PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Torbjörn Tomson

Publications and source records attributed to Torbjörn Tomson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Optimizing treatment of epilepsy during pregnancy.

Freedom from seizures is the ultimate goal in treatment of patients with epilepsy. At the same time, the side effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should not outweigh the benefits of treatment. This is particularly important in women with epilepsy who wish to become pregnant. These women and their partners should be made aware of the risks associated with uncontrolled seizures as well as the teratogenicity of some AEDs. Recent studies have indicated a higher risk for birth defects and possibly also adverse cognitive effects associated with exposure to valproate compared with carbamazepine. Although further studies are needed, it appears reasonable to use valproate with caution in women with epilepsy who are planning to become pregnant and to consider whether other equally effective and safer AEDs are available. However, women who need valproate to control their seizures should continue the drug and not be discouraged from pregnancy, provided that they receive counseling with the best available knowledge. With proper management before conception, during pregnancy, and after birth, the vast majority of pregnancies in women with active epilepsy will have a favorable outcome.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Eigth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII).

The Eigth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)-EILAT VII, took place in Sitges, Barcelona from the 10th to 14th September, 2006. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 24 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included a focus on status epilepticus (epidemiology, current and future treatments), evidence-based treatment guidelines and the potential of neurostimulation in refractory epilepsy. Consistent with previous formats of this conference, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well as updates on marketed AEDs introduced since 1989. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in development, including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA-2-093), fluorofelbamate, ganaxolone, huperzine, lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide, seletracetam, stiripentol, talampanel, valrocemide, JZP-4, NS1209, PID and RWJ-333369. Updates on felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and new extended release oxcarbazepine formulations, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide and new extended release valproic acid formulations, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.

Anticonvulsants↗

Pharmacokinetic variability of newer antiepileptic drugs: when is monitoring needed?

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Amines↗

Gender aspects of pharmacokinetics of new and old AEDs: pregnancy and breast-feeding.

Alterations in drug disposition in pregnancy and drug transfer into breast milk during lactation are the most important gender-related aspects of the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs(AEDs). The effect of pregnancy on drug disposition has been fairly well characterized for the old AEDs. Total and unbound plasma concentrations of phenobarbital decline up to 50%. Total phenytoin levels may drop to approximately 40% of prepregnancy concentrations,but unbound concentrations considerably less. Unbound valproate levels remain unchanged despite a fairly marked decrease in total concentrations, and changes in unbound and total plasma concentrations of carbamazepine are minor. In contrast, pregnancy has a pronounced effect on lamotrigine, with a 300% increase in apparent clearance in the third trimester. Much less is known about the kinetics of other new AEDs during pregnancy. Umbilical cord/maternal plasma concentration ratios close to unity suggest free transplacental passage of most AEDs,whereas higher ratios indicate fetal accumulation of valproate and gabapentin. Milk/maternal plasma concentration ratios close to 1 demonstrate extensive transfer to breast milk of many AEDs including ethosuximide, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and zonisamide. Plasma levels are, however, in general low in the nursed infant, although pharmacological concentrations have been reported occasionally for carbamazepine, ethosuximide, lamotrigine, and phenobarbital. For most of the new-generation AEDs, there is an urgent need for further kinetic data from pregnancy and breast-feeding.

Anticonvulsants↗

Teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs: state of the art.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Information on the risks associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) use in pregnancy is necessary for a rational approach to the management of women of childbearing potential who have epilepsy. This reviews addresses recent reports on the risk for birth defects and impaired postnatal development attributable to prenatal exposure to AEDs. RECENT FINDINGS: Some studies have indicated greater risk for birth defects as well as for lower verbal IQ in association with exposure to valproic acid, as compared with some other AEDs. The risk appears to be greater at doses above 800-1000 mg/day; lower doses may not carry higher risks than those associated with other AEDs. This observation is a cause of concern but more data are needed from prospective studies to assess the possible impact of confounding factors in order to clarify whether there is a causal relationship. Large-scale pregnancy registries have been launched and are expected to provide more conclusive comparative data on the most frequently used AEDs in the near future. SUMMARY: Although further studies are needed, it appears reasonable to use valproic acid with caution in women with epilepsy who are planning to become pregnant, and to consider prescribing other equally effective and safer AEDs if they are available. The importance of seizure control during pregnancy must not be neglected, and any attempt to change treatment should be done before conception. Drug withdrawal during pregnancy should be avoided, and patients should be made aware that definitive evidence on the relative safety of AEDs is lacking.

Anticonvulsants↗

Pharmacokinetics of gabapentin during delivery, in the neonatal period, and lactation: does a fetal accumulation occur during pregnancy?

PURPOSE: To study the pharmacokinetics of gabapentin (GBP) during delivery, lactation, and in the neonatal period. METHODS: GBP concentrations in plasma and breast milk were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography in samples from six women treated with GBP and in their offspring. Blood samples were obtained at delivery from mothers, from the umbilical cord, and from the newborns on three occasions during 2 days after delivery. GBP concentration also was determined in breast milk and in blood collected from five of the mothers and suckling infants 2 weeks to 3 months after birth. RESULTS: The umbilical cord/maternal plasma concentration ratios ranged from 1.3 to 2.1 (mean, 1.7). GBP plasma concentrations in the neonates declined with an estimated half-life of 14 h. Mean GBP plasma concentrations in the infants were 27% of the cord plasma levels (range, 12-36%) 24 h postpartum. The mean milk/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 1.0 (range, 0.7-1.3) from 2 weeks to 3 months. The infant dose of GBP was estimated to 0.2-1.3 mg/kg/day, equivalent to 1.3-3.8% of the weight-normalized dose received by the mother. The plasma concentrations in the breast-fed infants were approximately 12% of the mother's plasma levels, but no adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our limited observations suggest an active transplacental transport of GBP, with accumulation in the fetus as a consequence. We suggest that this could be by the specific L-type amino acid transporter 1 (LAT-1), which is expressed in the placenta. Newborns seem to have a slightly lower capacity to eliminate GBP than do adults. Transfer of GBP to breast milk is extensive, but plasma concentrations appear to be low in suckling infants. No adverse effects were observed in the newborn. Although more data are needed, our observations suggest that breastfeeding in conjunction with GBP treatment is safe.

Amines↗

Mortality of epilepsy in developed countries: a review.

Mortality in people with epilepsy has been studied in many different populations. In population-based incidence cohorts of epilepsy with 7-29 years follow-up, there was up to a threefold increase in mortality, compared to the general population (standardized mortality ratios [SMR] ranged from 1.6 to 3.0). When studies include selected epilepsy populations where patients with frequent and severe seizures are more common, the mortality is even greater. Relative survivorship (RS) following the diagnosis of epilepsy was 91%, 85%, and 83% after 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. In a population with childhood-onset epilepsy, RS was 94% and 88% after 10 and 20 years. The level of increased mortality is affected by several factors. In idiopathic epilepsy where the causes of seizures are unknown, the results are conflicting. There was no significant increase in mortality in studies from Iceland, France, and Sweden, a barely increased risk in a study from the United Kingdom, and a significantly increased risk in a study from the United States. In contrast, all studies report a significant increased mortality in remote symptomatic epilepsy (standardized mortality ratios [SMRs] ranging from 2.2 to 6.5). The highest mortality is found in patients with epilepsy and neurodeficits present since birth, including mental retardation or cerebral palsy (SMRs ranging from 7 to 50). Mortality is also affected by age, with the highest SMRs in children, the combined effect of low mortality in the reference population, and high mortality in children with neurodeficits and epilepsy. The highest excess mortality is found in the elderly, > or =75 years. A pronounced increase in mortality is found during the first year following the onset of seizures due to underlying severe diseases. The increased mortality remains in different studies 2-14 years following diagnosis. Most of the factors responsible for the increased mortality are related to the underlying disorder causing epilepsy with pneumonia, cerebrovascular disease, and neoplastic disorders (risk remains elevated when primary brain tumors are excluded), as the most frequently recorded causes. The most common direct seizure-related cause of death in adolescents and young adults is sudden unexpected death, which is 24 times more common than in the general population.

Adolescent↗

Effects of the antiepileptic drugs lamotrigine, topiramate and gabapentin on hERG potassium currents.

Drugs that inhibit the cardiac rapid delayed rectifier potassium ion current (I(Kr)) can be proarrhythmic and their clinical use has been associated with sudden unexpected death (SUD) due to cardiac arrhythmia. SUD is 20-40 times more common among people with epilepsy than in the general population and case-control studies have identified polytherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as a risk factor. In a previous study, it was described that the old AEDs phenytoin and phenobarbital had the potential to inhibit the I(Kr) channel and it was suggested that this could contribute to the increased risk for SUD in patients with epilepsy. In this study, we have investigated the I(Kr) blocking potential of some more recently introduced AEDs, lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM) and gapapentin (GBP). The whole cell patch-clamp recording technique was used to study the effects on I(Kr) channels expressed by the human ether-a-go-go related gene (hERG) stably expressed in human embryo kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Tail currents, which are purely related to hERG currents, were blocked with IC50 and IC20 (the concentrations when 50% and 20% inhibition was obtained compared to control values) of 229 and 21 microM, respectively, for LTG. A 40% inhibition of tail currents was obtained at GBP concentrations of 100 mM and a 20% inhibition at 54 mM. A 35% inhibition of tail currents was obtained at TPM concentrations of 1000 microM and a 20% inhibition at 87 microM, respectively. Collective data show that drugs with the same margins (ratio hERG IC50/unbound therapeutic concentration) as LTG, may have arrhythmogenic potential. The risk for arrhythmia may be clinically significant in the presence of predisposing factors such as seizure-induced acidosis and in the case of concurrent treatment with other I(Kr) blocking drugs, or in case of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions resulting in excessively high concentrations of LTG.

Amines↗

[It's possible to influence prescriptions patterns by producer-independent information].

Following the publication of a metaanalysis over effectiveness and tolerability of triptanes for acute treatment of migraine we investigated whether a short oral information by clinical pharmacologists, describing the rationale for prescribing a certain triptane, combined with memory cards could influence the prescription by general practitioners. The primary care units, which had received the information, showed a significantly better adherence to prescription of the recommended triptane than units that had not received such information. The desired influence on prescription was, however, transient and not statistically significant for more than three months following the prescription. The finding underlines the need for repeated information when effects on prescription habits are wanted.

Community Health Centers↗

Drug selection for the newly diagnosed patient: when is a new generation antiepileptic drug indicated?

Treatment options in epilepsy have increased dramatically since the early 1990s with the introduction of nine new generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) (felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide). This makes drug selection much more complicated and challenging. This review discusses drug selection in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and in particular the role of new AEDs in this population. The choice of treatment should always be based on a careful comparison of the risk-benefit ratio for the different treatment options and the outcome of such evaluation may be different in patients with new onset compared with chronic epilepsy. Efficacy, tolerability and safety are the main criteria for selection of AEDs and any first line drug for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy must have demonstrated satisfactory efficacy as monotherapy in that patient population. So far, of the new AEDs only lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and topiramate have documentation sufficient to be granted licence for use as monotherapy in most European countries. Because the new generation AEDs have failed to demonstrate improved effectiveness as monotherapy, old generation AEDs such as carbamazepine and valproate remain drugs of first choice for partial and generalised seizures, respectively. However, there are special situations and populations where a new AED may be a reasonable first line drug. These include vigabatrin in West syndrome associated with tuberous sclerosis, lamotrigine as alternative to valproate in idiopathic generalised seizures in women of childbearing potential and lamotrigine for the treatment of epilepsy in the elderly population. The role of the new generation AEDs is likely to become more prominent as more experience is gained.

Anticonvulsants↗

Medical risks in epilepsy: a review with focus on physical injuries, mortality, traffic accidents and their prevention.

The present review aims at highlighting selective aspects of the medical risks in epilepsy and their prevention. Emphasis is put on accidents and physical injuries, including risk factors and effectiveness of prevention; mortality, its causes, risk factors and prevention of seizure-related deaths, as well as traffic accidents, their risk factors and the effectiveness of prevention. Accidents and injuries are slightly more frequent among people with epilepsy than in the general population. This increased risk is probably most prevalent in patients with symptomatic epilepsy and frequent seizures, most often in combination with associated handicaps. The majority of accidents are trivial and occur at home. The most frequent injuries among patients with epilepsy are contusions, wounds, fractures, abrasions and brain concussions. The standardised mortality ratio (SMR; the ratio of observed number of deaths in a population with epilepsy to that expected, based on age and sex-specific mortality rates in a reference population) in population-based studies of epilepsy is 2-3 compared to the general population. This increased mortality is largely related to the etiology of the epilepsy and is probably not influenced by the treatment of the epilepsy. On the other hand, most fatalities in patients with chronic, therapy resistant epilepsy seem to be seizure-related and often sudden unexpected deaths (SUDEP). The frequency of such seizure-related deaths is most likely to be reduced by intensified treatment aiming at early seizure control, although appropriate studies for definitive evidence are still lacking. Apparently, there is an increased rate of traffic accidents in drivers with epilepsy, even if population-based prospective data are lacking. Many of these accidents are seizure-related. Probably, the extent to which physicians report their patients with uncontrolled epilepsy to the authorities is too low, but this has not yet been explored. Moreover, the preventive measures in legislation may be ignored by many people with epilepsy.

Accidents, Traffic↗

Navigating toward fetal and maternal health: the challenge of treating epilepsy in pregnancy.

A rational approach to the treatment of women of childbearing potential with epilepsy has been hampered by the lack of conclusive data on the comparative teratogenic potential of different antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Although, several cohort studies on birth defects associated with AED use during pregnancy have been published, these have generally failed to demonstrate differences in malformation rates between AEDs, probably mainly due to insufficient power. In particular, pregnancies with new generation AEDs have been too few. In recent years, pregnancy registries have been introduced to overcome this problem--EURAP (an international collaboration), the North American, and the U.K. AED and pregnancy registries are observational studies that prospectively assess pregnancy outcome after AED exposure using slightly different methods. Each has enlisted 3-5,000 pregnancies in women with epilepsy, and the North American and the U.K. have released preliminary observations. Thus the U.K. registry reported a higher malformation rate with valproate, 5.9% (4.3-8.2%; 95% CI), than with carbamazepine, 2.3% (1.4-3.7%), and lamotrigine, 2.1% (1.0-4.0%). Most of the more recent cohort studies have also identified a nonsignificant trend toward a higher teratogenicity with valproate. These signals need to be interpreted with some caution since none of the studies to date have fully assessed the impact of possible confounders, such as type of epilepsy, family history of birth defects, etc. However, with increasing number of pregnancies it should be possible in the near future for the pregnancy registries to take such confounding factors into account and thus make more reliable assessments of the causal relationship between exposure to specific AEDs and teratogenic risks. While awaiting more conclusive results, it appears reasonable to be cautious in prescribing valproate to women considering to become pregnant if other suitable treatment alternatives, and with less teratogenic potential, are available. Any attempt to change treatment should, however, be accomplished well before conception. The importance of maintained seizure control must also be kept in mind, and the woman who needs valproate to control her seizures should not be discouraged from pregnancy, provided that counseling at the best of available knowledge is given.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

Oral contraceptives reduce lamotrigine plasma levels.

The mean steady-state plasma concentration of lamotrigine (LTG) was 13 micro mol/L in 22 women taking LTG in combination oral contraceptives (OC) compared with 28 micro mol/L among 30 women on LTG who did not take OC (p < 0.0001). The LTG dose/body weight/plasma concentration was 2.1 L/kg/day in women on OC compared with 0.8 L/kg/day in women without OC (p < 0.0001), indicating that LTG plasma levels are reduced by >50% during OC co-medication. It is advisable to monitor LTG plasma levels in conjunction with initiation or withdrawal of OC in women on LTG therapy.

Adolescent↗