Biomedical subjects

Tommi Nyrönen

Publications and source records attributed to Tommi Nyrönen.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Molecular evolution of adrenoceptors and dopamine receptors: implications for the binding of catecholamines.

We derived homology models for all human catecholamine-binding GPCRs (CABRs; the alpha-1, alpha-2, and beta-adrenoceptors and the D1-type and D2-type dopamine receptor) using the bovine rhodopsin-11-cis-retinal X-ray structure. Interactions were predicted from the endogenous ligands norepinephrine or dopamine and from the binding site and were used to optimize receptor-ligand interactions. Similar binding modes in the complexes agree with a large "binding core" conserved across the CABRs, that is, D3.32, V(I)3.33, T3.37, S5.42, S(A/C)5.43, S5.46, F6.51, F6.52, and W6.48. Model structures and docking simulations suggest that extracellular loop 2 could provide a common attachment point for the ligands' beta-hydroxyl via a hydrogen bond donated by the main-chain NH group of residue xl2.52. The modeled CABRs and docking modes are in good agreement with published experimental studies. Complementarity between the ligand and the binding site suggests that the bovine rhodopsin structure is a suitable template for modeling agonist-bound CABRs.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

PubMed2005

Model structures of alpha-2 adrenoceptors in complex with automatically docked antagonist ligands raise the possibility of interactions dissimilar from agonist ligands.

Antagonist binding to alpha-2 adrenoceptors (alpha2-ARs) is not well understood. Structural models were constructed for the three human alpha2-AR subtypes based on the bovine rhodopsin X-ray structure. Twelve antagonist ligands (including covalently binding phenoxybenzamine) were automatically docked to the models. A hallmark of agonist binding is the electrostatic interaction between a positive charge on the agonist and the negatively charged side chain of D3.32. For antagonist binding, ion-pair formation would require deviations of the models from the rhodopsin structural template, e.g., a rotation of TM3 to relocate D3.32 more centrally within the binding cavity, and/or creation of new space near TM2/TM7 such that antagonists would be shifted away from TM5. Thus, except for the quinazolines, antagonist ligands automatically docked to the model structures did not form ion-pairs with D3.32. This binding mode represents a valid alternative, whereby the positive charge on the antagonists is stabilized by cation-pi interactions with aromatic residues (e.g., F6.51) and antagonists interact with D3.32 via carboxylate-aromatic interactions. This binding mode is in good agreement with maps derived from a molecular interaction library that predicts favorable atomic contacts; similar interaction environments are seen for unrelated proteins in complex with ligands sharing similarities with the alpha2-AR antagonists.

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists↗

PubMed2004

BODIL: a molecular modeling environment for structure-function analysis and drug design.

BODIL is a molecular modeling environment geared to help the user to quickly identify key features of proteins critical to molecular recognition, especially (1) in drug discovery applications, and (2) to understand the structural basis for function. The program incorporates state-of-the-art graphics, sequence and structural alignment methods, among other capabilities needed in modern structure-function-drug target research. BODIL has a flexible design that allows on-the-fly incorporation of new modules, has intelligent memory management, and fast multi-view graphics. A beta version of BODIL and an accompanying tutorial are available at http://www.abo.fi/fak/mnf/bkf/research/johnson/bodil.html.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2003

Molecular mechanisms of ligand-receptor interactions in transmembrane domain V of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor.

1. The structural determinants of catechol hydroxyl interactions with adrenergic receptors were examined using 12 alpha2-adrenergic agonists and a panel of mutated human alpha2A-adrenoceptors. The alpha2ASer201 mutant had a Cys --> Ser201 (position 5.43) amino-acid substitution, and alpha2ASer201Cys200 and alpha2ASer201Cys204 had Ser --> Cys200 (5.42) and Ser --> Cys204 (5.46) substitutions, respectively, in addition to the Cys --> Ser201 substitution. 2. Automated docking methods were used to predict the receptor interactions of the ligands. Radioligand-binding assays and functional [35S]GTPgammaS-binding assays were performed using transfected Chinese hamster ovary cells to experimentally corroborate the predicted binding modes. 3. The hydroxyl groups of phenethylamines were found to have different effects on ligand affinity towards the activated and resting forms of the wild-type alpha2A-adrenoceptor. Substitution of Ser200 or Ser204 with cysteine caused a deterioration in the capability of catecholamines to activate the alpha2A-adrenoceptor. The findings indicate that (i) Cys201 plays a significant role in the binding of catecholamine ligands and UK14,304 (for the latter, by a hydrophobic interaction), but Cys201 is not essential for receptor activation; (ii) Ser200 interacts with the meta-hydroxyl group of phenethylamine ligands, affecting both catecholamine binding and receptor activation; while (iii) substituting Ser204 with a cysteine interferes both with the binding of catecholamine ligands and with receptor activation, due to an interaction between Ser204 and the para-hydroxyl group of the catecholic ring.

Adrenergic Agonists↗

PubMed2002

Determinants of antagonist binding at the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor subunit, GluR-D. Role of the conserved arginine 507 and glutamate 727 residues.

Previous structural and mutagenesis studies indicate that the invariant alpha-amino and alpha-carboxyl groups of glutamate receptor agonists are engaged in polar interactions with oppositely charged, conserved arginine and glutamate residues in the ligand-binding domain of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor. To examine the role of these residues (R507 and E727 in the GluR-D subunit) in the discrimination between agonists and antagonists, we analyzed the ligand-binding properties of homomeric GluR-D and its soluble ligand-binding domain with mutations at these positions. Filter-binding assays using [3H]AMPA, an agonist, and [3H]Ro 48-8587, a high-affinity antagonist, as radioligands revealed that even a conservative mutation at R507 (R507K) resulted in the complete loss of both agonist and antagonist binding. In contrast, a negative charge at position 727 was necessary for agonist binding, whereas the isosteric mutation, E727Q, abolished all agonist binding but retained high-affinity binding for [3H]Ro 48-8587, displaceable by 7,8-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione. Competition binding studies with antagonists representing different structural classes in combination with ligand docking experiments suggest that the role of E727 is antagonist-specific, ranging from no interaction to weak electrostatic interactions involving indirect and direct hydrogen bonding with the antagonist molecule. These results underline the importance of ion pair interaction with E727 for agonist activity and suggest that an interaction with R507, but not with E727, is essential for antagonist binding.

Animals↗