Biomedical subjects

Torsten Dau

Publications and source records attributed to Torsten Dau.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

External and internal limitations in amplitude-modulation processing.

Three experiments are presented to explore the relative role of "external" signal variability and "internal" resolution limitations of the auditory system in the detection and discrimination of amplitude modulations (AM). In the first experiment, AM-depth discrimination performance was determined using sinusoidally modulated broadband-noise and pure-tone carriers. The AM index, m, of the standard ranged from -28 to -3 dB (expressed as 20 log m). AM-depth discrimination thresholds were found to be a fraction of the AM depth of the standard for standards down to -18 dB, in the case of the pure-tone carrier, and down to -8 dB, in the case of the broadband-noise carrier. For smaller standards, AM-depth discrimination required a fixed increase in AM depth, independent of the AM depth of the standard. In the second experiment, AM-detection thresholds were obtained for signal-modulation frequencies of 4, 16, 64, and 256 Hz, applied to either a band-limited random-noise carrier or a deterministic ("frozen") noise carrier, as a function of carrier bandwidth (8 to 2048 Hz). In general, detection thresholds were higher for the random- than for the frozen-noise carriers. For both carrier types, thresholds followed the pattern expected from frequency-selective processing of the stimulus envelope. The third experiment investigated AM masking at 4, 16, and 64 Hz in the presence of a narrow-band masker modulation. The variability of the masker was changed from entirely frozen to entirely random, while the long-term average envelope power spectrum was held constant. The experiment examined the validity of a long-term average quantity as the decision variable, and the role of memory in experiments with frozen-noise maskers. The empirical results were compared to predictions obtained with two modulation-filterbank models. The predictions revealed that AM-depth discrimination and AM detection are limited by a combination of the external signal variability and an internal "Weber-fraction" noise process.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2003

The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses.

A model for the generation of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and frequency following responses (FFRs) is presented. The model is based on the concept introduced by Goldstein and Kiang [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 30, 107-114 (1958)] that evoked potentials recorded at remote electrodes can theoretically be given by convolution of an elementary unit waveform (unitary response) with the instantaneous discharge rate function for the corresponding unit. In the present study, the nonlinear computational auditory-nerve model recently developed by Heinz et al. [ARLO 2(3), 91-96 (2001)] was used to calculate the instantaneous discharge rate ri(t) for fibers i in the frequency range from 0.1 and 10 kHz. The summed activity across frequency was convolved with a unitary response which is assumed to reflect contributions from different cell populations within the auditory brainstem, recorded at a given pair of electrodes on the scalp. Predicted potential patterns are compared with experimental data for a number of stimulus and level conditions. Clicks, chirps as defined in Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1530-1540 (2000)], long-duration stimuli comprising the chirp, as well as tones and slowly varying tonal sweeps were considered. The results demonstrate the importance of considering the effects of the basilar-membrane traveling wave and auditory-nerve processing for the formation of ABR and FFR. Specifically, the results support the hypothesis that the FFR to low-frequency tones represents synchronized activity mainly stemming from mid- and high-frequency units at more basal sites, and not from units tuned to frequencies around the signal frequency.

Auditory Pathways↗

PubMed2003

Modulation masking produced by complex tone modulators.

Thresholds were measured for detecting sinusoidal amplitude modulation in the presence of a complex-tone masker modulation. Both modulations were applied to the same sinusoidal carrier. Two different masker modulations were used: (i) a pair of components beating at the difference frequency and (ii) a three-tone complex producing a sinusoidal amplitude modulation of the modulation depth at the difference frequency between adjacent components. Both maskers show a periodicity in the waveform that is not contained in the envelope spectrum itself but can be observed when the envelope of the envelope, referred to as the "venelope" [Ewert et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112, 2921-2931 (2002)], is calculated. For a signal frequency equal to the masker-venelope periodicity, modulation depth at threshold was measured as a function of the signal phase relative to the phase of the masker-venelope component. Signal frequencies of 5, 30, and 90 Hz were used. It was found that masking was phase dependent for all three signal frequencies. Thresholds were lower for the in-phase condition, where maxima in the signal waveform coincided with maxima in the masker-venelope waveform, than for the antiphase condition. The maximum threshold difference was 15 dB. The results are in contrast to recent data [Moore et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 908-918 (1999)], where lowest thresholds were reported for the antiphase condition in a similar experiment. The present data are in line with the idea that a nonlinearity prior to a modulation filterbank extracts the venelope of the masker modulator. However, a compressive nonlinearity such as that associated with the processing on the basilar membrane cannot account for the empirical findings, since it predicts the opposite phase effect.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The representation of peripheral neural activity in the middle-latency evoked field of primary auditory cortex in humans(1).

Short sweeps with increasing instantaneous frequency (up-chirps) designed to compensate for the propagation delay along the human cochlea enhance the magnitude of wave V of the auditory brainstem responses, while time reversed sweeps (down-chirps) reduce the magnitude of wave V [Dau, T., Wegner, O., Mellert, V., Kollmeier, B., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 (2000) 1530-1540]. This effect is due to synchronisation of frequency channels along the basilar membrane and it indicates that cochlear phase delays are preserved up to the input of the inferior colliculus. The present magnetoencephalography study was designed to investigate the influence of peripheral synchronisation on the activation in primary auditory cortex. Spatio-temporal source analysis of middle-latency auditory evoked fields (MAEFs) elicited by clicks and up- and down-chirps showed that up-chirps elicited significantly larger MAEF responses compared to clicks or down-chirps. Both N19m-P30m magnitude and its latency are influenced by peripheral cross-channel phase effects. Furthermore, deconvolution of the empirical source waveforms with spike probability functions simulated with a cochlear model indicated that the source waves for all stimulus conditions could be explained with the same unit-response function, i.e. a far field recorded cortical response of a very small cell assembly along the medio-lateral axis of Heschl's gyrus that receives input from a small number of excitatory fibres. The conclusion is that (i) phase delays between channels in the auditory pathway are preserved up to primary auditory cortex, and (ii) MAEFs can be described by a convolution of a unit-response function with the summary neural activity pattern of the auditory nerve.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Frequency specificity of chirp-evoked auditory brainstem responses.

This study examines the usefulness of the upward chirp stimulus developed by Dau et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 1530-1540 (2000)] for retrieving frequency-specific information. The chirp was designed to produce simultaneous displacement maxima along the cochlear partition by compensating for frequency-dependent traveling-time differences. In the first experiment, auditory brainstem responses (ABR) elicited by the click and the broadband chirp were obtained in the presence of high-pass masking noise, with cutoff frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz. Results revealed a larger wave-V amplitude for chirp than for click stimulation in all masking conditions. Wave-V amplitude for the chirp increased continuously with increasing high-pass cutoff frequency while it remains nearly constant for the click for cutoff frequencies greater than 1 kHz. The same two stimuli were tested in the presence of a notched-noise masker with one-octave wide spectral notches corresponding to the cutoff frequencies used in the first experiment. The recordings were compared with derived responses, calculated offline, from the high-pass masking conditions. No significant difference in response amplitude between click and chirp stimulation was found for the notched-noise responses as well as for the derived responses. In the second experiment, responses were obtained using narrow-band stimuli. A low-frequency chirp and a 250-Hz tone pulse with comparable duration and magnitude spectrum were used as stimuli. The narrow-band chirp elicited a larger response amplitude than the tone pulse at low and medium stimulation levels. Overall, the results of the present study further demonstrate the importance of considering peripheral processing for the formation of ABR. The chirp might be of particular interest for assessing low-frequency information.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2002

Spectro-temporal processing in the envelope-frequency domain.

The frequency selectivity for amplitude modulation applied to tonal carriers and the role of beats between modulators in modulation masking were studied. Beats between the masker and signal modulation as well as intrinsic envelope fluctuations of narrow-band-noise modulators are characterized by fluctuations in the "second-order" envelope (referred to as the "venelope" in the following). In experiment 1, masked threshold patterns (MTPs), representing signal modulation threshold as a function of masker-modulation frequency, were obtained for signal-modulation frequencies of 4, 16, and 64 Hz in the presence of a narrow-band-noise masker modulation, both applied to the same sinusoidal carrier. Carrier frequencies of 1.4, 2.8, and 5.5 kHz were used. The shape and relative bandwidth of the MTPs were found to be independent of the signal-modulation frequency and the carrier frequency. Experiment 2 investigated the extent to which the detection of beats between signal and masker modulation is involved in tone-in-noise (TN), noise-in-tone (NT), and tone-in-tone (TT) modulation masking, whereby the TN condition was similar to the one used in the first experiment. A signal-modulation frequency of 64 Hz, applied to a 2.8-kHz carrier, was tested. Thresholds in the NT condition were always lower than in the TN condition, analogous to the masking effects known from corresponding experiments in the audio-frequency domain. TT masking conditions generally produced the lowest thresholds and were strongly influenced by the detection of beats between the signal and the masker modulation. In experiment 3, TT masked-threshold patterns were obtained in the presence of an additional sinusoidal masker at the beat frequency. Signal-modulation frequencies of 32, 64, and 128 Hz, applied to a 2.8-kHz carrier, were used. It was found that the presence of an additional modulation at the beat frequency hampered the subject's ability to detect the envelope beats and raised thresholds up to a level comparable to that found in the TN condition. The results of the current study suggest that (i) venelope fluctuations play a similar role in modulation masking as envelope fluctuations do in spectral masking, and (ii) envelope and venelope fluctuations are processed by a common mechanism. To interpret the empirical findings, a general model structure for the processing of envelope and venelope fluctuations is proposed.

Adult↗