PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Tirone E David

Publications and source records attributed to Tirone E David.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Aortic dissection complicating pregnancy following prophylactic aortic root replacement in a woman with Marfan syndrome.

Prophylactic aortic root replacement is the main factor explaining the increase in median probability of survival in Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients. In women with MFS, earlier root replacement has been suggested as a strategy to facilitate safe pregnancy. However, in this case report a pregnant patient with MFS who sustained a Type B aortic dissection in her second trimester, with fatal outcome, despite having had a prophylactic aortic root replacement five months prior to conception is described.

Adult↗

Surgical treatment of paravalvular abscess: long-term results.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcomes of surgery for active infective endocarditis with paravalvular abscess. METHODS: Paravalvular abscess was defined as infective necrosis of the valve annulus that required patch reconstruction before implanting a new valve. Of 383 patients with active infective endocarditis who underwent surgical treatment, 135 (35%) had paravalvular abscess. Patients' mean age was 51+/-16 years and 68% were men. The infected valve was native in 69 patients and prosthetic in 66. The abscess involved the aortic annulus in 73 patients, the mitral annulus in 27, the aortic and mitral annuluses in 33, and the aortic and tricuspid and/or pulmonary annuluses in 2. Surgery consisted of radical resection of the abscess, reconstruction of the annulus with patches and valve replacement. Mean follow-up was 6.2+/-5.2 years and complete. RESULTS: There were 21 (15.5%) operative deaths. Preoperative shock and abscess in the aortic and mitral annuluses were independent predictors of operative death. There were 34 (25%) late deaths. Survival at 15 years was 43+/-6% for all patients, 50+/-8% for native valve endocarditis and 35+/-9% for prosthetic (p=0.41). Age by increments of 5 years and recurrent endocarditis were independent predictors of late death. There were 16 episodes of recurrent endocarditis in 15 patients, and the freedom from recurrent endocarditis was 82+/-4% at 15 years. Fifteen reoperations were performed in 14 patients. Freedom from reoperation was 72+/-9% at 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for active endocarditis with paravalvular abscess was associated with high operative mortality, particularly in patients in shock and abscess of both mitral and aortic annuluses. Long-term survival was adversely affected by age and recurrent bouts of endocarditis.

Abscess↗

Surgical treatment of active infective endocarditis: a continued challenge.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the outcomes of surgery for active infective endocarditis in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: Three hundred eighty-three consecutive patients underwent surgery for active infective endocarditis. The mean age was 51 +/- 16 years, and 64% were men. The infected valve was native in 266 patients and prosthetic in 117. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism. Surgery consisted of valve replacement or repair in patients with infection limited to the cusps or leaflets of the valve or radical resection of seemingly infected paravalvular tissues, and reconstruction with patches and valve replacement in patients with abscess (135 patients). The mean follow-up was 6.1 +/- 5.2 years. RESULTS: There were 45 (12%) operative and 88 (23%) late deaths. The operative mortality did not change during the period of study. Preoperative shock, prosthetic valve endocarditis, paravalvular abscess, and S aureus were independent predictors of operative mortality. Age, shock, prosthetic valve endocarditis, left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, and recurrent endocarditis were independent predictors of death from all causes. Survivals at 15 years were 44% +/- 5% overall, 59% +/- 5% for native valve endocarditis, and 25% +/- 7% for prosthetic valve endocarditis (P = .001). Freedom from recurrent endocarditis at 15 years was 86% +/- 3% for all patients, similar to those for native and prosthetic valve endocarditis (P = .39). Freedom from reoperation at 15 years was 70% +/- 6% for all patients, similar to those for native and prosthetic valve endocarditis (P = .55). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for endocarditis continues to be challenging and associated with high operative mortality and morbidity. Age, shock, prosthetic valve endocarditis, impaired ventricular function, and recurrent infections adversely affect long-term survival.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

Long-term results of aortic valve-sparing operations for aortic root aneurysm.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the results of aortic valve sparing for aortic root aneurysm. METHODS: Two hundred twenty consecutive patients who had aortic valve sparing for aortic root aneurysm were prospectively studied with annual clinical assessments and echocardiography. Their mean age was 46 +/- 15 years, 40% had Marfan syndrome, 17% had aortic dissection, and 7% had bicuspid aortic valve. Reimplantation of the aortic valve was performed in 167 patients and remodeling of the aortic root in 53. Aortic cusp repair was performed in 80 patients, and reinforcement of the free margin of one of the cusps with a fine polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-Tex) suture in 48. The mean follow-up was 5.2 +/- 3.7 years and it was complete. RESULTS: There were 3 operative and 13 late deaths. Patients' survival at 10 years was 88% +/- 3%. Age older than 65 years, advanced functional class, and ejection fraction less than 40% were independent predictors of death. Moderate aortic insufficiency developed in 7 patients and severe insufficiency in 6. Freedom from moderate or severe aortic insufficiency at 10 years was 85% +/- 5% for all patients, but it was 94% +/- 4% after reimplantation and 75% +/- 10% after remodeling (P = .04). Five patients required aortic valve replacement; the freedom from valve replacement at 10 years was 95% +/- 3%. One case of endocarditis developed 11 years postoperatively. At the latest follow-up, 88% of the patients were in functional class I, and 10% were in class II. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve-sparing operation is associated with low rates of valve-related complications. The probability of late aortic insufficiency was lower after the reimplantation procedure than after remodeling in our experience.

Adult↗

Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term results of tricuspid valve (TV) repair with or without an annuloplasty ring. METHODS AND RESULTS: 702 patients underwent TV repair at our institution (1978 to 2003), of which 493 had, predominantly, a De Vega procedure (no ring) and 209 had an annuloplasty ring (ring). TV pathology was functional (secondary) in 74% of patients. Concomitant procedures consisted of mitral valve surgery in 80% of patients, aortic valve surgery in 33%, and coronary bypass in 14%. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up data were obtained. Follow-up was 99% complete and was 5.9+/-4.9 (mean+/-SD) years long. Ring patients were younger (55+/-14 versus 59+/-14 years; P=0.001) and less likely to have coronary artery disease (10% versus 17%; P=0.02), more likely to be female (75% versus 65%; P=0.01) and having had previous cardiac surgery (56% versus 42%; P=0.001). Operative times were similar between the 2 groups. Long-term survival, event-free survival and freedom from recurrent TR were significantly better in the ring group, and there was a trend toward fewer TV reoperations. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the use of an annuloplasty ring was an independent predictor of long-term survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5 to 1.0; P=0.03) and event-free survival (HR, 0.8; CI, 0.6 to 1.0; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of an annuloplasty ring in patients undergoing tricuspid valve repair is associated with improved survival and event-free survival.

Adult↗

The Toronto Risk Score for adverse events following cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an objective and reliable measure of acuity that will identify high-risk patients and predict length of stay following all cardiac surgery procedures. METHODS: Logistical regression analysis of 12,683 patients undergoing cardiac surgery between 1996 and 2000 was used to identify the independent predictors of postoperative adverse events (AEs, defined as death, myocardial infarction, low cardiac output syndrome, postoperative renal failure, stroke or deep sternal wound infection). The rounded ORs for each of the 18 predictors of AEs were summed to calculate the Toronto Risk Score (TRS) for each patient. Weighted linear regression was used to determine the relationship between TRS and length of stay in the 4378 patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2001 and 2002. RESULTS: TRS was significantly associated with cardiovascular intensive care unit length of stay (R2=0.85, slope=0.42, intercept=0.4; P<0.001). For each unit increase in TRS, cardiovascular intensive care unit length of stay increased by 0.4+/-0.05 days. TRS was also significantly associated with total postoperative length of stay (R2=0.88, slope=0.71, intercept=4.9; P<0.001). TRS captured a significant increase in acuity from 1996 and 2000 (5.12+/-3.5) to 2001 and 2002 (5.54+/-3.5; P<0.001). Despite increased acuity, AEs were reduced in 2001 and 2002 (8.1%) compared with 1996 to 2000 (9.8%; P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS: The TRS is a valid measure of acuity that can identify patients who are at high risk of experiencing an AE and having prolonged length of stay after any cardiac surgery procedure, capture changes in acuity over time and allow for continuous quality performance evaluation.

Aged↗

Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: repair, replace or rethink?

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a common complication of coronary artery disease and is the focus of a rapidly increasing amount of research. Mechanistic studies have determined that IMR is caused by apical displacement and tethering of the mitral valve leaflets after myocardial infarction, resulting in incomplete coaptation. Despite the relatively high prevalence of IMR, most centers have only a small surgical experience with this disorder. The result is that a number of different procedures have been recently developed without clear improvement in patient outcomes. The current review will examine the myriad surgical options for IMR with a focus on clinical outcomes.

Chronic Disease↗

Sex-specific long-term outcomes after combined valve and coronary artery surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare sex-specific, long-term outcomes after combined valve and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). METHODS: Between 1990 and 2000, 1,567 patients underwent combined valve and CABG surgery at our institution. Our surgical database was linked to a governmental administrative hospital discharge database and a registry of deaths to obtain long-term follow-up. All patients underwent CABG plus aortic (62%), mitral (31%), or multiple valve surgery (7%). RESULTS: Women had more preoperative risk factors than men (namely, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke; all p < 0.001). The prevalence of triple-vessel disease was the same between men and women, but women received fewer mammary grafts and fewer total bypass grafts (both p < 0.01). Women received fewer mitral valve repairs and more mitral valve replacements than men (p = 0.014). Length of follow-up was 5.3 +/- 3.2 years (mean +/- SD; range, 0 to 12.5) and was 99.8% complete. Both sexes had similar long-term survival rates. Women were at higher risk of stroke during follow-up (risk ratio = 1.52, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 2.1). There were no sex differences in rehospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.9), heart failure (p = 0.4), redo cardiac surgery (p = 0.5), or endocarditis (p = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: Women have a higher preoperative risk profile than men undergoing combined valve and CABG surgery, but long-term survival rates are similar. Female sex is an independent predictor of stroke during follow-up. Further studies should focus on the cause of increased risk of stroke and methods of prevention.

Aged↗

Short- and long-term results of triple valve surgery in the modern era.

BACKGROUND: Triple valve surgery is usually complex and carries a reported operative mortality of 25% and 10-year survival of 40%. We examined surgical results in the modern era. METHODS: A total of 174 consecutive patients, mean age 58 +/-12 years underwent triple valve surgery from 1990 to 2004. The most common aortic and mitral valve disease was rheumatic disease (61%), followed by prosthetic valve dysfunction (22%). Tricuspid valve disease was functional regurgitation in 72% of patients. Ninety-four percent of patients were in New York Heart Association class III and IV, and 60% had had previous cardiac operations. The aortic valve procedures consisted of 160 replacements and 14 repairs, the mitral valve procedures, 153 replacements and 21 repairs, and the tricuspid valve procedures, 12 replacements and 162 repairs. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of early and late survival. RESULTS: Operative mortality was 13% (n = 22). Univariate factors associated with mortality included urgent surgery, shock, tricuspid valve replacement, preoperative renal failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Survival at 5 and 10 years was 75% and 61%, respectively. Seventy-three percent of patients were in New York Heart Association class I and II at their most recent follow-up. Ten-year freedom from thromboembolism was 88%, from anticoagulation-related hemorrhage, 83%, from endocarditis, 96%, and from cardiac reoperation, 92%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced rheumatic valve disease and prosthetic valve dysfunction are at risk for requiring triple valve surgery. Compared with historic reports, the results of triple valve surgery, primary and reoperative, have improved. Although early mortality is high, long-term and event-free survival are comparable with that of patients undergoing single valve replacement.

Adult↗

Midterm outcomes of tricuspid valve repair versus replacement for organic tricuspid disease.

BACKGROUND: Organic tricuspid valve (TV) disease is uncommon. Few studies have compared TV repair with replacement in these patients. The current study compared midterm outcomes of TV repair versus replacement in a large group of patients with organic tricuspid disease. METHODS: Two-hundred and fifty patients underwent surgery for organic TV disease at our institution from 1979 to 2003. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up were obtained, were 99% complete, and were 5.2 +/- 4.1 years long (mean +/- standard deviation). RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-eight patients (71%) underwent TV repair and 72 (29%) received TV replacement (54 bioprosthetic, 18 mechanical). Repair patients were more likely to have hypertension, rheumatic pathology, or elective surgery. Concomitant procedures included mitral (50% of patients), aortic (26%), and coronary bypass (6%) operations. Perioperative and midterm mortality were higher in the replacement group (both p < 0.001). Cox regression analysis revealed TV replacement as an independent predictor of midterm mortality (hazard ratio: 5.1, 95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 9.1, p < 0.001) and decreased event-free survival (hazard ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 3.6, p = 0.02). Follow-up echocardiography revealed more moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation in repair patients (38% vs 5%, p < 0.001), but no difference in New York Heart Association functional class or reoperation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Tricuspid valve repair is associated with better perioperative, midterm, and event-free survival than TV replacement in patients with organic tricuspid disease. Despite more tricuspid regurgitation in the repair group during follow-up, reoperation rates and functional class were similar. Repair should be performed whenever possible in patients with organic tricuspid disease.

Adult↗

Reoperation is not an independent predictor of mortality during aortic valve surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Reoperations on aortic valves are associated with increased mortality, which may affect valve prosthesis selection at the time of initial aortic valve replacement. We analyzed our experience to determine whether reoperation itself independently predicts mortality during aortic valve surgery. METHODS: Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were collected prospectively on patients undergoing primary or redo aortic valve replacement or Bentall procedures after previous aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary bypass grafting at a single institution from 1990 through 2002. Logistic regression analyses validated by means of bootstrap methodology identified the predictors of hospital mortality and the independent effect of reoperation. RESULTS: Of 2673 patients undergoing aortic valve surgery, 2375 were primary operations, 216 were reoperations, and 82 were Bentall-after-aortic valve replacement procedures. Of 298 reoperations, 32 were third and 5 were fourth procedures. Mortality was 2.3% for primary operations, 4.6% for redo aortic valve replacement, and 2.4% for Bentall-after-aortic valve replacement procedures. Most patients underwent elective procedures, with mortalities of 1.6%, 1.7%, and 2.5%, respectively. Hospital mortality was independently predicted by peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio, 3.6), active endocarditis (odds ratio, 2.9), worsening New York Heart Association class (odds ratio, 2.3), and need for annular enlargement (odds ratio, 2.1). Reoperation itself did not predict hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of mortality during aortic valve surgery is due mostly to active endocarditis, New York Heart Association class, and comorbidity. We failed to find a significant effect of reoperation on perioperative mortality. Mechanical valves, with their attendant anticoagulation-related morbidity, should not be implanted solely because of anticipated high mortality associated with bioprosthetic rereplacement.

Aged↗

Twenty-year results of the Hancock II bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The Hancock II bioprosthesis (HII) has several design features designed to increase its durability. The study aim was to determine very long-term outcomes for the HII valve in a large patient population. METHODS: Long-term follow up was obtained by mail and/or telephone questionnaire of patients undergoing HII valve replacement surgery between 1982 and 2001 (n = 1,569). Follow up was complete on 1,568 patients (99.9%), and ranged from 0 to 250 months. RESULTS: Isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed in 1,010 patients and mitral valve replacement (MVR) in 559. The average (+/- SD) age of patients was 67 +/- 11 years, and 65% were males. Long-term death occurred in 445 AVR patients and 275 MVR patients, of which 11% and 17%, respectively, were valve-related. Twenty-year freedom from thromboembolism (all results actuarial) was 79 +/- 3% after AVR and 83 +/- 3% after MVR; freedom from endocarditis was 91 +/- 5% and 85 +/- 5%, respectively. Twenty-year freedom from structural valve deterioration (SVD) was 73 +/- 16% and 39 +/- 9% in AVR patients aged > or = 65 years and < 65 years, respectively. Similarly, 20-year freedom from SVD was 59 +/- 11% and 27 +/- 9% in MVR patients aged > or = 65 years and < 65 years, respectively. When actual statistical techniques were applied (cumulative incidence), 20-year actual risk of SVD was 18 +/- 3% in all AVR patients and 23 +/- 3% in all MVR patients. Reoperation was required in 72 AVR patients, and was valve-related in 60. A total of 49 MVR patients underwent reoperation; 48 of these were valve-related. CONCLUSION: The Hancock II bioprosthesis continues to show very good long-term results and durability, particularly in patients aged over 65 years.

Aged↗

Valve surgery in octogenarians: a safe option with good medium-term results.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The number of octogenarians is increasing in industrialized societies, and many patients aged over 80 years have heart valve disease which is amenable to surgical treatment. The perioperative outcomes and long-term results in very elderly patients undergoing valve surgery were evaluated. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 2,791 patients with long-term follow up, who underwent valve surgery between 1990 and 2002. Of these patients, 132 (68 males, 64 females) were aged over 80 years (mean age 82 +/- 2 years; range: 80-94 years). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients (71.9%) underwent aortic valve replacement, 36 (27.3%) mitral surgery, and one patient had double-valve surgery. Sixty-five patients (49.2%) required concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. There were 11 (8.3%) redo procedures. Patients aged over 80 years were significantly more symptomatic preoperatively than their younger counterparts (NYHA class III-IV 90.9% versus 69.0%, p < 0.001), with more congestive cardiac failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, obstructive pulmonary disease, and renal failure (all p < 0.05). Perioperative mortality did not, however, differ significantly between groups (< 80 years versus > or = 80 years, 2.9% versus 4.6%, p = 0.10). There was also no difference in the composite end point of in-hospital death, renal failure, stroke, low output state, myocardial infarction, or sternal wound infection (< 80 years versus > or = 80 years, 10.5% versus 11.4%, p = 0.8). The mean follow up period was 66 +/- 44 months (< 80 years) versus 61 +/- 37 (> or = 80 years). Late mortality was higher in the elderly group (10-year survival 37.9% versus 68.2%, p < 0.001) and preoperative atrial fibrillation (RR 2.75; CI: 1.44-5.23), coronary artery disease (RR 1.98; CI 1.12-3.52) and congestive cardiac failure (RR 2.13; CI: 1.10-4.11) were independent predictors of late mortality. The groups did not differ with respect to long-term valve-related events, with the exception of fewer reoperations among elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Valve surgery in selected octogenarians is associated with low morbidity and mortality. The outlook after surgery is very good, and surgery should not be denied to this group on the basis of age alone.

Age Factors↗

A comparison of outcomes of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease with posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in patients with degenerative disease of the mitral valve with posterior, anterior, or bileaflet prolapse. METHODS: Patients underwent operations from 1981 through 2001: 359 had posterior (mean age, 60.4 years), 92 had anterior (mean age, 53.3 years), and 250 had bileaflet (means age, 56.4 years) prolapse. Patients with anterior prolapse were younger (P = .04) and had more associated aortic valve disease (P = .02), particularly bicuspid aortic valve disease (P < .001). Anterior prolapse was corrected by using chordal replacement with Gore-Tex sutures in most patients, but early on in this series, leaflet resection, chordal shortening, and chordal transfer were also used. Echocardiograms were done annually, and clinical follow-up was complete at a mean of 6.9 +/- 4.0 years (range, 0-23 years). RESULTS: The overall survival at 12 years was 75% +/- 5%, with no difference among the posterior, anterior, and bileaflet prolapse groups (P = .3). The freedom from reoperation at 12 years was 96% +/- 2% for posterior, 88% +/- 4% for anterior, and 94% +/- 2% for bileaflet prolapse (P = .019). Anterior prolapse was the only independent predictor of reoperation. The freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation at 12 years was 80% +/- 4% for posterior, 65% +/- 8% for anterior, and 67% +/- 6% for bileaflet prolapse (P = .001). Anterior and bileaflet prolapse, age, ejection fraction of less than 40%, and aortic valve disease were independent predictors of recurrent moderate or severe mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: The pathophysiology of mitral regurgitation affects the durability of mitral valve repair for degenerative disease, and the results of posterior prolapse are better than those of anterior and bileaflet prolapse. This study indicates that rates of reoperation underscore the rates of failure of mitral valve repair.

Cardiac Surgical Procedures↗

Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after isolated aortic valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), defined as the need for postoperative intraaortic balloon pump or inotropic support for >30 minutes in the intensive care unit, remains a relatively common complication of aortic valve (AV) surgery. The aim of this study is to identify the preoperative predictors of LCOS in patients undergoing isolated AV surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective review of data prospectively entered into an institutional database. Between 1990 and 2003, 2255 patients underwent isolated AV surgery with no other concomitant cardiac surgery. The independent predictors of LCOS and operative mortality (OM) were determined by stepwise logistic regression analysis. The overall prevalence of LCOS was 3.9%. The independent predictors of LCOS were (odds ratio in parentheses) renal failure (5.0), earlier year of operation (4.4), left ventricular ejection fraction <40% (3.6), shock (3.2), female gender (2.8), and increasing age (1.02). Overall OM was 2.9%. The OM was higher in patients who experienced LCOS (38% versus 1.5%; P<0.001). The independent predictors of mortality were (odds ratio in parentheses) preoperative renal failure (8.3), urgency of surgery (3.4), previous stroke (2.9), congestive heart failure (2.6), previous cardiac surgery (2.3), hypertension (1.7), and small AV size (1.3). CONCLUSIONS: Low-output syndrome is associated with significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Novel strategies to preserve renal function, optimization of preexisting heart failure symptoms, and avoidance of prosthesis-patient mismatch may reduce the incidence of LCOS and lead to improved results after AV surgery.

Aged↗