PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Todd R Otten

Publications and source records attributed to Todd R Otten.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Thromboembolic disease involving the superior vena cava and brachiocephalic veins.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency of diagnosis and the characteristics of brachiocephalic vein and superior vena cava (SVC) thromboembolic disease. BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic disease of the brachiocephalic veins or SVC rarely has been reported. In view of the frequent use of central venous access lines, it would seem that the percentage of hospitalized patients with thromboembolic disease of the brachiocephalic veins or SVC should be higher than is generally recognized. METHODS: A retrospective search for thromboembolic disease involving the brachiocephalic veins and SVC was made of patients who were hospitalized over a 2-year period. RESULTS: Thromboembolic disease of the brachiocephalic veins or SVC was diagnosed in 23 of 34,567 hospitalized adults (0.06%) who were > or = 20 years old. Two of 23 patients (8.7%) had pulmonary embolism. Cancer was present in 17 of 23 patients (74%), and 15 of 23 patients (65%) had central venous access lines. Edema of the arm, face, or neck was present in 21 of 23 patients (91%). Pain or discomfort was present 15 of 23 patients (65%). CONCLUSION: Isolated brachiocephalic vein and SVC thrombosis occur in a sufficient number of hospitalized patients to merit consideration of the diagnosis in patients who have cancer, central venous access lines, or both. The signs and symptoms of brachiocephalic vein thrombosis have features in common with SVC syndrome as well as with upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. In a patient with appropriate clinical findings, venography or other imaging may be indicated.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of symptomatic upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and its association with symptomatic acute pulmonary embolism (PE) in a community teaching hospital. METHODS: The prevalence of symptomatic upper extremity DVT was evaluated retrospectively at a community teaching hospital during the 2-year period between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 2000. Patients were identified by International Classification of Disease, ninth revision, clinical modification, discharge codes and a review of the records of all compression Doppler ultrasonograms, venograms of the upper extremities, and magnetic resonance angiograms of the upper extremities. RESULTS: Symptomatic upper extremity DVT was diagnosed in 65 of 44,136 patients of all ages (0.15%) [or 64 of 34,567 adult patients >or= 20 years of age; 0.19%]. In seven patients, the upper extremity DVT was shown by venography to extend proximally to the brachiocephalic vein. Among these, the DVT extended to the superior vena cava in two. All of the patients received anticoagulant therapy for upper extremity DVT. No patients developed symptomatic PE. Central lines at the site of the upper extremity DVT were inserted in 39 of 65 patients (60%). Cancer was diagnosed in 30 of 65 patients (46%), 23 cancer patients also had central lines, and 19 patients (29%) had upper extremity DVT with no apparent cause. All patients had swelling of the upper extremities. Erythema over the affected site was present in four patients (6%). Pain was present in 26 patients (40%), although some discomfort due to swelling was present in all patients. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic upper extremity DVT is not uncommon in hospitalized patients. Symptomatic PE resulting from upper extremity DVT was not observed in these patients, all of whom were treated with anticoagulants.

Acute Disease↗