folate levels, (2) normal or low B12 levels, and (3) elevated or normal homocysteine levels and clinical response to double-blind treatment. The study was conducted from November 1992 to January 1999. RESULTS: Low serum folate levels (chi2=3.626, p =.04), but not elevated homocysteine (p >.05) or low vitamin B12 levels (p >.05), were associated with poorer response to treatment. The response rates for patients with (N = 14) and without (N = 38) low folate levels were 7.1% versus 44.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low serum folate levels were found to be associated with further treatment resistance among patients with fluoxetine-resistant MDD.

Adult↗

Serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine in major depressive disorder, Part 2: predictors of relapse during the continuation phase of pharmacotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: In the present study, we assessed the relationship between serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine levels on the rate of relapse in outpatients with remitted major depressive disorder (MDD) during a 28-week continuation phase of treatment with fluoxetine. METHOD: Seventy-one outpatients (mean +/- SD age = 40.2 +/- 11.1 years; 56.3% women) with MDD (as assessed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R) who had remitted and who were enrolled in the continuation phase of treatment with fluoxetine had serum folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine measurements completed at baseline (prior to acute-phase treatment). Patients were followed for 28 weeks of continued treatment with fluoxetine 40 mg/day to monitor for depressive relapse. Folate levels were classified as either low (< or = 2.5 ng/mL) or normal. Vitamin B12 levels were classified as either low (< or = 200 pg/mL) or normal. Homocysteine levels were classified as either elevated (> or = 13.2 micromol/L) or normal. With the use of separate logistic regressions, we then assessed the relationship between folate, vitamin B12, and homocysteine level status and relapse. The study was conducted from November 1992 to January 1999. RESULTS: The presence of low serum folate levels (p =.004), but not low B12 (p >.05) or elevated homocysteine levels (p >.05), was associated with relapse during continuation treatment with fluoxetine. The relapse rates for patients with (N = 7) and without (N = 64) low folate levels were 42.9% versus 3.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low serum folate levels were found to place patients with remitted MDD at risk for depressive relapse during the continuation phase of treatment with fluoxetine.

Adult↗

Serum cholesterol and serotonergic function in major depressive disorder.

Studies have revealed a relationship between serum cholesterol levels and serotonergic (5HT) function in healthy young adults. Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) may have significant differences in cholesterol levels compared with healthy adults, while MDD patients with elevated cholesterol have a poorer prognosis for treatment response. The goal of the present study is to examine (1) the relationship between serum cholesterol levels and central 5HT function by way of the cortisol and prolactin response to the 5HT-selective agonist DL-fenfluramine in MDD patients and (2) differences in 5HT-function between MDD patients who present with and without elevated cholesterol. Fasting serum cholesterol levels were measured in 21 outpatients with MDD. After oral administration of 60 mg of DL-fenfluramine in these patients, cortisol and prolactin responses were measured to test whether cholesterol levels predicted the degree of cortisol or prolactin response. Cortisol and prolactin responses were compared between patients with and without elevated cholesterol levels, defined as >/=200 mg/dl. MDD patients with elevated cholesterol levels were more likely to demonstrate an attenuated cortisol response. There was no relationship between cholesterol levels and cortisol or prolactin response. Excess cholesterol may adversely affect the function of membrane-bound serotonergic structures, and this may explain why MDD patients with elevated cholesterol are more likely to exhibit attenuated neuroendocrine responses, less likely to respond to treatment and more likely to relapse.

Adult↗

Axis III disorders in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

A number of naturalistic studies have found that medical co-morbidity conveys a worse long-term prognosis in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). The purpose of this study was to test whether the presence of co-morbid medical conditions can predict clinical response in patients with treatment-resistant MDD (TRD) treated with open-label nortriptyline (NT). Ninety-two patients with TRD entered a 6-week open trial of NT. The presence of co-morbid medical disorders was assessed during the screen visit. The degree of medical co-morbidity during the screen visit was then quantified with the use of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric Version (CIRS(G)). We tested whether CIRS(G) scores predicted clinical response or depression severity at endpoint. CIRS scores at baseline did not significantly predict treatment response. The results of this study fail to confirm the relationship between co-morbid medical conditions and poor outcome in the treatment of MDD for patients with TRD. Patients with TRD and co-morbid medical conditions can be expected to respond to antidepressants as well as their counterparts without concurrent axis III co-morbidity. The CIRS(G) scores for this TRD sample were lower than those reported for geriatric depression, or for depressed patients with severe medical illness, common in medical and surgical wards and in most specialty clinics of large academic centers. Thus, the present results cannot be generalized to such populations.

Adult↗

Somatic symptoms in treatment-resistant depression.

The purpose of this work was to study the prevalence of somatic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and their impact on the response to antidepressant treatment. Somatic symptoms were assessed during the screen visit with the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) somatic symptom (SQ-SS) and somatic well-being sub-scales (SQ-SWB) in 40 patients with TRD enrolled in a 6-week open trial of nortriptyline. A logistic regression was used to test whether SQ-SS or SQ-SWB scores predicted clinical response to nortriptyline. Ninety-five percent of patients reported at least one somatic symptom. Higher SQ-SS scores during the screen visit predicted poorer response to nortriptyline. There was a trend for lower SQ-SWB scores to predict poor response to nortriptyline. None of the patients with SQ-SS scores above the mean for the sample responded to nortriptyline. The overwhelming majority of patients with TRD presented with somatic symptoms. In addition, a greater number of somatic symptoms during the screen visit placed patients at risk for further treatment resistance.

Adult↗