PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Timothy W Yu

Publications and source records attributed to Timothy W Yu.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Screening rare genetic diagnoses for amenability to bespoke antisense oligonucleotide therapy development: A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: To estimate the proportion of molecular genetic diagnoses in a real-world, phenotypically heterogeneous patient cohort that are amenable to antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively applied the N=1 Collaborative's Variant Assessments toward Eligibility for Antisense Oligonucleotide Treatment guidelines to all diagnostic variants found by clinical genome-wide sequencing at a single pediatric hospital in 532 patients over a 6-year period. Variants were classified as either "eligible," "likely eligible," "unlikely eligible," or "not eligible" in relation to the different ASO approaches, or "unable to assess." RESULTS: In total, 25 unique variants across 26 patients (4.9% of 532 patients) were eligible or likely eligible for ASO treatment at a molecular genetic level, via canonical exon skipping (4), splice correction (3), or messenger RNA knockdown (19). Only 8 of these molecular genetic diagnoses were made within a year of symptom onset. After considering disease and delivery related factors, 11 diagnoses were still considered candidates for bespoke ASO development. CONCLUSION: A meaningful proportion of genetic diagnoses identified by genome-wide sequencing may be amenable to ASO treatment. These results underscore the importance of timely diagnosis, and the proactive identification and accelerated functional testing of genetic variants amenable to ASO treatments.

Humans

Implementing customized genomic sequencing reports to empower providers in safety-net neonatal intensive care units.

PURPOSE: Through our implementation study providing rapid genomic sequencing (rGS) in safety-net neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), we investigated the feasibility and perceived usefulness of customized "clinical interpretive reports" (CIRs) to help neonatal providers with interpreting, disclosing, and managing care based on rGS results. METHODS: Enrolled infants received rGS through a clinically accredited vendor. We developed 5 CIR types to provide customized interpretation of rGS results and link results to clinical management considerations, research opportunities, and resources. We developed workflows to triage, create, and deliver CIRs within 3 business days. Providers received the vendor reports and CIRs, disclosed results, and completed post-disclosure surveys. We analyzed summary statistics for the first 100 cases. RESULTS: We delivered 97 of 100 CIRs (97%) within our goal time frame (average 1.3 days) and provided clinical management recommendations in 40 of 100 (40%). Neonatal providers completed the post-disclosure surveys for 86 of 100 disclosures (86%). Most reported using the CIR before disclosure (80/86, 93%) and found it helpful at providing useful information beyond the vendor report (79/80, 99%). CONCLUSION: It is feasible and useful to develop customized rGS reports to assist non-genetics providers in safety-net NICU settings. Similar approaches may hold promise for equitably advancing genomic care in non-NICU settings.

Humans