Biomedical subjects

Tom Morris

Publications and source records attributed to Tom Morris.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Is prostate-specific antigen a valid surrogate end point for survival in hormonally treated patients with metastatic prostate cancer? Joint research of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the Limburgs Universitair Centrum, and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.

PURPOSE: The long duration of phase III clinical trials of overall survival (OS) slows down the treatment-development process. It could be shortened by using surrogate end points. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the most studied biomarker in prostate cancer (PCa). This study attempts to validate PSA end points as surrogates for OS in advanced PCa. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Individual data from 2,161 advanced PCa patients treated in studies comparing bicalutamide to castration were used in a meta-analytic approach to surrogate end-point validation. PSA response, PSA normalization, time to PSA progression, and longitudinal PSA measurements were considered. RESULTS: The known association between PSA and OS at the individual patient level was confirmed. The association between the effect of intervention on any PSA end point and on OS was generally low (determination coefficient, < 0.69). CONCLUSION: It is a common misconception that high correlation between biomarkers and true end point justify the use of the former as surrogates. To statistically validate surrogate end points, a high correlation between the treatment effects on the surrogate and true end point needs to be established across groups of patients treated with two alternative interventions. The levels of association observed in this study indicate that the effect of hormonal treatment on OS cannot be predicted with a high degree of precision from observed treatment effects on PSA end points, and thus statistical validity is unproven. In practice, non-null treatment effects on OS can be predicted only from precisely estimated large effects on time to PSA progression (TTPP; hazard ratio, < 0.50).

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

PubMed2004

Prophylactic breast irradiation with a single dose of electron beam radiotherapy (10 Gy) significantly reduces the incidence of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of prophylactic breast irradiation in reducing the incidence and severity of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia and breast pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In all, 106 men with prostate cancer (T1b-T4/Nx/M0) and no current gynecomastia/breast pain were enrolled in this randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group multicenter trial. Patients received either a single dose of electron beam radiotherapy (10 Gy) or sham radiotherapy. Bicalutamide (Casodex) 150 mg/day was administered for 12 months from the day of radiotherapy. Every 3 months, patients underwent physical examination and questioning about gynecomastia and breast pain. RESULTS: The incidence of investigator-assessed gynecomastia was significantly lower with radiotherapy vs. sham radiotherapy (52% vs. 85%; odds ratio [OR], 0.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04, 0.38; p < 0.001); direct questioning showed similar results. Fewer radiotherapy patients had >/=5 cm gynecomastia (measured by calipers; 11.5% vs. 50.0% for sham radiotherapy), and fewer cases were moderate-to-severe in intensity (21% vs. 48%). Similar proportions of radiotherapy and sham radiotherapy patients experienced breast pain (83% vs. 91%; OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.05, 1.27; p = 0.221); patients receiving radiotherapy experienced some reduction in its severity (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20, 0.97; p = 0.0429). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic breast irradiation is an effective and well-tolerated strategy for prevention of bicalutamide-induced gynecomastia.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Is the efficacy of hormonal therapy affected by lymph node status? data from the bicalutamide (Casodex) Early Prostate Cancer program.

OBJECTIVES: To report an exploratory subgroup analysis assessing the extent to which the overall benefit found in the Early Prostate Cancer program is dependent on lymph node status at randomization. The program is ongoing, and the overall survival data are immature. The first combined analysis of the bicalutamide (Casodex) Early Prostate Cancer program at 3 years' median follow-up showed that bicalutamide, 150 mg once daily, plus standard care (radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, or watchful waiting), significantly reduced the risk of objective progression and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling in patients with localized/locally advanced prostate cancer. METHODS: Men (n = 8113) with localized/locally advanced disease received bicalutamide 150 mg or placebo once daily, plus standard care. The time to event data (objective progression, PSA doubling) was analyzed by lymph node status at randomization. RESULTS: Compared with standard care alone, bicalutamide significantly reduced the risk of objective progression, irrespective of lymph node status, with the most pronounced reduction in patients with N+ (hazard ratio [HR] 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15 to 0.56) compared with those with N0 (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.73) and Nx (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.72) disease. The largest decrease in risk of PSA doubling with bicalutamide was observed in N+ disease (HR 0.16; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.29), with significantly reduced risks seen in N0 (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.51) and Nx (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.33 to 0.44) disease. CONCLUSIONS: The greatest reduction in the risk of objective progression and PSA doubling with bicalutamide was seen in patients with N+ disease. However, bicalutamide also provided a statistically significant benefit in those with N0 and Nx disease.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Bicalutamide (150 mg) versus placebo as immediate therapy alone or as adjuvant to therapy with curative intent for early nonmetastatic prostate cancer: 5.3-year median followup from the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 6.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the benefits of adding 150 mg bicalutamide to standard care, that is radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy or watchful waiting (WW), in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,218 men with T1-4, M0, any N prostate cancer were recruited from 62 Scandinavian centers and randomized 1:1 to 150 mg bicalutamide or placebo plus standard care. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. RESULTS: At a median 5.3-year followup patients with locally advanced disease had improved survival with bicalutamide (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.92), while those with localized disease had decreased survival with bicalutamide (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.03). Bicalutamide significantly improved PFS, decreasing the risk of disease progression by 43% compared with placebo (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.68, p<0.0001). The rate of events was 35.4% for bicalutamide and 46.2% for placebo. Patients with locally advanced disease gained the greatest PFS benefits with bicalutamide (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.52). Since 81% of the trial population were untreated before entry and would otherwise have undergone WW, the findings essentially reflect the results of immediate hormone therapy vs WW. CONCLUSIONS: Bicalutamide (150 mg) provides significant benefit in patients with locally advanced disease. In previously untreated patients there may be a tumor burden below which endocrine therapy provides no benefit or may even decrease survival.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Bicalutamide 150 mg in addition to standard care in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer: results from the second analysis of the early prostate cancer program at median followup of 5.4 years.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of 150 mg bicalutamide daily given in addition to standard care, in patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The bicalutamide Early Prostate Cancer program consists of 3 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials prospectively designed for combined analysis. A total of 8,113 men with T1b-T4, M0, any N (N0 in 1 trial) prostate cancer were randomized to bicalutamide 150 mg/day (4,052) or placebo (4,061) in addition to standard care (radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy or watchful waiting). Primary end points were objective progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. RESULTS: At median 5.4 years of followup (21.6% progression events) bicalutamide significantly improved PFS in the overall population. This result was driven by positive results in trials 24 and 25, with the North American trial (trial 23) showing no difference. Patients with locally advanced disease gained most benefit from bicalutamide in terms of PFS, irrespective of underlying therapy. Overall survival was similar in the bicalutamide and placebo groups, across the program and in each trial. Among watchful waiting patients survival appeared to be improved with bicalutamide in those with locally advanced disease, whereas survival appeared to be reduced with bicalutamide in those with localized disease. The most common adverse events with bicalutamide were gynecomastia and breast pain. Other adverse events occurred with a similarly low incidence in the 2 treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms that bicalutamide provides benefit in patients with locally advanced disease. The current data suggest that early or adjuvant hormonal therapy for patients at low risk of disease progression, such as those with localized disease, is not appropriate.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Rural policy development: an NRHA and PACE association collaborative model.

The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) offers a unique model of comprehensive care for frail, elderly people. To date, all of the PACE programs have been located in urban areas. Rural advocates and policymakers, however, believe the program may hold great promise for use in rural areas, which have higher percentages of elderly residents than urban areas. In 2002, the National Rural Health Association and the National PACE Association convened a meeting that brought together PACE experts, policymakers, and rural health care providers to examine PACE and its applicability for rural communities. The meeting participants concluded that there were many rural communities where the PACE model might not only be appropriate but also highly successful in caring for rural, frail, elderly people. This article examines the notion of expanding the PACE model to rural communities, including some of the barriers and some of the possible solutions that might make PACE a viable part of the rural health care delivery system.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Rural public health: policy and research opportunities.

Changes in the health care system, medicine, and technology as well as in the characteristics of rural communities raise issues that impact the responsiveness of the rural public health system to emerging threats to health. These issues, which are systemic in nature and primarily involve the infrastructure of public health, include the capacity of rural public health to manage population health, utilize information technology, monitor performance of the essential public health functions, develop leadership and the public health workforce, and promote the interaction and integration of public health and health care. This article provides an overview of policy and research implications, and it suggests that each of these issues contributes to the capacity of public health to effectively improve the outcomes of health in rural communities.

Delivery of Health Care, Integrated↗