PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Trond Aamo

Publications and source records attributed to Trond Aamo.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Ciprofibrate stimulates the gastrin-producing cell by acting luminally on antral PPAR-alpha.

The lipid-lowering drug ciprofibrate stimulates gastrin-producing cells in the rat stomach without lowering gastric acidity. Although suggested to be a luminal action on antral peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPAR-alpha), the mechanism is still not fully elucidated. Gastric bypass was surgically prepared in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Gastric-bypassed and sham-operated rats were either given ciprofibrate (50 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) in methocel) or vehicle alone for 7 wk. PPAR-alpha knockout (KO) and wild-type (WT) mice were either given ciprofibrate (500 mg.kg(-1).day(-1) in methocel) or vehicle alone for 2 wk. The concentration of gastrin in blood was analyzed. Antral G cell density and gastrin mRNA abundance were determined by using immunostaining and Northern blot analysis. Ciprofibrate did not raise plasma gastrin or G cell density in gastric-bypassed rats, although the gastrin mRNA level was slightly increased. In contrast, ciprofibrate induced hypergastrinemia, a 50% increase in G cell density, and a threefold increase in gastrin mRNA in sham-operated rats. In PPAR-alpha KO mice, ciprofibrate did not raise G cell density or the gastrin mRNA level. The serum gastrin level was reduced by ciprofibrate. In WT mice, ciprofibrate induced hypergastrinemia, a doubling of G cell density, and a threefold increase in gastrin mRNA. Comparing animals dosed with vehicle only, PPAR-alpha KO mice had higher serum gastrin concentration than WT mice. We conclude that the main effects of ciprofibrate on G cells are mediated from the antrum lumen, and the mechanism is dependent on PPAR-alpha. The results indicate that PPAR-alpha may have a role in the physiological regulation of gastrin release.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Stimulant and relaxant drugs combined with stimulant and relaxant information: a study of active placebo.

RATIONALE: The active placebo hypothesis states that placebo effects are potentiated when an active drug is administered. OBJECTIVE: This hypothesis was tested in an experiment where information about the effect of a drug was combined with administration of an active drug or placebo. METHODS: Information that a drug acted as a relaxant, a stimulant, or as a placebo was crossed with oral administration of a relaxant drug (700 mg carisoprodol), a stimulant drug (400 mg caffeine) or placebo (lactose) in healthy volunteers ( n=94). Dependent variables were subjective and physiological measures of arousal, as well as serum carisoprodol and caffeine levels. Data were collected from 15 to 280 min after administration of drug or placebo. RESULTS: Caffeine increased alertness, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, startle blink reflexes, and skin conductance responses. Subjects were calmer after carisoprodol, and heart rate was increased. There was a positive correlation between increased arousal and carisoprodol levels when stimulant information had been provided. However, this was only seen when carisoprodol levels were very low. There was no evidence that caffeine modulated the placebo response. CONCLUSIONS: Active placebo responses were seen only transiently when carisoprodol levels were low, and only in the subjective arousal data. Caffeine did not support active placebo responses. The overall findings did not favour the active placebo hypothesis.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Routine drug monitoring of serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide do not predict clinical observations in cancer patients.

The clinical importance of routine drug monitoring of serum concentrations of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) and morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) during chronic morphine therapy is not established. We measured morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations in cancer pain patients receiving oral (n = 263, median dose 80 mg/24 hours) or subcutaneous (sc) (n = 35, median dose 110 mg/24 hours) morphine. Regression analyses were performed to investigate if serum concentrations of morphine, M3G and M6G predicted pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory), health-related quality-of-life variables (EORTC QLQ-C30) and cognitive function (Mini-Mental Score). Serum concentrations were also compared in patients categorized as morphine 'treatment successes' and 'treatment failures'. We observed that serum concentrations of morphine, M6G or M3G did not predict pain intensity, cognitive function, nausea or tiredness. 'Treatment failures' caused by nausea, tiredness, cognitive failure or constipation did not have statistically significant different morphine, M6G and M3G serum concentrations than patients classified as 'treatment successes'. In conclusion, this study did not observe any concentration-effect relationships of morphine, M3G or M6G with pain intensity, nausea, constipation, tiredness or cognitive failure in blood samples obtained during routine clinical drug monitoring in cancer patients. This result suggests that therapeutic drug monitoring as a routine tool during chronic morphine treatment has limited value for clinical decision making.

Administration, Oral↗