Spinal manipulation reduces pain and hyperalgesia after lumbar intervertebral foramen inflammation in the rat.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Biomedical subjects
Tony S Keller
Publications and source records attributed to Tony S Keller.
Muscular contributions to dynamic dorsoventral lumbar spine stiffness.
Spinal musculature plays a major role in spine stability, but its importance to spinal stiffness is poorly understood. We studied the effects of graded trunk muscle stimulation on the in vivo dynamic dorsoventral (DV) lumbar spine stiffness of 15 adolescent Merino sheep. Constant voltage supramaximal electrical stimulation was administered to the L3-L4 interspinous space of the multifidus muscles using four stimulation frequencies (2.5, 5, 10, and 20 Hz). Dynamic stiffness was quantified at rest and during muscle stimulation using a computer-controlled testing apparatus that applied variable frequency (0.46-19.7 Hz) oscillatory DV forces (13-N preload to 48-N peak) to the L3 spinous process of the prone-lying sheep. Five mechanical excitation trials were randomly performed, including four muscle stimulation trials and an unstimulated or resting trial. The secant stiffness (k (y) = DV force/L3 displacement, kN/m) and loss angle (phase angle, deg) were determined at 44 discrete mechanical excitation frequencies. Results indicated that the dynamic stiffness varied 3.7-fold over the range of mechanical excitation frequencies examined (minimum resting k (y) = 3.86 +/- 0.38 N/mm at 4.0 Hz; maximum k (y) = 14.1 +/- 9.95 N/mm at 19.7 Hz). Twenty hertz muscle stimulation resulted in a sustained supramaximal contraction that significantly (P < 0.05) increased k (y) up to twofold compared to rest (mechanical excitation at 3.6 Hz). Compared to rest, k (y) during the 20 Hz muscle stimulation was significantly increased for 34 of 44 mechanical excitation frequencies (mean increase = 55.1%, P < 0.05), but was most marked between 2.55 and 4.91 Hz (mean increase = 87.5%, P < 0.05). For lower frequency, sub-maximal muscle stimulation, there was a graded change in k (y), which was significantly increased for 32/44 mechanical excitation frequencies (mean increase = 40.4%, 10 Hz stimulus), 23/44 mechanical excitation frequencies (mean increase = 10.5%, 5 Hz stimulus), and 11/44 mechanical excitation frequencies (mean increase = 4.16%, 2.5 Hz stimulus) when compared to rest. These results indicate that the dynamic mechanical behavior of the ovine spine is modulated by muscle stimulation, and suggests that muscle contraction plays an important role in stabilizing the lumbar spine.
Animals↗
Increased multiaxial lumbar motion responses during multiple-impulse mechanical force manually assisted spinal manipulation.
BACKGROUND: Spinal manipulation has been found to create demonstrable segmental and intersegmental spinal motions thought to be biomechanically related to its mechanisms. In the case of impulsive-type instrument device comparisons, significant differences in the force-time characteristics and concomitant motion responses of spinal manipulative instruments have been reported, but studies investigating the response to multiple thrusts (multiple impulse trains) have not been conducted. The purpose of this study was to determine multi-axial segmental and intersegmental motion responses of ovine lumbar vertebrae to single impulse and multiple impulse spinal manipulative thrusts (SMTs). METHODS: Fifteen adolescent Merino sheep were examined. Tri-axial accelerometers were attached to intraosseous pins rigidly fixed to the L1 and L2 lumbar spinous processes under fluoroscopic guidance while the animals were anesthetized. A hand-held electromechanical chiropractic adjusting instrument (Impulse) was used to apply single and repeated force impulses (13 total over a 2.5 second time interval) at three different force settings (low, medium, and high) along the posteroanterior axis of the T12 spinous process. Axial (AX), posteroanterior (PA), and medial-lateral (ML) acceleration responses in adjacent segments (L1, L2) were recorded at a rate of 5000 samples per second. Peak-peak segmental accelerations (L1, L2) and intersegmental acceleration transfer (L1-L2) for each axis and each force setting were computed from the acceleration-time recordings. The initial acceleration response for a single thrust and the maximum acceleration response observed during the 12 multiple impulse trains were compared using a paired observations t-test (POTT, alpha = .05). RESULTS: Segmental and intersegmental acceleration responses mirrored the peak force magnitude produced by the Impulse Adjusting Instrument. Accelerations were greatest for AX and PA measurement axes. Compared to the initial impulse acceleration response, subsequent multiple SMT impulses were found to produce significantly greater (3% to 25%, P < 0.005) AX, PA and ML segmental and intersegmental acceleration responses. Increases in segmental motion responses were greatest for the low force setting (18%-26%), followed by the medium (5%-26%) and high (3%-26%) settings. Adjacent segment (L1) motion responses were maximized following the application of several multiple SMT impulses. CONCLUSION: Knowledge of the vertebral motion responses produced by impulse-type, instrument-based adjusting instruments provide biomechanical benchmarks that support the clinical rationale for patient treatment. Our results indicate that impulse-type adjusting instruments that deliver multiple impulse SMTs significantly increase multi-axial spinal motion.
Journal Article↗
Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.
BACKGROUND: Previous study in human subjects has documented biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to impulsive spinal manipulative thrusts, but very little is known about the neuromechanical effects of varying thrust force-time profiles. METHODS: Ten adolescent Merino sheep were anesthetized and posteroanterior mechanical thrusts were applied to the L3 spinous process using a computer-controlled, mechanical testing apparatus. Three variable pulse durations (10, 100, 200 ms, force = 80 N) and three variable force amplitudes (20, 40, 60 N, pulse duration = 100 ms) were examined for their effect on lumbar motion response (L3 displacement, L1, L2 acceleration) and normalized multifidus electromyographic response (L3, L4) using a repeated measures analysis of variance. FINDINGS: Increasing L3 posteroanterior force amplitude resulted in a fourfold linear increase in L3 posteroanterior vertebral displacement (p < 0.001) and adjacent segment (L1, L2) posteroanterior acceleration response (p < 0.001). L3 displacement was linearly correlated (p < 0.001) to the acceleration response over the 20-80 N force range (100 ms). At constant force, 10 ms thrusts resulted in nearly fivefold lower L3 displacements and significantly increased segmental (L2) acceleration responses compared to the 100 ms (19%, p = 0.005) and 200 ms (16%, p = 0.023) thrusts. Normalized electromyographic responses increased linearly with increasing force amplitude at higher amplitudes and were appreciably affected by mechanical excitation pulse duration. INTERPRETATION: Changes in the biomechanical and neuromuscular response of the ovine lumbar spine were observed in response to changes in the force-time characteristics of the spinal manipulative thrusts and may be an underlying mechanism in related clinical outcomes.
Animals↗
Dynamic dorsoventral stiffness assessment of the ovine lumbar spine.
Posteroanterior spinal stiffness assessments are common in the evaluating patients with low back pain. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of mechanical excitation frequency on dynamic lumbar spine stiffness. A computer-controlled voice coil actuator equipped with a load cell and LVDT was used to deliver an oscillatory dorsoventral (DV) mechanical force to the L3 spinous process of 15 adolescent Merino sheep. DV forces (48 N peak, approximately 10% body weight) were randomly applied at periodic excitation frequencies of 2.0, 6.0, 11.7 and a 0.5-19.7 Hz sweep. Force and displacement were recorded over a 13-22 s time interval. The in vivo DV stiffness of the ovine spine was frequency dependent and varied 3.7-fold over the 0.5-19.7 Hz mechanical excitation frequency range. Minimum and maximum DV stiffness (force/displacement) were 3.86+/-0.38 and 14.1+/-9.95 N/mm at 4.0 and 19.7 Hz, respectively. Stiffness values based on the swept-sine measurements were not significantly different from corresponding periodic oscillations (2.0 and 6.0 Hz). The mean coefficient of variation in the swept-sine DV dynamic stiffness assessment method was 15%, which was similar to the periodic oscillation method (10-16%). The results indicate that changes in mechanical excitation frequency and animal body mass modulate DV spinal stiffness.
Animals↗
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty affect vertebral motion segment stiffness and stress distributions: a microstructural finite-element study.
STUDY DESIGN: The mechanical behavior of a thoracic motion segment following cement augmentation was studied using the finite-element method. OBJECTIVE: To examine effects of cement augmentation on motion segment stiffness and load transfer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty procedures are meant to stiffen and strengthen the vertebral body, but the optimal cement volume and placement to achieve these goals without altering load transfer to adjacent segments are unknown. METHODS: A microstructural finite-element model of a vertebral motion segment was constructed from micro-CT images. Microdamage within the vertebral body trabecular structure was modeled using an elasto-plastic modulus reduction scheme. Three motion segment damage models were created: I = 18% apparent modulus reduction (least damage), II = 45%, and III = 85% (most damage); and several one- and two-segment polymethylmethacrylate cement repair strategies (partial fill kyphoplasty, replacement of bone and marrow; and both partial fill and complete fill vertebroplasty, replacement of marrow only) were studied. Average disc and bone stresses and motion segment apparent compressive stiffness were compared with baseline (undamaged and untreated) simulation results. RESULTS: In terms of maximizing stiffness and minimizing stress alterations in the adjacent vertebral body and increasing motion segment apparent stiffness, we found that, other than complete fill, the most effective single-segment cement repair strategy was vertebroplasty on the periphery of the superior segment overlying the disc anulus (<0.1% overall vertebral body bone stress alteration and 83% stiffness increase, respectively, damage Model III). Two-segment vertebroplasty (all repair models) restored motion segment stiffness to baseline levels in all damage models, while single-segment vertebroplasty (all repair models) restored stiffness to baseline levels only in damage Model I. Single- and two-segment kyphoplasty was effective in restoring stiffness to baseline levels for Model I only. Compared with the baseline model, cement augmentation decreased average treated segment bone stresses (up to 66%, complete fill vertebroplasty elasto-plastic modulus reduction Model III), increased average intervertebral disc nucleus stresses (up to 59%, kyphoplasty elasto-plastic modulus reduction Model III), and increased average adjacent segment, endplate region stresses (up to 2.8%, kyphoplasty elasto-plastic modulus reduction Model II). Adjacent (untreated) segment peak bone stresses were increased (up to 45%, kyphoplasty, Model III) in endplate regions underlying the intervertebral disc nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: The damage-repair simulations indicated that cement augmentation improves motion segment stiffness but substantially alters bone stress distributions in treated and adjacent segments.
Aged↗
Hydraulic strengthening affects the stiffness and strength of cortical bone.
A nonlinear, interstitial fluid flow constitutive model for cortical bone was developed to study the strain-rate dependency of cortical bone apparent modulus (Ea). Nine representative volume element (RVE) structural models of cortical bone spanning an effective pore volume fraction P range of 1-40% were examined. Dynamic loading conditions were used to study the fluid flow contribution or hydraulic strengthening (HS) effect on Ea for each RVE model. The model indicated that there is an upper and lower asymptotic bound of strain-rate (10(+/-3) sec(-1)) above or below which there are no further HS effects on Ea. At certain strain-rates (10(-1) to 10(0) sec(-1)) variations in cortical bone porosity had little or no influence on Ea. At lower and higher frequencies, the loss tangent, hence the magnitude of viscoelastic effects is greater. For strain-rates less than 10(-1) sec(-1), lower porosity RVE models were always stiffer than higher porosity RVE models. A generalized power law model is proposed to account for the fact that HS in cortical bone exhibits an upper and lower asymptotic bound and is bi-modal in terms of strain-rate.
Animals↗
Anterior thoracic posture increases thoracolumbar disc loading.
In the absence of external forces, the largest contributor to intervertebral disc (IVD) loads and stresses is trunk muscular activity. The relationship between trunk posture, spine geometry, extensor muscle activity, and the loads and stresses acting on the IVD is not well understood. The objective of this study was to characterize changes in thoracolumbar disc loads and extensor muscle forces following anterior translation of the thoracic spine in the upright posture. Vertebral body geometries (C2 to S1) and the location of the femoral head and acetabulum centroids were obtained by digitizing lateral, full-spine radiographs of 13 men and five women volunteers without previous history of back pain. Two standing, lateral, full-spine radiographic views were obtained for each subject: a neutral-posture lateral radiograph and a radiograph during anterior translation of the thorax relative to the pelvis (while keeping T1 aligned over T12). Extensor muscle loads, and compression and shear stresses acting on the IVDs, were calculated for each posture using a previously validated biomechanical model. Comparing vertebral centroids for the neutral posture to the anterior posture, subjects were able to anterior translate +101.5 mm+/-33.0 mm (C7-hip axis), +81.5 mm+/-39.2 mm (C7-S1) (vertebral centroid of C7 compared with a vertical line through the vertebral centroid of S1), and +58.9 mm+/-19.1 mm (T12-S1). In the anterior translated posture, disc loads and stresses were significantly increased for all levels below T9. Increases in IVD compressive loads and shear loads, and the corresponding stresses, were most marked at the L5-S1 level and L3-L4 level, respectively. The extensor muscle loads required to maintain static equilibrium in the upright posture increased from 147.2 N (mean, neutral posture) to 667.1 N (mean, translated posture) at L5-S1. Compressive loads on the anterior and posterior L5-S1 disc nearly doubled in the anterior translated posture. Anterior translation of the thorax resulted in significantly increased loads and stresses acting on the thoracolumbar spine. This posture is common in lumbar spinal disorders and could contribute to lumbar disc pathologies, progression of L5-S1 spondylolisthesis deformities, and poor outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. In conclusion, anterior trunk translation in the standing subject increases extensor muscle activity and loads and stresses acting on the intervertebral disc in the lower thoracic and lumbar regions.
Biomechanical Phenomena↗
Active trunk extensor contributions to dynamic posteroanterior lumbar spinal stiffness.
BACKGROUND: Assessments of posteroanterior (PA) spinal stiffness using mobilization apparatuses have demonstrated an increase in PA spine stiffness during voluntary contraction of the lumbar extensor muscles; yet, little work has been done to this degree in symptomatic subjects. OBJECTIVE: To use a previously validated dynamic mechanical impedance procedure to quantify changes in PA dynamic spinal stiffness at rest and during lumbar isotonic extension tasks in patients with low back pain (LBP). METHODS: Thirteen patients with LBP underwent a dynamic spinal stiffness assessment in the prone-resting position and again during lumbar extensor efforts. Stiffness assessments were obtained using a handheld impulsive mechanical device equipped with an impedance head (load cell and accelerometer). PA manipulative thrusts (approximately 150 N, <5 milliseconds) were delivered to skin overlying the L3 left and right transverse processes (TPs) and to the L3 spinous process (SP) in a predefined order (left TP, SP, right TP) while patients were at rest and again during prone-lying lumbar isotonic extension tasks. Dynamic spinal stiffness characteristics were determined from force and acceleration measurements using the apparent mass (peak force/peak acceleration, kg). Apparent mass measurements for the resting and active lumbar isotonic task trials of each patient were compared using a 2-tailed, paired t test. RESULTS: A significant increase in the PA dynamic spinal stiffness was noted for thrusts over the SP (apparent mass [17.0%], P=.0004) during isotonic trunk extension tasks compared with prone resting, but no statistically significant changes in apparent mass were noted for the same measures over the TPs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings add support to the significance of the trunk musculature and spinal posture in providing increased spinal stability.
Adult↗
Biomechanical and neurophysiological responses to spinal manipulation in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify in vivo vertebral motions and neurophysiological responses during spinal manipulation. METHODS: Nine patients undergoing lumbar decompression surgery participated in this study. Spinal manipulative thrusts (SMTs) ( approximately 5 ms; 30 N [Sham], 88 N, 117 N, and 150 N [max]) were administered to lumbar spine facet joints (FJs) and spinous processes (SPs) adjacent to an intraosseous pin with an attached triaxial accelerometer and bipolar electrodes cradled around the S1 spinal nerve roots. Peak baseline amplitude compound action potential (CAP) response and peak-peak amplitude axial (AX), posterior-anterior (PA), and medial-lateral (ML) acceleration time and displacement time responses were computed for each SMT. Within-subject statistical analyses of the effects of contact point and force magnitude on vertebral displacements and CAP responses were performed. RESULTS: SMTs (>/= 88 N) resulted in significantly greater peak-to-peak ML, PA, and AX vertebral displacements compared with sham thrusts (P <.002). SMTs delivered to the FJs resulted in approximately 3-fold greater ML motions compared with SPs (P <.001). SMTs over the SPs resulted in significantly greater AX displacements compared with SMTs applied to the FJs (P <.05). Seventy-five percent of SMTs resulted in positive CAP responses with a mean latency of 12.0 ms. Collectively, the magnitude of the CAP responses was significantly greater for max setting SMTs compared with sham (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Impulsive SMTs in human subjects were found to stimulate spinal nerve root responses that were temporally related to the onset of vertebral motion. Further work, including examination of the frequency and force duration dependency of SMT, is necessary to elucidate the clinical relevance of enhanced or absent CAP responses in patients.
Adult↗
Prevention of hip lag screw cut-out by cement augmentation: description of a new technique and preliminary clinical results.
Cement augmentation of hip lag screws to avoid cut-out displacement is classically described, along with a number of technical drawbacks. In a series of six elderly patients with hip fractures in osteoporotic bone, we illustrate catheter-assisted delivery of limited amounts of a new bisphenol-a-glycidyl dimethacrylate (bis-GMA)-based composite into hip compression screw threads, enabling significant increase in insertional torque compared with unaugmented screws. In two patients, unaugmented screws that did not initially purchase were tightened with a minimum torque of 1 N-m after augmenting with bis-GMA-based composite. No screw or femoral head displacement relative to baseline (2 days postoperative) was seen in any patient on serial x-rays taken up to 6 months after surgery. This technique adds approximately 10 minutes to surgery time. Advantages of bis-GMA-based composite over traditional PMMA augmentation include mixing on-demand, the ability to make repeated injections over extended periods in the event of femoral head perforations (in one patient in this series), precise placement of adequately small volumes of material, and a lower exotherm. Potentially, this bis-GMA-based composite may reduce the frequency of cut-out complications by enhancing bone-implant interface.
Aged↗
Prediction of osteoporotic spinal deformity.
STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical model was developed from full-spine lateral radiographs to predict osteoporotic spinal deformity in elderly subjects. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the biomechanics of age-related spinal deformity and concomitant height loss associated with vertebral osteoporosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebral bone loss and disc degeneration associated with aging causes bone and disc structures to weaken and deform as a result of gravity and postural stresses. METHODS: An anatomically accurate sagittal-plane, upright-posture biomechanical model of the anterior spinal column (C2-S1) was created by digitizing lateral full-spine radiographs of 20 human subjects with a mean height of 176.8 cm and a mean body weight of 76.6 kg. Body weight loads were applied to the model, after which intervertebral disc and vertebral body forces and deformation were computed and the new spine geometry was calculated. The strength and stiffness of the vertebral bodies were reduced according to an osteopenic aging model and modulus reduction algorithm, respectively. RESULTS: The most osteopenic model (L3 F(ult) = 750 N) produced gross deformities of the spine, including anterior wedge-like fracture deformities at T7 and T8. In this model, increases in thoracic kyphosis and decreases in vertebral body height resulted in a 25.2% decrease in spinal height (C2-S1), an 8.6% decrease in total body height, and a 15.1-cm anterior translation of the C2 spine segment centroid. The resulting deformity qualitatively resembled deformities observed in elderly individuals with osteoporotic compression fractures. CONCLUSIONS: These predictions suggest that postural forces are responsible for initiation of osteoporotic spinal deformity in elderly subjects. Vertebral deformities are exacerbated by anterior translation of the upper spinal column, which increases compressive loads in the thoracolumbar region of the spine.
Age Factors↗
Comparison of dynamic posteroanterior spinal stiffness to plain film radiographic images of lumbar disk height.
BACKGROUND: Assessments of spinal stiffness have become more popular in recent years as a noninvasive objective biomechanical means to evaluate the human spine. Studies investigating posteroanterior (PA) forces in spinal stiffness assessment have shown relationships to spinal level, body type, and lumbar extensor muscle activity. Such measures may be important determinants to discriminate between patients with low back pain (LBP) and asymptomatic subjects. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationships between dynamic PA spinal stiffness and radiographic measures of lower lumbar disk height and disk degeneration. METHODS: L4 and L5 posterior disk height (PDH), vertebral body height (PVH), anterior disk height (ADH), and vertebral body height (AVH) were obtained from digitized plain film anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of 18 symptomatic LBP patients presenting to a chiropractic office (8 female patients and 10 male patients, aged 15-69 years, mean 44.3, SD 15.4 years). Disk degeneration (DD) and facet arthrosis (FA) were qualitatively assessed from the films by an independent examiner. Anterior disk height ratios (ADHR = ADH/AVH) and posterior disk height ratios (PDHR = PDH/PVH) were calculated from the disk height measurements and were compared to L4 and L5 posteroanterior spinal stiffness obtained using a previously validated mechanical impedance stiffness assessment procedure. RESULTS: One third of the subjects were found to have radiographic evidence of mild or moderate DD and approximately two thirds of the subjects showed signs of mild or moderate FA. The L4 and L5 anterior disk height and posterior disk height were approximately one half and one fifth of the respective vertebral body heights, and the PA stiffness was greater at L4 than at L5. Male subjects had a greater ADHR than female subjects, but female subjects had a greater L4 and L5 PA stiffness in comparison to male subjects; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Posteroanterior L5 vertebral stiffness was found to be significantly correlated to the L5 PDHR. CONCLUSIONS: Computations of spinal input impedance are relatively simple to perform, can provide a noninvasive measure of the dynamic mechanical behavior of the spine, appear to have potential to discriminate pathologic changes to the spine, and warrant further study on a larger sample of normal subjects and patients.
Adolescent↗
Assessment of trunk function in single and multi-level spinal stenosis: a prospective clinical trial.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify the biomechanical indicators of single- and multi-level stenosis and to determine the biomechanical outcome of selective conservative decompression. DESIGN: This study is a prospective clinical trial examining trunk function in spinal stenosis patients operated using a conservative procedure in an orthopaedic clinic. BACKGROUND: Although several clinical studies have examined the instability and motion characteristics of operated lumbar spinal canal stenosis, few if any studies have prospectively examined the biomechanical outcome of lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive pre- and post-operative trunk dynamometer strength and motion analysis tests were performed on 36 patients operated for lumbar canal stenosis. Surgical treatment efficacy was evaluated within a three variable crossed factorial design considering stenosis classification, number of operative levels, and changes in several trunk biomechanical outcomes from pre- to post-operative assessment. Patients were evaluated after a minimum one-year follow-up. RESULTS: Pre-operatively there were no differential effects associated with stenosis classification or number of operated levels. There was a significant post-operative increase in isometric trunk extension torque and flexion-extension power and a return to a more normal trunk extension-flexion torque ratio. Patients with mixed, single level stenosis demonstrated greater trunk extension power both pre- and post-operatively compared to other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis produced a marked improvement in the functional mechanical status of the low back. RELEVANCE: This study assists clinicians and researchers to understand trunk function following conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis.
Decompression, Surgical↗
Finite element modeling of trabecular bone damage.
This paper presents a finite element-based, computational model for analysis of structural damage to trabecular bone tissues. A modulus reduction method was formulated from elasto-plasticity theory, and was used to account for site-specific trabecular bone tissue damage. Trabecular bone tissue damage is illustrated using a large-scale, anatomically accurate, two-dimensional, microstructural finite element model of a human thoracic vertebral body. Four models with varying specifications for damage accumulation were subjected to compressive loading and unloading cycles. The numerical results and experimental validation demonstrated that the modulus reduction method reproduced the non-linear mechanical behaviour of vertebal trabecular bone. The iterative computational approach presented provides a methodology to study trabecular bone damage, and should provide researchers with a computational approach to study bone fracture and repair and to predict vertebral fragility.
Aged↗
Force-deformation response of the lumbar spine: a sagittal plane model of posteroanterior manipulation and mobilization.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a mathematical model capable of describing the static and dynamic motion response of the lumbar spine to posteroanterior forces. DESIGN: Static, impulsive and oscillatory forces with varying thrust angles and offsets were applied to the model, and the resulting motion responses were compared to experimental data published for spinal mobilization and manipulation of prone-lying subjects. BACKGROUND: Methods are sought to improve understanding of the dynamic force-induced displacement response of the lumbar spine during spinal mobilization and manipulation treatment. METHODS: The thorax, pelvis and five lumbar vertebrae were represented as seven rigid structures and eight flexible joint structures. Flexible joint structures were modeled using spring and damper elements with three displacement degrees-of-freedom (posterior-anterior and axial displacement, and flexion-extension rotation). The resulting 21 degrees-of-freedom lumped parameter model was solved in modal space. RESULTS: The fundamental natural frequency of vibration was 5.24 Hz. Simulations performed using 100 N static and dynamic posteroanterior forces applied to the L3 vertebrae indicated that peak L3 segmental displacements were up to 2.40 mm (impulsive) and 8.23 mm (oscillatory at 2 Hz). Appreciable axial displacements (0.41 mm) and flexion-extension rotations (1.49 degrees ) were also observed for oscillatory forces at L3. The posteroanterior motion response of the lumbar vertebrae was relatively insensitive to both the thrust force angle and thrust force offset, but axial displacements and flexion-extension rotations showed a large change (2-fold or greater) for thrust angles greater than -5 degrees (caudal) in comparison to vertical thrusts. Intersegmental motion responses for static, impulsive and oscillatory loads were more comparable than their segmental counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The model predicts lumbar segmental and inter-segmental motion responses to manipulative forces that are otherwise difficult to obtain experimentally. RELEVANCE: This study assists clinicians to understand the biomechanics of posteroanterior forces applied to the lumbar spine of prone-lying subjects. Of particular clinical relevance is the finding that greater spinal mobility is possible by targeting specific load-time histories.
Biomechanical Phenomena↗
A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine.
BACKGROUND: Clinicians apply posteroanterior (PA) forces to the spine for both mobility assessment and certain spinal mobilization and manipulation treatments. Commonly applied forces include low-frequency sinusoidal oscillations (<2 Hz) as used in mobilization, single haversine thrusts (<0.5 seconds) as imparted in high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation, or very rapid impulsive thrusts (<5 ms) such as those delivered in mechanical-force, manually-assisted (MFMA) manipulation. Little is known about the mechanics of these procedures. Reliable methods are sought to obtain an adequate understanding of the force-induced displacement response of the lumbar spine to PA forces. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the kinematic response of the lumbar spine to static and dynamic PA forces. DESIGN: A 2-dimensional modal analysis was performed to predict the dynamic motion response of the lumbar spine. METHODS: A 5-degree-of-freedom, lumped equivalent model was developed to predict the PA motion of the lumbar spine. Lumbar vertebrae were modeled as masses, massless-spring, and dampers, and the resulting equations of motion were solved by using a modal analysis approach. The sensitivity of the model to variations in the spring stiffness and damping coefficients was examined, and the model validity was determined by comparing the results to oscillatory and impulsive force measurements of vertebral motion associated with spine mobilization and 2 forms of spinal manipulation. RESULTS: Model predictions, based on a damping ratio of 0.15 (moderate damping) and PA spring stiffness coefficient ranging from 25 to 60 kN/m, showed good agreement with in vivo human studies. Quasi-static and low-frequency (<2.0 Hz) forces at L3 produced L3 segmental and L3-L4 intersegmental displacements up to 8.1 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively. PA oscillatory motions were over 2.5-fold greater for oscillatory forces applied at the natural frequency. Impulsive forces produced much lower segmental displacements in comparison to static and oscillatory forces. Differences in intersegmental displacements resulting from impulsive, static, and oscillatory forces were much less remarkable. The latter suggests that intersegmental motions produced by spinal manipulation may play a prominent role in eliciting therapeutic responses. CONCLUSIONS: The simple analytical model presented in this study can be used to predict the static, cyclic, and impulsive force PA displacement response of the lumbar spine. The model provides data on lumbar segmental and intersegmental motion patterns that are otherwise difficult to obtain experimentally. Modeling of the PA motion response of the lumbar spine to PA forces assists in the understanding the biomechanics of therapeutic PA forces applied to the lumbar spine and may ultimately be used to validate chiropractic technique procedures and minimize risk to patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.
Biomechanical Phenomena↗
Posture-dependent isometric trunk extension and flexion strength in normal male and female subjects.
The objective of this study was to quantify the relationship between trunk posture and trunk muscle function in a group of young, normal male and female subjects. Ten male and 10 female subjects performed isometric flexion and extension tasks using a trunk dynamometer. Peak isometric torque was recorded in flexion and extension at 10 degrees increments over a sagittal posture range of -20 degrees extension to +50 degrees of flexion. Significant differences in trunk strength (isometric torque) were found between males and females, at various sagittal plane trunk postures, and between flexion (F) and extension (E) tasks. Flexion torque was greatest at 20 degrees to 30 degrees flexion, whereas extension torque was greatest at 50 degrees flexion. Gender-specific differences in trunk strength were markedly reduced when the torque data were normalized by the subject's height multiplied by body weight. The E/F torque ratio showed a relatively linear, over twofold increase with increasing flexion angle, and was significantly greater for female subjects compared with male subjects at most sagittal postures. The baseline trunk isometric strength data provided by this study should help clinicians to use strength testing more precisely and specifically in prevention and diagnosis of patients at risk for back disorders.
Adult↗