Biomedical subjects

Ting-Ling Chang

Publications and source records attributed to Ting-Ling Chang.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Biomechanical aspects of initial intraosseous stability and implant design: a quantitative micro-morphometric analysis.

PURPOSE: The objective of this biomechanical study was to explore the effect of bone micro-morphology on initial intraosseous stability of implants with different designs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Straumann and Astra Tech dental implants were placed into anterior and posterior regions of completely edentulous maxilla and mandible of a human cadaver. Experiments were undertaken to quantify initial implant stability and bone micro-morphology. Installation torque values (ITVs) and implant stability quotients (ISQs) were measured to determine initial intraosseous implant stability. For quantification of relative bone volume and micro-architecture, sectioned implant-bone and bone core specimens of each implant placement site were consecutively scanned and trabecular bone was analyzed in a micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) unit. Experimental outcomes were evaluated for correlations among implant designs, initial intraosseous implant stability and bone micro-structural parameters. RESULTS: ITVs correlated higher with bone volume fraction (BV/TV) than ISQs, at 88.1% and 68.9% levels, respectively. Correlations between ITVs and micro-morphometric parameters were significant at the 95% confidence level (P<0.05) while ISQs were not. Differences in ITVs, ISQs and BV/TV data in regards to implant designs used were not significant at the 95% confidence level (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Bone micro-morphology has a prevailing effect over implant design on intraosseus initial implant stability, and ITV is more sensitive in terms of revealing biomechanical properties at the bone-implant interface in comparison with ISQ.

Alveolar Process↗

PubMed2006

Use of osseointegrated implants in the restoration of head and neck defects.

Osseointegrated implants can be applied to facilitate retention, stability, and support for facial and intraoral prostheses used to restore head and neck defects. At the University of California, Los Angeles, Maxillofacial Prosthetics Clinic, retrospective studies have indicated that in nonirradiated maxillectomy patients, implant survival rates are 82.6 percent. In mandibles reconstructed with fibula free flaps, survival rates are 94.6 percent. Similarly, high implant survival rates have been observed for most sites used to support facial prostheses. Cumulative six-year survival rates for auricular sites exceed 95 percent and for floor of nose sites, success rates exceed 87 percent. However, survival rates are low (53 percent) for implants placed in the frontal bone for retention of orbital prostheses and even lower for irradiated bone sites ranging from 63 percent in the maxilla to 27 percent in the orbit.

Bone Transplantation↗

PubMed2006

Prosthodontic treatment of patients with hypodontia.

Hypodontia is a relatively rare occurrence that can have a significant impact on treatment planning for those patients with the condition. This paper will describe the forms of hypodontia, as well as associated dental issues. Treatment planning considerations for children, adolescents, and adults will be presented.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Treatment satisfaction with facial prostheses.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Facial defects secondary to the treatment of neoplasms, congenital malformations, and trauma result in multiple functional and psychosocial difficulties. Prosthetic rehabilitation attempts to restore these facial disfigurements and may improve the level of function and self-esteem for these patients. However, a limited number of studies have evaluated the change in perceived quality of life after maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients' perceptions of treatment with adhesive-retained and implant-retained facial prostheses and to assess differences in overall satisfaction with these 2 types of treatments. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, a questionnaire with 28 items was administered for evaluation of perceptions of appearance, comfort, fit and irritation, reliability of retention, frequency of wear, ease of placement and removal, level of self-consciousness, and value of treatment. Subjects were categorized into 2 groups: adhesive-retained group (n=16) and implant-retained group (n=19). Comparisons were made for each item in the questionnaire using Fisher exact tests (alpha=.05). RESULTS: The implant group reported higher positive ratings on all 28 questionnaire items when compared with the adhesive group. Statistically significant (P<.05) differences between the implant and adhesive groups were noted for ease of placement and removal, frequency of wear at home, and quality of retention during various activities, such as home chores and when perspiring or sneezing/coughing. CONCLUSION: The implant-retained facial prosthesis offers significant enhancement over an adhesive-retained prosthesis with respect to ease of use and retention during a variety of daily activities, resulting in greater use of the prosthesis.

Adhesives↗

PubMed2004

Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: microstructural data from maxilla and mandible.

The mechanical behavior of bone is a critical factor in the attainment and maintenance of osseointegration. Current procedures and classifications in assessing bone quality have limitations. Micro-computed tomography (microCT) is a new method to image and quantify bone with very high resolution. This study was aimed to analyze cadaveric maxillary and mandibular trabecular bone with 3-D morphometric data acquired through microCT and correlate with conventional bone assessment methods. Moderately resorbed edentulous maxilla and mandible from a human cadaver were scanned in the conventional CT unit with opaque markers indicating specific anterior and posterior sites. These sites were then sectioned and standard periapical radiographs were obtained. Bone cores were harvested from the sectioned sites and scanned in the microCT unit. Bone density values based on the Hounsfield scale ranged from 51 to 529 in the mandible and 186 to 389 in the maxilla, anterior sites being higher in both. Periapical images did not yield distinct differences. 3-D morphometric analysis in microCT produced a range of values with anterior specimens being favorable: bone volume density (0.12-0.291), trabecular thickness (0.12-0.16 mm), trabecular separation (0.46-0.82 mm), trabecular number (1.08-2.071/mm) and structural model index (0.29-1.27). General agreement between bone density and microCT indices was noted; however, subtle differences have to be studied with larger samples. This preliminary study suggests that the understanding of mechanical competence of trabecular bone might reveal further information about the prognosis of implant therapy, advancements in implant design, surgical techniques and grafting.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Implant-retained prostheses for facial defects: an up to 14-year follow-up report on the survival rates of implants at UCLA.

PURPOSE: An analysis of retrospective data was conducted to establish the survival rates of osseointegrated implants used to retain orbital, nasal, and auricular prostheses over a 14-year period and to recommend guidelines in the restorative treatment of such facial defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in this study were all patients who received implant-retained prostheses for auricular, nasal, or orbital defects from 1987 to 2001 in the Maxillofacial Clinics at the UCLA and City of Hope Medical Centers. Data were obtained from patient charts. Two methods were used to determine survival rates: (1) the percentage of the total exposed implants that survived was determined, and (2) life table analysis was used to calculate cumulative survival rates at different time intervals. RESULTS: A total of 207 implants were placed in 72 patients, and 182 implants had been uncovered. During the study period, 35 implants failed to integrate, and the survival rate for all exposed implants was 80%. Auricular implants showed the highest survival rate (95%), and orbital implants showed the lowest survival rate (53%). The life table analysis demonstrated a cumulative 6-year survival rate of 92% for auricular implants and 87% for piriform/nasal implants. In contrast, the survival rate for orbital implants showed a steady downward trend and reached 59% at 66 months. CONCLUSION: It is possible to achieve high survival rates of implants in the auricular and piriform/nasal sites through careful presurgical and radiographic planning. The less favorable long-term survival of implants in the orbital rim, especially at irradiated sites, requires further study.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Dimensional accuracy analysis of implant framework castings from 2 casting systems.

PURPOSE: To compare the dimensional accuracy of implant framework castings from an argon vacuum casting machine with those from a centrifugal casting machine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three 4 x 10-mm external hex-type implants (3i/Implant Innovations) were embedded in an acrylic resin block 7 mm apart, with a 2 mm offset of the middle implant. Eight reference points were marked on the implant collars. Twenty implant bar frameworks were waxed with UCLA abutments, invested with a ringless system, and subjected to the same thermal cycle. Ten wax patterns were cast in gold alloy using an oxygen-propane torch and centrifugal casting system; 10 were cast using an argon vacuum casting machine (KDF; Denken). The White 1-screw technique was applied after sequentially tightening the mesial and distal abutment screws to 10 Ncm. Fit of the implant framework castings was evaluated by measuring the marginal opening between the casting and implant at the reference points. These measurements were averaged and statistically compared for differences. RESULTS: The mean marginal openings at the most distant measuring locations from the tightened retaining screw at location 1 was between 44 to 48 microm for the centrifugal system compared to between 28 to 32 mm for KDF (P < .01). For screws tightened at location 3, the mean marginal openings at the most distant measuring locations were between 40 to 51 mm for the centrifugal system compared to between 27 to 29 microm for KDF (P < .01). DISCUSSION: In comparison with the centrifugal casting and oxygen-propane system, the argon vacuum system was more accurate and user friendly and less technique-sensitive. CONCLUSION: The argon vacuum casting machine tested produced more accurate, better fitting implant-supported prosthesis frameworks than a conventional centrifugal casting system. The "1-screw" method of evaluating casting fit was most effective when either of the prostheses' end screws were tightened.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Three-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling using micro-computed tomography.

PURPOSE: The capability of micro-computed tomography (microCT) for quantitative analysis of peri-implant bone has not been previously addressed. This study aimed to establish and validate a method to use this technique for 3-dimensional bone-implant integration profiling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unthreaded cylindric implants with a dual acid-etched surface were placed into the right femurs of 7 Sprague-Dawley rats. Two weeks postimplantation, the femurs were harvested and measured with a desktop micro-tomographic scanner with an isotropic resolution of 8 microm. To validate the microCT outcome, ground histologic sections and corresponding CT slices were compared with respect to bone morphometry. RESULTS: Bone-implant integration profiles assessed by microCT revealed that the percentage of cancellous bone gradually increased with proximity to the implant surface, while the percentage of cortical bone was not affected by proximity to the implant. Using the optimized segmentation threshold, the bone configuration in the microCT images corresponded to that observed in the histologic sections. The correlation between microCT and histology was significant for cortical (r = 0.65; P < .05) and cancellous bone (r = 0.92; P < .05) at distances of 24 to 240 microm from the implant surface, but no significant correlation was found for the area from 0 to 24 microm from the surface. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results support the usefulness of microCT assessment as a rapid, nondestructive method for 3-dimensional bone ratio measurements around implants, which may provide new perspectives for osseointegration research. Further study is necessary, however, to address the inherent metallic halation artifact, which potentially confounds peri-implant bone assessment.

Animals↗