PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Tomas O Albrektsson

Publications and source records attributed to Tomas O Albrektsson.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: I. Preliminary investigations--52 patients followed for 3 years.

BACKGROUND: We developed a total hip system using osseointegration guidelines, a metaphyseal-loading proximal femoral replacement in the retained neck and a dual-geometry titanium shell in the acetabulum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was undertaken in 52 patients (53 hips), using the cemented Spectron stem and cementless Harris-Galante II cup as control implants (24 patients in experimental group, 29 control patients). Clinical measures of Harris Hip Score (HHS), pain score and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at regular intervals for up to three years were used to monitor progress. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found in HHS and pain score; the stability of the cementless experimental implant was also comparable to that of the cemented controls by RSA. 3 revisions were required for migration in the experimental group and 1 was required for component dislocation in the control group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings indicate the practicality of osseointegration of titanium implants, but suggest that current performance is inadequate for clinical introduction. However, the stable fixation achieved in the retained neck in the majority of patients is indicative of osseointegration. This finding will encourage technical and design improvements for enhancement of clinical osseointegration and should also encourage further study. Periprosthetic osteolysis might be avoided by the establishment and maintenance of direct implant-bone connection: "osseointegration".

Acetabulum↗

A descriptive study on retrieved non-threaded and threaded implant designs.

OBJECTIVES: In the light microscope compare the amount of bone saucerization for non-threaded cylindrical and threaded implant designs in retrieved samples from patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Consecutively received retrieved oral implants from 117 patients, whereof 85 non-threaded cylindrical and 85 Brånemark implants, have been included in the study. For 75 non-threaded cylindrical and 46 Brånemark implants was the entire implant length available for calculation. Undecalcified ground sections were investigated in the light microscope with calculation of percentage of implant length coronal to the first bone-implant contact and percentage of bone to implant contact. RESULTS: Mean value for implant length coronal to first bone-implant contact was 65%, standard error of the mean (SEM) 3 (range 0-100%), for non-threaded cylindrical implants and 43%, SEM 6 (range 0-100%) for Brånemark implants. Mean values of bone contact along the entire implant length was 23%, SEM 2 (range 0-65%), for the non-threaded cylindrical implants and 33%, SEM 5 (range 0-93%) for the Brånemark implants. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this retrospective, retrieval study non-threaded cylindrical implants demonstrated a greater bone saucerization when evaluated in the light microscope.

Adult↗