[Acute coronary syndrome in the German diagnosis-related groups system. 2: Reimbursement of interventional treatment and consequences of the current system].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Angina, Unstable↗
Biomedical subjects
Torsten Fürstenberg
Publications and source records attributed to Torsten Fürstenberg.
[G-dRG version 2005: relevant aspects for dermatology].
One year after the obligatory implementation of a new hospital funding system based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) the third version of a German DRG-system has been published. It differs significantly from the previous version. Modifications in the classification system and the introduction of further procedure-based payments contribute to a better depiction of specialized clinical services. A number of acknowledged problems which caused great discussion in 2004 have been solved, yielding a more appropriate mapping of clinical services. The algorithms of the major diagnostic categories have been modified and complications, comorbidities and/or multiple procedures will be considered more precisely in selecting a group. However, some inconsistencies concerning highly specialized medical procedures and special features of impatient dermatological care remain. Nevertheless, a great improvement over the previous versions is apparent. The crucial aspects of the G-DRG version 2005 and the accompanying rules and regulations of payment are reviewed in detail with special relevance to dermatology.
Algorithms↗
[DRGs in dermatology: results of the DRG evaluation project of the German Society of Dermatology (DDG)].
SUMMARY BACKGROUND: The implementation of a DRG system in Germany--voluntarily since January 1st, 2003, and obligatory after January 1 st, 2004--has led to uncertainty, particularly in the hospitals. There are fears that current well-accepted German diagnostic and therapeutic services may not be properly financed by the new system. In response, the German Dermatologic Society (DDG) in cooperation with the DRG Research Group of the University Hospital Muenster and the German Medical Association carried out a DRG evaluation project in order to investigate the medical and economic homogeneity of the case groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 19,403 dermatological cases from 19 hospitals--ten university hospitals and nine non-university hospitals-were collected over a period of four months and then evaluated with regard to their performance, length of stay and cost homogeneity. RESULTS: The data provided the background needed to indicate suspected potential deficiencies for mapping dermatology cases within the German DRG system. Based on the data 10 modifications were formulated and submitted to the InEK by the deadline of March 31st, 2003. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the DRG Evaluation Project show that the G-DRG-Variant Version 1.0 does not offer the necessary possibilities of differentiation to map the broad spectrum of various dermatology services in Germany.
Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
[G-DRG Version 2004: changes in view of dermatology].
In the year 2004 the obligatory introduction of the new hospital funding system based on a Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG) system will become reality for all German hospitals. After all fundamental items of the new G-DRG version were made generally known, the possible consequences had to be considered. The first mandatory German case-based lump sum catalogue differs importantly from the previous payment models and requires intensive study. Economic considerations will increasingly play a role in the daily routine of hospitals and influence treatment patterns. Therefore, comprehensive knowledge of basic principles of G-DRG is essential. In the following aspects of the reimbursement system with special relevance to dermatology are reviewed in detail. Additionally, the revised classification system versions OPS-301 SGB V and ICD-10-GM 2004 and the German coding standards version 2004 must be appropriately applied for dermatologic purposes.
Dermatology↗