Biomedical subjects

Tsukasa Sakurada

Publications and source records attributed to Tsukasa Sakurada.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Possible involvement of endogenous nociceptin/orphanin FQ in the pain-related behavioral responses induced by its own metabolite, nociceptin/orphanin FQ(14-17).

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ(14-17) (N/OFQ(14-17)) is one of the major fragments that are released from N/OFQ, an endogenous ligand for the opioid receptor like-1 (ORL-1) receptor by endopeptidase 24.11. In the present study, we determined the pharmacological profiles of N/OFQ(14-17) on pain-related behavioral responses in the mouse. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of N/OFQ(14-17) (5-160 pmol) evoked pain-related behaviors, and these behavioral responses were reduced by i.t. co-administration of an ORL-1 receptor antagonist, [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)NH2 (4 pmol). However, in the ligand-binding receptor assay, N/OFQ(14-17) had no affinity for the ORL-1 receptor. Furthermore, i.t. pretreatment with an antiserum against N/OFQ (1:50) diminished the N/OFQ(14-17)-induced pain-related behaviors, suggesting that endogenous N/OFQ is involved in their expression. Therefore, N/OFQ(14-17)-induced pain-related behaviors may be mediated through the release of endogenous N/OFQ in the mouse spinal cord.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Contribution of spinal mu(1)-opioid receptors and dynorphin B to the antinociception induced by Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-Sar.

The antinociceptive effect of Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-Sar (TAPS) at the spinal level was characterized with the mouse tail-flick test. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of TAPS produced a dose-dependent antinociception. The antinociception induced by TAPS was completely blocked by i.t. pretreatment with the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine, the mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine or the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine, but not with the delta-opioid receptor antagonist naltrindole. Moreover, TAPS-induced antinociception was dose-dependently attenuated by i.t. pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin B, but not against dynorphin A, alpha-neo-endorphin, [Met(5)]enkephalin, or [Leu(5)]enkephalin. In mice lacking prodynorphin, TAPS-induced antinociception was significantly reduced compared to that in wild-type mice. These results suggest that TAPS mainly stimulates mu(1)-opioid receptors, which subsequently induce the release of dynorphin B, which then acts on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2006

Involvement of spinal mu1-opioid receptors on the Tyr-d-Arg-Phe-sarcosine-induced antinociception.

The involvement of spinal mu-opioid receptor subtypes on the antinociception induced by i.t.-administered Tyr-D-Arg-Phe-sarcosine (TAPS), a N-terminal tetrapeptide analog of dermorphin, was determined in mice tail-flick test. Intrathecal administration of TAPS produced the marked inhibition of the tail-flick response in a dose-dependent manner. The antinociception induced by TAPS was completely eliminated by i.t.-co-administration of Tyr-D-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH2 (D-Pro2-endomorphin-2), the mu1-opioid receptor antagonist, whereas i.t. co-treatment with Tyr-D-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH2 (D-Pro2-endomorphin-1) or Tyr-D-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2 (D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1), the mu2-opioid receptor antagonists, did not affect the TAPS-induced antinociception. In contrast, the antinociception induced by i.t.-administered [D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin was significantly attenuated by i.t.-co-administration of D-Pro2-endomorphin-1 or D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1, but not D-Pro2-endomorphin-2. These results suggest that TAPS may stimulate spinal mu1-opioid receptors to produce the antinociception.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2006

Possible involvement of dynorphin A-(1-17) release via mu1-opioid receptors in spinal antinociception by endomorphin-2.

The antinociception induced by i.t. or i.c.v. administration of endomorphins is mediated via mu-opioid receptors. However, although endomorphins do not have an appreciable affinity for kappa-opioid receptors, pretreatment with the kappa-opioid receptor antagonist norbinaltorphimine markedly reduces the antinociceptive response to i.c.v. or i.t. administered endomorphin-2 but not endomorphin-1. These results suggest that endomorphin-2 initially stimulates mu-opioid receptors, which subsequently induce the release of dynorphins that act on kappa-opioid receptors to produce antinociception. The present study was performed in mice to determine whether the release of dynorphins by i.t. administered endomorphin-2 is mediated through mu-opioid receptors to produce antinociception. Intrathecal pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin A-(1-17), but not against dynorphin B-(1-13) or alpha-neoendorphin, dose-dependently prevented the paw-withdrawal inhibition by endomorphin-2. The pretreatments with these antisera did not affect the endomorphin-1- or [D-Ala(2),MePhe(4),Gly(ol)(5)]enkephalin-induced paw-withdrawal inhibition. The attenuation of endomorphin-2-induced antinociception by i.t. pretreatment with an antiserum against dynorphin A-(1-17) or s.c. pretreatment with norbinaltorphimine was blocked dose-dependently by s.c. pretreatment with the mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine or the mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist naloxonazine at ultra-low doses that are ineffective against mu-opioid receptor agonists. These results suggest that the spinal antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 is mediated through the stimulation of a distinct subtype of mu(1)-opioid receptor that induces the release of the endogenous kappa-opioid peptide dynorphin A-(1-17) in the spinal cord.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2005

Differential inhibitory effects of mu-opioids on substance P- and capsaicin-induced nociceptive behavior in mice.

The antinociceptive mechanisms of the selective mu-opioid receptor agonists [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly(ol)5]enkephalin (DAMGO), H-Tyr-D-Arg-Phe-beta-Ala-OH (TAPA) or H-Tyr-D-Arg-Phe-beta-Ala-NH2 (TAPA-NH2) against substance P (SP)- or capsaicin-elicited nociceptive behaviors was investigated in mice. DAMGO, TAPA or TAPA-NH2 given intrathecally inhibited the nociceptive behaviors elicited by intrathecally administered SP or capsaicin, and these antinociceptive effects were completely eliminated by intrathecal co-administration with D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2 (CTOP), a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist. Pretreatment subcutaneously with naloxonazine, a selective mu1-opioid receptor antagonist, partially attenuated the antinociceptive effect of TAPA-NH2, but not DAMGO and TAPA, against SP. However, the antinociception induced by TAPA, but not DAMGO and TAPA-NH2, against capsaicin was significantly inhibited by naloxonazine. On the other hand, co-administration intrathecally with Tyr-D-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH2 (D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1), a selective mu2-opioid receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated the antinociceptive effects of DAMGO, but not TAPA and TAPA-NH2, against capsaicin, while the antinociceptions induced by three opioid peptides against SP were significantly inhibited by D-Pro2-Tyr-W-MIF-1. These results suggest that differential inhibitory mechanisms on pre- and postsynaptic sites in the spinal cord contribute to the antinociceptive effects of the three mu-opioid peptides.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2005

Effects of intraplantar injections of nociceptin and its N-terminal fragments on nociceptive and desensitized responses induced by capsaicin in mice.

Injection of capsaicin into the hindpaw has been employed as a model of chemogenic nociception in mice. Intraplantar injection of nociceptin (30-240 pmol) produced a significant and dose-dependent antinociceptive activity in the capsaicin test. The nociceptin N-terminal fragments, (1-11) and (1-13), were also active with a potency higher than nociceptin and comparable to nociceptin, respectively. Intraplantar injection of the nociceptin (1-7) fragment had no effect on capsaicin-induced nociception. Antinociception induced by nociceptin or nociceptin (1-13) was reversed significantly by intraplantar co-injection of [Nphe1]nociceptin (1-13)NH2, an orphan opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor antagonist, whereas local injection of the antagonist did not interfere with the action of nociceptin (1-11). Nociceptin (1-11) was approximately 2.0-fold more potent than naturally occurring peptide nociceptin, and 10-fold more active than intraplantar morphine. Nociceptive licking/biting response to intraplantar injection of capsaicin was desensitized by repeated injections of capsaicin at the interval of 15 min. Desensitization induced by capsaicin was attenuated significantly by co-injection of nociceptin at much lower doses than antinociceptive ED50 for nociceptin. Capsaicin desensitization was also decreased by co-injection of nociceptin (1-11) and (1-13) to a similar extent. The present results indicate that not only nociceptin but also the N-terminal fragment (1-13) possesses a local peripheral antinociceptive action, which may be mediated by peripheral ORL1 receptors. In addition, the difference of the effective doses suggests that the antinociceptive action and inhibition of capsaicin-induced desenitization by nociceptin, nociceptin (1-11) and (1-13), may involve distinct mechanisms at the level of the peripheral nerve terminal.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Mechanisms of nociception evoked by intrathecal high-dose morphine.

Morphine is recommended by WHO as the analgesic of choice for effective treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain . Indeed spinally administered morphine at small doses injected intrathecally (i.t.) or intracerebroventricularly into animals produces a profound antinociception at both spinal and supraspinal sites. Conversely, high doses of spinally administered morphine elicit a series of scratching, biting and licking in mice, and vocalization and agitation in rats, indicative of a spontaneous nociceptive behavioural response. Hyperalgesia and allodynia are also induced by such morphine treatment in humans as well as animals. These behaviours are not an opioid receptor-mediated event. This article will review the potential mechanisms of spinally mediated nociceptive behaviour evoked by i.t. morphine at high concentrations. We will discuss a possible presynaptic release of nociceptive neurotransmitters/neuromodulators (e.g., substance P, glutamate and dynorphin) in the primary afferent fibers following i.t. high-dose morphine. There must be an intimate interaction of i.t. high-dose morphine with tachykinin neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors and multiple sites on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor complex in the dorsal spinal cord. Since the effect of NMDA receptor activation and the associated Ca2+ influx results in production of nitric oxide (NO) by activation of NO synthase, it seems that spinal NO also plays an important role in nociception evoked by i.t. high-dose morphine. Morphine-3-glucuronide, one of the major metabolites of morphine, has been found to evoke nociceptive behaviour similar to that of i.t. high-dose morphine. It is plausible that morphine-3-glucuronide may be responsible for nociception seen after i.t. high-dose morphine treatment. The demonstration of neural mechanism underlying morphine-induced nociception provides a pharmacological basis for improved pain management with morphine at high doses.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2004

A Tyr-W-MIF-1 analog containing D-Pro2 acts as a selective mu2-opioid receptor antagonist in the mouse.

The antagonistic properties of Tyr-d-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH(2) (d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1), a Tyr-Pro-Trp-Gly-NH(2)(Tyr-W-MIF-1) analog, on the antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonists Tyr-W-MIF-1, [d-Ala(2),N-Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), Tyr-Pro-Trp-Phe-NH(2) (endomorphin-1), and Tyr-Pro-Phe-Phe-NH(2) (endomorphin-2) were studied in the mouse paw-withdrawal test. d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1 injected intrathecally (i.t.) had no apparent effect on the thermal nociceptive threshold. d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1 (0.1-0.4 nmol) coadministered i.t. showed a dose-dependent attenuation of the antinociception induced by Tyr-W-MIF-1 without affecting endomorphin- or DAMGO-induced antinociception. However, higher doses of d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1 (0.8-1.2 nmol) significantly attenuated endomorphin-1- or DAMGO-induced antinociception, whereas the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 was still not affected by d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1. Pretreatment i.t. with various doses of naloxonazine, a mu(1)-opioid receptor antagonist, attenuated the antinociception induced by Tyr-W-MIF-1, endomorphin-1, endomorphin-2, or DAMGO. Judging from the ID(50) values for naloxonazine against the antinociception induced by the mu-opioid receptor agonists, the antinociceptive effect of Tyr-W-MIF-1 is extremely less sensitive to naloxonazine than those of endomorphin-1 or DAMGO. In contrast, endomorphin-2-induced antinociception is extremely sensitive to naloxonazine. The present results clearly suggest that d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1 is the selective antagonist to be identified for the mu(2)-opioid receptor in the mouse spinal cord. d-Pro(2)-Tyr-W-MIF-1 may also discriminate between Tyr-W-MIF-1-induced antinociception and the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 or DAMGO, all of which show a preference for the mu(2)-opioid receptor in the spinal cord.

3,4-Dichloro-N-methyl-N-(2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)-cycloh↗

PubMed2004

Nociceptive behavior induced by poly-L-lysine and other basic compounds involves the spinal NMDA receptors.

We have previously shown that spermine, a basic polyamine, and big dynorphin, a basic polypeptide, induce nociceptive behavior if injected intrathecally (i.t.) in mice (see [Pain 86 (2000) 55-61] and [Brain Res. 952 (2002) 7-14]). This suggests that other basic molecules might have the same effects. Here, i.t. administration of poly-L-lysine (12 and 36 pg) to mice was found to produce the same characteristic behavioral response, biting and/or licking of the hindpaw and the tail along with slight hindlimb scratching directed toward the flank, which peaked at 0-10 min after injection. The behavior induced by poly-L-lysine (12 pg) was dose-dependently inhibited by intraperitoneal injection of morphine (0.25-4 mg/kg) and also dose-dependently, by i.t. co-administration of D-(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV) (1-4 nmol), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, (5R,10S)-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptene-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate (MK-801) (0.0156-4 nmol), an NMDA ion-channel blocker, and ifenprodil (2-8 nmol), an antagonist of the polyamine recognition site and the NR2B-containing NMDA receptor subtype. On the other hand, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, 7-chlorokynurenic acid, a competitive antagonist of the glycine recognition site on the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex, [D-Phe7, d-His9]-substance P (6-11), a specific antagonist for substance P (NK1) receptors, or MEN-10,376, a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist, had no effect. These results confirm the observations obtained with other basic molecules and suggest that the behavior induced by poly-l-lysine is mediated through the activation of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex acting either on the polyamine recognition site or on the NR2B subunit.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2004

Differential involvement of mu 1-opioid receptors in dermorphin tetrapeptide analogues-induced antinociception.

The involvement of putative mu(1)-opioid receptors in the antinociception induced by the dermorphin tetrapeptide analogues Try-D-Arg-Phe-beta-Ala (TAPA) and Tyr-D-Arg-Phe-beta-Ala-NH(2) (TAPA-NH(2)) was determined in mice, using a tail-pressure test and a formalin test. TAPA and TAPA-NH(2) injected i.c.v. and i.t. produced dose-dependent antinociception in both assays. In the tail-pressure test, the antinociception induced by i.c.v. or i.t. injected TAPA, but not TAPA-NH(2), was significantly attenuated by pretreatment with naloxonazine, a selective antagonist for putative mu(1)-opioid receptors. Moreover, naloxonazine also significantly attenuated the antinociception induced by i.c.v. injected TAPA, but not TAPA-NH(2), in the formalin test. In contrast, the antinociception induced by both TAPA and TAPA-NH(2) given i.t. was significantly attenuated by pretreatment with naloxonazine in the formalin test. The present results suggest that TAPA and TAPA-NH(2) should be considered selective agonists for putative mu(1)- and mu(2)-opioid receptors, respectively. The C-terminal amidation of TAPA-NH(2) may be critical for distinguishing between putative mu(1)- and mu(2)-opioid receptors.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2004

Involvement of the histaminergic system in the nociceptin-induced pain-related behaviors in the mouse spinal cord.

Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of nociceptin elicited a behavioral response mainly consisting of biting and licking, which were eliminated by the i.t. co-administration of opioid receptor-like-1 (ORL-1) receptor antagonists. The behavioral response induced by nociceptin was characteristically similar to that by i.t.-administered histamine, and was attenuated by i.t. co-administration of the H1 receptor antagonists, but not by the H2 receptor antagonists, whereas the H3 receptor antagonist promoted the nociceptin-induced behavior. H1 receptor knockout (H1R-KO) mice did not show the nociceptin-induced nociceptive behavior, which was observed in wild-type mice. Pretreatment with a histamine antiserum or a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor resulted in a significant reduction of the response to nociceptin. The previous studies showed that NK1 receptor antagonists and a novel substance P (SP)-specific antagonist given i.t. could reduce the behavioral response to nociceptin and histamine. On the other hand, the nociceptive response induced by nociceptin, but not histamine, was completely attenuated by the i.t. co-administration of agonists for GABAA and GABAB receptors. In contrast, the antagonists for GABAA and GABAB receptors injected i.t. showed same nociceptive response with nociceptin and histamine, and their nociceptive responses were significantly blocked by the i.t. co-administration of the H1 receptor antagonists, but not H2 receptor antagonists or ORL-1 receptor antagonists. The present results suggest that the activation of the ORL-1 receptor by nociceptin may induce the disinhibition of histaminergic neuron and enhance the release of histamine, which subsequently acts on the H1 receptor located on the SP-containing neurons to produce the spinal cord-mediated nociceptive response.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Evidence that nitric oxide-glutamate cascade modulates spinal antinociceptive effect of morphine: a behavioural and microdialysis study in rats.

We evaluated the ability of spinally administered nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor to modulate antinociceptive action of intrathecal (i.t.) morphine in rats by measuring the early and late phases of flinching and licking/biting in the formalin test. To determine the contribution of spinal NO and glutamate, we measured the release of NO metabolites (nitrite/nitrate) and glutamate from the spinal cord in rats, using a microdialysis probe placed in the lumbar space. The i.t. administration of NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) produced a dose-dependent reduction in the number of flinches during the late phase, whereas there were no significant alterations in the late phase licking/biting, and early phase flinching and licking/biting. Spinal administration of morphine at low doses produced a significant antinociceptive activity in the early and late phases of the flinching behaviour, whereas higher doses of morphine were required to obtain a significant effect in the licking/biting behaviour during both phases. Combination of L-NAME with morphine resulted in an enhanced reduction in the early and late phase flinching. Enhanced antinociceptive activity was observed in the late phase licking/biting by i.t. combined administration of L-NAME (400 nmol) and morphine (1.25 nmol). In the present study, we have confirmed our prior results that injection of formalin (5.0%) into the plantar surface of the paw evoked a biphasic spinal release of nitrite/nitrate and a transient release of glutamate. Formalin-evoked release of nitrite/nitrate and glutamate was also reduced markedly by i.t. combined administration of L-NAME and morphine. These behavioural and biochemical results suggest that i.t. administered L-NAME may enhance morphine-induced antinociception through an increased inhibition of nitrite/nitrate and glutamate releases evoked by formalin injection at the spinal cord level.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2003

Degradation of endomorphin-2 at the supraspinal level in mice is initiated by dipeptidyl peptidase IV: an in vitro and in vivo study.

Endomorphin-2 (Tyr-Pro-Phe-PheNH(2)) was discovered as an endogenous ligand for the mu-opioid receptor. The physiological function of endomorphin-2 as a neurotransmitter or neuromodulator may cease through the rapid enzymatic process in the synapse of brain, as for other neuropeptides. The present study was conducted to examine the metabolism of endomorphin-2 by synaptic membranes prepared from mouse brain. Major metabolites were free tyrosine, free phenylalanine, Tyr-Pro and PheNH(2). Both the degradation of endomorphin-2 and the accumulation of major metabolites were inhibited by specific inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase IV, such as diprotin A and B. On the other hand, the accumulation of Phe-PheNH(2) and Pro-Phe-PheNH(2) was increased in the presence of bestatin, an aminopeptidase inhibitor, whereas that of free phenylalanine and PheNH(2) was decreased. Furthermore, purified dipeptidyl peptidase IV hydrolyzed endomorphin-2 at the cleavage site, Pro(2)-Phe(3) bond. Thus, degradation of endomorphin-2 by brain synaptic membranes seems to take place mainly through the cleavage of Pro(2)-Phe(3) bond by dipeptidyl peptidase IV, followed by release of free phenylalanine and PheNH(2) from the liberated fragment, Phe-PheNH(2) by aminopeptidase. We have also examined that the effect of diprotin A on the antinociception induced by intracerebroventricularly administered endomorphin-2 in the mouse paw withdrawal test. Diprotin A simultaneously injected with endomorphin-2 enhanced endomorphin-2-induced antinociception. These results indicate that dipeptidyl peptidase IV may be an important peptidase responsible for terminating endomorphin-2-induced antinociception at the supraspinal level in mice.

Aminopeptidases↗

PubMed2003

Intrathecal histamine induces spinally mediated behavioral responses through tachykinin NK1 receptors.

Intrathecal injection of histamine elicited a behavioral response consisting of scratching, biting and licking in conscious mice. Here, we have examined the involvement of substance P (SP) by using intrathecal injection of tachykinin neurokinin (NK)(1) receptor antagonists and SP antiserum. Histamine-induced behavioral response was evoked significantly 5-10 min after intrathecal injection and reached a maximum at 10-15 min. Dose-dependency of the induced response showed a bell-shaped pattern from 200 to 3200 pmol, and maximum effect was observed at 800-1000 pmol. The H(1) receptor antagonist, d-chlorpheniramine and pyrilamine but not the H(2) receptor antagonists, ranitidine and zolantidine, inhibited histamine-induced behavioral response. The NK(1) receptor antagonists, CP-99,994, RP-67580 and sendide, inhibited histamine-induced behavioral response in a dose-dependent manner. A significant antagonistic effect of [D-Phe(7), D-His(9)]SP (6-11), a selective antagonist for SP receptors, was observed against histamine-induced response. The NK(2) receptor antagonist, MEN-10376, had no effect on the response elicited by histamine. Pretreatment with SP antiserum resulted in a significant reduction of the response to histamine. No significant reduction of histamine-induced response was detected in mice pretreated with NK A antiserum. The present results suggest that elicitation of scratching, biting and licking behavior induced by intrathecal injection of histamine may be largely mediated by NK(1) receptors via H(1) receptors in the spinal cord.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Differential effects of intraplantar capsazepine and ruthenium red on capsaicin-induced desensitization in mice.

Intraplantar injection of capsaicin (1.6 microg/paw) into the mouse hindpaw produced an acute paw-licking/biting response. This study was designed (1) to investigate the antinociceptive effects of intraplantar administration of capsazepine, a competitive vanilloid receptor antagonist, and ruthenium red, a noncompetitive antagonist, in the nociceptive licking/biting response induced by intraplantar injection of capsaicin, and (2) to determine whether these compounds were able to prevent capsaicin-induced desensitization in mice. Both capsazepine and ruthenium red produced a dose-dependent reduction in the capsaicin-induced nociceptive response. In licking/biting response to intraplantar capsaicin, ruthenium red was more potent than capsazepine in producing antinociceptive activity as assayed by the capsaicin test. The first injection of capsaicin induced a profound desensitization to the second and third injections of capsaicin at the interval of 15 or 30 min. The capsaicin-induced desensitization was prevented dose-dependently by antinociceptive doses of capsazepine, whereas ruthenium red in doses exhibiting antinociceptive activity was without effect on capsaicin-induced desensitization. The present results suggest that both capsazepine and ruthenium red can produce a local peripheral antinociceptive action, which may be mediated by inhibiting the membrane ion channel activated by capsaicin. In addition, these data suggest that capsazepine may act in the mechanism clearly different from ruthenium red in the capsaicin-induced nociceptive desensitization.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

The role of spinal nitric oxide and glutamate in nociceptive behaviour evoked by high-dose intrathecal morphine in rats.

Injection of high-dose of morphine into the spinal lumbar intrathecal (i.t.) space of rats elicits a nociceptive behavioural syndrome characterized by periodic bouts of spontaneous agitation and severe vocalization. The induced behavioural response such as vocalization and agitation was observed dose-dependently by i.t. administration of morphine (125-500 nmol). Pretreatment with naloxone (s.c. and i.t.), an opioid receptor antagonist, failed to reverse the morphine-induced behavioural response. The excitatory effect of morphine was inhibited dose-dependently by pretreatment with 3-((+)2-carboxy-piperazin-4-yl)-propyl-1-phosphonic acid (CPP), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist and MK-801, a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist. The non-selective nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N(G)-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) inhibited dose-dependently the behavioural response to high-dose i.t. morphine (500 nmol), whereas D-NAME was without affecting the response to high-dose i.t. morphine. In the present study, we measured NO metabolites (nitrite/nitrate) in the extracellular fluid of rat dorsal spinal cord using in vivo microdialysis. The i.t. injection of morphine (500 nmol) evoked significant increases in NO metabolites and glutamate from the spinal cord. Not only NO metabolites but also glutamate released by high-dose morphine were reduced significantly by pretreatment with L-NAME (400 nmol). Pretreatment with CPP and MK-801 showed a significant reduction of the NO metabolites and glutamate levels elevated by high-dose i.t. morphine. These results suggest that the excitatory action of high-dose i.t. morphine may be mediated by an NMDA-NO cascade in the spinal cord.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Degradation of nociceptin (orphanin FQ) by mouse spinal cord synaptic membranes is triggered by endopeptidase-24.11: an in vitro and in vivo study.

We analyzed spinal metabolic pathway of nociceptin/orphanin FQ related to pain-transmission or modulation in the both in vitro and in vivo experiments. Nociceptin was degraded by spinal synaptic membranes. Major metabolites of nociceptin were free phenylalanine, nociceptin (1-13) and nociceptin (14-17). Both the degradation of nociceptin and the accumulation of the major cleavage metabolites, nociceptin (1-13) and nociceptin (14-17), were strongly inhibited by a metal chelator and also by specific inhibitors of endopeptidase-24.11, thiorphan and phosphoramidon. Furthermore, purified endopeptidase-24.11 hydrolyzed nociceptin at the cleavage site (Lys(13)-Leu(14) bond) identical to that by spinal synaptic membranes. Recently, we have found that nociceptin, injected intrathecally at small doses (fmol order) elicits a behavioral response consisting of scratching, biting and licking in mice. In the present study, we have examined the effect of peptidase inhibitors on the behavioral response elicited by intrathecal injection of nociceptin in mice. Phosphoramidon simultaneously injected with nociceptin additively enhanced nociceptin-induced behavioral response, whereas the nociceptin-induced behavioral response was unaffected by either bestatin, an aminopeptidase inhibitor or captopril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. However, the nociceptin effect was potentiated by combined injection of phosphoramidon and bestatin, indicating that inhibition of aminopeptidase may also contribute to inducing the behavioral response to nociceptin. These data suggest that endopeptidase-24.11 plays a major role in initial stage of nociceptin metabolism at the spinal cord level in mice.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Intrathecally administered big dynorphin, a prodynorphin-derived peptide, produces nociceptive behavior through an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mechanism.

Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of big dynorphin (1-10 fmol), a prodynorphin-derived peptide consisting of dynorphin A and dynorphin B, to mice produced a characteristic behavioral response, the biting and/or licking of the hindpaw and the tail along with slight hindlimb scratching directed toward the flank, which peaked at 5-15 min after an injection. Dynorphin A produced a similar response, though the doses required were higher (0.1-30 pmol) whereas dynorphin B was practically inactive even at 1000 pmol. The behavior induced by big dynorphin (3 fmol) was dose-dependently inhibited by intraperitoneal injection of morphine (0.125-2 mg/kg) and also dose-dependently, by i.t. co-administration of D(-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV) (1-4 nmol), a competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, MK-801 (0.25-4 nmol), an NMDA ion-channel blocker, and ifenprodil (2-8 pmol), an inhibitor of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex interacting with the NR2B subunit and the polyamine recognition site. On the other hand, naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX), a non-NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, 7-chlorokynurenic acid, a competitive antagonist of the glycine recognition site on the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex, [D-Phe(7),D-His(9)]-substance P(6-11), a specific antagonist for substance P (NK1) receptors, and MEN-10376, a tachykinin NK2 receptor antagonist, had no effect. These results suggest that big dynorphin-induced nociceptive behavior is mediated through the activation of the NMDA receptor ion-channel complex by acting on the NR2B subunit and/or the polyamine recognition site but not on the glycine recognition site, and does not involve opioid, non-NMDA glutamate receptor mechanisms or tachykinin receptors in the mouse spinal cord.

2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate↗