PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Tiny Jaarsma

Publications and source records attributed to Tiny Jaarsma.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Cardiovascular risk estimation by professionally active cardiovascular nurses: results from the Basel 2005 Nurses Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Nurses play a key role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and one would, therefore, expect them to have a heightened awareness of the need for systematic screening and their own CVD risk profile. The aim of this study was to examine personal awareness of CVD risk among a cohort of cardiovascular nurses attending a European conference. METHODS: Of the 340 delegates attending the 5th annual Spring Meeting on Cardiovascular Nursing (Basel, Switzerland, 2005), 287 (83%) completed a self-report questionnaire to assess their own risk factors for CVD. Delegates were also asked to give an estimation of their absolute total risk of experiencing a fatal CVD event in the next 10 years. Level of agreement between self-reported CVD risk estimation and their actual risk according to the SCORE risk assessment system was compared by calculating weighted Kappa (kappa(w)). RESULTS: Overall, 109 responders (38%) self-reported having either pre-existing CVD (only 2%), one or more markedly raised CVD risk factors, a high total risk of fatal CVD (> or =5% in 10 years) or a strong family history of CVD. About half of this cohort (53%) did not know their own total cholesterol level. Less than half (45%) reported having a 10-year risk of fatal CVD of <1%, while 13% reported having a risk > or =5%. Based on the SCORE risk function, the estimated 10-year risk of a fatal CVD event was <1% for 96% of responders: only 2% had a > or =5% risk of such an event. Overall, less than half (46%) of this cohort's self-reported CVD risk corresponded with that calculated using the SCORE risk function (kappa(w)=0.27). CONCLUSION: Most cardiovascular nurses attending a European conference in 2005 poorly understood their own CVD risk profile, and the agreement between their self-reported 10-year risk of a fatal CVD and their CVD risk using SCORE was only fair. Given the specialist nature of this conference, our findings clearly demonstrate a need to improve overall nursing awareness of the role and importance of systematic CVD risk assessment.

Adult↗

Correlates of B-type natriuretic peptide and 6-min walk in heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and 6-min walk test (6MWT) are both related to the severity and prognosis in chronic heart failure (CHF), but may reflect different aspects of CHF. We related BNP and 6MWT to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA), and two indices of quality of life (physical subscales): the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLwHFQph) and the RAND-36ph. METHODS: Plasma BNP and 6MWT were measured at discharge in 229 patients who had been admitted for CHF. LVEF and NYHA were determined, and patients completed the MLwHFQ and RAND-36 questionnaires. RESULTS: BNP was weakly correlated to LVEF (r=-0.29, P<0.01) and NYHA (r=0.20, P<0.01), but not to MLwHFQph and RAND-36ph. On the other hand, 6MWT is related to MLwHFQph (r=-0.23, P<0.01), RAND-36ph (r=0.52, P<0.01), and NYHA (r=-0.46, P<0.01), but not to LVEF (r=-0.15, P=0.05). There is also no correlation between BNP and 6MWT (r=-0.01, P=0.87). CONCLUSIONS: The present data show that BNP and 6MWT represent different aspects of the clinical syndrome of CHF. The outcomes of this study suggest that BNP plasma levels are more related to cardiac function, while 6MWT reflects functional capacity and quality of life.

Aged↗

Pharmacological treatment and perceived health status during 1-year follow up in patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease, but ineligible for revascularization. Results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.

BACKGROUND: It has been recognized that a clinically significant portion of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) continue to experience anginal and other related symptoms that are refractory to the combination of medical therapy and revascularization. The Euro Heart Survey on Revascularization (EHSCR) provided an opportunity to assess pharmacological treatment and outcome in patients with proven CAD who were ineligible for revascularization. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of EHS-CR data. After excluding patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and those in whom revascularization was not indicated, 4409 patients remained in the analyses. We selected two groups: (1) patients in whom revascularization was the preferred treatment option (n = 3777, 86%), and (2) patients who were considered ineligible for revascularization (n = 632, 14%). RESULTS: Patient ineligible for revascularization had a worse risk profile, more often had a total occlusion (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.001), were treated more often with ACE-inhibitors (65% vs. 55%, p < 0.001) but less likely with aspirin (83% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). Overall, they had higher case-fatality at 1-year (7.0% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Regarding self-perceived health status, measured via the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire, these same patients reported more problems on all dimensions of the EQ-5D. Furthermore, in the revascularization group we observed an increase between discharge and 1-year follow up (utility score from 0.85 to 1.00) whereas patients ineligible for revascularization did not improve over time (utility score remained 0.80) CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of European patients with CAD, those considered ineligible for revascularization had more co-morbidities and risk factors, and scored worse on self-perceived health status as compared to revascularized patients in the revascularization group. With the exception of ACE-inhibitors and aspirin, there were no major differences regarding drug treatment between the two groups. Given these clinically significant observations, there appears to be a role for nurse-led, multidisciplinary, rehabilitation teams that target clinically vulnerable patients whose symptoms remain refractory to standard medical care.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Depressive symptoms are prominent among elderly hospitalised heart failure patients.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the prevalence of depressive symptoms in hospitalised elderly HF patients and demographic and clinical characteristics associated with depressive symptoms are not known. METHODS: A sample of 572 HF patients (61% male; age 71+/-12 years; LVEF 34%+/-15) was recruited from 17 Dutch hospitals during HF admission. Depressive symptoms were assessed by the CES-D. Demographic, clinical variables and HF symptoms were collected from patient chart and interview. RESULTS: Forty one percent of the patients had symptoms of depression with women significantly more often reporting depressive symptoms than men 48% vs. 36% (chi(2)=8.1, p<0.005). HF patients with depressive symptoms reported more clinical HF symptoms than patients without depressive symptoms. Even after deleting HF related symptoms (sleep disturbances and loss of appetite) from the CES-D scale, 36% of patients were still found to have symptoms of depression. Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that depressive symptoms were associated with female gender (odds 1.68, 95% CI 1.14-2.48), COPD (odds 2.11, 95% CI 1.35-3.30), sleep disturbance (odds 3.45, 95% CI 2.03-5.85) and loss of appetite (odds 2.61, 95% CI 1.58-4.33). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms are prominent in elderly hospitalised HF patients especially in women. Depressive symptoms are associated with more pronounced symptomatology, despite the fact that other indices of severity of left ventricular dysfunction are similar.

Age Factors↗

Low prevalence of B-type natriuretic peptide levels < 100 pg/mL in patients with heart failure at hospital discharge.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute heart failure (HF) presenting at the emergency department, a B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level < 100 pg/mL was found in only 10% of the patients. However, in a more stable outpatient HF population from another study, a BNP level < 100 pg/mL was found in as many as 21% of the patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence and characteristics of stabilized patients with BNP levels < 100 pg/mL before discharge after admission for decompensated heart failure HF. METHODS: We investigated 601 patients with HF who were part of a large-scale multicenter study in The Netherlands. All patients had been admitted for decompensated HF, and their BNP levels were measured before discharge when they had been clinically stabilized. Clinical characteristics of patients with BNP levels < 100 and > or = 100 pg/mL were compared. RESULTS: Patients were 70 +/- 12 years old, 61% were men, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.34 +/- 0.14. Of these patients, 10% had BNP levels < 100 pg/mL. Patients with a BNP level < 100 pg/mL were similar in age and sex but had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (0.41 +/- 0.14 vs 0.33 +/- 0.13, P < .001), body mass index, and hemoglobin and hematocrit concentrations compared with those with BNP levels > or = 100 pg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: In clinically stable patients with a recent admission for decompensated HF, only 10% had BNP levels > or = 100 pg/mL. These patients with low BNP levels seemed to have less severe HF and more frequently had preserved systolic function compared with patients with BNP levels > or = 100 pg/mL.

Aged↗

Compliance in heart failure patients: the importance of knowledge and beliefs.

AIMS: Non-compliance in patients with heart failure (HF) contributes to worsening HF symptoms and may lead to hospitalization. Several smaller studies have examined compliance in HF, but all were limited as they only studied either the individual components of compliance and its related factors or several aspects of compliance without studying the related factors. The aims of this study were to examine all dimensions of compliance and its related factors in one HF population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were collected in a cohort of 501 HF patients. Clinical and demographic data were assessed and patients completed questionnaires on compliance, beliefs, knowledge, and self-care behaviour. Overall compliance was 72% in this older HF population. Compliance with medication and appointment keeping was high (>90%). In contrast, compliance with diet (83%), fluid restriction (73%), exercise (39%), and weighing (35%) was markedly lower. Compliance was related to knowledge (OR=5.67; CI 2.87-11.19), beliefs (OR=1.78; CI 1.18-2.69), and depressive symptoms (OR=0.53; CI 0.35-0.78). CONCLUSION: Although some aspects of compliance had an acceptable level, compliance with weighing and exercise were low. In order to improve compliance, an increase of knowledge and a change of patient's beliefs by education and counselling are recommended. Extra attention should be paid to patients with depressive symptoms.

Aged↗

Development and testing of the Dutch Heart Failure Knowledge Scale.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) knowledge as well as compliance are considered to be underlying mechanisms of the effects of HF management programs. However, there are no valid and reliable measurement instruments available which measures knowledge of HF patients. AIM: To develop a reliable and valid instrument, which measures the knowledge, patients have on their disease and the HF-related health care regimen. METHODS: The HF knowledge scale was developed in 3 phases; (1) concept analysis and first construction, (2) revision of items and (3) testing for validity and reliability. RESULTS: The Dutch HF knowledge scale is a 15-item, self-administered questionnaire that covers items concerning HF knowledge in general, knowledge on HF treatment (including diet and fluid restriction) and HF symptoms and symptom recognition. Face validity as well as content and construct validity was tested in HF patients in 19 hospitals in the Netherlands. The scale was able to differentiate between HF patients with high and low level of HF knowledge. Cronbach's alpha of the knowledge scale in this population (n=902) was .62. CONCLUSION: The instrument is a valid and reliable scale that can be used in research to gain insight in the effect of education and counselling of HF patients. After additional testing, the instrument seems to be a valid and reliable scale to be used in clinical practice to measure HF knowledge.

Heart Failure↗

Management of heart failure in The Netherlands.

In The Netherlands, the incidence and prevalence of heart failure are rising as is the case in most other European countries. Overall, there are 200,000 patients with heart failure in The Netherlands and around 25,000 hospitalisations annually with a discharge diagnosis of heart failure. Most of these patients are managed in primary care, often together with a cardiologist. There is an active guideline program in different professional organisations (e.g. general practitioners, cardiologists) and in 2002 a collaborative multidisciplinary guideline for management of chronic heart failure was developed. However, there is clearly room for improvement in the adherence to these guidelines both with regard to the diagnosis and the treatment of HF patients. For example, ACE-I and beta-blockers are still under-prescribed. In particular, the more severely ill patients seem to be under treated. At present, general practitioners and cardiologists differ in their views on heart failure, resulting in differences in diagnosis and management. In addition to the multidisciplinary guidelines, several other initiatives have been developed to improve outcomes in these patients, such as rapid access clinics and outpatient heart failure clinics.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

Health care professionals in a heart failure team.

A heart failure team that treats heart failure patients often faces the challenge of managing multiple conditions requiring multiple medications and life style changes in an older patient group. A multidisciplinary team approach can optimally diagnose, carefully review and prescribe treatment, and educate and counsel patients and their families about medication use and life style changes. In this paper the possible role of the pharmacist, dietician, physical therapist, psychologist, primary care provider and social worker in heart failure management is discussed.

Allied Health Personnel↗

Complexity of program and clinical outcomes of heart failure disease management incorporating specialist nurse-led heart failure clinics. A meta-regression analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a hierarchy of effectiveness exists with respect to complexity of published protocols of heart failure (HF) disease management (DM) incorporating specialist nurse-led HF clinics. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We searched MEDLINE (1966-November 2004), the Cochrane Library, article bibliographies, and contacted experts. Inclusion criteria were random allocation of at least 100 patients, specialist HF nurses, HF clinics, and readmission as an outcome measure. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers conducted quality assessment, deconstructed and categorized protocols by complexity, and extracted results for readmission, mortality, the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization, HF readmission, and hospital days utilized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six trials were selected (N=949, mean age 73 years [range 62-79], men 58%, LVEF 34% [27-41], and average follow-up of 8.5 months [3-12]). Compared with usual care, the overall relative risk [95% confidence interval] for readmission with this strategy was 0.91 [0.72, 1.16], mortality was 0.80 [0.57, 1.06], and the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization was 0.88 [0.74, 1.04]. We observed better outcomes for programs with versus programs without hospital discharge planning and immediate post-discharge follow-up; readmission 0.30 [0.04, 2.60] vs. 1.00 [0.86, 1.17], mortality 0.96 [0.63, 1.47] vs. 0.75 [0.55, 1.03], the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization 0.61 [0.18, 2.02] vs. 0.91 [0.80, 1.03], HF readmission 0.09 [0.10, 0.65] vs. 0.65 [0.43, 1.00], and hospitalized days utilized per patient -0.26 [-0.49,-0.02] vs. 0.09 [-1.17, 1.34]. CONCLUSIONS: HF DM with specialist nurse-led HF clinics is a promising strategy or effective alternative whose benefit may be optimized by programs with a homogeneous structure and components that are delivered with consistency.

Aged↗

For better and for worse: Quality of life impaired in HF patients as well as in their partners.

BACKGROUND: Quality of Life (QOL) is known to be impaired in patients with Heart Failure (HF). The involvement of a key person, most often the spouse, enables the HF patient to manage the medical regimen and therefore to sustain Quality of Life (QOL). Yet little is known on the impact of caring for an HF patient on the QOL of the caregiving partner. This study aims to explore the QOL of partners of HF patients compared to the QOL of the patients. METHODS: The study population consisted of 38 couples of hospitalized HF patients and their partners. The Cantril Ladder of Life was used to rate QOL during hospitalization, with regard to the month prior to hospitalization and as projected 3 years in the future. Demographic and clinical variables were collected by patient interview and chart review. RESULTS: On a scale from 0-10, QOL scores of partners varied from 5.9 to 6.4. At some point the QOL score of partners was even lower than the QOL scores of HF patients. In the month prior to hospital admission the QOL of partners was significantly higher in comparison to the QOL of HF patients (6.1 vs. 4.9, respectively). However, this reversed during hospital admission, with QOL scores of partners being significantly lower compared to QOL scores of HF patients (5.9 vs. 6.8, respectively), even after correcting for age and gender. CONCLUSION: In our study the QOL of partners of HF patients was low. Whether this is explicitly due to having to live with a HF patient is not clear. Further research on what partners actually do and the relationship between being a caregiver and QOL is necessary in order to support these partners in giving optimal care and support.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Influence of age on natriuretic peptides in patients with chronic heart failure: a comparison between ANP/NT-ANP and BNP/NT-proBNP.

BACKGROUND: Natriuretic peptides are currently used in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Chronic Heart Failure (CHF). However, it is unknown whether there are different influences of age on atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP)/N-terminal-ANP (NT-ANP) or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP). AIMS: To compare the influence of age and gender on plasma levels of ANP/NT-ANP and BNP/NT-proBNP in CHF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Natriuretic peptides were measured in 311 CHF patients (68+/-8 years, 76% males, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 0.23+/-0.08). All natriuretic peptides were significantly related to age (p<0.05) on multivariate regression analysis, with partial correlation coefficients of 0.18, 0.29, 0.28 and 0.25 for ANP, NT-ANP, BNP and NT-proBNP, respectively. The relative increase of both BNP/NT-proBNP were more pronounced than of ANP/NT-ANP (p<0.01). Furthermore, the relative increase of BNP with age was markedly larger than of NT-proBNP (p<0.01). Levels of all natriuretic peptides were also significantly related to cardiothoracic ratio, renal function and LVEF. CONCLUSION: In patients with CHF, BNP/NT-proBNP were more related to age than ANP/NT-ANP, and BNP was more related to age than NT-proBNP. However, in these CHF patients the influence of age on the levels of all natriuretic peptides was modest, and comparable to several other factors.

Age Factors↗