Biomedical subjects

Tomoko Kuwahara

Publications and source records attributed to Tomoko Kuwahara.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Regional differences in peripheral vasoconstriction of prepubertal boys.

To elucidate the mechanisms that underlie the greater decline of skin temperature on the limbs in prepubertal boys as compared to young men, we compared cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) of the boys and men in response to a reduced ambient temperature (T (a)). The boys had a greater surface area-to-mass ratio (A (D)/mass) and a lower mean skinfold thickness on the trunk but not on the limbs compared to the men. As T (a) decreased from 30 to 17 degrees C over 60 min, the skin temperature (T (sl)) on the limbs (as represented by forearm, finger and thigh) decreased significantly more in the boys than in the men; while T (sl) on the trunk (chest, back and abdomen) and forehead decreased to the same extent. The CVC decreased at all body sites in all subjects, but regional difference existed in age-related alterations in CVC responses despite the similar rectal and mean body temperatures of the groups. The decline in the finger CVC was greater for the boys than for the men, suggesting that greater vasoconstriction and greater A (D)/mass on the fingers may have contributed to the lower finger T (sl) of the boys. However, thigh CVC in the boys was similar to that in the men over the 60-minute exposure, indicating that the lower thigh T (sl) of the boys may be the result of greater heat loss owing to the greater A (D)/mass on the limbs of the boys (but not to greater vasoconstriction or subcutaneous fat). The CVC on the chest and back was greater in the boys over the cold exposure, suggesting that similar T (sl )on the chest and back of the boys and men may result from greater cooling owing to the larger A (D)/mass being offset by combination of less vasoconstriction and more conductive heat transfer in the presence of less subcutaneous fat. These results suggest that the age-related difference in T (sl) in response to mild cold stress may not directly reflect that in cutaneous vasoconstriction alone owing to the differences in anthropometric characteristics (such as greater A (D)/mass and lower subcutaneous fat on trunk) between boys and men.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Effects of physical training on heat loss responses of young women to passive heating in relation to menstrual cycle.

To examine the effects of physical training on cutaneous vasodilation and sweating responses of young women in the follicular and luteal phase, 11 physically trained (T group) and 13 untrained (U group) women were passively heated by lower-leg immersion into hot water of 42 degrees C (ambient temperature of 30 degrees C and 45%RH) for 60 min in their mid-follicular and mid-luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. Female hormones increased significantly from the mid-follicular to the mid-luteal phase in T and U groups, but the degree of increase was significantly lower in T group. Mean body temperature (T(B)) thresholds for cutaneous vasodilation and sweating responses were significantly lower in T group than in U group, in both the menstrual phases, and the differences between the groups were greatest during the mid-luteal phase. The slope of the relationship between frequency of sweat expulsion (F(sw)) and (T(B)), and between local sweating rate and F(sw) was significantly greater in T group, although the slope of the relationship between cutaneous blood flow and (T(B)) did not differ between the groups, regardless of body site or menstrual phase. These results suggest that regular physical activity enhanced sweating and cutaneous vasodilation in young women. The enhancement of sweating was due to both central and peripheral mechanisms, and the enhancement of cutaneous vasodilation was possibly due to a central mechanism. Enhancement of heat loss responses via central mechanisms was greater during the mid-luteal phase than in the mid-follicular phase because the elevation of female reproductive hormone levels during the mid-luteal phase was relatively low in T group.

Body Temperature Regulation↗

PubMed2005

Sex- and menstrual cycle-related differences in sweating and cutaneous blood flow in response to passive heat exposure.

To examine sex- and menstrual cycle-related differences in thermoregulatory responses to heat exposure, ten young women and six young men were heated passively by immersing their legs in water heated to 42 degrees C for 60 min (in ambient conditions of 30 degrees C and 45% relative humidity). The women underwent heat exposure during the mid-follicular (F) and mid-luteal (L) phases of the menstrual cycle, which were confirmed by assaying plasma female reproductive hormones. The rectal and mean body (T(b)) temperatures of women in the L phase were significantly greater than those of women in the F phase and of men during a pre-heating equilibration period (28 degrees C) and during heat exposure. During heat exposure, the local sweat rates (m(sw)) on the forehead, chest, back, and forearm of women in either phase were significantly lower than those of men, but the thigh (m(sw)) was similar to that of men. The m(sw) did not change at any site during the different phases of the menstrual cycle. The cutaneous blood flow (%LDF) was significantly greater on the thigh for women in either phase compared with men, but no difference was found at any other site (forehead, chest, back, and forearm). The %LDF on the back was significantly greater for women in the L phase than in the F phase, but those at other sites were similar in both phases. We conclude that, compared with men, heat loss from women depends more on cutaneous vasodilation (especially on the thigh) than on sweating, irrespective of the phase of the menstrual cycle. This phenomenon was due to peripheral mechanisms, as reflected in the greater slope of the relationship between %LDF and T(b) lower slope of the relationship between m(sw)) and frequency of sweat expulsion, and lower sweat output per gland. The menstrual cycle modified the T(b) threshold for vasodilation and sweat onset in women. Therefore, the sex difference in the T(b) threshold was more marked for women during the L phase than during the F phase. Moreover, the menstrual cycle modified the slope of the relationship between %LDF on the back and T(b).

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Effects of menstrual cycle and physical training on heat loss responses during dynamic exercise at moderate intensity in a temperate environment.

We evaluated the effects of the menstrual cycle and physical training on heat loss (sweating and cutaneous vasodilation) responses during moderate exercise in a temperate environment. Ten untrained (group U) and seven endurance-trained (group T) women (maximal O2 uptake of 36.7+/-1.1 vs. 49.4+/-1.7 ml.kg-1.min-1, respectively; P<0.05) performed a cycling exercise at 50% maximal O2 uptake for 30 min during both the midfollicular and midluteal menstrual phase in a temperate environment (ambient temperature of 25 degrees C, relative humidity of 45%). In group U, plasma levels of estrone, estradiol, and progesterone at rest and esophageal temperature (Tes) during exercise were significantly higher during the midluteal than during the midfollicular phase (P<0.05). Sweating rate and cutaneous blood flow (measured via laser-Doppler flowmetry) on the chest, back, forearm, and thigh were lower during the midluteal than during the midfollicular phase during exercise. Tes threshold for heat loss responses was significantly higher and sensitivity of the heat loss responses was significantly lower in the midluteal than in the midfollicular phase, regardless of body site. These effects of the menstrual cycle in group U were not observed in group T. The sweating rate and cutaneous blood flow were significantly higher in group T than in group U, regardless of menstrual phase or body site. Tes threshold for heat loss responses was significantly lower and sensitivity of heat loss responses was significantly greater in group T than in group U in the midluteal phase; however, sensitivity of the sweating response was significantly greater in the midfollicular phase. These results suggest that heat loss responses in group U were inhibited in the midluteal phase compared with in the midfollicular phase. Menstrual cycle had no remarkable effects in group T. Physical training improved heat loss responses, which was more marked in the midluteal than in the midfollicular phase.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Maturation- and aging-related changes in heat loss effector function.

This paper addresses the ways in which heat loss effector functions change with maturation and aging, using data obtained in our laboratory. Prepubertal children have an underdeveloped sweat function compared with young adults; this is compensated by a greater surface area-to-mass ratio and relatively greater heat loss from cutaneous vasodilation on the head and trunk when the air temperature is lower than the skin temperature. As the heat dissipation depends greatly on the evaporation of sweat, the core temperature of prepubertal children is greater than that of young adults owing to the underdevelopment of sweating. In the elderly the heat loss effector function decreases with aging. The decrease may first involve cutaneous vasodilation, then sweat output per gland, and finally active sweat gland density; and it may proceed from the lower limbs to the back of the upper body, the front of the upper body, then the upper limbs and finally to the head.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Intensity-dependent thermoregulatory responses at the onset of dynamic exercise in mildly heated humans.

To investigate quantitatively how sweating and cutaneous blood flow responses at the onset of dynamic exercise are affected by increasing exercise intensity in mildly heated humans, 18 healthy male subjects performed cycle exercise at 30, 50, and 70% of maximal O2 uptake (VO2 max) for 60 s in a warm environment. The study was conducted in a climatic chamber with a regulated ambient temperature of 35 degrees C and relative humidity of 50%. The subjects rested in the semisupine position in the chamber for 60 min, and then sweating rate (SR) and skin blood flow were measured during cycle exercise at three different intensities. Changes in the heart rate, rating of perceived exertion, and mean arterial blood pressure were proportional to increasing exercise intensity, whereas esophageal and mean skin temperatures were essentially constant throughout the experiment. The SR on the chest, forearm, and thigh, but not on the palm, increased significantly with increasing exercise intensity (P < 0.05). The mean SR of the chest, forearm, and thigh increased 0.05 mg.cm-2.min-1 with an increase in exercise intensity equivalent to 10% VO2 max. On the other hand, the cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) on the chest, forearm, and palm decreased significantly with increasing exercise intensity (P < 0.05). The mean CVC of the chest and forearm decreased 5.5% and the CVC on the palm decreased 8.0% with an increase in exercise intensity equivalent to 10% VO2 max. In addition, the reduction in CVC was greater on the palm than on the chest and forearm at all exercise intensities (P < 0.01). We conclude that nonthermal sweating and cutaneous blood flow responses are exercise intensity dependent but directionally opposite at the onset of dynamic exercise in mildly heated humans. Furthermore, cutaneous blood flow responses to increased exercise intensity are greater in glabrous (palm) than in nonglabrous (chest and forearm) skin.

Adult↗